In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore the complex historical figure of Richard III, examining his rise to power during the Wars of the Roses and his controversial legacy. Through the lens of both contemporary and modern perspectives, they discuss how Richard III ascended from Lord Protector to king, and address the persistent questions surrounding the fate of the "Princes in the Tower."
The episode covers how Tudor-era portrayals, particularly Shakespeare's characterization, shaped public perception of Richard III for centuries. It also examines recent developments in understanding Richard III's life and reign, including the discovery of his remains in Leicester and the efforts of organizations like the Richard III Society to reassess historical accounts of his character and actions.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The Wars of the Roses, a series of civil wars between two branches of the Plantagenet dynasty—the houses of York and Lancaster—shaped the political landscape of British history. The Lancasters, seeking to counter Yorkist claims, supported Henry Tudor as their champion. Born into this tumultuous period in 1452, Richard III's connection to the conflict ran deep through his father, the third Duke of York, who challenged King Henry VI for the throne in 1455, ultimately meeting a brutal end in battle.
As Lord Protector for his young nephew Edward V, Richard III orchestrated a calculated rise to power. He delayed Edward's coronation and spread rumors of the boy's illegitimacy to strengthen his own claim to the throne. After securing his position through parliamentary approval, Richard III moved against potential opponents, including Edward IV's advisors and William Hastings, having them executed for alleged treason.
The mysterious disappearance of Edward V and his brother Richard—known as the "Princes in the Tower"—remains one of English history's greatest enigmas, as Josh Clark notes. While Shakespeare's portrayal suggests Richard III ordered their murder, contemporary evidence remains speculative. Philippa Langley's Two Princes Project offers an alternative theory, suggesting the princes may have survived and grown up abroad.
The Tudor dynasty's subsequent portrayal of Richard III, particularly through Shakespeare's work, painted him as a physically deformed and morally corrupt ruler. However, the Richard III Society and other Ricardians have worked to challenge this narrative, questioning the objectivity of posthumous accusations.
The discovery of Richard III's remains in a Leicester parking lot, spearheaded by Philippa Langley with support from the Richard III Society, has reignited discussions about his character. While DNA testing confirmed the skeleton's identity and its scoliosis offered a more nuanced view of his physical appearance than Shakespeare's exaggerated portrayal, many mysteries about Richard III's reign, including the fate of the Princes in the Tower, remain unresolved.
1-Page Summary
The Wars of the Roses was a series of civil wars that significantly determined the course of British history, particularly impacting the reign of King Richard III.
The conflict between the houses of York and Lancaster, both branches of the Plantagenet dynasty, tore the country apart. The Plantagenets had ruled England since 1154, but internecine battles marked their reign, marked by Machiavellian politics and shocking brutality. The Lancasters sought a legitimate claimant to counter the Yorkists, pinning their hopes on Henry Tudor, a distant Lancaster relative under the Tudor name.
Richard III, a staunch Yorkist born in 1452, was deeply entrenched in these familial and political entanglements from a young age. His father, Richard, the third Duke of York, was a pivotal figure in the early Wars of the Roses. In a significant move in 1455, Richard III's father challenged the Lancastrian King Henry VI for the throne, further intensifying the wars. Tragically, the Duke of York met a grim fate, dying in battle. Victorious Lancastrian forces beheaded him, humili ...
Wars of the Roses & Context of Richard III's Reign
The controversial rise to power of Richard III and the ensuing mystery surrounding the "Princes in the Tower" remains one of the most tantalizing chapters in English history.
Richard III, initially the Lord Protector for his young nephew Edward V, delayed the boy's coronation and began to maneuver for the throne himself. To strengthen his claim, Richard III propagated the rumor that Edward V was illegitimate and therefore had no right to be king. The narrative suggested that Richard III and Edward IV's father had engaged in an extramarital affair from which Edward IV was born, rendering Edward's reign and his offspring's claims to the throne illegitimate. Conversely, Richard III was considered legitimate as he was the product of his parents' lawful union. An act of Parliament solidified Richard's claim and facilitated his ascent from Lord Protector to King.
As part of his power grab, Richard III met with Edward IV's advisors, including Anthony Woodville and Richard Gray, and had them arrested and executed on charges of alleged treason. He took similar actions against his brother's friend William Hastings, effectively eliminating opponents who could have supported Edward V's claim.
Edward V and his brother Richard, known as the "Princes in the Tower," were confined within the Tower of London, ostensibly in preparation for Edward's upcoming coronation. Their increasingly rare appearances in public led to complete silence by the fall of 1483, marking their mysterious disappearance – a cold case that still baffles historians and captures the public imagination. Josh Clark describes this vanishing act as one of the greatest enigmas in English history.
Contemporary speculation fueled by Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Richard III," has painted the monarch as the chief suspect in the presumed murder of the princes. Those who formed the Anti-Richard faction promoted the notion that Richard III orchestrated their deaths. Shakespeare immortalized this in his play, depicting Richard III ordering his henchman Sir James Terrell to execute the young royals, possibly by smotherin ...
Richard III's Accession and Controversies
The legacy and reputation of King Richard III have long been the subject of intense debate, fueled by centuries-old propaganda and literary portrayals, and reignited by the recent discovery of his remains. Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into this discussion, exploring the roots of Richard III's vilified image and the efforts to rehabilitate his name.
The ebb and flow of Richard III's legacy largely hinged on the creative license of William Shakespeare. In "The Tragedy of Richard III," Shakespeare depicted the king with physical deformities and a sinister personality, reinforcing a negative image that served to flatter Queen Elizabeth I and bolster Tudor legitimacy. Shakespeare's reliance on the work of Sir Thomas More, who correlated physical differences with moral deficiencies, amplified the effect. The character's hunchback, withered arm, and dark soul became defining traits in the collective consciousness of society.
The continuing discord about Richard III's legacy gave rise to the Ricardians and the Richard III Society, both fervently committed to rewriting the monarch's story by challenging existing narratives. They questioned the objectivity of posthumously laid accusations and suggested that the Tudors' smear campaign pointed to a more complex truth.
The discovery of Richard III's remains revolutionized the centuries-old debate. Philippa Langley’s dedicated search culminated in an excavation in a Leicester parking lot, with strong financial support from the Richard III Societ ...
Debate Over Richard III's Legacy and Reputation
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser