Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > The Strange Story of Lysol

The Strange Story of Lysol

By iHeartPodcasts

Lysol, the household disinfectant, has a surprising backstory. In this episode of the Stuff You Should Know podcast, Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explore Lysol's origins, its controversial history as an ineffective and potentially dangerous contraceptive, and its evolution into a household cleaner.

The hosts shed light on the current marketing of disinfectants like Lysol during the COVID-19 pandemic. They also delve into the potential health and environmental impacts of disinfectants, examining the "hygiene hypothesis" linking overly sterile environments to autoimmune diseases, and the exploration of alternative disinfection methods like UV light.

Listen to the original

The Strange Story of Lysol

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 3, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Strange Story of Lysol

1-Page Summary

Lysol's Origins and Early History

Invented in 1889

Lysol was invented in 1889 by German chemist Gustav Raupinstrauch as a medical disinfectant containing 50% creosol in soap, as an alternative to the more toxic carbolic acid used at the time. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark highlight that Lysol quickly gained popularity in hospitals and medical settings as an antiseptic.

However, by the early 1900s, concerns arose about Lysol's caustic nature causing patient burns and skin irritation. The AMA Council explicitly raised these concerns in 1912.

Lysol's Controversial Use as a Contraceptive

Marketed as "Feminine Hygiene" for Contraception

In a surprising marketing shift in the 1910s, Lysol's manufacturers repositioned the product for home "feminine hygiene" use as an illegal contraceptive. Bryant and Clark note it was promoted for use as a post-coital vaginal douche to prevent pregnancy.

Most Widely Used Contraceptive Despite Dangers

Lysol became the most popular contraceptive in the U.S. from the 1930s to 1960s, despite being ineffective and potentially dangerous. A 1933 study cited by Clark found about 50% of 507 women using Lysol for contraception still became pregnant.

Exploiting women's insecurities through advertising, Lysol promotions suggested using it as key to marital satisfaction. However, its caustic cresol content led to inflammation, scarring, and even deaths from poisoning when used vaginally.

Lysol's Evolution as a Household Disinfectant

Pivoted Marketing in 1950s

In the 1950s, Lysol transitioned away from contraceptive marketing towards safer use as a reformulated household disinfectant product.

Sales Surge During COVID-19 Pandemic

Bryant and Clark describe how during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic, Lysol sales surged 12% as disinfectants were highly sought after, with 35 million cans produced per month in North America.

However, the CDC warned about potential long-term health impacts from excessive disinfectant use disrupting the microbiome. This highlighted the importance of safe, educated use despite record sales driven by the public health crisis.

The Potential Health and Environmental Impacts

The Hygiene Hypothesis on Autoimmune Diseases

The "hygiene hypothesis" posited by bacteriologist Graham Rook suggests the rise of autoimmune diseases may be linked to overly sterile modern environments killing microbes that help train the immune system. Supporting evidence comes from lower rates of such conditions in less industrialized areas.

How Disinfectants Like Lysol Work

Clark explains that Lysol contains quaternary ammonium compounds like benzalkonium chloride that destroy microbes by denaturing cells and coagulating proteins. At recommended potencies around 2.4%, they are effective germ-killers but highly concentrated forms pose ingestion and absorption dangers.

Alternatives Like UV Light Disinfection

Emerging technologies like germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) light offer potential as disinfectants by using a far-UV spectrum that cannot penetrate human skin and eyes. However, they may create indoor air pollution via ozone production when interacting with other particles.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While Lysol was indeed popular as an antiseptic in medical settings, it's important to consider that its widespread use was due to the lack of better alternatives at the time, rather than it being the ideal solution.
  • The AMA Council's concerns in 1912 about Lysol's caustic nature could be contextualized by noting that many products of that era were not subject to the rigorous safety testing standards we have today.
  • The marketing of Lysol as a contraceptive could be critiqued not just for its ineffectiveness and danger but also for the lack of ethical standards in advertising during that time period.
  • The statistic about 50% of women using Lysol still becoming pregnant could be challenged by questioning the methodology of the 1933 study, as historical studies often lacked the controls and rigor of modern clinical trials.
  • The transition of Lysol to a household disinfectant in the 1950s could be seen as a positive move, but it also raises questions about the company's responsibility and the regulatory environment that allowed its previous use as a contraceptive.
  • The surge in Lysol sales during the COVID-19 pandemic could be critiqued from an environmental perspective, considering the potential increase in plastic waste from disinfectant containers.
  • The CDC's warning about the microbiome could be supplemented with a discussion on the balance between disinfection and maintaining a healthy microbial environment.
  • The "hygiene hypothesis" is a theory that has been debated, and it's worth noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between cleanliness and autoimmune diseases.
  • The effectiveness of quaternary ammonium compounds in Lysol could be contrasted with concerns about antimicrobial resistance and the potential environmental impact of these chemicals when they enter waterways.
  • The mention of GUV light as an alternative disinfection method could be balanced by noting that while it avoids some chemical risks, it may not be as practical or effective in all settings and could have its own unforeseen long-term effects.

Actionables

  • You can create a balanced home hygiene plan by scheduling regular cleaning with mild disinfectants and incorporating natural microbial exposure, like having indoor plants or safely spending time outdoors, to potentially support a healthy microbiome.
    • This approach aims to strike a balance between maintaining cleanliness and avoiding an overly sterile environment that could contribute to the hygiene hypothesis concerns. For example, instead of using strong disinfectants daily, opt for them when cleaning high-touch surfaces weekly, and use gentler cleaning agents like vinegar or soap and water for routine cleaning.
  • Opt for safer disinfection methods by using products with recommended potencies and proper ventilation, and explore non-chemical alternatives like steam cleaning for certain areas in your home.
    • This reduces the risk of health issues from overexposure to potent chemicals. For instance, you might use a steam cleaner for your bathroom tiles and reserve chemical disinfectants for kitchen countertops, always ensuring the room is well-ventilated during and after cleaning.
  • Educate yourself on the proper use and risks of household chemicals by reading product labels thoroughly and following the manufacturer's safety guidelines, and consider attending a local community workshop on safe cleaning practices if available.
    • Understanding the active ingredients and their concentrations can help you make informed decisions about the products you use in your home. For example, if a product contains a high concentration of quaternary ammonium compounds, you might use it sparingly and with gloves, or choose a different product with safer ingredients for regular use.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Strange Story of Lysol

Lysol's Origins and Early History

Lysol, a product known worldwide for its disinfecting properties, has its roots in the late 19th century. It originated from the pursuit of combating infectious diseases in medical settings.

Lysol was invented in 1889 by German chemist Gustav Raupinstrauch as a medical disinfectant.

Invented in 1889 by German chemist Gustav Raupinstrauch, Lysol was intended to act as a medical disinfectant to help control infectious diseases and save lives.

Lysol's original formula was 50% creosol in soap, which was less toxic than the carbolic acid that was commonly used for disinfection at the time.

Lysol's initial formula comprised 50% creosol in soap, forming a brown-colored germ-killing solution. This was a significant development as creosol was considered less poisonous than the formerly used carbolic acid, making Lysol a safer option for disinfecting purposes at the time.

Lysol gained popularity in the late 1800s and early 1900s as an antiseptic used in hospitals and medical settings.

Lysol became widely recognized and used as an antiseptic in medical facilities. However, despite its popularity, concerns about its safety began to surfac ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Lysol's Origins and Early History

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The assertion that Lysol's original formula was safer than carbolic acid could be challenged by noting that "safer" is a relative term, and even though creosol was less toxic, it still posed significant health risks.
  • The popularity of Lysol in medical settings might be nuanced by discussing the lack of alternative antiseptics at the time, which could have contributed to its widespread use rather than a universal endorsement of its effectiveness.
  • The mention of concerns about Lysol's caustic na ...

Actionables

  • You can explore the evolution of household disinfectants by comparing the ingredients of modern cleaners with those of historical products like Lysol. Look at the labels of various disinfectants you have at home and research their active ingredients online. This will give you an understanding of how product formulations have changed over time and why, which can inform your choices when purchasing cleaning supplies.
  • Create a personal safety checklist for handling household chemicals based on the historical concerns about Lysol's causticity. Include guidelines like wearing gloves, ensuring proper ventilation, and never mixing chemicals. This proactive approach will help you use household cleaners safely and prevent skin irritation or other hazards.
  • Engage in a DIY project to make a simple, non-caustic disinf ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Strange Story of Lysol

Lysol's Controversial Use as a Contraceptive

In an astonishing twist of historical marketing, Lysol, now a household disinfectant brand, was once controversially repositioned as a women's contraceptive. This repositioning led to widespread use and serious health consequences.

In the 1910s, Lysol's manufacturers shifted their marketing strategy to position the product as a "feminine hygiene" solution for home use.

In 1912, as hospitals ceased the use of Lysol due to safety concerns, the manufacturers decided to target women for home use, specifically for cleaning reproductive organs. This shift in marketing portrayed Lysol as a preventative solution for pregnancy.

This allowed them to market Lysol as an illegal contraceptive, as it was promoted as a way for women to douche after intercourse to prevent pregnancy.

The ability to market Lysol as a "feminine hygiene" product covertly allowed it to be pitched as an illegal contraceptive method. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark highlight that Lysol was ultimately marketed to women as a post-coital vaginal douche to prevent pregnancy. The term "feminine hygiene" itself became a euphemism for contraception through douching.

Lysol became the most widely used contraceptive in the United States from the 1930s through the 1960s, despite being ineffective and potentially dangerous.

Clark underscores the ineffectiveness of this method with a study from 1933, which pointed out that of 507 women using Lysol for contraception, about half became pregnant. However, it remained in use as a contraceptive until the 1960s, when the introduction of the pill brought about its abrupt discontinuation for this purpose.

Lysol advertisements during this period exploited women's insecurities about sex and marital life to promote the product's contraceptive use.

Lysol’s marketing campaigns played on gendered insecurities to sell the product, suggesting that a woman's desirability and marital satisfaction hinged on her "cleanliness." Ads portrayed scenarios where lack of use led to a loss of m ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Lysol's Controversial Use as a Contraceptive

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Lysol was marketed as a contraceptive from the 1910s to the 1960s, despite being ineffective and dangerous. The shift in marketing occurred in 1912 when hospitals stopped using Lysol due to safety concerns, prompting manufacturers to target women for home use. Lysol was promoted as a post-coital vaginal douche to prevent pregnancy, exploiting insecurities about sex and marital life. The contraceptive use of Lysol declined in the 1960s with the introduction of the birth control pill.
  • Lysol, when used as a contraceptive, posed serious health risks to women. It could cause inflammation, scarring, and even fatalities due to the absorption of harmful chemicals like quaternary ammonium compounds through the vaginal tissue. Additionally, the cresol content in Lysol made it particularly dangerous and had been associated with illegal abortions. These risks highlight the severe consequences of using Lysol for contraception.
  • Lysol's marketing campaigns in the past exploited women's insecurities by suggesting that a woman's desirability and marital satisfaction were linked to her cleanliness. Ads implied that not using Lysol could lead to a loss of intimacy in marriage, playing on fears of being undesirable to their husbands. The marketing implied that using Lysol could help restore marital bliss, creating a narrative that tied a woman's worth to the product's use. These tactics preyed on societal pressures and anxieties around femininity, marriage, and intimacy.
  • Lysol contained harmful chemicals like cresol and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). These chemicals could cau ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Strange Story of Lysol

Lysol's Evolution as a Household Disinfectant Brand

Lysol has evolved from its controversial history as a marketed contraceptive to being part of everyday household cleaning, especially noted during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic.

In the 1950s, Lysol started transitioning away from its contraceptive marketing and towards promoting its use as a household disinfectant.

In the 1950s, Lysol began to pivot away from marketing its product as a contraceptive, a use that had dangerously misled many consumers. The brand reformulated its product to be less toxic, replacing harmful ingredients like creosol with safer chemicals, to promote its use more responsibly as a household disinfectant.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021, Lysol saw a huge increase in sales as people sought out disinfectants, leading to concerns about overuse and potential health impacts.

During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Lysol sales soared, with a notable 12% increase in just one year and the company producing 35 million cans per month in North America. Specifically recommended by the CDC for its effectiveness against COVID due to its ingredient benzalkonium saccharate, Lysol became a staple in pandemic mitigation measures.

However, as the pandemic eased and daily life began to return to some sense of normalcy, people started to stow away their cans of Lysol, leading to a subsequent decline in sales. Despite the increase in sales and widespread adoption of the product, Lysol and other disinfectant brands took the step of warning against the ingestion of their products, reacting to some errant advice ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Lysol's Evolution as a Household Disinfectant Brand

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The transition from contraceptive marketing to household disinfectant may not have been solely motivated by safety concerns but also by changing market demands and regulatory pressures.
  • While Lysol reformulated to be less toxic, it's important to consider that even modern formulations can contain chemicals that may pose health risks with improper use.
  • The increase in Lysol sales during the pandemic could be seen not just as a response to increased demand for disinfectants but also as a result of aggressive marketing and public fear.
  • The CDC's recommendation of Lysol for its effectiveness against COVID-19 should be balanced with an understanding that no disinfectant can guarantee complete protection against the virus, and that proper ventilation and handwashing are also crucial.
  • The decline in Lysol sales post-pandemic might reflect not only a return to normalcy but also a growing public awareness of the potential risks associated with chemical disinfectants.
  • Warnings against ingesting products like Lysol, while necessary, may overshadow the need for broader education on the safe and effective use of disinfecta ...

Actionables

  • You can create a balanced cleaning schedule that limits the use of disinfectants to situations where they're most effective, such as cleaning up after raw meat or when someone in the household is ill. This approach helps reduce the risk of disrupting the natural microbial balance in your home. For example, use soap and water for routine cleaning and save Lysol for high-risk areas.
  • Develop a habit of reading and following product labels for proper usage to ensure safety and effectiveness. For instance, if a label says to use gloves or ventilate the area, make sure to do so every time. This practice can prevent accidental poisonings and misuse of products like disinfectants.
  • Consider integrating natural cleaning alt ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Strange Story of Lysol

The Potential Health and Environmental Impacts of Disinfectant Use

An examination of the increased use of disinfectants like Lysol reveals both potential health repercussions for individuals and wider environmental impacts. The "hygiene hypothesis" suggests that this surge could be contributing to a rise in autoimmune diseases due to reduced exposure to necessary microbes.

Overuse of disinfectants and the hygiene hypothesis

The hygiene hypothesis posits that overly sterile conditions in industrialized countries might predispose individuals to autoimmune diseases due to a lack of exposure to a variety of germs during childhood. Bacteriologist Graham Rook suggested that the human immune system has evolved with certain microbes, essential for immune system training, which are wiped out by disinfectants. Studies, such as one comparing Finnish, Estonian, and Russian children, found that those from the more industrialized countries had immune systems less exposed to microbes like E. coli, which are necessary to promote a healthy immune response. Clark also remarks that autoimmune diseases became more prevalent after the generation that began using disinfectants, pointing to a significant circumstantial evidence.

High disinfectant use in the U.S. could be problematic if it is indeed killing beneficial microbes that help train our immune system. Comparative studies show lower rates of conditions like food allergies and type 1 diabetes in less developed countries, where there is less exposure to disinfectants and a greater variety of microbial exposures.

The effects of Lysol and other disinfectants

Disinfectants work by destroying microbes' protective layers, causing them to die. Lysol contains a quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) called benzalkonium chloride, potent at concentrations as low as 2.4%. When combined with alcohol, QACs become even more effective at killing germs. These substances can denature cells and coagulate proteins, wiping out bacteria.

For disinfectants to be effective, they need to be used at a minimum inhibitory concentration. Lysol is often used at a potency of 2.4%, with recommended conta ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Potential Health and Environmental Impacts of Disinfectant Use

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The hygiene hypothesis suggests that reduced exposure to germs in early childhood due to overly clean environments may lead to an increased risk of autoimmune diseases later in life. This theory proposes that a lack of microbial exposure can impact the development of the immune system, potentially contributing to the rise in autoimmune conditions in industrialized societies. The hypothesis highlights the importance of a balanced immune system, which requires early encounters with various microbes to develop properly. Studies have shown that children in less industrialized settings with higher microbial exposure tend to have lower rates of certain autoimmune diseases compared to those in more sanitized environments.
  • Disinfectants like Lysol work by destroying microbes' protective layers, leading to their death. Lysol contains a compound called benzalkonium chloride, which is effective at killing germs by denaturing cells and coagulating proteins. When combined with alcohol, this compound becomes even more potent at eliminating bacteria. Effective disinfection requires using these substances at specific concentrations and following recommended contact times on surfaces.
  • Super concentrated Lysol can be hazardous due to its potential inclusion of endocrine disruptors and possibly antifreeze. Ingesting or skin absorption of such concentrated forms can be dangerous. Chronic exposure to these substances may carry risks, although this area lacks comprehensive study.
  • Germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) light is a technology that uses a specific type of UV light, known as far-UV light, to disinfect by killing bacteria and vir ...

Counterarguments

  • The hygiene hypothesis is not universally accepted, and some experts argue that the rise in autoimmune diseases is due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors, not just reduced exposure to microbes.
  • There is ongoing debate about the role of specific microbes in immune system development, and it's possible that not all microbes are beneficial or necessary for immune training.
  • The lower rates of allergies and autoimmune diseases in less developed countries could also be attributed to factors other than disinfectant use, such as dietary differences, genetic factors, or other environmental exposures.
  • While Lysol and other disinfectants can be harmful in high concentrations, when used as directed, they are generally considered safe and effective for controlling harmful pathogens in various settings.
  • The potential risks associated with benzalkonium chloride in disinfectants like Lysol need to be weighed against the benefits of preventing infection, especially in healthcare settings where the risk of disease transmission is high.
  • The assertion that super concentrated Lysol contains antifreeze may be misleading, as the specifi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA