In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore the origins, manufacturing processes, and environmental implications of Styrofoam. From its discovery in 1839 to its widespread adoption during World War II, the episode traces how this versatile material became a staple in modern life, particularly through its two main forms: extruded polystyrene (XPS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS).
The hosts examine the challenges surrounding Styrofoam use, including its environmental impact and potential health risks. They discuss how the material's non-biodegradable nature affects marine ecosystems, its connection to various health concerns, and the obstacles to recycling—including economic barriers and industry resistance to regulation. The episode also covers emerging solutions, from innovative recycling methods to the discovery of Styrofoam-eating organisms.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The journey of Styrofoam began in 1839 when German pharmacist Eduard Simon first isolated styrene from the sweet gum tree. While this natural source is no longer used in modern production, it laid the groundwork for future developments. In the 1930s, Karl Munters developed what we now know as Styrofoam, though its practical applications weren't realized until World War II when Dow Chemical Company combined styrene with isobutylene to create a lightweight, insulating material.
During this same period, IP Farben developed expanded polystyrene foam (EPS), which became the material commonly used in food containers. The Dart Manufacturing Company later brought Styrofoam into the fast-food industry in the 1960s, with Chick-fil-A among the first to adopt Styrofoam cups for to-go orders.
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant explain that Styrofoam production involves two main types: extruded polystyrene (XPS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS). XPS is created by melting polystyrene with blowing agents and extruding the mixture, resulting in dense, water-resistant boards. EPS, on the other hand, uses steam to expand polystyrene pellets, creating a lighter, more malleable material ideal for products like coffee cups.
The manufacturing process historically used CFCs as blowing agents, later replaced by hydrofluorocarbons like HFC-134a. While newer alternatives like pentane are less harmful, environmental concerns persist, particularly with XPS production which tends to trap these agents within its structure.
Styrofoam's environmental impact is significant due to its non-biodegradable nature and the harmful chemicals released during production. The material can take centuries to degrade and often fragments into microplastics, particularly affecting marine environments where it's frequently consumed by wildlife.
Health concerns are equally pressing. Workers in Styrofoam manufacturing plants exposed to styrene can experience various health issues, including central nervous system problems and fatigue. The World Health Organization classified styrene as a probable carcinogen in 2018. Consumer safety is also at risk, as styrene can leach into food and drinks, especially when heated above 104 degrees Fahrenheit.
Despite producing 15.2 million tons of polystyrene worldwide annually, recycling Styrofoam remains economically unfeasible. Chuck Bryant notes that its bulky nature makes transportation costs prohibitive for recycling centers, which operate based on weight. While innovative solutions exist, such as Agilyx's method of converting Styrofoam back to petroleum and the discovery of Styrofoam-eating mealworms, these aren't yet scalable solutions.
The industry faces increasing regulation, with 14 states implementing Styrofoam bans. However, companies like Dart Container actively oppose these restrictions through lobbying and legal action, maintaining a status quo that favors new production over recycling efforts.
1-Page Summary
The history of Styrofoam, a widely used and recognized material, reaches back to the 19th century, with significant developments in the 20th century shaping its widespread usage today.
Styrene, a naturally occurring substance found in plants, was first isolated in 1839 by Eduard Simon, a German pharmacist. Initially derived from the sweet gum tree, Simon distilled the molecules into a polymer, creating a rigid plastic solid. Though he had no immediate applications for it, Simon had uncovered the building block of what would eventually become Styrofoam.
Despite his early discovery, chemical production of styrene does not involve plant sources like those used by Simon. Instead, styrene, also known as vinyl benzene, has since been synthesized through various chemical processes.
Karl Munters initially developed Styrofoam in the 1930s, but he did not find a practical application for the material at the time. Its breakthrough came with the onset of World War II. Engineers at Dow Chemical Company, including engineer Ray McIntyre, were tasked with finding a synthetic alternative to rubber. They ended up combining styrene with isobutylene. This resulted in a light, airy, insulating, water-resistant, and flexible material, now commonly known as Styrofoam.
After recognizing Munters' concept, Dow acquired the rights and fine-tuned the production of Styrofoam. The material saw its first practical uses in marine applications, particularly floating docks, due to its buoyancy.
Concurrently with the invention of XPS (extruded polystyrene foam), a German company named IP Farben was developing EPS (expanded polystyrene foam). EPS is what most people think of when it comes to produ ...
History and Development of Styrofoam
The manufacturing and environmental impact of Styrofoam, commonly confused with both expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS), involves a complex chemical and physical process.
Styrofoam is made by combining polystyrene, a material similar to what is used for CD jewel cases, with a blowing agent such as isobutylene.
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant discuss the creation of Styrofoam by first looking at the material styrene, derived from petroleum products benzene and ethylene, combined with aluminum chloride to create ethyl benzene. Styrene is a monomer that can bind into polymers, forming long carbon chains. Polystyrene alone consists of pellets, which, when joined, create solid objects like CD cases. However, making Styrofoam involves further steps.
For XPS, these steps include melting and adding chemicals, including a blowing agent, then extruding the mixture through a die. XPS results in a dense, water-resistant board, often used for insulation. XPS boards are smooth due to the high pressure and heat eliminating space between the compressed pellets.
On the other hand, EPS uses steam to expand the polystyrene pellets up to 40 times their original size. The blowing agent vaporizes at low temperatures, leading to a light and malleable material that can be shaped into products like coffee cups.
While both types of Styrofoam use blowing agents, XPS is better known for its water resistance, and EPS for its lightness and molding ability. EPS can be molded into nearly any shape during production, lending to limitless applications.
Prev ...
The Chemistry and Manufacturing of Styrofoam
The production and disposal of Styrofoam have a significant environmental and health impact, releasing harmful chemicals into the air and posing risks to both human health and marine environments.
Air pollution results from the manufacturing process of Styrofoam due to the use of blowing agents. Although companies have shifted from using CFCs to HFC-134a, concerns regarding the environmental impact of these gases remain. The difference between expanded Styrofoam (EPS) and extruded Styrofoam (XPS) is notable, with EPS having a less significant problem regarding the environmental impact of blowing agents.
UV radiation can break down polystyrene; however, Styrofoam often ends up buried in landfills, shielded from sunlight and therefore not biodegradable. Chemically, it can take centuries to degrade. This is a pertinent issue considering that Styrofoam's durability and prevalence lead to fragmentation and accumulation, particularly in marine environments.
Styrene, the key component in Styrofoam production, poses various health risks. Workers at manufacturing plants exposed to styrene can suffer from central nervous system issues, headaches, depression, and fatigue. Neurotoxic effects experienced by workers can impair reaction times and cognition, to the extent of mimicking inebriation. Furthermore, studies have linked styrene to birth defects, reproductive issues, and cancer, and it has been detected in samples of human fat tissue, raising serious health concerns. In 2018, the World Health Organization classified styrene as a probable carcinogen.
Consumer usage of polystyrene poses additional risks: microwaving polystyrene ...
Environmental and Health Impacts of Styrofoam
The recycling and disposal of Styrofoam presents an economic and environmental challenge, as industry statistics reveal a booming market for the material, despite the growing awareness of its long-term harm to the environment.
Recycling styrofoam is not economically feasible primarily because it's much cheaper for "styrofoam people" to produce new styrofoam than to recycle it, leading to its dismissal mostly to landfills. Chuck Bryant notes that the styrofoam industry remains large, with 15.2 million tons of polystyrene produced worldwide last year. Styrofoam's lightweight yet bulky nature renders it problematic for landfills; it occupies substantial space without biodegrading and persists chemically for centuries. Every piece of Styrofoam ever made still exists in some form. The hosts underscore the impracticability of recycling Styrofoam, given how its volume diminishes monetary returns for recycling centers that operate based on weight, making it financially unviable for trucks to transport Styrofoam for recycling.
Despite innovative approaches, such as an Oregon company named Agilyx that turns Styrofoam back into petroleum, established a microbial and solvent-based Styrofoam recycling methods are rare. Specific microbes in the guts of mealsworms and other larvae can digest Styrofoam, converting it into benign substances, with their solid waste potentially serving as soil fertilizer. Yet, this microbial degradation isn't a widely adopted or scalable solution to the current Styrofoam output. Acetone can dissolve Styrofoam effectively on a small scale, as demonstrated by shrinking the contents of a beanbag chair into a cup of solvent, but this isn't practical for large-scale recycling efforts.
The Styro ...
Recycling and Disposal of Styrofoam
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser