Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > The Tragedy of the Commons

The Tragedy of the Commons

By iHeartPodcasts

In an episode of the Stuff You Should Know podcast, Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant unpack the "tragedy of the commons" concept and its far-reaching implications. Originating with Garrett Hardin's 1968 essay, this theory posits that individuals exploiting shared resources, like cows grazing on communal land, inevitably leads to overuse and degradation.

The hosts dive into the historical context and policy applications of the tragedy of the commons idea, exploring both criticisms and alternatives. While Hardin advocated privatization and population control, later scholars like Elinor Ostrom demonstrated how local communities can successfully self-govern common-pool resources. This thought-provoking episode examines topics like sustainability, individual vs. community interests, and environmentalism from multiple angles.

Listen to the original

The Tragedy of the Commons

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 6, 2025 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Tragedy of the Commons

1-Page Summary

Origins and Key Concepts

Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant explore the development and core principles of the "tragedy of the commons" concept, introduced by Garrett Hardin in 1968. Hardin built upon earlier ideas by William Forster Lloyd, describing how individuals exploiting a shared resource—like farmers adding cows to a communal field—leads to its depletion.

Hardin argued that privatization or government intervention were solutions, controversially linking the commons tragedy to overpopulation in poorer nations. He advocated for capitalism and privatization through Lloyd's concept, which countered Adam Smith.

Tragedy of the Commons in Policy

Hardin's ideas prompted privatization and market solutions, like environmental trading markets (ETMs) starting in the 1980s-1990s for emissions and fishing rights. The World Bank recognized ETMs as crucial for managing natural resources.

While reducing issues like acid rain, ETMs enabled consolidation of power among few entities. Hardin's arguments also justified restricting population growth and immigration to prevent resource overuse.

Critiques and Alternatives

In contrast, Elinor Ostrom showed how communities can successfully self-govern common-pool resources (CPRs). She identified principles like clear boundaries, local rules, group decision-making, and sanctions for misuse.

Ostrom provided evidence of communities sustainably managing resources for centuries, from Switzerland to the Philippines. She highlighted how common ownership can grant autonomy, and local rule-setting is key for those with vested interests in sustainability.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "tragedy of the commons" concept, introduced by Garrett Hardin in 1968, describes how individuals exploiting a shared resource can lead to its depletion. Hardin argued for solutions like privatization or government intervention to address this issue. The concept is based on the idea that self-interested individuals, when acting independently, can deplete a shared limited resource, even if it is against their long-term interests. This concept has influenced discussions on environmental policy and resource management globally.
  • Garrett Hardin controversially linked the tragedy of the commons to overpopulation in poorer nations, suggesting that uncontrolled population growth exacerbates resource depletion. This connection stirred debate as it implied a need for population control measures to prevent environmental degradation. Hardin's stance on overpopulation intersected with his advocacy for privatization and market-based solutions to address resource management challenges. The controversy surrounding this link reflects differing perspectives on the role of population growth in environmental sustainability.
  • Environmental trading markets (ETMs) are systems where entities can buy and sell permits to engage in activities that impact the environment, like emitting pollutants or fishing. These markets aim to create economic incentives for reducing environmental harm by allowing those who can reduce pollution more efficiently to do so. ETMs have been used to address issues like emissions trading for pollutants such as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, providing a market-based approach to environmental regulation. By putting a price on environmental impacts, ETMs encourage businesses to innovate and find cost-effective ways to reduce their environmental footprint.
  • Elinor Ostrom's principles for self-governing common-pool resources (CPRs) include clear boundaries to define the resource, local rules established by the community, collective decision-making processes, and mechanisms to enforce rules and address misuse. Ostrom's work emphasizes the effectiveness of community-based governance in sustaining shared resources over time, showcasing examples from various cultures and regions worldwide.

Counterarguments

  • Hardin's solutions of privatization and government intervention may not be universally applicable or effective in all contexts.
  • Linking the tragedy of the commons to overpopulation in poorer nations can be seen as a simplistic view that overlooks the complexities of global resource distribution and consumption patterns.
  • The advocacy for capitalism and privatization does not consider the potential benefits of alternative economic systems in managing common resources.
  • The implementation of environmental trading markets (ETMs) might not address the root causes of environmental degradation and can lead to unintended consequences such as the commodification of nature.
  • The success of ETMs in managing natural resources is debated, and some argue that they can lead to inequities and fail to protect the environment in the long term.
  • The idea that restricting population growth and immigration can prevent resource overuse does not take into account the role of consumption patterns and technological innovation in resource management.
  • Ostrom's principles for self-governance of common-pool resources may not be scalable or applicable in all situations, especially in highly complex or globalized resource systems.
  • The evidence provided by Ostrom of communities sustainably managing resources may not account for external pressures such as market forces or climate change that can impact the sustainability of these practices.
  • The emphasis on local rule-setting and autonomy may not always align with broader societal goals or the need for coordinated action at larger scales to address environmental challenges.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Tragedy of the Commons

Origins and Key Concepts of the Tragedy of the Commons

Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant explore the development and core principles of the Tragedy of the Commons, as introduced by Garrett Hardin in 1968 but built upon earlier ideas by William Forster Lloyd.

Tragedy of the Commons by Hardin, 1968, Building On Lloyd

The discussion begins with Chuck Bryant citing the 19th-century English mathematician and economist William Forster Lloyd for the foundational idea that would later become known as the Tragedy of the Commons through the work of biologist Garrett Hardin.

Hardin's Experiment: Farmers Depleting Shared Field Resources

Clark and Bryant describe a thought experiment used by Hardin, which deals with multiple farmers sharing a grazing field. They outline how, if one farmer adds an extra cow to increase profits, it leads to the depletion of the shared resources. As more farmers decide to add cows, the problem of overtaxing the commons is compounded.

Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons" Argument

Hardin argued that the tragedy of the commons occurs when individuals exploit a shared resource for their own benefit, which inevitably leads to resource depletion. Bryant mentions the psychological aspect where each farmer keeps adding cows, under the assumption that other farmers will do the same. Clark explains how the diminishing profit from each additional cow forces even reluctant farmers to add more to remain profitable.

They summarize Hardin’s assertion that the depletion of shared resources is inevitable under these circumstances, as all parties seek to maximize their profits. The solutions Hardin proposed included dividing communal areas into private plots or government intervention to regulate usage.

Hardin controversially linked the tragedy of the commons to overpopulation in poorer, non-white countries. He argued that international aid enables overbreeding by providing food a ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Origins and Key Concepts of the Tragedy of the Commons

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The Tragedy of the Commons can be mitigated through cooperative management of resources rather than privatization or government control.
  • Hardin's model assumes that individuals will always act in their short-term self-interest, which may not account for cultural or social factors that encourage sustainable resource management.
  • The link between the Tragedy of the Commons and overpopulation has been criticized for being overly simplistic and for ignoring the complexities of global resource distribution and consumption patterns.
  • Hardin's views on international aid and overpopulation have been criticized for being ethnocentric and for failing to address the root causes of poverty and resource depletion.
  • The "lifeboat" metaphor has been challenged for promoting a worldview that lacks compassion and ignores the interconnectedness of global societies.
  • Critics argue that privatization can lead to inequalities in resource ...

Actionables

  • You can analyze your daily habits to identify where you might be contributing to a "tragedy of the commons" in your community. For instance, if you frequently drive short distances that could be walked or biked, you're adding to traffic congestion and air pollution, which affects everyone. Consider alternative transportation methods that reduce your impact on communal resources like air quality and road space.
  • Start a conversation with friends or family about the concept of shared resources and personal responsibility. Use examples like shared spaces in your neighborhood, such as parks or community gardens, and discuss ways to ensure these spaces aren't depleted or degraded. This could lead to forming a small community group focused on maintaining and improving these shared areas.
  • Ref ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Tragedy of the Commons

Tragedy of the Commons in Policymaking and Impact

Clark and Bryant discuss the concept of the tragedy of the commons, which has dramatically influenced resource management and environmental policy, and the shift towards privatization and market solutions driven by this narrative.

Commons Tragedy Prompted Privatization and Market Solutions

The tragedy of the commons became a dominant perspective in environmental policymaking, particularly as environmental consciousness grew in the latter half of the 20th century. Hardin's ideas propelled a shift towards privatization, and influenced the development of market mechanisms such as environmental trading markets for managing common resources.

Environmental Trading Markets Began in 1980s-1990s for Emissions and Fishing Rights

Environmental trading markets emerged as a solution to resource management, beginning prominently in the 1980s and 1990s. Attributed to Canadian economist J.H. Dales, these markets responded to government regulations intended to cap emissions and manage resources like fishing rights efficiently. Companies received permits that allowed them to harvest a specific number of fish or emit a certain amount of sulfur dioxide, for instance. These permits could then be traded, establishing environmental trading markets (ETMs). The World Bank recognized this paradigm as crucial to understanding and addressing natural resource issues.

The implementation of cap and trade schemes led to a significant reduction in acid rain-causing sulfur dioxide emissions. As emissions were curtailed, companies that managed to reduce their emissions could profit by selling their surplus allowances to others who exceeded their caps. This system created monetary incentives for pollution reduction and imposed financial penalties for exceeding limits.

Success In Reducing Acid Rain Consolidated Power Among Few

While cap and trade schemes were effective in reducing environmental issues like acid rain, they inadvertently enabled the consolidation of power among a few entities. By successfully managing their emission allowances, companies could dominate their respective markets. For example, the same system applied to fisheries could unexpectedly lead to monopolizing that market, where one company controls most of the fishing rights, thereby running smaller competitors out of business.

Hardin's Ideas Justified Restricting Population Growth and Immigration to Prevent Resource Overuse

Garrett ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Tragedy of the Commons in Policymaking and Impact

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The tragedy of the commons is not universally applicable to all common resources, as many communities have historically managed commons sustainably through collective action and social norms.
  • Privatization and market solutions may not always be the most effective or equitable approach for managing environmental resources, as they can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups and may not address the root causes of overexploitation.
  • Environmental trading markets can lead to unintended consequences, such as the creation of "hot spots" where pollution is concentrated, and they may not adequately protect the environment if caps are set too high or enforcement is weak.
  • Cap and trade schemes, while reducing certain emissions, may not be comprehensive in addressing all environmental issues, and they can shift the burden of pollution to communities with less political power.
  • The consolidation of power as a ...

Actionables

  • You can adopt a personal cap and trade system for your household emissions by setting a carbon budget and trading chores or rewards with family members for staying under the limit. For example, if you set a monthly carbon budget for electricity and gas usage, any family member who contributes to staying under this budget could be rewarded with extra internet time or a favorite meal. This gamifies energy conservation and makes everyone in the household conscious of their carbon footprint.
  • Start a neighborhood resource-sharing initiative to prevent overuse of individual items that can be communally owned. For instance, instead of everyone owning a lawn mower, create a schedule where neighbors share one or two. This not only saves resources and money but also fosters community relationships and reduces the collective environmental impact.
  • Engage in a personal audit of your consumption habit ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Tragedy of the Commons

Tragedy of the Commons: Critiques and Alternatives

Elinor Ostrom's work presents a stark contrast to Garrett Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" by demonstrating how local communities can successfully manage shared resources.

Elinor Ostrom Showed Communities Self-Govern Common-Pool Resources, Contradicting the Tragedy of the Commons

Principles for Successful Common-Pool Resource Management

In her book "Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action," written in 1990, Elinor Ostrom brought managed common-pool resources (CPRs) to the attention of the political world. She identified eight principles of successful regulation of a commons, including clear boundaries, rules fitting local needs, group decision-making, local monitoring including fines and incremental sanctions, and supportive or non-interfering authorities. Josh Clark highlights that privatization and outside industry shares in the commons can lead to the tragedy, not the commons themselves. He and Chuck Bryant discuss how communities use ostracism for repeat offenders, showing community-driven governance mechanisms.

Ostrom Showed Local Communities Can Sustainably Manage Resources

Ostrom's field studies provided evidence that local communities can indeed sustainably manage resources. Using examples from Switzerland, Japan, and the Philippines, she showed that areas like grazing lands, forests, meadows, and fisheries have been effectively maintained for centuries. Maine's lobster fishermen, who formed harbor gangs for self-policing, underline Ostrom's findings with a contemporary example of sustainable resource management.

Common Ownership Grants Autonomy in Shared Resources

The conversation touches on how communities can have autonomy w ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Tragedy of the Commons: Critiques and Alternatives

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Tragedy of the Commons is a concept highlighting the potential overuse and degradation of shared resources when individuals act in their self-interest without considering the common good. It was popularized by Garrett Hardin in 1968, illustrating the challenges of managing resources like pastures or fisheries when access is unrestricted. Elinor Ostrom's work provided insights into how communities can successfully govern and sustainably manage common-pool resources, offering alternatives to the bleak outcomes predicted by the Tragedy of the Commons.
  • Common-pool resources (CPRs) are resources like fisheries or forests that are shared among multiple users. These resources face challenges like overuse due to their subtractable nature. Effective management is crucial to prevent depletion and ensure sustainable use by balancing individual benefits with the collective good. Examples include fishing grounds and groundwater basins, where regulations are necessary to prevent overexploitation and maintain long-term viability.
  • Ostracism as a governance mechanism involves the exclusion or shunning of individuals from a community as a form of punishment or social control. In the context of managing shared resources, communities may use ostracism to deter individuals who repeatedly violate rules or norms governing the use of common-pool resources. This practice aims to maintain cooperation and adherence to established regulations within the community by imposing social consequences on those who act against the collective interest. Ostracism serves as a social tool to reinforce community norms and ensure the sustainable management of resources through peer-enforced governance.
  • Autonomy within common ownership structures means that individuals or communities collectively own and manage a resource while still retaining a degree of independence and self-governance within that shared ownership framework. This setup allows for decision-making power and control over the resource to be distributed among the members involved, enabling them to make choices and set rules that align with their specific needs and values. Autonomy in common ownership can provide a balance between shared responsibility for the resource and individual freedoms in its use and management. This concept emphasizes the idea that collective ownership does not necessarily mean a loss of personal agency or control but can instead offer a way for individuals to have a say in how the resource is utilized while benefiting from shared ownership arrangements.
  • Watersheds are areas of land where all the water drains to a common point, like a riv ...

Counterarguments

  • While Ostrom's principles have been successful in many cases, they may not be universally applicable or scalable, especially in highly complex or globalized resource systems.
  • The effectiveness of local governance can be undermined by external pressures such as market forces, state policies, or global environmental changes, which may not be adequately addressed by local rules.
  • Ostrom's model relies heavily on the presence of social capital and strong community ties, which may not exist in all contexts, particularly in more urbanized or individualistic societies.
  • The threat of ostracism as a governance mechanism may not be effective in larger or more anonymous settings where community bonds are weaker.
  • Common ownership and local autonomy may sometimes lead to exclusionary practices, where certain groups are denied access to resources.
  • The success of local management of commons may be challenged by issues of equity and representation, particularly if some community members have more power or influence than others.
  • There may be instances where local management fails to protect the environment or resources due to lack of knowledge, resources, or due to local conflicts of interest.
  • The assumption that local communities always have a vested ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA