Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > Mexican Standoff in Texas

Mexican Standoff in Texas

By Ben Shapiro

In the latest episode of "The Ben Shapiro Show," host Ben Shapiro dives headfirst into what he describes as the worst border crisis the United States has seen, pinpointing the policies of President Joe Biden as the catalyst. With guest appearances from political figures like Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Shapiro delves into the sting of illegal immigration and the showdown between the state of Texas and the federal government over border security. Amidst this tension, Shapiro voices concerns over undocumented "got aways" and the alleged exploits by drug cartels, painting a picture of a nation grappling with the safety and legal implications of its border policies.

Additionally, the episode turns the spotlight on Nikki Haley's bid for the 2024 presidential race, portraying her as a stark contrast to former President Donald Trump. Shapiro covers Haley's critique of Trump's leadership and mental fitness, juxtaposing this with Congressman Chip Roy's defense of Trump's influence on the GOP. The discussion branches into a broader analysis of media partisanship, referencing Jon Stewart's iconic critique of cable news, as Shapiro contemplates the legacy of entertainment in political journalism and its impact on the American political divide. Notable figures like Vice President Kamala Harris and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Official Patrick Lechleitner find mention in Shapiro's exploration of a nation at a crossroads in leadership and media integrity.

Listen to the original

Mexican Standoff in Texas

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 26, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Mexican Standoff in Texas

1-Page Summary

Biden Border Crisis

Ben Shapiro accuses President Joe Biden of causing the United States' worst border crisis in history through policies that allow for increased illegal immigration and asylum claims. He criticizes Biden for ending the "Remain in Mexico" policy and suggests that the administration is complicit in a surge of undocumented immigrants, which he estimates to number between six to ten million. Shapiro also highlights the issue of "got aways," individuals who evade capture at the border and could pose a security risk. He claims drug cartels are taking advantage of lenient policies to smuggle drugs and potentially dangerous individuals into the U.S.

Shapiro indicates that Texas is actively fighting back by installing physical barriers like razor wire, leading to a legal conflict with the federal government about the right to maintain these deterrents. Furthermore, Shapiro details the contentious negotiations in Congress over border funding, with a focus on a bill that may or may not pass due to disagreements between Republicans and Democrats on the provisions for border enforcement.

Nikki Haley Challenging Trump in 2024 Race

Nikki Haley has announced her candidacy for the 2024 presidential race and is criticizing former President Donald Trump's competence and mental fitness. Citing instances of what she perceives as Trump's insecurity and inappropriate behavior, Haley disputes Trump's accusations and frames herself as a new vision for the Republican Party. Meanwhile, Chip Roy suggests that Haley represents an old establishment out of sync with the party's new direction initiated by Trump. Roy emphasizes the importance of a traditional electoral process and challenges Trump to confidently face Haley's competition rather than acting threatened by her entry into the race.

Joe Biden's Declining Mental State

Ben Shapiro raises alarms over President Joe Biden's mental well-being, claiming there is clear evidence of cognitive decline. He compares Biden's current public appearances to those from earlier years, maintaining that the President's faculties are deteriorating. Shapiro conveys a narrative of Biden struggling on the campaign trail and suggests this decline contributes to his unpopularity. By portraying Biden as absent and not in control, Shapiro casts doubt on the President's ability to lead effectively.

Partisan Media

The partisan nature of media is under scrutiny as Shapiro recounts Jon Stewart's historical critique of it, particularly his 2004 confrontation on CNN's "Crossfire." Stewart had accused the show hosts of partisan hackery, which Shapiro believes has influenced the current state of political media. Shapiro posits that Stewart's style of mixing humor with political commentary paved the way for a preference for entertainment over substantive debate in media. This movement, according to Shapiro, has contributed to the polarization and partisan divide in how political issues are presented and discussed in mainstream media.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "Remain in Mexico" policy, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, required asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while awaiting their US immigration court dates. Initially implemented in 2019 under President Trump, it was ended by the Biden administration but faced legal challenges. The policy aimed to address the influx of asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border by keeping them in Mexico until their immigration cases were processed.
  • "Got aways" are individuals who manage to evade capture by authorities at the border, often after attempting to enter a country illegally. These individuals are not apprehended and can pose a challenge to border security efforts. They may include migrants, smugglers, or individuals with malicious intent who successfully avoid detection and enter the country without authorization. The term highlights the gaps in border enforcement and the potential risks associated with unchecked entry into a country.
  • Texas installing physical barriers like razor wire: Texas has taken steps to enhance border security by erecting physical barriers, such as razor wire, along certain sections of the border. These barriers are intended to deter unauthorized crossings and enhance border enforcement efforts. The use of razor wire is a measure to prevent individuals from easily crossing the border illegally. Texas's actions have sparked legal conflicts with the federal government over the authority to implement and maintain these barriers.
  • The contentious negotiations in Congress over border funding typically involve debates and disagreements between lawmakers from different political parties regarding the allocation of financial resources for border security measures, immigration enforcement, and related programs. These discussions often revolve around the amount of funding to be allocated, how it should be spent, and the specific policies or initiatives that should be supported or restricted using these funds. The outcome of these negotiations can impact the implementation of border-related measures and influence the overall approach to immigration and security at the border.
  • Chip Roy is an American attorney and politician who currently serves as the U.S. representative for Texas's 21st congressional district. He is a member of the Republican Party and has held various positions in government before being elected to Congress in 2018. Roy is known for his conservative views and is considered part of the far-right faction within the House Republican Conference.
  • Jon Stewart's critique on political media, particularly his confrontation on CNN's "Crossfire" in 2004, highlighted his belief that shows like "Crossfire" prioritized sensationalism over substantive political discourse. Stewart accused the hosts of engaging in partisan hackery and contributing to the decline of meaningful political debate on television. His criticism underscored the growing trend of infotainment in media, where entertainment value often overshadowed in-depth analysis and thoughtful discussion of important issues. Stewart's remarks resonated widely and sparked discussions about the role of media in shaping public perception and understanding of politics.
  • "Crossfire" was a political debate program that aired on CNN. It featured hosts from different political perspectives who would engage in heated discussions about current events and political issues. The show was known for its confrontational style and was a platform for lively debates between guests with opposing viewpoints. "Crossfire" was a significant part of CNN's programming lineup, providing a forum for robust political discourse.

Counterarguments

  • The characterization of the border situation as the "worst border crisis in US history" is subjective and can be debated; historical context is important, and there have been various periods of high immigration and border challenges in the past.
  • The end of the "Remain in Mexico" policy could be seen as an effort to uphold international standards for the treatment of asylum seekers and to ensure humane policies.
  • The estimated number of undocumented immigrants could be inflated or based on incomplete data; accurate counts are challenging to obtain.
  • The term "got aways" is not an official metric and can be misleading; not all individuals who evade capture are a security risk, and many may be seeking asylum or better economic opportunities.
  • Drug smuggling and border security are complex issues that predate the Biden administration, and cartels have historically exploited various policies and border enforcement strategies.
  • The legal conflict between Texas and the federal government over border barriers involves constitutional questions about federal versus state authority on immigration enforcement.
  • Bipartisan negotiations and disagreements in Congress are a normal part of the legislative process, and compromise is often necessary to pass legislation.
  • Nikki Haley's candidacy represents a legitimate challenge within the Republican Party, and internal competition can be a healthy part of the democratic process.
  • Chip Roy's comments about the party's direction are his perspective, and there are diverse views within the Republican Party about its future and leadership.
  • Concerns about President Joe Biden's mental state are subjective and should be approached with caution; cognitive assessments are a matter for medical professionals.
  • Public appearances may not be a reliable indicator of cognitive ability, and it is normal for individuals to show signs of aging.
  • The portrayal of Biden's campaign struggles could be seen as partisan framing; unpopularity can be influenced by many factors, not just public speaking.
  • The critique of partisan media can apply to media outlets across the political spectrum, and there are efforts within journalism to maintain objectivity and balance.
  • Jon Stewart's critique of "Crossfire" was specific to that show, and while it may have influenced some media trends, the current state of political media is the result of many factors.
  • The preference for entertainment in media is not solely the result of Stewart's style; market forces and audience preferences also play significant roles.
  • Polarization and the partisan divide in media are complex phenomena that involve the interplay of media, politics, and public engagement, not just the style of political commentary.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Mexican Standoff in Texas

Biden Border Crisis

Ben Shapiro delivers a critical commentary on the state of the United States border under the Biden administration, suggesting that the current border situation is the worst in U.S. history and is not being adequately reported in the press.

Biden administration enabling illegal immigration

Shapiro places the blame for the alleged "totally wide open" southern border squarely on President Joe Biden, arguing that the current influxes could be halted if the President so chose. He asserts that the Biden administration has effectively transformed Customs and Border Protection (CBP) into a mere busing and processing service, particularly under the more lenient asylum policies compared to those under Trump.

He is staunchly critical of the administration's approach to asylum, especially since Biden ended the "Remain in Mexico" policy. Shapiro believes Biden's policies facilitate illegal immigration because individuals at ports of entry can still claim asylum, and generally, if they express a desire for asylum or fear of returning to their home country, they are typically allowed into the U.S.

Record number of border crossings

Shapiro highlights that since Biden took office, estimates suggest that between six million to as high as ten million illegal immigrants have entered the United States. He recounts that at least 600,000 known "got aways" were detected last year, referring to migrants who were spotted but not apprehended. Shapiro implies that under Biden's watch, America is experiencing an "unprecedented border invasion."

Drug cartels exploiting open border to smuggle drugs and criminals

He accuses drug cartels of having full control over the southern border and exploiting asylum processes to smuggle individuals into the U.S. Shapiro describes how the cartels divert the attention of border security agents, enabling them to smuggle fentanyl and possibly dangerous individuals into the country. He also suggests that among the "unknown got aways" could be individuals with criminal records, drug connections, or potential terror connections, raising concerns over national security threats.

Texas fighting back with physical border barriers

In response to the crisis, Shapiro indicates that Texas, led by Governor Greg Abbott, has implemented physical barriers, such as razor wire, to prevent illegal border crossings. Texas has engaged in a constitutional showdown with the federal government and 24 other states over its border enforcement actions, with Shapiro suggesting that a legal battle is imminent or already taking place. Texas has not been ordered to cease placing razor wire, but they cannot prevent the federal government from dismantling it should they choose to.

The situation has escalated into a feud with the federal government over the right of Texas to erect razor wire at the bor ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Biden Border Crisis

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "Remain in Mexico" policy, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, required asylum seekers to stay in Mexico until their U.S. immigration court date. It was implemented in 2019 under the Trump administration and faced legal challenges under the Biden administration. The policy aimed to address the influx of asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border by keeping them in Mexico during the asylum process.
  • "Got aways" are individuals who are detected by border security but manage to evade apprehension. These are migrants who are spotted crossing the border but are not caught by authorities. The term "got aways" is used to describe those who successfully avoid being detained or stopped by law enforcement. These individuals are considered to have entered the country illegally despite not being caught at the border.
  • The legal battle between Texas and the federal government over razor wire involves Texas using physical barriers like razor wire to deter illegal border crossings. There has been a dispute over whether Texas has the right to erect these barriers, leading to a showdown with the federal government. The situation escalated with a Supreme Court ruling allowing Border Patrol to cut through the razor wire, but Texas has restricted access to the area where the wire is located, leading to tensions over enforcement. The conflict highlights the ongoing struggle between state and federal authorities regarding border security measures.
  • A triggering mechanism for border closure based on daily crossings is a provision that sets a specific threshold for the number of daily border crossings that, if exceeded, would trigger certain actions, such as closing the border or implementing stricter border control measures. This mechanism is often included in legislation or negotiations related to border security to establish clear criteria for when certain responses should be activated in r ...

Counterarguments

  • The Biden administration argues that their approach to immigration is more humane and in line with international asylum laws.
  • CBP's role is complex and involves humanitarian, legal, and enforcement aspects; it's not solely a busing and processing service.
  • The "Remain in Mexico" policy has been criticized for putting asylum seekers in dangerous conditions; ending it could be seen as a commitment to human rights.
  • Asylum is a legal right under U.S. and international law, and the ability to claim asylum at ports of entry is part of these obligations.
  • The number of border crossings is often influenced by factors beyond U.S. policy, such as conditions in home countries.
  • The figures for illegal immigration are often disputed and may not be as high as claimed.
  • "Got aways" are a concern, but the term may not accurately reflect the complexity of border encounters and apprehensions.
  • Drug smuggling and border security are issues that predate the Biden administration and require comprehensive strategies beyond immigration policy.
  • National security threats are taken seriously by multiple agencies, and not all undocumented immigrants pose such threats.
  • Texas' actions at the border raise questions about states' rights versus federal authority in immigration enforcement.
  • The legal battle over razor wire involves constitutional questions about federal ver ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Mexican Standoff in Texas

Nikki Haley Challenging Trump in 2024 Race

Haley criticizing Trump's competence and mental fitness

Nikki Haley has entered the political fray, openly challenging Donald Trump's competence and mental fitness as she positions herself for the 2024 race.

Haley has spoken out about behaviors of Trump that she considers to be signs of insecurity and feeling threatened. For example, she mentions an occasion when Trump threw what she described as a temper tantrum and resorted to insults. Haley also scoffs at Trump’s accusation that she failed to provide security at the Capitol on January 6th, pointing out that he was clearly confused because she had never worked at the Capitol in such a capacity.

On the other hand, Chip Roy presents a different perspective, depicting Nikki Haley as a part of the old guard of the Republican Party, known for its big spending and propensity for engaging in endless wars. Roy criticizes this segment of the party and suggests there is a need for the Republican Party to venture in a new direction ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Nikki Haley Challenging Trump in 2024 Race

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Nikki Haley and Donald Trump have had a complex relationship. Haley served as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations under Trump's administration. While she has been supportive of some of Trump's policies, she has also criticized him on certain issues, leading to a mix of cooperation and disagreement between the two. Their dynamic has evolved over time, with Haley now openly challenging Trump's competence and mental fitness as she positions herself for the 2024 presidential race.
  • Chip Roy is a Republican politician who has served as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 21st congressional district. He is known for his conservative views and has been associated with the Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative Republican members of the House of Representatives. Roy is critical of what he sees as the old guard of the Republican Party, advocating for a shift towards a more populist and anti-establishment direction, similar to the approach taken by former President Trump.
  • The old guard in the Republican Party represents established members with traditional views on policies and strategies. The new direction signifies a shift towards more unconventional approaches and a break from traditional party norms. This division reflects a broader ideological struggle within the party between maintaining traditional values and embracing change. The debate between the old guard and the new direction is about the future di ...

Counterarguments

  • Nikki Haley's criticisms of Trump's competence and mental fitness could be seen as subjective and potentially part of a political strategy to differentiate herself as a candidate.
  • Trump's behaviors, which Haley interprets as signs of insecurity, could alternatively be viewed as a form of assertive leadership or a response to the high-pressure environment of politics.
  • The incident where Trump allegedly threw a temper tantrum might be defended as a moment of passion or frustration, which can occur in any high-stakes job.
  • Trump's confusion about Haley's role on January 6th could be attributed to a misunderstanding rather than a serious lapse in mental fitness.
  • Chip Roy's characterization of Nikki Haley as part of the old guard could be challenged by highlighting her efforts to bring new ideas or reforms to the party.
  • The suggestion that the Republican Party needs a new direction could be countered by arguing that the party's core ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Mexican Standoff in Texas

Joe Biden's Declining Mental State

Evidence of accelerating cognitive decline

Ben Shapiro has raised concerns over President Joe Biden's cognitive condition, arguing that it has shown noticeable deterioration over time. He refers to a comparative analysis of Biden's speech and demeanor from 2007 to the present year, 2024, to support his claim. Shapiro describes witnessing Biden's cognitive capabilities "breaking down in real time."

Shapiro comments on Biden's recent appearances on the campaign trail, illustratively depicting him as being wheeled out and slurring through a rally. He uses this portrayal to emphasize the severity of decline he believes is apparent in Biden’s public engagements.

Drawing a stark contrast between recordings of Biden from 2024 and those from 2007, Shapiro contends that there's an observable degradation in Biden's speech and cognitive abilities. He points ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Joe Biden's Declining Mental State

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator, author, and lawyer known for his strong conservative views and criticism of liberal policies. He founded The Daily Wire, a conservative media outlet, and is a prominent figure in conservative media circles. Shapiro is known for his articulate debating style and often appears on television and radio programs to discuss political issues from a conservative p ...

Counterarguments

  • Age-related cognitive changes are not necessarily indicative of a debilitating condition and may not impair the ability to fulfill presidential duties.
  • Public appearances and speeches can be affected by factors other than cognitive decline, such as fatigue, stress, or medical conditions unrelated to cognitive health.
  • The portrayal of Biden being "wheeled out" and "slurring" could be exaggerated or taken out of context, and may not accurately represent his overall mental state.
  • Cognitive assessments and the determination of cognitive decline should be made by medical professionals, not political commentators.
  • Unpopularity can stem from a variety of factors, including policy decisions and political opposition, and may not be directly related to perceptions of cognitive ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Mexican Standoff in Texas

Partisan Media

Partisan media has long been a target for critique and mockery, especially from figures like Jon Stewart who have a history of engaging with and challenging its practices.

Jon Stewart's history critiquing and mocking partisan media

Jon Stewart's approach to critiquing partisan media was discussed in Ben Shapiro's commentary.

Calling out Crossfire in 2004

Ben Shapiro revisits Jon Stewart’s famous appearance on CNN's "Crossfire" in 2004, where Stewart confronted the then-hosts Tucker Carlson and Paul Begala. During this appearance, Stewart criticized the show’s political debate style, which he felt was contributing to America's harmful political climate due to its highly partisan nature. Stewart asserted that rather than engaging in genuine political discourse, "Crossfire" was "hurting America" and acting in complicity with politicians' strategies, thereby functioning as partisan hackery rather than offering honest debate.

Shapiro credits Stewart's confrontation as having had a lasting impact on political media, suggesting that Stewart's perspective played a role in the decline of bipartisan debate shows on television. Shapiro points out that Jon Stewart accused the hosts of being partisan hacks, arguing that this moment ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Partisan Media

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his critiques of liberal viewpoints. He often provides commentary on various political and social issues, offering a perspective that aligns with his conservative beliefs. Shapiro's commentary on Jon Stewart's critique of partisan media highlights his view that Stewart's approach influenced a shift towards more entertainment-focused political commentary in mainstream media. Shapiro suggests that Stewart's criticism of shows like "Crossfire" played a role in changing the landscape of political debate on television.
  • Jon Stewart, a well-known comedian and political commentator, gained fame for his satirical news program "The Daily Show." Stewart often critiqued partisan media by using humor to highlight biases and inconsistencies in news coverage. His approach involved blending comedy with sharp political analysis to challenge the practices of partisan media outlets and their impact on public discourse. Stewart's criticism of shows like "Crossfire" in 2004, where he accused them of promoting divisive partisanship over genuine debate, exemplifies his efforts to address the shortcomings of media in fostering healthy political discussions.
  • Jon Stewart's appearance on CNN's "Crossfire" in 2004 was notable for his criticism of the show's format and its contribution to divisive political discourse. Stewart argued that the program's emphasis on partisan arguments over substantive debate was detrimental to the public discourse. His confrontation with the hosts, Tucker Carlson and Paul Begala, led to a memorable moment where he accused them of being partisan hacks and criticized the show for prioritizing entertainment over meaningful political discussion. This incident is often cited as a turning point in how media approaches political commentary and debate.
  • "Partisan hackery" is a term used to criticize biased and unprincipled behavior in media or politics. It implies that individuals or media outlets are more focused on promoting a particular political agenda or viewpoint rather than engaging in fair and honest discourse. Essentially, it suggests that instead of providing balanced and informative content, they are engaging in manipulative tactics to push a specific narrative. The term is often used to highlight instances where individuals or organizations prioritize partisanship over truth and integrity in their communicati ...

Counterarguments

  • Stewart's critique of "Crossfire" could be seen as a call for higher standards in media rather than an outright dismissal of bipartisan debate shows.
  • The decline of bipartisan debate shows might not be solely attributable to Stewart's appearance on "Crossfire," as there are numerous factors that influence television programming decisions.
  • While Shapiro suggests Stewart's commentary influenced media to prioritize entertainment, it could also be argued that Stewart was responding to an existing demand for more engaging and accessible political discourse.
  • The assertion that Stewart's approach was demagogic and one-sided could be countered by noting that his critiques often targeted political absurdity across the spectrum, and his humor served to make complex issues more relatable to a wider audience.
  • The idea that Stewart's brand of political commentary led to a lack of ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA