In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, Bryant and Clark explore the history of land enclosure in England, beginning with the Norman Conquest of 1066. They examine how the medieval manor system operated, where peasants held important usage rights to common lands despite not owning them, and how this system provided opportunities for sustenance and economic mobility.
The hosts trace how this system was dismantled through various waves of enclosure, sparked initially by the labor shortages following the Black Death and later accelerated by government-backed initiatives during the Industrial Revolution. The episode covers the resistance movements that fought against enclosure, the agricultural innovations that accompanied it, and its lasting impact on wealth inequality and the transformation of rural life in England.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Chuck Bryant explains that following the Norman Conquest of 1066, England developed a manor system where nobility controlled the land but peasants held important usage rights. These manors included the lord's house, peasant villages, and communal farmland where peasants worked individual strips in rotation. While peasants didn't own the common lands, they had legal rights to use them for sustaining their families, enabling some degree of equality and upward mobility through subletting opportunities.
The Black Death's devastating impact led to significant labor shortages, which temporarily empowered surviving peasants through increased bargaining power. In response, landowners began enclosing common lands for sheep farming, driven by profitable wool trade opportunities. This first wave of enclosures utilized the Statute of Merton, which allowed lords to enclose lands while theoretically maintaining sufficient commons for peasants, though this often resulted in village displacement.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, government-supported enclosure accelerated to support industrialization. New agricultural innovations, such as Lord Townsend's Norfolk four-course system and the seed drill, improved farming efficiency. Parliament passed acts requiring formal enclosure processes and criminalized vagrancy, effectively forcing displaced peasants into urban areas. This transformation fueled both the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions, as Josh Clark notes, establishing the foundations of wage labor and wealth inequality.
Despite significant resistance, including the 1381 Peasants' Revolt and the Diggers' movement during the English Civil War, peasants ultimately failed to prevent enclosure. Chuck Bryant observes that the process led to the disappearance of about 350 English villages and fundamentally transformed rural life. Government officials like Arthur Young documented the impoverishment of commoners, but these concerns were largely ignored by institutions like the Board of Agriculture, as wealthy landowners' interests prevailed.
1-Page Summary
The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands in England presented a form of society where the nobility controlled the lands, but peasants enjoyed certain rights that allowed them to sustain themselves, and possibly achieve upward mobility.
Chuck Bryant explains that after the Normans conquered England in 1066, land was allocated to the nobility. They became lords of manors, which encompassed a manor house, peasant villages, and farmland. Included in these manors were Commons, shared landscapes that, while not owned by the peasants, were vital for their survival.
The common lands were indeed the lord's property, but the peasants had usufructory rights. This legal provision allowed them to use and work the land, and to reap the products of their labor to sustain themselves.
Farming on the manor was a collective endeavor. The farmland was divided into thin strips, with each household farming a strip. To prevent monopolizing the best soil, no one's strips were contiguous. Every few years, the fields were rotated, allowing some to recover as meadowland, enriched by animal manure. Peasants shared the responsibility of managing oxen for plowing and participated in communal decisions regarding agricultural practices.
Despite the lack of ownership, the Common Lands provided a stable life for peasants, enabling some measure of equality and opportunities for those who started with less.
Families inherited the str ...
The Medieval Manor System and Common Lands
The Black Death pandemic had a profound impact on European society, with labor shortages after the catastrophe leading to significant changes in land use and agriculture.
The drastic population reduction from the Black Death resulted in a labor shortage, altering the balance of power between landowners and peasants.
The surviving peasants found themselves in an unprecedented position of increased bargaining power due to the scarcity of labor. This shift disrupted traditional feudal dynamics and shifted the power dynamics of the time.
The labor shortage pushed landowners to look for more profitable ways to use their land. Driven by the high demand for wool, many decided to transform their holdings into sheep pastures, believing it to be a more lucrative venture than traditional farming methods that demanded more workers.
The first wave of enclosures was primarily driven by the pursuit of profits from the wool trade.
Landowners began the process of enclosure, which often meant the fencing of common lands, traditionally shared for peasant use, to create dedicated sheep pastures.
Fences and hedges were employed to confine the sheep to specific areas. Literal fences were erected, and hedges were cultivated to become thick an ...
Initial Drivers of Enclosure After the Black Death
The second, more intense wave of enclosure in England was endorsed and supported by the government, with significant implications for agriculture and industrialization.
The government believed that efficient, large-scale farming required a single entity to be in charge of agricultural operations. During the period between 1750 and 1850, England saw a significant increase in agricultural efficiency, vital to support a growing population and transfer workers from rural areas to the booming city economy.
Among these innovations was the Norfolk four-course system introduced by Lord Townsend from the Netherlands, which involved crop rotation of wheat, turnips, barley, and clover. The use of clover not only provided grazing but also improved soil quality, eliminating the need to leave fields fallow.
Additionally, the introduction of the seed drill allowed precise planting of grains in straight rows, further enhancing farm productivity.
To ensure an orderly transition, the government required enclosure to be done through an act of Parliament, needing a supermajority agreement in the local area. To promote movement to cities, Parliament made vagrancy a crime, forcing those displaced by enclosure into urban areas to avoid legal repercussions.
As agriculture became more efficient, fewer people were needed to work the land, shifting the population dramatically towards urban centers and factories.
The displaced rural population, who once said they could earn more working the Fens than in city wage labor, relocated to cities where they were compelled to buy the food produced on the land they were forced off of. Peasants moved into factories out of necessity, as vagrancy laws left no ch ...
The Later Waves of Widespread and Government-Backed Enclosure
The historical podcast episode reveals a long and often violent struggle between English peasants and elite landowners over enclosure, which had lasting social and economic consequences for village life and the structure of English society.
The discontent with enclosure sparked several peasant resistances, including the 1381 Peasants' Revolt and the actions of the Diggers during the English Civil War. The Diggers viewed British soil as a birthright of all and saw enclosure as a violation of this right. They were known to break down enclosures and fences as an act of defiance. Despite various attempts to stop the process, such as staving off the draining of the Fens, peasant resistance ultimately proved no match for the overwhelming power of elite landowners backed by the government.
The peasants had traditionally relied on common resources such as hunting, fishing, and using leftover crops after the harvest. The enclosure of waste land restricted access to these lands, which peasants used for hunting and fishing, and irrevocably altered their way of life.
Government officials like Arthur Young acknowledged that commoners were becoming impoverished and villages were drying up, but their reports were ignored by institutions like the Board of Agriculture. Josh Clark highlights the uprisings as a legitimate resistance to having their lands taken, but he notes that the government and wealthy interested parties consistently quashed these resistances, underscoring the dominant influence of the elite.
The impacts of enclosure had far-reaching effects on the social fabric and economic structure of English villages and the livelihoods of commoners.
About 350 English villages vanished during the hundred years of parliamentary enclosures. The medieval village system that English people knew was transformed dramatica ...
Peasant Resistance and Failure to Prevent Enclosure
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser