Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

By iHeartPodcasts

In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore the complex historical figure of Richard III, examining his rise to power during the Wars of the Roses and his controversial legacy. Through the lens of both contemporary and modern perspectives, they discuss how Richard III ascended from Lord Protector to king, and address the persistent questions surrounding the fate of the "Princes in the Tower."

The episode covers how Tudor-era portrayals, particularly Shakespeare's characterization, shaped public perception of Richard III for centuries. It also examines recent developments in understanding Richard III's life and reign, including the discovery of his remains in Leicester and the efforts of organizations like the Richard III Society to reassess historical accounts of his character and actions.

Listen to the original

Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Apr 22, 2025 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

1-Page Summary

Wars of the Roses & Context of Richard III's Reign

The Wars of the Roses, a series of civil wars between two branches of the Plantagenet dynasty—the houses of York and Lancaster—shaped the political landscape of British history. The Lancasters, seeking to counter Yorkist claims, supported Henry Tudor as their champion. Born into this tumultuous period in 1452, Richard III's connection to the conflict ran deep through his father, the third Duke of York, who challenged King Henry VI for the throne in 1455, ultimately meeting a brutal end in battle.

Richard III's Accession and Controversies

As Lord Protector for his young nephew Edward V, Richard III orchestrated a calculated rise to power. He delayed Edward's coronation and spread rumors of the boy's illegitimacy to strengthen his own claim to the throne. After securing his position through parliamentary approval, Richard III moved against potential opponents, including Edward IV's advisors and William Hastings, having them executed for alleged treason.

The mysterious disappearance of Edward V and his brother Richard—known as the "Princes in the Tower"—remains one of English history's greatest enigmas, as Josh Clark notes. While Shakespeare's portrayal suggests Richard III ordered their murder, contemporary evidence remains speculative. Philippa Langley's Two Princes Project offers an alternative theory, suggesting the princes may have survived and grown up abroad.

Debate Over Richard III's Legacy and Reputation

The Tudor dynasty's subsequent portrayal of Richard III, particularly through Shakespeare's work, painted him as a physically deformed and morally corrupt ruler. However, the Richard III Society and other Ricardians have worked to challenge this narrative, questioning the objectivity of posthumous accusations.

The discovery of Richard III's remains in a Leicester parking lot, spearheaded by Philippa Langley with support from the Richard III Society, has reignited discussions about his character. While DNA testing confirmed the skeleton's identity and its scoliosis offered a more nuanced view of his physical appearance than Shakespeare's exaggerated portrayal, many mysteries about Richard III's reign, including the fate of the Princes in the Tower, remain unresolved.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The Wars of the Roses were complex and cannot be solely attributed to a dynastic feud; economic factors, personal rivalries, and foreign policy also played significant roles.
  • Some historians argue that the Lancastrian support for Henry Tudor was not just to counter Yorkist claims but also due to his distant blood claim to the throne and the lack of other viable Lancastrian heirs.
  • While Richard III's father did challenge Henry VI, it's worth noting that the political context was one of widespread discontent with Henry VI's rule, which was characterized by loss of territories in France and internal strife.
  • The extent to which Richard III orchestrated his rise to power and the nature of his involvement in the delay of Edward V's coronation are debated among historians, with some suggesting that his actions were driven by political necessity rather than personal ambition.
  • The execution of Edward IV's advisors and William Hastings can be seen in the context of the turbulent times and the need for consolidating power, which was a common practice among monarchs of the period.
  • Alternative theories about the disappearance of the "Princes in the Tower" include the possibility that they were murdered by someone other than Richard III or that their deaths were accidental.
  • Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard III is recognized as a work of drama and fiction, and not a historical account; thus, it reflects the artistic license and the political context of Elizabethan England rather than objective history.
  • The Richard III Society's efforts to rehabilitate Richard III's reputation are sometimes criticized for being overly sympathetic and possibly ignoring some of the more negative aspects of his reign.
  • The discovery of Richard III's remains and the confirmation of his scoliosis do not necessarily provide insights into his character or the actions he took during his reign.
  • While DNA testing confirmed the identity of the skeleton found in Leicester, it does not resolve historical controversies surrounding Richard III's policies and decisions.
  • The unresolved mysteries of Richard III's reign, including the fate of the Princes in the Tower, are subject to ongoing historical debate and interpretation, with new evidence and perspectives potentially altering our understanding.

Actionables

  • You can explore your own family history to see if there are any mysteries or legends similar to the "Princes in the Tower." Start by interviewing older relatives, gathering family documents, and using online genealogy platforms to trace your lineage. This could lead to fascinating discoveries about your ancestors and perhaps even uncover some family stories that have been lost or altered over time.
  • Create a simple blog or social media page dedicated to a historical figure from your local area, akin to the Richard III Society's efforts. Research using local archives, libraries, and historical societies to gather information, then share your findings online. This not only helps preserve local history but also improves your research and critical thinking skills.
  • Engage in creative writing by crafting a short story that reimagines the life of a historical figure or event from a different perspective, much like the alternative theories about the Princes in the Tower. Use historical facts as a foundation but build a narrative that explores 'what if' scenarios. This exercise can enhance your empathy and understanding of how history can be interpreted in various ways.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

Wars of the Roses & Context of Richard III's Reign

The Wars of the Roses was a series of civil wars that significantly determined the course of British history, particularly impacting the reign of King Richard III.

York-Lancaster Conflict for British Throne

Plantagenet Dynasty's Rule and the War of the Roses Power Struggle

The conflict between the houses of York and Lancaster, both branches of the Plantagenet dynasty, tore the country apart. The Plantagenets had ruled England since 1154, but internecine battles marked their reign, marked by Machiavellian politics and shocking brutality. The Lancasters sought a legitimate claimant to counter the Yorkists, pinning their hopes on Henry Tudor, a distant Lancaster relative under the Tudor name.

Richard III's Father and the Wars of the Roses

Richard III's Father Attempted to Dethrone King Henry VI, Escalating the Conflict

Richard III, a staunch Yorkist born in 1452, was deeply entrenched in these familial and political entanglements from a young age. His father, Richard, the third Duke of York, was a pivotal figure in the early Wars of the Roses. In a significant move in 1455, Richard III's father challenged the Lancastrian King Henry VI for the throne, further intensifying the wars. Tragically, the Duke of York met a grim fate, dying in battle. Victorious Lancastrian forces beheaded him, humili ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Wars of the Roses & Context of Richard III's Reign

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The Wars of the Roses were complex, and while they impacted Richard III's reign, it's also true that his reign itself contributed to the continuation and final phases of the conflict.
  • The conflict between York and Lancaster was more than a simple tear in the fabric of England; it was also a struggle for power that involved shifting alliances and political maneuvering that went beyond the two houses.
  • While the Plantagenet dynasty did rule England since 1154, it's important to note that the nature of their rule evolved over time, with different factions and family branches vying for power.
  • The legitimacy of Henry Tudor's claim to the throne can be debated, as it was through his mother's side and required a legitimization of his lineage, which some might argue was a political convenience rather than a strong hereditary right.
  • Richard III's father's challenge to the throne in 1455 was a significant event, but it was one of many escalations in the ongoing conflict, and other figures also played crucial roles in the Wars of the Roses.
  • The display of the Duke of York's head with a paper crown was indeed brutal, but such acts were not uncommon in the context of medieval warfare and served as a warning to others who might challenge the reigning power.
  • While Richard III did face opposition after his coronation, it's worth considering that such oppo ...

Actionables

  • You can explore your own family history to understand how past conflicts may have shaped your lineage, much like the Wars of the Roses impacted the reign of King Richard III. Start by creating a family tree and interviewing older relatives to gather stories, then research historical events that coincide with your ancestors' lives to see if and how they were affected.
  • Develop a board game that simulates the power struggles similar to those between the houses of York and Lancaster. Design the game with factions vying for control, incorporating elements of strategy, alliance-building, and resource management to reflect the complexities of historical conflicts.
  • Write a short story or novella inspired by the dramatic events ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

Richard III's Accession and Controversies

The controversial rise to power of Richard III and the ensuing mystery surrounding the "Princes in the Tower" remains one of the most tantalizing chapters in English history.

Richard III Declared Nephew Edward V Illegitimate to Claim Throne

Richard III, initially the Lord Protector for his young nephew Edward V, delayed the boy's coronation and began to maneuver for the throne himself. To strengthen his claim, Richard III propagated the rumor that Edward V was illegitimate and therefore had no right to be king. The narrative suggested that Richard III and Edward IV's father had engaged in an extramarital affair from which Edward IV was born, rendering Edward's reign and his offspring's claims to the throne illegitimate. Conversely, Richard III was considered legitimate as he was the product of his parents' lawful union. An act of Parliament solidified Richard's claim and facilitated his ascent from Lord Protector to King.

As part of his power grab, Richard III met with Edward IV's advisors, including Anthony Woodville and Richard Gray, and had them arrested and executed on charges of alleged treason. He took similar actions against his brother's friend William Hastings, effectively eliminating opponents who could have supported Edward V's claim.

Mystery of Edward V and the "Princes in the Tower"

Edward V and his brother Richard, known as the "Princes in the Tower," were confined within the Tower of London, ostensibly in preparation for Edward's upcoming coronation. Their increasingly rare appearances in public led to complete silence by the fall of 1483, marking their mysterious disappearance – a cold case that still baffles historians and captures the public imagination. Josh Clark describes this vanishing act as one of the greatest enigmas in English history.

Contemporary speculation fueled by Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Richard III," has painted the monarch as the chief suspect in the presumed murder of the princes. Those who formed the Anti-Richard faction promoted the notion that Richard III orchestrated their deaths. Shakespeare immortalized this in his play, depicting Richard III ordering his henchman Sir James Terrell to execute the young royals, possibly by smotherin ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Richard III's Accession and Controversies

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Richard III's claim that Edward V was illegitimate may have been a political maneuver rather than a propagation of a rumor; it was a common practice in medieval times to question the legitimacy of rivals to secure a throne.
  • The execution of Edward IV's advisors and supporters could be interpreted as a standard consolidation of power, which was not unusual in the context of the turbulent political climate of the time.
  • The disappearance of the "Princes in the Tower" has alternative explanations, such as the possibility that they were moved or escaped rather than being murdered.
  • Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard III has been criticized for being heavily influenced by Tudor propaganda, as Shakespeare was writing during the reign of the Tudor dynasty, which had a vested interest in discrediting Richard III.
  • The necklace linked to Edward V could have come into the possession of the widow through means other than direct involvement in the princes ...

Actionables

  • You can explore historical bias by comparing different accounts of a controversial figure. Start by reading different historical texts or watching documentaries about Richard III and the Princes in the Tower, then note the varying perspectives and what might have influenced them. For example, compare Shakespeare's portrayal with that in a modern history book to see how time and culture may have shaped the narrative.
  • Develop critical thinking by creating a "historical detective" game. Gather friends or family and assign roles based on the figures involved in the mystery of the Princes in the Tower. Use publicly available information to debate and discuss the possible outcomes, encouraging participants to question sources and motives, much like a jury would in a trial.
  • Enhance your understanding of historical impact by tracing the lineage of a curren ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Richard III: Good Guy or Evil Putz?

Debate Over Richard III's Legacy and Reputation

The legacy and reputation of King Richard III have long been the subject of intense debate, fueled by centuries-old propaganda and literary portrayals, and reignited by the recent discovery of his remains. Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into this discussion, exploring the roots of Richard III's vilified image and the efforts to rehabilitate his name.

After His Death, the Tudors Vilified Richard III As a Tyrannical, Deformed Usurper

The ebb and flow of Richard III's legacy largely hinged on the creative license of William Shakespeare. In "The Tragedy of Richard III," Shakespeare depicted the king with physical deformities and a sinister personality, reinforcing a negative image that served to flatter Queen Elizabeth I and bolster Tudor legitimacy. Shakespeare's reliance on the work of Sir Thomas More, who correlated physical differences with moral deficiencies, amplified the effect. The character's hunchback, withered arm, and dark soul became defining traits in the collective consciousness of society.

Ricardians Challenge Biased History, Rehabilitate Richard III's Reputation

The continuing discord about Richard III's legacy gave rise to the Ricardians and the Richard III Society, both fervently committed to rewriting the monarch's story by challenging existing narratives. They questioned the objectivity of posthumously laid accusations and suggested that the Tudors' smear campaign pointed to a more complex truth.

Richard III's Remains Discovery Sparks Debates On His Character and Rule

The discovery of Richard III's remains revolutionized the centuries-old debate. Philippa Langley’s dedicated search culminated in an excavation in a Leicester parking lot, with strong financial support from the Richard III Societ ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Debate Over Richard III's Legacy and Reputation

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The Tudors had political motives to vilify Richard III, but this does not necessarily invalidate all negative aspects of his reign.
  • Shakespeare's portrayal, while influential, is a work of fiction and should not be taken as historical fact.
  • Sir Thomas More's work was also a product of its time and may reflect Tudor biases rather than objective truth.
  • Ricardians may be subject to their own biases, potentially overlooking evidence that does not fit their narrative of rehabilitation.
  • The discovery of Richard III's remains, while significant, does not provide direct insight into his actions or character as a ruler.
  • Financial support from the Richard III Society for the excavation could be seen as a conflict of interest, potentially influencing the interpretation of findings.
  • Ground penetrating radar and other technologies provide data that must be carefully interpreted and can sometimes lead to incorrect conclusions if not used properly.
  • The presence of scoliosis does ...

Actionables

  • You can explore the impact of historical narratives by comparing different accounts of a single event from various sources. For example, read about a historical figure or event from a textbook, a novel, and an academic paper, then note how the portrayal and interpretation differ across these mediums. This exercise will help you understand how narratives are shaped by their authors and the context in which they are written.
  • Start a book club focused on historical fiction and non-fiction to encourage discussions about the reliability of historical representations. Each month, select a book that deals with a historical figure or event, and after reading, discuss how the author's perspective might influence the portrayal of the subject. This can be a fun way to critically engage with history and its modern interpreta ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA