Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > The Fencing Of The Commons

The Fencing Of The Commons

By iHeartPodcasts

In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, Bryant and Clark explore the history of land enclosure in England, beginning with the Norman Conquest of 1066. They examine how the medieval manor system operated, where peasants held important usage rights to common lands despite not owning them, and how this system provided opportunities for sustenance and economic mobility.

The hosts trace how this system was dismantled through various waves of enclosure, sparked initially by the labor shortages following the Black Death and later accelerated by government-backed initiatives during the Industrial Revolution. The episode covers the resistance movements that fought against enclosure, the agricultural innovations that accompanied it, and its lasting impact on wealth inequality and the transformation of rural life in England.

Listen to the original

The Fencing Of The Commons

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jun 17, 2025 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Fencing Of The Commons

1-Page Summary

The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands

Chuck Bryant explains that following the Norman Conquest of 1066, England developed a manor system where nobility controlled the land but peasants held important usage rights. These manors included the lord's house, peasant villages, and communal farmland where peasants worked individual strips in rotation. While peasants didn't own the common lands, they had legal rights to use them for sustaining their families, enabling some degree of equality and upward mobility through subletting opportunities.

Initial Drivers of Enclosure After the Black Death

The Black Death's devastating impact led to significant labor shortages, which temporarily empowered surviving peasants through increased bargaining power. In response, landowners began enclosing common lands for sheep farming, driven by profitable wool trade opportunities. This first wave of enclosures utilized the Statute of Merton, which allowed lords to enclose lands while theoretically maintaining sufficient commons for peasants, though this often resulted in village displacement.

The Later Waves of Widespread and Government-Backed Enclosure

During the 18th and 19th centuries, government-supported enclosure accelerated to support industrialization. New agricultural innovations, such as Lord Townsend's Norfolk four-course system and the seed drill, improved farming efficiency. Parliament passed acts requiring formal enclosure processes and criminalized vagrancy, effectively forcing displaced peasants into urban areas. This transformation fueled both the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions, as Josh Clark notes, establishing the foundations of wage labor and wealth inequality.

Peasant Resistance and Failure to Prevent Enclosure

Despite significant resistance, including the 1381 Peasants' Revolt and the Diggers' movement during the English Civil War, peasants ultimately failed to prevent enclosure. Chuck Bryant observes that the process led to the disappearance of about 350 English villages and fundamentally transformed rural life. Government officials like Arthur Young documented the impoverishment of commoners, but these concerns were largely ignored by institutions like the Board of Agriculture, as wealthy landowners' interests prevailed.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The medieval manor system in England was a structure where nobles owned land, but peasants had rights to use common lands for farming and sustenance. Peasants worked on communal farmland, each tending to individual strips of land. While they didn't own the common lands, peasants had legal rights to use them, providing some level of equality and economic opportunities.
  • Enclosure after the Black Death involved the fencing off of common lands for sheep farming, driven by the profitable wool trade. This process was accelerated by labor shortages post-Black Death, leading to increased bargaining power for surviving peasants. Enclosure was facilitated by laws like the Statute of Merton, allowing landowners to enclose lands while often displacing villagers. The shift towards enclosure marked a significant transformation in land use and rural life, impacting the socio-economic structure of England.
  • The Statute of Merton was an English law enacted in 1235 during the reign of Henry III. It allowed landowners to enclose common lands for their own use while supposedly leaving enough land for commoners. This legal framework facilitated the initial wave of land enclosure in England following the Black Death. The statute aimed to balance the interests of landowners with the traditional rights of commoners to use common lands. However, in practice, it often led to the displacement of villagers and the concentration of land in the hands of the wealthy.
  • Vagrancy criminalization involved making it illegal for people to wander without a fixed home or employment. This was used to control the movement of displaced peasants who were forced off their lands due to enclosure. The laws aimed to push these individuals into urban areas to provide a labor force for emerging industries. Failure to comply could result in punishment or imprisonment, further disrupting the traditional rural way of life for these individuals.
  • The 1381 Peasants' Revolt was a major uprising in medieval England led by peasants against high taxes and oppressive laws. The Diggers' movement was a group of agrarian communists in the 17th century who advocated for the communal ownership of land and resources. Both movements aimed to challenge the existing social and economic structures that oppressed peasants and sought to bring about more equitable conditions for the common people.
  • Government officials, like Arthur Young, documented the impoverishment of commoners as a result of the enclosure movement. This documentation highlighted how the loss of access to common lands and the shift towards wage labor negatively impacted the economic well-being of rural peasants. The reports by officials like Young served to bring attention to the struggles faced by commoners who were displaced from their traditional way of life due to enclosure policies. The documentation of impoverishment underscored the social and economic consequences of the enclosure process on the rural population.
  • Institutions favoring wealthy landowners' interests often referred to governmental bodies or organizations that enacted policies or made decisions benefiting the affluent land-owning class. These institutions typically prioritized the economic and social advantages of landowners over the rights and well-being of peasants or commoners. This bias was evident in laws, regulations, and enforcement practices that tended to protect the property and profits of the wealthy elite. The influence of these institutions contributed to the historical trend of land consolidation and the marginalization of peasant communities.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Fencing Of The Commons

The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands

The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands in England presented a form of society where the nobility controlled the lands, but peasants enjoyed certain rights that allowed them to sustain themselves, and possibly achieve upward mobility.

Medieval Manor System: Lord's House, Peasant Villages, Farmland, Common Lands

Chuck Bryant explains that after the Normans conquered England in 1066, land was allocated to the nobility. They became lords of manors, which encompassed a manor house, peasant villages, and farmland. Included in these manors were Commons, shared landscapes that, while not owned by the peasants, were vital for their survival.

Peasants Had Usufructory Rights, Not Ownership of Common Lands

The common lands were indeed the lord's property, but the peasants had usufructory rights. This legal provision allowed them to use and work the land, and to reap the products of their labor to sustain themselves.

Collective Manor Cropland Farming

Farming on the manor was a collective endeavor. The farmland was divided into thin strips, with each household farming a strip. To prevent monopolizing the best soil, no one's strips were contiguous. Every few years, the fields were rotated, allowing some to recover as meadowland, enriched by animal manure. Peasants shared the responsibility of managing oxen for plowing and participated in communal decisions regarding agricultural practices.

Common Lands and Village System Ensured Stable, Self-Sustaining Peasantry Life

Despite the lack of ownership, the Common Lands provided a stable life for peasants, enabling some measure of equality and opportunities for those who started with less.

System Enabled Equality and Upward Mobility

Families inherited the str ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The nobility's control over land often led to exploitation and inequality, not just stability and opportunities for peasants.
  • Usufructory rights did not equate to land ownership, which meant peasants had limited control over their economic future.
  • Collective farming was not always efficient and could lead to tensions and disagreements among peasants.
  • The system of inheritance and subletting could perpetuate social stratification, as not everyone had equal access to land.
  • The resistance to change and preference for a traditional lifestyle could also be seen as a hindrance to progress and adaptation, potentially keeping peasants in poverty.
  • The romanticization of the medieval manor system overlooks the hardships and limited freedoms experienced by peasants.
  • The upward mobility mentioned was relatively rare and often not significant enough to change one's social standing in a meaningful way.
  • The enclosure movement ...

Actionables

  • You can explore community gardening to experience collective management and shared responsibility. By participating in a local community garden, you'll gain insight into how shared spaces can provide stability and opportunities, much like the common lands did for peasants. In these gardens, everyone contributes to the upkeep and harvest, and you might even have the chance to manage resources collectively, such as shared tools or compost systems.
  • Consider joining or forming a tool-sharing cooperative in your neighborhood to understand the value of common resources. This cooperative would operate on the principle that not everyone needs to own every tool, which mirrors the medieval concept of shared oxen for plowing fields. By pooling resources, you can save money, reduce waste, and foster a sense of community, while also learning about the logistics of managing shared assets.
  • Try a barter system with friends or ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Fencing Of The Commons

Initial Drivers of Enclosure After the Black Death

The Black Death pandemic had a profound impact on European society, with labor shortages after the catastrophe leading to significant changes in land use and agriculture.

Black Death Pandemic Caused Labor Shortage, Empowering Peasants

The drastic population reduction from the Black Death resulted in a labor shortage, altering the balance of power between landowners and peasants.

Peasants Gained Bargaining Power

The surviving peasants found themselves in an unprecedented position of increased bargaining power due to the scarcity of labor. This shift disrupted traditional feudal dynamics and shifted the power dynamics of the time.

Landowners Sought to Enclose Lands for Profitable Sheep Farming

The labor shortage pushed landowners to look for more profitable ways to use their land. Driven by the high demand for wool, many decided to transform their holdings into sheep pastures, believing it to be a more lucrative venture than traditional farming methods that demanded more workers.

First Wool-Driven Enclosure Wave

The first wave of enclosures was primarily driven by the pursuit of profits from the wool trade.

Enclosure of Common Lands For Sheep Pastures

Landowners began the process of enclosure, which often meant the fencing of common lands, traditionally shared for peasant use, to create dedicated sheep pastures.

Fences and hedges were employed to confine the sheep to specific areas. Literal fences were erected, and hedges were cultivated to become thick an ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Initial Drivers of Enclosure After the Black Death

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The labor shortage may have empowered peasants, but it also led to increased use of wage labor, which could undermine the traditional feudal bonds and eventually lead to different forms of exploitation.
  • While peasants gained bargaining power, this was not uniform across Europe, and in some regions, peasants remained oppressed or saw their conditions worsen due to other factors such as war or additional taxation.
  • Enclosure for sheep farming was profitable for landowners, but it can be argued that it was not the only or even the primary driver of enclosure in some areas, where agricultural innovations or changes in crop demand played a significant role.
  • The first wave of enclosures may have been influenced by multiple factors beyond the wool trade, such as changes in agricultural practices, population movements, and local economic conditions.
  • The enclosure of common lands often led to social unrest and resistance from peasants, which is a significant aspect of the enclosure movement that is not fully addressed in the main ideas.
  • The use of fences and hedges for sheep farming was not universally adopted and varied greatly dependin ...

Actionables

  • You can explore the impact of supply and demand on your career choices by researching industries with labor shortages and considering how you might leverage your skills in those areas for better employment terms. For instance, if there's a high demand for cybersecurity experts and a shortage of qualified individuals, you might pursue training in this field to increase your bargaining power for salary and benefits.
  • You can apply the concept of enclosure to personal finance by creating a budget that 'encloses' your savings, allocating funds to specific savings goals like retirement or a down payment on a house. This method, akin to fencing off resources for future use, can help you resist the temptation to spend on non-essentials.
  • You can use the principle of legal leve ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Fencing Of The Commons

The Later Waves of Widespread and Government-Backed Enclosure

The second, more intense wave of enclosure in England was endorsed and supported by the government, with significant implications for agriculture and industrialization.

Enclosure Accelerated In the 18th-19th Centuries For Industrialization Support

The government believed that efficient, large-scale farming required a single entity to be in charge of agricultural operations. During the period between 1750 and 1850, England saw a significant increase in agricultural efficiency, vital to support a growing population and transfer workers from rural areas to the booming city economy.

Efficient Large-Scale Farming With New Techniques and Technologies

Among these innovations was the Norfolk four-course system introduced by Lord Townsend from the Netherlands, which involved crop rotation of wheat, turnips, barley, and clover. The use of clover not only provided grazing but also improved soil quality, eliminating the need to leave fields fallow.

Additionally, the introduction of the seed drill allowed precise planting of grains in straight rows, further enhancing farm productivity.

Government Passes Acts Enabling Enclosure of Common Lands

To ensure an orderly transition, the government required enclosure to be done through an act of Parliament, needing a supermajority agreement in the local area. To promote movement to cities, Parliament made vagrancy a crime, forcing those displaced by enclosure into urban areas to avoid legal repercussions.

Peasant Displacement Fueled Urban Factory Labor Growth

As agriculture became more efficient, fewer people were needed to work the land, shifting the population dramatically towards urban centers and factories.

Peasants Moved To Cities For Harsh Wage Labor

The displaced rural population, who once said they could earn more working the Fens than in city wage labor, relocated to cities where they were compelled to buy the food produced on the land they were forced off of. Peasants moved into factories out of necessity, as vagrancy laws left no ch ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Later Waves of Widespread and Government-Backed Enclosure

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The belief that efficient, large-scale farming required centralized control can be challenged by the success of small-scale, sustainable farming practices that have been shown to be productive and environmentally friendly.
  • The increase in agricultural efficiency during the 18th and 19th centuries often came at the expense of traditional farming methods and biodiversity, which some argue was a loss of valuable ecological knowledge and practices.
  • The acts enabling enclosure of common lands often favored the wealthy and powerful, leading to a critique that the government's role was not neutral but rather served the interests of the elite.
  • The displacement of peasants and the subsequent urban wage labor they were forced into can be seen as a form of social injustice, rather than an inevitable or wholly positive aspect of industrialization.
  • The notion that enclosure was necessary for industrialization can be contested by historical examples of industrial growth that did not rely on such drastic changes in land ownership and social structure.
  • The idea that the Industrial Revolution and urbanization were unequivocally beneficial can be challenged by pointing out the environmental degradation and social problems, such as poor working conditions and urban squalor, that accompanied them.
  • The impact of enclosure on global populations, particularly in the colonies, can be viewed critically as an imposition of British land ownership models that disregarded ind ...

Actionables

  • Explore your local community's history to understand the impact of past agricultural and industrial changes. Visit your town's historical society or library to find maps, documents, and records that show how the land and industry have evolved over time. This can give you a personal connection to the historical processes discussed, such as enclosure and industrialization, and help you appreciate the long-term effects on your own environment.
  • Start a small-scale garden using efficient farming techniques to gain a hands-on understanding of agricultural innovation. Research methods like crop rotation and companion planting, which are modern equivalents of historical practices like the Norfolk four-course system, and apply them to your garden. This will give you a practical sense of how agricultural efficiency can be achieved on a micro-scale, mirroring the larger historical shifts in farming.
  • Volunteer with urban development or housing charities to directly address the le ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Fencing Of The Commons

Peasant Resistance and Failure to Prevent Enclosure

The historical podcast episode reveals a long and often violent struggle between English peasants and elite landowners over enclosure, which had lasting social and economic consequences for village life and the structure of English society.

Peasant Resistance: From the Revolt to the Diggers

The discontent with enclosure sparked several peasant resistances, including the 1381 Peasants' Revolt and the actions of the Diggers during the English Civil War. The Diggers viewed British soil as a birthright of all and saw enclosure as a violation of this right. They were known to break down enclosures and fences as an act of defiance. Despite various attempts to stop the process, such as staving off the draining of the Fens, peasant resistance ultimately proved no match for the overwhelming power of elite landowners backed by the government.

Enclosure Violated Their Birthright and Destroyed Their Traditional Life

The peasants had traditionally relied on common resources such as hunting, fishing, and using leftover crops after the harvest. The enclosure of waste land restricted access to these lands, which peasants used for hunting and fishing, and irrevocably altered their way of life.

Elite Landowner Power Overwhelms Peasant Resistance

Government officials like Arthur Young acknowledged that commoners were becoming impoverished and villages were drying up, but their reports were ignored by institutions like the Board of Agriculture. Josh Clark highlights the uprisings as a legitimate resistance to having their lands taken, but he notes that the government and wealthy interested parties consistently quashed these resistances, underscoring the dominant influence of the elite.

Peasant Displacement and Village Life Destruction: Profound Social and Economic Consequences

The impacts of enclosure had far-reaching effects on the social fabric and economic structure of English villages and the livelihoods of commoners.

Villages Destroyed, Commoners' Resource Access Restricted

About 350 English villages vanished during the hundred years of parliamentary enclosures. The medieval village system that English people knew was transformed dramatica ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Peasant Resistance and Failure to Prevent Enclosure

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can explore the impact of historical land practices on modern community dynamics by comparing your local area's land ownership patterns with historical maps. By doing this, you'll gain insight into how past events may have shaped current social and economic structures in your community. For example, if you find that certain areas were once common lands but are now privately owned, consider how this might have affected local access to resources and community cohesion.
  • Start a conversation about wealth inequality and its historical roots by hosting a book club or discussion group focused on literature that explores themes of land ownership and labor. Choose books like "The Great Leveler" by Walter Scheidel or "The Condition of the Working Class in England" by Friedrich Engels to understand the long-term effects of land concentration and wage labor. Discussing these topics with others can deepen your understanding of how historical events continue to influence modern society.
  • Reflect on your pers ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA