Podcasts > The Ben Shapiro Show > Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

By Ben Shapiro

Dive into a contentious exploration of academia and policy on "The Ben Shapiro Show," where host Ben Shapiro wields his sharp commentary on issues ranging from Harvard's leadership to America's political strategies. Throughout the episode, Shapiro provides his provocative take on President Claudine Gay's time at Harvard, addressing allegations of plagiarism and criticizing the administration for its handling of academic integrity and free speech—especially concerning antisemitism. With a laser focus on the implications of diversity initiatives, Ben Shapiro questions the meritocracy of Harvard admissions and the broader impact these measures have on educational standards.

Shapiro's incisive analysis doesn't stop with educational matters. He casts a skeptical eye on the Biden administration's foreign and domestic policies, from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to the failed attempts at bipartisan consensus on border security. The show pivots to dissect the political ideologies steering the left, the complexities of U.S.-Russia policies post-2016, and the biased media representation of international politics, notably Israel's defense strategies. Engaging with figures like John Kirby, Mark Kelly, and Mark Regev, Ben Shapiro brings deep dives into current events, with journalism that seeks to outline the tension between public perception and political storylines—all while offering exclusive content for his dedicated listenership.

Listen to the original

Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Dec 13, 2023 episode of the The Ben Shapiro Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

1-Page Summary

Academic Integrity and Free Speech at Harvard

Critique of President Claudine Gay's Actions

In a recent podcast episode, Ben Shapiro levied a multifaceted critique of Claudine Gay, currently serving as the president of Harvard University. Shapiro articulated his concerns without specifying the particulars surrounding Gay's testimony at a Congressional appearance.

Antisemitism and Speech Policies

Shapiro did not mince words when he addressed what he deems as Harvard's contradictory stance on free speech, specifically when it pertains to statements made against Jewish people. He condemned the university for its alleged failure to repudiate speech that calls for the extermination of Jews, pointing out what he believes to be a dangerous hypocrisy.

The Plagiarism Controversy

The discussion intensified as Shapiro delved into accusations of plagiarism against Claudine Gay. Scholars Ann Williamson and Carol Slane have reportedly accused Gay of utilizing their work without proper citation. Further, Slane hinted at affirmative action's role in the supposed lowering of academic standards that may have played to Gay's favor. In response, Harvard emphasized its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, sidestepping a deeper investigation, according to Shapiro.

Harvard Admissions: Diversity vs. Meritocracy

Continuing his critique, Shapiro highlighted a study from the Harvard Crimson revealing a racial disparity in SAT scores required for admissions, an issue particularly affecting Asian-American applicants. This, Shapiro argued, indicates a compromised commitment to merit-based admissions, with diversity and inclusion taking precedence over academia.

Dissecting U.S. Policies at Home and Abroad

The Biden Administration's Ukraine Strategy

Ben Shapiro expressed skepticism regarding the Biden administration's approach to the conflict in Ukraine, questioning the absence of a clear exit strategy despite Russia's military and personnel setbacks. Shapiro raised concerns that the administration might be more interested in political optics rather than the practical aspects of support for Ukraine.

Israel's Defense and the Israel-Hamas Conflict

Moving to the Middle East, Shapiro defended Israel's military operations against Hamas. He criticized President Biden for comments that seemed to underscore diminishing global support for Israel, advocated for Israel's precise military engagements, and contradicted Biden's portrayal of Israeli politics as dominated by the right wing.

Border Security and Legislative Challenges

Regarding domestic policies, Shapiro scrutinized the resistance from Democrats, such as Senator Mark Kelly, to a legislative bill combining aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security enhancements. He argued that the Biden administration should leverage immigration controls to garner Republican support for Ukrainian assistance.

Analyzing Economic Policies and Inflation Causes

Shapiro also targeted President Biden's economic policies, notably inflation, contradicting Senator Sherrod Brown and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's attributions of inflation to corporatism and pandemic-related factors. Instead, he places the blame squarely on U.S. government monetary policy.

Sociopolitical Dynamics and Public Perception

The Debate over Multiculturalism

Shapiro discussed societal changes with a critical lens, specifically the elite's push for multiculturalism. He postulates that this drives social instability and heightens autocracy on the political left.

Autocracy and Ideology on the Political Left

Further exploring this theme, Shapiro referenced Jonathan Pashow's "End of the World" series as a guide to understanding the cyclical nature of societal changes and the potential for upheaval within Western societies.

Consistency and Change in U.S. Russia Policy

On the topic of Russia, Shapiro commented on the U.S. political attitudes post-2016 election, emphasizing his own consistent view of Russia as problematic under Vladimir Putin. He further noted the scrutiny Israel faces in the media as being harsher than that for other conflicts.

Media Representation and Bias

The media's portrayal of international politics, especially Israel's global support and its operations against Hamas, was also a focal point. Shapiro conversed with journalist Boris and Israeli spokesperson Mark Regev about these issues, underscoring the importance of U.S. diplomatic support and Israel's commitment to combatting Hamas while minimizing civilian harm.

Additional Content and Promotions

Shapiro used part of the episode to share promotions for services and products, such as life insurance through Policy Genius, Beams Dream Powder, and Good Ranchers.

Exclusive Podcast Membership Benefits

Toward the end of the episode, Shapiro extended an invitation for listeners to subscribe to his membership for more comprehensive analyses and insider information, hinting at the potential significance of the New Hampshire governor's endorsement in the forthcoming 2024 elections.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The study from the Harvard Crimson highlighted differences in SAT scores required for admission, showing disparities that particularly affected Asian-American applicants. This suggests that there may be unequal expectations or standards based on racial backgrounds in the admissions process. Such findings can raise questions about fairness, equity, and potential biases in the university's selection criteria.
  • A legislative bill combining aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security enhancements could involve a proposed piece of legislation that seeks to address both providing support to Ukraine in its conflict with Russia and enhancing security measures along the U.S. border. This type of bill could aim to allocate resources for both international aid and domestic security priorities, potentially linking the two issues in terms of policy and funding decisions. The bill may reflect a strategic approach to address multiple concerns simultaneously, such as foreign relations and national security, within a single legislative package. The combination of these two seemingly disparate issues in one bill could indicate a broader legislative strategy or political maneuver to address multiple priorities in a unified manner.
  • Senator Sherrod Brown and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen have differing views on the causes of inflation. Senator Brown and Secretary Yellen attribute inflation to corporatism and pandemic-related factors, respectively. Senator Brown believes that corporate power and monopolies are driving inflation, while Secretary Yellen points to pandemic-related disruptions in the supply chain and labor market as key factors. Their contrasting perspectives highlight the complexity of understanding and addressing inflation in the current economic landscape.
  • Media scrutiny of Israel compared to other conflicts can be a contentious issue. Some critics argue that Israel receives disproportionate attention and criticism in the media compared to other conflicts around the world. This heightened scrutiny is often attributed to various factors, including historical contexts, geopolitical interests, media bias, and the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Critics of this scrutiny suggest that it can lead to a skewed or imbalanced portrayal of the situation, influencing public perception and international discourse.
  • Beams Dream Powder is a product that is often promoted for its sleep-enhancing properties, typically containing ingredients like melatonin and other natural compounds to aid in relaxation and better sleep quality. Good Ranchers is a service that delivers high-quality meats directly to consumers, focusing on providing ethically sourced and sustainable meat options for customers looking for premium cuts.

Counterarguments

  • Harvard may have policies in place to address hate speech, including antisemitism, and may take action that is not publicly visible.
  • Accusations of plagiarism are serious, but due process is important, and individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty; Harvard's response may be in line with privacy and legal considerations.
  • Diversity initiatives in admissions can be seen as an effort to correct historical inequities and create a more inclusive educational environment, which can coexist with high academic standards.
  • The Biden administration's Ukraine strategy may be informed by complex geopolitical considerations, and an exit strategy might not be disclosed for strategic reasons.
  • The U.S. support for Israel can be multifaceted, and criticism of Israeli policies does not necessarily equate to a lack of support or an undermining of Israel's right to defend itself.
  • Combining different policy measures, such as aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security, in a single legislative bill can be contentious and may require separate discussions to address the nuances of each issue.
  • Inflation is a complex phenomenon that can be influenced by multiple factors, including but not limited to government monetary policy, corporate behavior, and global events like pandemics.
  • Multiculturalism can be viewed as a strength that contributes to the richness and diversity of society, and not necessarily as a driver of social instability or autocracy.
  • Media representation and bias are subjective, and different outlets may have varying perspectives on international politics; some may argue that media scrutiny is necessary for accountability.
  • Promotions for services and products are common in media, and listeners have the autonomy to decide whether or not to engage with advertised content.
  • Membership benefits for exclusive content are a standard practice in media to offer more in-depth analysis to those interested, and it is up to individuals to decide if they want to subscribe.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

Academic Integrity and Free Speech at Harvard

Critique of President Claudine Gay's Actions

In a recent podcast episode, Ben Shapiro levied a multifaceted critique of Claudine Gay, currently serving as the president of Harvard University.

Shapiro responded to NAACP president Derek Johnson's defense of Gay, who suggested that criticism towards her was rooted in racism and sexism, by challenging that notion directly, suggesting a different perspective on the situation.

Antisemitism and Speech Policies

Shapiro did not mince words when he addressed what he deems as Harvard's contradictory stance on free speech, specifically when it pertains to statements made against Jewish people.

He specifically condemned the university for its failure to declare that advocating for the extermination of Jews breaches Harvard's policy on speech. He further pointed out what he believes to be dangerous hypocrisy, noting that in its Title IX training, Harvard includes content that labels 'cis heterosexism' as contributing to violence, yet seemingly tolerates extreme statements against Jews.

The Plagiarism Controversy

The discussion intensified as Shapiro delved into accusations of plagiarism against Claudine Gay. His discourse involved a response to the defense by NAACP president Derek Johnson, who implied that allegations could be influenced by racial a ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Academic Integrity and Free Speech at Harvard

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro is a conservative political commentator known for his strong views on free speech and academic integrity. He often criticizes what he perceives as liberal biases in academia and the media. Shapiro has been vocal about his concerns regarding antisemitism and the importance of upholding academic standards. He is a proponent of meritocracy and has raised objections to diversity and inclusion efforts that he believes may compromise academic excellence.
  • DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, which are ...

Counterarguments

  • Criticism towards Claudine Gay may indeed be influenced by unconscious biases, and it's important to consider the impact of systemic racism and sexism when evaluating such claims.
  • Harvard's speech policies may be designed to protect free speech broadly, and the university might argue that it addresses specific incidents of hate speech, including antisemitism, on a case-by-case basis.
  • The inclusion of 'cis heterosexism' in Title IX training could be part of a broader effort to address various forms of discrimination and violence, and does not necessarily indicate tolerance of antisemitism.
  • Accusations of plagiarism are serious and s ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

Dissecting U.S. Policies at Home and Abroad

The Biden Administration's Ukraine Strategy

Ben Shapiro expressed skepticism regarding the Biden administration's approach to the conflict in Ukraine. He criticized the Democrats for potentially prioritizing political gains over tangible aid to Ukraine and accused them of casting blame on Republicans to avoid dealing with the issues in Ukraine.

Shapiro questioned the absence of a clear, well-defined goal for U.S. involvement and voiced concerns about whether Ukraine could reclaim territories without significant increases in military support.

He compared the extended support for Ukraine to the scrutiny over the duration of Israel's conflicts, suggesting that the U.S. harbors inconsistencies in its policy, especially considering political pressures from the left concerning Israel.

Israel's Defense and the Israel-Hamas Conflict

Moving to the Middle East, Shapiro argued against President Biden's interpretation of Israeli politics, emphasizing the significant role of moderate figures such as Benny Gantz over some right-wing leaders.

Addressing the Israel-Hamas conflict, Shapiro highlighted the Biden administration's handling of the conflict as ambiguous and criticized its attempt to take a centrist stance. He staunchly defended Israel's three-decade-long efforts to minimize civilian casualties despite the challenges faced by Israeli service members and criticized the media's disproportionate scrutiny of Israel compared to other conflicts, such as with ISIS.

Shapiro highlighted the conversations with journalist Boris and Israeli spokesperson Mark Regev, who discussed the perceived declining global support for Israel and emphasized the U.S.'s crucial diplomatic backing. Regev thanked the U.S. for its support and reaffirmed Israel's commitment to overcoming Hamas while ensuring civilian protection and humanitarian aid in Gaza.

Border Security and Legislative Challenges

Regarding domestic policies, Shapiro scrutinized the resistance from Democrats to legislative bills combining aid to Ukraine and U.S. border security enhancements. He highlighted Senator Mark Kelly's acknowledgment of the bipartisan agreement on the need for additional border resources and his insistence on handling Ukraine aid and border policy issues separately.

Shapiro argued that the Biden administration should leverage immigration controls to garner Republican support for Ukrainian assistance. He detailed potential border policy changes, advocating for authorizing officials to remove migrants without processing their asylum requests, reinstating Title 42, expanding the scope of expedited deportations, and mandating the detention of specific categories of migrants.

He suggested these policies as negotiation points for Republicans and expressed doubts about the Biden administration's will to strategically implement these changes.

...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Dissecting U.S. Policies at Home and Abroad

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ben Shapiro criticized the Biden administration's approach to the conflict in Ukraine, questioning the lack of a clear goal for U.S. involvement and expressing concerns about Ukraine's ability to reclaim territories without increased military support. He also highlighted his skepticism towards President Biden's economic policies, particularly regarding inflation, attributing it to U.S. government monetary policy rather than corporatism or pandemic-related factors.
  • The Israel-Hamas conflict is a long-standing and complex issue involving Israel and the militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The conflict has roots in historical, political, and territorial disputes between the two parties. U.S. involvement in this conflict has been significant, with the U.S. traditionally supporting Israel while also advocating for peace and stability in the region through diplomatic efforts and aid initiatives.
  • U.S. government monetary policy involves decisions made by the Federal Reserve to manage the money supply and interest rates to achieve economic goals. Inflation can be influenced by these policies, as increasing the money supply excessively can lead to rising prices. Adjusting interest rates is a common tool used to control inflation; higher rates can help curb infla ...

Counterarguments

  • The Biden administration may argue that their strategy in Ukraine is based on a nuanced understanding of the conflict and is aimed at balancing support for Ukraine with the need to avoid escalating tensions with Russia.
  • Some experts might contend that a clear goal in Ukraine is established, focusing on supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity while deterring further aggression from Russia.
  • It could be argued that the U.S. has provided substantial military support to Ukraine, and that further increases are being carefully considered to avoid provoking a larger conflict.
  • Critics might point out that U.S. policy towards Israel is complex and multifaceted, reflecting a balance of various domestic and international interests and values.
  • There may be a perspective that President Biden's interpretation of Israeli politics is informed by a range of diplomatic and intelligence sources, and that moderate figures are indeed considered in his administration's approach.
  • Some would argue that while Israel makes efforts to minimize civilian casualties, any military conflict inevitably leads to civilian harm, and scrutiny of these incidents is warranted regardless of the country involved.
  • The importance of media scrutiny could be defended as a necessary check on all governments' actions, including Israel's, to ensure accountability and adherence to international law.
  • The Biden administration might emphasize that diplomatic backing for Israel remains strong, but it must be balanced with the pursuit of broader regional peace and respect for human rights.
  • Democrats may argue that combining aid to Ukraine with U.S. border security is a political tactic that undermines the urgency and distinct nature of each issue.
  • Some policymakers might suggest that ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

Sociopolitical Dynamics and Public Perception

The Debate over Multiculturalism

Shapiro discussed societal changes with a critical lens, specifically the elite's push for multiculturalism. He postulates that this drives social instability and heightens autocracy on the political left.

In Shapiro's view, the push for multiculturalism corrodes fundamental societal concepts such as morality, justice, and objective reality.

Autocracy and Ideology on the Political Left

Further exploring this theme, Shapiro referenced Jonathan Pashow's "End of the World" series, recommending it as a valuable guide for understanding and preparing for the cyclical nature of societal changes, indicating a possible framework to prepare for upheaval within Western societies.

Consistency and Change in U.S. Russia Policy

On the topic of Russia, Shapiro commented on the U.S. political attitudes post-2016 election, emphasizing his own consistent view of Russia as problematic under Vladimir Putin. He pointed out the fluctuating attitudes of U.S. political parties, particularly the left, suggesting that partisanship has significantly influenced the U.S. stance on Russia since the post-2016 election period.

Shapiro also noted the scrutiny Israel faces in the media as being harsher than that for other conflicts, tying it into his broader argument about media representation and bias.

Media Repr ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Sociopolitical Dynamics and Public Perception

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Shapiro believes that the promotion of multiculturalism by elites can lead to social instability and strengthen autocracy within left-wing politics. He argues that this emphasis on multiculturalism can erode fundamental societal values like morality, justice, and objective reality.
  • After the 2016 U.S. presidential election, there were significant shifts in how political parties viewed Russia. The Republican Party generally took a more favorable stance towards Russia, while the Democratic Party became more critical, especially regarding Russian interference in the election. This shift in attitudes led to a polarized view on how to approach relations with Russia, impacting foreign policy decisions and public discourse.
  • Criticism of media representation and bias regarding Israel and Hamas involves the examination of how the media portrays the conflict between the two entities. This criticism often focuses on ...

Counterarguments

  • Multiculturalism can be argued to enrich societies by fostering diversity, inclusivity, and global understanding, which can lead to more robust and adaptable communities.
  • The erosion of societal concepts like morality, justice, and objective reality can also be attributed to factors other than multiculturalism, such as technological changes, economic pressures, and evolving cultural norms.
  • Some may argue that autocracy and ideological extremism can arise on both ends of the political spectrum, not just the left, and that it is important to address these tendencies wherever they occur.
  • Jonathan Pashow's "End of the World" series, while potentially insightful, is one of many perspectives on societal changes, and alternative literature may offer different frameworks for understanding and preparing for societal upheavals.
  • The view of Russia as problematic may not take into account the complexities of international relations and the potential for constructive engagement with Russia on various global issues.
  • Partisanship in U.S. foreign policy is not unique to the post-2016 period, and fluctuating attitudes toward foreign nations may reflect changing geopolitical realities and information rather than mere partisanship.
  • Media scrutiny of Israel, or any nation, can be seen as part of the necessary role of journalism in hold ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Oh, To Be A Black Harvard President

Additional Content and Promotions

Shapiro used part of the episode to promote Good Ranchers, discussing the advantages of their subscription service and sharing a special promotional deal, which includes a free holiday ham for new subscribers.

He noted that while he personally has not tried their ham due to dietary restrictions, his production team has given it positive reviews.

Exclusive Podcast Membership Benefits

Toward the end of the episode, Shapiro extended an invitation for li ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Additional Content and Promotions

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Good Ranchers offers a subscription service for high-quality meats delivered to your door. Customers can sign up for regular shipments of various cuts of beef, pork, and chicken. The service aims to provide convenience and quality by sourcing meat directly from American farms. Subscribers can customize their orders based on their preferences and dietary needs.
  • The New Hampshire governor's endorsement in the 2024 elections holds significance as it can influence voter perceptions and sway support towards a particular candidate. Endorsements from prominent political figures like governors can lend credibility and support to a candidate's ...

Counterarguments

  • While Shapiro's promotion of Good Ranchers may seem beneficial, it's important to consider the potential bias when a media figure endorses a product or service. Listeners should be aware that endorsements can sometimes influence the content and objectivity of the show.
  • Shapiro has not personally tried the Good Ranchers' ham, so his promotion is based on second-hand information. Listeners might prefer a personal endorsement from the host himself for a more trustworthy recommendation.
  • The offer of a free holiday ham may not appeal to all new subscribers, such as those with different dietary preferences or restrictions. It's important for promotions to be inclusive of the diverse audience.
  • The invitation to subscribe to a membership for more comprehensive analyses and insider information could be seen as gating important content behind a paywall, which may not be accessible or ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA