Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > A Country Without Borders

A Country Without Borders

By Ben Shapiro

Dive into a discussion of critical challenges facing the U.S. and beyond in "The Ben Shapiro Show," with host Ben Shapiro and guests Patrick Ryder, Chris Coons, John Kirby, and Antony Blinken. This episode delves into the consequences of the Biden administration's immigration policies, forewarning the repercussions on the U.S.'s border security. Shapiro, known for his incisive commentary, tackles the issue head-on, presenting staggering numbers of illegal border crossings and scrutinizing the political decisions that exacerbated the crisis—foretelling an even greater surge as electoral strategies heat up.

The episode doesn't shy away from contentious subjects, ranging from Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity over January 6th to the global economic forecast published by the World Bank, signaling a period of stagnation and a downturn in American leadership on the world stage. Even as these topics present daunting concerns, Shapiro extends the scope of analysis to Europe, where the rise of right-wing nationalist parties signifies a severe pivot in political culture, with ripple effects that could reshape the continent's future governance and ideological landscape.

Listen to the original

A Country Without Borders

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 10, 2024 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

A Country Without Borders

1-Page Summary

Border Crisis

In 2023, the United States experiences a dramatic spike in illegal border crossings, with an estimated 3.1 million attempts. Ben Shapiro identifies that 600,000 people, known as "known gotaways," have managed to enter the U.S. undetected, with the possibility of an additional 400,000 "unknown gotaways." Overall, Shapiro notes that 2.4 million individuals successfully crossed illegally, highlighting the magnitude of the crisis.

Shapiro attributes the escalating issue to the Biden administration's reversal of Trump-era policies, specifically the termination of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy and Title 42 expulsions. He criticizes the current administration for not adequately proving the asylum status of the immigrants, and he forecasts an increase in crossings due to these policy changes.

As the 2024 election looms, Shapiro observes an intensification in political rhetoric around immigration. He takes issue with Democrats who request more funding for administrative purposes as opposed to strengthening border security, insisting such actions facilitate cartel activities.

Trump Claims Presidential Immunity Over January 6th

Former President Donald Trump's legal team claims he has presidential immunity regarding the events of January 6th, contending that impeachment is a necessary precursor to any criminal charges while in office. The federal appellate court, however, shows strong skepticism towards this claim, even questioning Trump's lawyers about the extremity of the immunity in hypothetical scenarios involving the ordering of political rival assassinations. The Trump defense team insists that impeachment must come before any charges, despite the extremity of the hypothetical offenses.

Economic Struggles Under Biden Administration

Shapiro discusses the World Bank's forecast predicting a period of global economic stagnation through 2024. They report that global growth is expected to slow for a third consecutive year to 2.4 percent. Shapiro emphasizes that this could be the most sluggish period in over thirty years. The World Bank blames the lack of U.S. leadership, ongoing trade conflicts, and tightening credit conditions for these struggles, signaling a fracturing global economy influenced by a retreat in American international influence.

Constitutional Crisis in Poland

Poland is embroiled in a constitutional crisis, with a major standoff between President Andrzej Duda and Prime Minister Donald Tusk over the legality of pardons issued by Duda for two MPs convicted of abuse of power. The crisis intensifies as the Supreme Court rules presidential pardons invalid before a final verdict, while the Constitutional Tribunal upholds the president's action. This discord within Poland's judicial branches signifies a grave constitutional jeopardy.

Rise of Right-Wing Nationalist Parties Across Europe

Shapiro reports on the surge of right-wing nationalist parties throughout Europe. In Germany, protests by farmers against the new government regulations on diesel tax and farming methods are clogging highways, potentially aiding the appeal of right-wing groups. In France, Marine Le Pen's nationalist party is leading in the polls, while center-right groups in the European Parliament are steadfast in their refusal to work with these surging right-wing factions. This shift towards right-wing nationalism is a transformative phase in European politics, potentially impacting governance and stability within the union.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Title 42 expulsions were a measure used during the COVID-19 pandemic to remove individuals who posed a health risk due to potential exposure to communicable diseases. This provision allowed for the immediate expulsion of individuals without holding them in congregate areas for processing. The expulsions were not based on immigration status and were separate from regular immigration processes. The program ended with the conclusion of the COVID-19 national emergency in the United States.
  • The "Remain in Mexico" policy, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, required asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while awaiting their immigration court dates in the United States. Initially implemented in 2019 under the Trump administration, it aimed to address the influx of migrants at the US-Mexico border. The policy was terminated by the Biden administration but faced legal challenges, leading to a complex legal battle over its continuation. The policy has been criticized for exposing migrants to risks and challenges while waiting for their asylum claims to be processed.
  • The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland is a judicial body established to ensure that laws and actions of state institutions align with the country's constitution. It resolves disputes regarding constitutional matters, including the constitutionality of legislation and the activities of political parties. The tribunal consists of 15 judges appointed by the lower house of parliament for nine-year terms. It plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and the separation of powers in Poland.
  • Center-right groups in the European Parliament are political factions that align with conservative or moderate ideologies. These groups typically advocate for policies that prioritize free-market principles, individual freedoms, and traditional values. They play a significant role in shaping legislation and decision-making within the European Parliament, often forming alliances with other like-minded parties to advance their agendas. The center-right groups may include members from various European countries who share similar political beliefs and work together to influence the direction of the European Union.

Counterarguments

  • The increase in illegal border crossings could be attributed to a variety of factors beyond policy changes, such as economic conditions in home countries, climate change, or violence and persecution, rather than solely the Biden administration's policies.
  • The effectiveness of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy and Title 42 expulsions in deterring illegal immigration is debated, and some argue that these policies violate international law or the right to seek asylum.
  • The term "gotaways" may not accurately reflect the complexity of migration, as it does not account for individuals who may later seek legal status or have legitimate claims for asylum.
  • The assertion that Democrats are facilitating cartel activities by not focusing on border security oversimplifies the issue and does not consider the potential benefits of addressing root causes of migration or improving the immigration system's administrative capacity.
  • Presidential immunity is a complex legal issue, and there are arguments that no one is above the law, including the president, especially after leaving office.
  • Economic struggles under the Biden administration could be part of broader global economic challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic's aftermath, rather than solely due to U.S. leadership or policy decisions.
  • The constitutional crisis in Poland reflects a broader debate on the balance of powers and the rule of law, and some may argue that checks and balances are functioning as intended when different branches of government hold each other accountable.
  • The rise of right-wing nationalist parties in Europe may reflect broader societal concerns about globalization, immigration, and national identity, and not all support for these parties necessarily equates to an endorsement of extreme ideologies.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Country Without Borders

Border Crisis

Over 3 million attempted border crossings under Biden in 2023

Ben Shapiro discusses the increasing issue of illegal immigration and its implications on public resources and policy.

600,000 entered undetected; possibly 1 million total entered undetected

Shapiro notes that, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, there were 3.1 million attempted border crossings in 2023, with 600,000 people known as "known gotaways" estimated to have entered the U.S. undetected. Additionally, he implies there might be another estimated 400,000 "unknown gotaways," leading to the possibility of around 1 million people who have entered the country without being detected.

2.4 million people successfully crossed the border illegally in 2023

Out of those attempting to cross the border, 2.4 million people were successful, as per Shapiro's discussion. This unprecedented number suggests the extent of the current border crisis.

Biden administration policies blamed rather than asylum seekers

Shapiro critiques the Biden administration for the increase in illegal border crossings.

Ended Trump policies like Remain in Mexico and Title 42 expulsions

He specifically blames the policy decisions of the current administration, such as ending the Trump-era Remain in Mexico policy and Title 42 expulsions, for exacerbating the situation. He suggests these policies are directly tied to the rate of illegal immigration.

Shapiro also points out that many people who have entered have not proven their need for asylum in a court of law. In light of the termination of Title 42, which was a public health order that allowed the U.S. to turn away migrants at the border during the COVID-19 pandemic, Shapiro suggests that even more people are likely to gain entry into the U.S.

Increase in violent political rhetoric ahead of 2024 election

Shapiro links the iss ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Border Crisis

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Known gotaways and unknown gotaways are terms used to describe individuals who have crossed the border undetected. Known gotaways are those who are estimated to have entered the country without being detected by authorities based on available information. Unknown gotaways are individuals who are believed to have crossed the border undetected, but their exact numbers and identities are not known. These terms help highlight the challenges in monitoring and controlling illegal border crossings.
  • The Remain in Mexico policy required asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases were processed in the U.S., aiming to reduce the strain on U.S. resources. Title 42 expulsions were a public health measure implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing the U.S. to quickly expel individuals crossing the border to prevent the spread of the virus. Both policies were controversial and had significant impacts on the flow of migrants and asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border.
  • "Public resources" typically refer to government funds, facilities, and services that are ...

Counterarguments

  • The number of attempted border crossings does not necessarily reflect a policy failure; it could also indicate push factors in other countries, such as violence, poverty, or political instability, driving people to seek asylum.
  • The term "undetected" does not account for those who may later seek legal status through asylum claims or other immigration processes.
  • High numbers of border crossings could be symptomatic of broader, systemic issues that require comprehensive immigration reform beyond the scope of any single administration's policies.
  • The termination of policies like Remain in Mexico and Title 42 could be seen as efforts to uphold international obligations to asylum seekers and to treat migrants humanely.
  • The increase in violent political rhetoric may not be directly tied to immigration policies but could be a reflection of a polarized political climate where many issues are used as political tools.
  • The repurposing of public resources, such as schools to house migrants, could be viewed as a necessary ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Country Without Borders

Trump Claims Presidential Immunity Over January 6th

Former President Trump's legal team asserts that he possesses presidential immunity regarding his involvement in the events of January 6th, contending that impeachment must precede any criminal charges for a sitting president. However, this claim faces strong skepticism from a federal appellate court.

Trump argues impeachment required before any criminal charges while president

Trump's lawyers are put in the position of arguing for absolute presidential immunity, stating that the impeachment clause in the Constitution requires a president to be impeached before facing any criminal trial for offenses committed during their term. Despite Shapiro's critique of Trump's immunity theory as weak, Trump warns of potential "bedlam" should he be denied immunity. Shapiro wryly dismisses Trump's arguments as "really, really dumb crap" rather than legitimate, criminal activity.

However, the federal appellate court seems inclined to reject Trump's immunity claim, challenging the notion that the president is shielded from prosecution over attempts to subvert the 2020 election results.

Judges skeptical, ask about ordering assassination of rivals

Judges on the panel express their skepticism towards Tru ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Trump Claims Presidential Immunity Over January 6th

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Presidential immunity is a legal concept that suggests a sitting president cannot be criminally prosecuted while in office. This immunity is based on the idea that the president's primary focus should be on their duties without the distraction of legal proceedings. However, this immunity is not absolute and does not shield the president from all legal actions. The extent and limitations of presidential immunity have been debated and tested in various legal contexts over time.
  • The federal appellate court expressed doubt about Trump's claim of presidential immunity, questioning whether a president could avoid prosecution for serious offenses without first being impeached. The judges raised concerns by posing a hypothetical scenario involving the potential extreme abuse of power, such as ordering the assassination of political rivals, to test the limits of Trump's immunity argument. This line of questioning highlighted the court's skepticism about the broad scope and implications of the immunity Trump's legal team was advocating for.
  • In the context of the text, the hypothetical scenario of ordering the assassination of political rivals is used by the judges to question the extent of presidential immunity claimed by Trump's legal team. The judges are probing whether, according to Trump's defense, a president could potentially commit such a serious offense and still be shielded from criminal charges without first going through the impeachment process. This extreme example is meant to challenge the argument for absolute presidential immunity put forth by Tru ...

Counterarguments

  • The concept of presidential immunity is not absolute and is subject to legal interpretation and limitations.
  • The impeachment process is a political mechanism and does not preclude criminal liability under the law.
  • The assertion that impeachment must precede criminal charges could be seen as a means to avoid accountability for actions taken while in office.
  • The potential for "bedlam" is speculative and does not necessarily justify immunity from prosecution.
  • The judiciary's role is to interpret the law, and skepticism from the court may reflect a legitimate concern for checks and balances in the constitutional system.
  • The hypothetical ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Country Without Borders

Economic Struggles Under Biden Administration

Under the Biden Administration, the global economy is facing significant challenges with predictions of stagnation through 2024, as highlighted by recent reports and expert analyses.

World Bank predicts global economic stagnation through 2024

The World Bank has presented a concerning forecast for the global economy, expecting it to endure its most sluggish pace in more than three decades. Shapiro describes the current state of the economy as a period of stagnation. An unsettling report from Axios echoes these sentiments, warning that the global economy is slated to continue this trend of tepid activity.

Recent projections indicate a downturn with global economic growth anticipated to decrease for the third year in a row to 2.4 percent. This figure represents a period that could be the slowest half-decade for GDP growth over the last thirty years. Moreover, the aftermath of this slowdown is a growth rate that falls significantly short of the previous year's performance and is expected to be almost 0.75% lower than the average growth rate experienced in the 2010s.

Blames lack of U.S. leadership, trade conflicts, tightening credit

The World Bank's assessment identifies multiple factors contributing to the global economic difficulties. A principal concern cited is the diminishing role of U.S. leadership on the world stage, which has been a catalyst for a break ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Economic Struggles Under Biden Administration

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The global economy is currently experiencing significant challenges, with predictions of stagnation through 2024. Factors contributing to these difficulties include the diminishing role of U.S. leadership, ongoing trade conflicts, and tightening credit conditions. These issues are leading to a slowdown in global economic growth and increased borrowing costs, impacting the overall economic landscape.
  • Trade conflicts can disrupt the flow of goods and services between countries, leading to higher prices for consumers and reduced market access for businesses. Tightening credit conditions make it more difficult for individuals and businesses to borrow money, potentially slowing down investment and economic activity. These factors can contribute to uncertainty in the global economy, impacting growth and stability.
  • American involvement in global affairs, particularly in trade and diplomacy, historically played a significant role in fostering interconnectedness and cooperation amon ...

Counterarguments

  • The global economy is complex, and attributing its challenges solely to the Biden Administration oversimplifies the issue.
  • Economic trends are influenced by a multitude of factors, including but not limited to U.S. policies.
  • The World Bank's predictions, while respected, are not infallible and are subject to change as new data emerges.
  • Slow growth does not necessarily equate to negative outcomes; it can also reflect a period of stabilization or restructuring.
  • The 2.4 percent growth rate, while lower than previous years, may still represent positive growth and does not inherently signify a crisis.
  • The comparison to the average growth rate in the 2010s does not account for unique circumstances of the 2020s, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath.
  • U.S. leadership is only one of many factors in the global economy, and other nations and international institutions also pla ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Country Without Borders

Constitutional Crisis in Poland

Poland is currently grappling with a constitutional crisis that reflects deep divisions within its government. A significant standoff between President Andrzej Duda and new Prime Minister Donald Tusk is at the forefront of this crisis.

Standoff between president and prime minister over pardons

The conflict between President Andrzej Duda and Prime Minister Donald Tusk arose due to Duda's decision to pardon two Members of Parliament during their trial for abuse of power. These MPs were later taken into custody on charges related to the same case. Tusk questions the legality of Duda's pardons, challenging their constitutionality and setting the stage for a political and legal showdown.

Supreme Court vs. Constitutional Tribunal battle

Further complicating the matter is a legal dispute involving the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal, two pinnacle branches of Poland's judiciary. The S ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Constitutional Crisis in Poland

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In Poland, the President is the head of state and represents the country in international affairs. The President's powers include appointing the Prime Minister and signing legislation into law. The Prime Minister, on the other hand, is the head of government and leads the executive branch. The Prime Minister is responsible for implementing domestic policies and overseeing the government's day-to-day operations.
  • The legal system in Poland consists of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal as two key branches of the judiciary. The Supreme Court primarily deals with civil and criminal cases, while the Constitutional Tribunal focuses on constitutional matters and ensures the constitutionality of laws and government actions. These institutions play crucial roles in upholding the rule of law and maintaining the balance of power within the Polish government. The current conflict between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal over the validity of presidential pardons highlights a broader struggle within the country's legal framework.
  • The constitutional crisis in Poland has led to a power struggle between the President and the Prime Minister, raising concerns ...

Counterarguments

  • The president's right to pardon is a constitutional prerogative, and questioning its use could undermine the separation of powers.
  • The timing of a pardon, whether before or after a final verdict, may be a matter of legal interpretation rather than a clear constitutional breach.
  • The prime minister's challenge to the pardons could be seen as a political maneuver rather than a genuine concern for legal processes.
  • The conflict between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal may reflect a healthy check and balance system at work rather than a crisis.
  • The term "constitutional crisis" might be an overstatement if the legal and political systems are functioning and the disputes are being handled through established procedures.
  • T ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
A Country Without Borders

Rise of Right-Wing Nationalist Parties Across Europe

Shapiro covers the growing tension in Europe as right-wing nationalist parties gain momentum and discuss both the causes and potential impacts of these political shifts on the continent.

Mass farmer protests over regulations snarling highways in Germany

A large-scale farmer protest in Berlin, Germany, is causing significant disruption as farmers block highways with their tractors. These demonstrations are a response to Chancellor Olaf Scholz's coalition government's plans to eliminate tax breaks on diesel used in agriculture as part of 2024 budgetary measures. Shapiro also notes that German farmers are protesting against regulations on their farming methods, principally concerning restrictions on the use of nitrogen in the soil.

There are growing concerns that the protests in Germany could provide a boost to right-wing parties, echoing similar events that occurred in the Netherlands. Such agrarian discontent appears to be part of a broader right-wing movement gaining traction across Europe.

Le Pen nationalist party leading polls in France

In France, the right-wing surge is exemplified by the increasing popularity of Marine Le Pen's nationalist party. Shapiro reports that Le Pen's party is leading the polls, outpacing President Macron's coalition by approximately 10 points in European election polling. This indicates a substantial shift in the political landscape of France, reflecting broader regional trends.

Center-right refusing to work with surging right-wing in European Parliament

The rise of right-wing parties is also affecting the dynamics of the European ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Rise of Right-Wing Nationalist Parties Across Europe

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Olaf Scholz is a German politician who has served as Chancellor of Germany since December 8, 2021. He is a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and leads a coalition government with the Free Democratic Party (FDP) and the Green Party. This coalition, known as the "traffic light coalition" due to the parties' colors (red, yellow, green), was formed after the 2021 federal elections in Germany. The coalition's policies and decisions reflect a balance of the priorities and ideologies of the three parties involved.
  • The rise of right-wing nationalist parties in Europe can be attributed to various factors, including concerns over immigration, cultural identity, economic disparities, and dissatisfaction with mainstream political establishments. These parties often capitalize on anti-globalization sentiments, fears of loss of national sovereignty, and a desire for stricter border controls. Economic challenges, such as job insecurity and income inequality, also play a role in fueling support for these parties. Additionally, historical and regional contexts, such as memories of past conflicts and changing demographics, contribute to the appeal of nationalist rhetoric in certain European countries.
  • The European Parliament is one of the institutions of the European Union, representing EU citizens. It has Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) elected by EU citizens. MEPs are organized into political groups based on shared ideologies, and these groups work together to pass legislation and oversee the EU's activities. The Parliament plays a crucial role in shaping EU laws and ...

Counterarguments

  • The farmer protests in Germany may not necessarily translate into a boost for right-wing parties; other factors could influence voter behavior.
  • Agrarian discontent could also be a sign of policy failures or lack of communication between the government and the agricultural sector, rather than an inherent shift to right-wing ideologies.
  • The rise in polls for Marine Le Pen's party in France could reflect temporary dissatisfaction with the current government rather than a long-term political shift.
  • The center-right's refusal to work with right-wing parties in the European Parliament could be seen as undemocratic or ignoring the will of the electorate who voted for those parties.
  • The fear of Europe becoming ungovernable might be exaggerated, as political shifts and realignments are common in democratic societies and can lead to new forms of governance and compromise.
  • The liberal leader' ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA