Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Taylorism: Work Faster!

Taylorism: Work Faster!

By iHeartPodcasts

Frederick Winslow Taylor's "scientific management" approach, known as Taylorism, aimed to optimize workplace productivity by establishing rigid divisions between managers and workers. This controversial system intensified efficiency through inflated work expectations and minimizing "wasted" movements, revolutionizing the workforce but dehumanizing and exploiting employees.

While criticized, Taylor's principles significantly shaped modern management theories and practices, influencing everything from management consulting to public education's focus on industrialization. The episode contrasts Taylorism with the Gilbreths' family-centric methods that emphasized increasing efficiency to provide more leisure time and happiness for workers.

Listen to the original

Taylorism: Work Faster!

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Dec 17, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Taylorism: Work Faster!

1-Page Summary

Frederick Winslow Taylor and "Scientific Management"

Frederick Winslow Taylor, an efficiency expert at Midvale Steel Company, published "The Principles of Scientific Management." Taylor aimed to optimize workplace productivity by establishing a rigid division between managers who devise efficient processes and workers who execute those processes.

Taylor's Principles and Methods

Taylor advocated for setting inflated work expectations based on time studies and minimizing wasted movements. His methods, known as Taylorism, revolutionized the workforce by intensively applying worker capacity but were criticized for dehumanizing and exploiting workers.

Criticism and Impacts

While increasing efficiency, Taylorism faced backlash for arbitrary standards, insensitivity to human variation, and deskilling workers into robotic roles. Despite worker strikes and being banned in federal facilities, Taylor's management techniques persisted and shaped industrial productivity standards.

Deskilling and Productivity Over Wellbeing

Taylorism segmented complex tasks into repetitive roles, reducing skill requirements and making workers replaceable. This pursuit of productivity largely ignored worker satisfaction and quality of life, alienating employees.

The Gilbreths' Contrasting Approach

Frank and Lillian Gilbreth of Gilbreth Inc. studied efficient work methods like the "therbligs" or basic movements. Unlike Taylor, the Gilbreths aimed to increase efficiency to provide more free time and happiness for workers.

Household Efficiency Innovations

Lillian Gilbreth extended efficiency principles to household tasks, popularizing concepts like the kitchen work triangle to streamline domestic work while allowing for more leisure time.

Lasting Influence on Management

Taylor and the Gilbreths significantly shaped modern management theories despite criticisms. Taylor's ideas boosted management consulting, influenced public education's industrial focus, and perpetuated deskilling and rigid labor divisions.

The Gilbreths' family-oriented approach contrasted with Taylor's impersonal methods, informing modern work-life balance philosophies across fields from home design to consulting.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Taylor's focus on efficiency and productivity could be seen as a necessary response to the industrial challenges of his time, aiming to improve overall economic performance and competitiveness.
  • The division of labor between managers and workers can be argued to allow for specialization and expertise, potentially leading to better management decisions and more efficient work processes.
  • Time studies and the establishment of work expectations can be defended as methods to understand work processes better and to set fair standards for performance evaluation.
  • Taylorism's emphasis on efficiency may have inadvertently led to technological advancements and innovations that improved working conditions over time.
  • The criticism of Taylorism for dehumanizing workers might overlook the potential for workers to find satisfaction in mastering their tasks and taking pride in their efficiency.
  • The backlash against Taylorism for arbitrary standards could be countered by the argument that these standards were based on empirical studies and were an attempt to create a fair and objective basis for work expectations.
  • The deskilling criticism might be mitigated by the fact that in some cases, simplifying tasks can make jobs more accessible to a broader range of people, potentially creating employment opportunities.
  • The persistence of Taylor's management techniques despite criticism could be attributed to their effectiveness in certain industries and contexts where efficiency is paramount.
  • The Gilbreths' focus on worker happiness and free time can be critiqued for potentially underestimating the complexity of balancing efficiency with human factors in diverse work environments.
  • Lillian Gilbreth's work in household efficiency could be seen as reinforcing traditional gender roles by focusing on domestic work, although her intent was to improve quality of life.
  • The influence of Taylor and the Gilbreths on modern management might be viewed as a foundation that has been built upon and refined to better suit contemporary work environments and societal values.
  • The idea that Taylor's methods perpetuated deskilling and rigid labor divisions could be challenged by the perspective that they also laid the groundwork for later improvements in worker training and development programs.
  • The contrast between the Gilbreths' family-oriented approach and Taylor's impersonal methods might be seen as complementary rather than opposing, with each contributing valuable insights to the field of management.

Actionables

  • You can analyze your daily routines to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps, enhancing personal efficiency. Start by writing down your typical daily tasks, then review each step to see if it's essential or if there's a faster way to accomplish the same result. For example, if you find you're making multiple trips to the grocery store each week, consider creating a weekly meal plan that allows you to shop once, saving time and effort.
  • Develop a personal time study to set realistic goals for task completion. Use a simple stopwatch or a smartphone app to time how long it takes you to complete regular tasks, like answering emails or doing household chores. With this data, you can set more accurate timeframes for these activities, helping you to schedule your day more effectively and avoid underestimating how long tasks take.
  • Create a comfortable and efficient workspace at home by applying the kitchen work triangle concept to your desk or office area. Position your most-used items like your computer, notepad, and phone within easy reach to minimize movement and save time. If you frequently use a printer or reference books, place them in a secondary triangle that's still within a few steps to maintain a smooth workflow.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Taylorism: Work Faster!

Frederick Winslow Taylor and the development of "scientific management"

The episode sheds light on Frederick Winslow Taylor's principles of scientific management and his lasting impact on the industry as the progenitor of the management consultant industry.

Taylor's background and early career as an efficiency expert

Frederick Winslow Taylor, born in Philadelphia in 1856 to an affluent Quaker family, studied engineering and propelled his career in efficiency as chief engineer at Midvale Steel Company. Despite being prepared for Harvard, his failing eyesight redirected him to a career in practical engineering, leading to his eventual role as an efficiency expert. At Midvale, he conducted more than 30,000 experiments in metal cutting and published "On the Art of Cutting Metals" in 1907, which greatly impacted his field.

Taylor's principles of "scientific management"

Throughout his career, Taylor persistently sought ways to make people work harder, forging a new role as someone who could ensure this. He published "The Principles of Scientific Management," which became a seminal business book, elevating his profile.

At Midvale Steel, Taylor famously divided the workforce into two components: managers and workers. The former were tasked with devising efficient processes, while the latter were to execute these processes without deviation. This approach aimed to carve the most efficient way to carry out tasks, such as loading pig iron onto rail cars. His 'scientific' method included time studies to determine the optimal workflow and minimize wasted movements.

One of his notable experiments was conducted at Bethlehem Steel, where he established an inflated daily work expectation for loading pig iron based on his studies. Moreover, Taylor created the fictitious character named Schmidt to exemplify his management theories—designating workers as simply motivated by money and easy to manipulate like the "high-priced man" Schmidt.

Taylorism revolutionized the workforce by establishing a rigid division of labor and advocating for the intensive application of worker capacity. His focus was often criticized as pushing workers to exhaustion for maximizing profits.

Criticism and impacts of Taylorism

Despite the criticism, Taylor’s methods gained traction, significantly influencing industrial operations and leading to the rise of management consulting firms. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss the legacy of Taylor's system, including modern practices like firing people and dismantling company structures as part of 'efficiency' strategies, echoing Taylor's principles ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Frederick Winslow Taylor and the development of "scientific management"

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Taylor's methods were not universally applicable across all industries and types of work, as they may not account for the complexity and variability of certain jobs.
  • The assumption that workers are primarily motivated by money, as exemplified by the character Schmidt, is overly simplistic and ignores other factors such as job satisfaction, workplace culture, and intrinsic motivation.
  • Scientific management may lead to short-term productivity gains at the expense of long-term employee well-being and job satisfaction.
  • Taylor's approach to management could stifle creativity and innovation among workers by overly focusing on efficiency and standardization.
  • The division of labor proposed by Taylorism could lead to monotonous work and a lack of opportunities for workers to develop a broader range of skills.
  • Taylor's time studies and efficiency standards could be seen as invasive and disrespectful to workers' autonomy and professional judgment.
  • The focus on efficiency and productivity might overshadow the importance of ethical considerations and social responsibility within a company.
  • Taylor's principles may not be as effectiv ...

Actionables

  • You can analyze your daily routines to identify inefficiencies and optimize your time. Start by logging your activities for a week, noting the time spent on each task. Review the log to spot repetitive or unnecessary actions, then brainstorm ways to streamline these processes, such as batching similar tasks together or eliminating steps that don't add value.
  • Develop a personal reward system to motivate yourself for completing tasks efficiently. Set clear, measurable goals for tasks you often procrastinate on, and assign a small reward for achieving each goal within a set time frame. This could be as simple as taking a break to enjoy a favorite snack after finishing a report ahead of schedule.
  • Create a character in your mind that embodies you ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Taylorism: Work Faster!

The impacts and criticism of Taylor's efficiency principles

Clark and Bryant delve into the efficiency principles designed by Frederick Taylor, popularly known as Taylorism, and the various criticisms and long-term impacts they have had on the workforce.

Deskilling and replaceable workers

Taylor's methods led to the segmentation of complex tasks into simpler and more repetitive roles with the aim of increasing productivity. This approach, however, reduced the overall skill requirements for workers and made them more easily replaceable, as they only needed to be trained in specific subtasks. This led to workers feeling disposable and insecure in their jobs.

Bryant brings attention to the inefficiency of constantly needing to replace employees, highlighting that even straightforward tasks, such as attaching an oven door, can lead to productivity losses when workers are not retained. Taylor was fixated on removing what he termed "systematic soldiering," the intentional slowdown of work by employees.

Prioritizing productivity over worker wellbeing

The principles of Taylorism were primarily focused on maximizing efficiency and productivity, with little concern for worker satisfaction or quality of life. This exploitative approach, critics argue, harmed workers and undermined their humanity by ignoring their needs and transforming them into mere cogs in the industrial machine. The hosts shed light on the alienation and dissatisfaction that employees experienced due to Taylor's measures, which overlooked the potential benefits of happier, more engaged workers.

Taylorism failed to deliver on the promise of providing more leisure time and better wages for workers to enjoy with their fami ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The impacts and criticism of Taylor's efficiency principles

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Taylorism introduced standardization and efficiency that significantly improved productivity and economic growth during the industrial era.
  • The principles of Taylorism can be seen as a response to the inefficiencies of the time, aiming to optimize human labor and reduce waste.
  • Deskilling can also be viewed as a way to make complex tasks accessible to a broader range of workers, potentially creating employment opportunities for those with less specialized skills.
  • The segmentation of tasks allows for easier quality control and consistency in product manufacturing.
  • Systematic soldiering was a real issue that Taylorism addressed, which can be seen as a positive step towards fair work practices where pay is based on output rather than time spent.
  • Taylorism laid the foundation for later improvements in management theory, including the human relations movement and participative management styles that address worker wellbeing.
  • The principles of Taylorism, when applied with consideration for worker wellbeing, can lead to a more efficient allocation of resources and potentially higher wages due to increased productivity.
  • The division of l ...

Actionables

  • You can reflect on your current job role to identify areas where you feel like a "cog in the machine" and brainstorm ways to add more creativity or decision-making to your tasks. For example, if you're in a data entry position, you might suggest to your supervisor the implementation of a new data validation process that you can help design, adding a layer of critical thinking to your role.
  • Start a casual peer discussion group at work to share experiences and strategies for job security and satisfaction. This could be as simple as a lunchtime conversation where you and your colleagues discuss what aspects of your work give you a sense of purpose and what changes could be made to enhance that feeling, fostering a sense of community and shared problem-solving.
  • Evaluate your work-life balance and set personal boundaries t ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Taylorism: Work Faster!

The Gilbreths' approach to efficiency in the workplace and the home

Frank and Lillian Gilbreth dedicated their careers to finding efficient work methods, extending those principles to home life, truly foreshadowing modern strategies for work-life balance.

Frank and Lillian Gilbreth's background and consulting firm

The dynamic duo formed Gilbreth Inc., a management consulting firm, to focus on improving workplace efficiency. Frank, originally a bricklayer, held a firm belief that there was one best way to complete any task.

The Gilbreths also studied efficiency, developing a system of 18 "therbligs" or basic movements

The Gilbreths studied the movements required to carry out a task and identified 18 different movements they called therbligs. Their focus was on reducing the number of therbligs to maximize efficiency, which differed from Taylor's methods by aiming to increase efficiency to provide workers with more free time and happiness.

Applying efficiency principles in the home

Lillian Gilbreth continued the legacy of their consulting firm after Frank's death, extending their efficiency studies to the realm of domestic tasks and household management. She played a crucial role in making home management more efficient. Innovations such as the kitchen work triangle and the introduction of the kitchen island exemplify her efforts to streamline household work. Lillian was dedicated to finding the most efficient method for tasks to give individuals more free time and happiness.

Innovations like the "kitchen triangle" layout helped make household work more streamlined

The kitchen triangle, an essential concept in kitchen design, facilitates efficient movement between the sink, stove, oven, and refrigerator. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discussed this triangle, specu ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Gilbreths' approach to efficiency in the workplace and the home

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The belief in one best way to complete any task, as held by Frank Gilbreth, can be seen as overly simplistic and may not account for the variability in human capabilities and preferences.
  • The focus on efficiency, even with the goal of increasing free time and happiness, might inadvertently lead to an overemphasis on productivity at the expense of creativity and innovation.
  • The Gilbreths' methods, while groundbreaking, may not be universally applicable across all cultures and industries, as different work environments may require different approaches to efficiency.
  • The application of efficiency principles to home life could be criticized for attempting to turn domestic spaces into production-oriented environments, which may not align with everyone's values or desires for their home life.
  • The kitchen work triangle, while innovative, may not be the most efficient layout for all kitchens, especially as the size and shape of kitchens, as well as cooking habits, have evolved since Lillian Gilbreth's time.
  • The Gilbreths' influence on modern management and work-life balance might be overstated, as many other theorists and practitioners have contributed to these fiel ...

Actionables

  • You can analyze your daily routines to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps, creating your own set of "personal therbligs." Start by writing down the sequence of actions for a routine task, like getting ready in the morning. Look for movements or steps that don't contribute to the end goal and experiment with cutting them out or reordering them to streamline the process.
  • Develop a "happiness index" for your workplace tasks to prioritize your well-being. Make a list of your daily work activities and rate each one on how much satisfaction it brings you. Use this index to negotiate with your employer or restructure your workday to focus more on tasks that contribute to your happiness, aligning with the Gilbreths' aim for a humane workplace.
  • Redesign a room in y ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Taylorism: Work Faster!

The lasting influence of Taylor and the Gilbreths on management and productivity

The legacies of Frederick Taylor and Frank and Lillian Gilbreth have substantially influenced modern management practices and philosophies. Despite criticism, their ideas continue to shape how organizations think about productivity, worker efficiency, and management strategies.

Taylor's legacy and the rise of management consulting

Taylor's ideas led to the growth of management consulting firms that applied similar efficiency-focused principles

Frederick Taylor's involvement in the Interstate Commerce Commission hearing and later a congressional hearing played a significant role in promoting the growth of management consulting firms. These firms adopted efficiency-focused principles similar to Taylor's ideas to improve management practices across various industries.

These firms have been criticized for a lack of concern for worker wellbeing and a focus on short-term profits

Although Taylor was dismissed from Bethlehem Steel with a sum equivalent to around $3.5 million today, his "Taylor" system and methods continued to be scrutinized for their impact on management practices. Josh Clark raises concerns over management consulting firms by suggesting that their operations, derived from Taylor's ideas, may be considered fraudulent. This indicates a problematic nature within these firms, potentially connected to a disregard for worker wellbeing and an emphasis on short-term profits.

Taylorism's impact on education and the workforce

Taylor's principles influenced how public schools prepared students for industrial careers, emphasizing specialization over broad skills

Taylorism's effect extended to public schools which shifted their educational focus to equipping students with skills that would directly contribute to the industrial workforce. This approach to education prioritized practicality and cost-effectiveness, for instance reducing the emphasis on teaching subjects like Greek, in favor of more utilitarian skills.

The division of labor and deskilling of workers associated with Taylorism remains a feature of many modern workplaces

The division of labor and the deskilling of workers, hallmarks of Taylorism, remain prevalent in contemporary workplaces. While Taylor believed his efficiency principles would be mutually beneficial for workers and companies, promising more efficiency and potentially better wages for workers while reducing costs, this progressive outcome has often not materialized.

Enduring impact on productivity and ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The lasting influence of Taylor and the Gilbreths on management and productivity

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Taylor's principles may have led to the dehumanization of the workforce, treating workers more like machines than people.
  • The Gilbreths' focus on efficiency could be seen as ignoring the complexity of human needs and motivations beyond productivity.
  • Management consulting firms may not always prioritize efficiency over worker wellbeing; some firms advocate for sustainable practices that consider long-term employee satisfaction and retention.
  • The specialization in education influenced by Taylorism might overlook the importance of a well-rounded education that fosters critical thinking and adaptability.
  • The division of labor has been criticized for potentially stifling creativity and innovation by limiting the scope of an individual's work.
  • Modern management theories have evolved to include more holistic and employee-centric approaches that challenge the purely efficiency-driven models of Taylorism and the Gilbreths.
  • The influence of Taylorism and the Gilbreths on households and schools could be overstated, as these institutions are also shaped by a wide array of soci ...

Actionables

  • You can reflect on your daily routines to identify areas where efficiency can boost your happiness, inspired by the Gilbreths' approach. Start by keeping a journal for a week, noting down all your activities and the time they take. Look for patterns where you might be able to streamline tasks, such as meal prep or email management, with the goal of reducing stress and creating more time for activities that bring you joy.
  • Develop a personal specialization plan to enhance your career prospects, taking a cue from the emphasis on specialization in schools. Identify the skills most in demand within your industry and create a roadmap for acquiring them. This could involve online courses, volunteering for specific projects at work, or even starting a side project that allows you to practice these skills in a real-world context.
  • Create a home-based division of labor syst ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA