Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

By iHeartPodcasts

In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, Sarah Sanger-Katz explores the historical practice of tarring and feathering—a brutal form of public humiliation and torture. She details the harrowing process in which victims were stripped, coated in hot tar, and covered in feathers, making them resemble "giant chickens." Sanger-Katz provides examples of notorious cases, including an 18th-century customs officer who was nearly drowned after being tarred and feathered.

The episode sheds light on how tarring and feathering evolved from a criminal punishment to a tool of political dissent and class discrimination during the American Revolution. While largely abandoned today, Sanger-Katz recounts a chilling 1981 incident that illustrates the brutality's modern resurgence. Overall, the episode offers an eye-opening look at this shocking historical practice.

Listen to the original

Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Aug 14, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

1-Page Summary

The Process of Tarring and Feathering

As Sanger-Katz explains, tarring and feathering served as a form of public humiliation and torture that was as painful as it was degrading, often accompanied by additional violence.

Stripping and Tarring the Victim

Victims would be stripped, sometimes fully nude, then have hot, sticky pine tar brushed onto their body. While not as hot as petroleum-based tar today, Sanger-Katz notes it was still hot enough to blister and burn the skin painfully.

Applying Feathers and Parading the Victim

After applying the tar, the mob would dump feathers on the victim, making them appear like a "big chicken." They would then parade the victim through town on a cart or rail, further humiliating them. Mobs also commonly beat, whipped, or otherwise physically abused victims during these processions.

Historical Examples

William Smith in 1766

In 1766, a sea captain named William Smith was tarred and feathered in Norfolk, Virginia for allegedly informing a royal official about smuggling activity. Beyond the tarring and feathering itself, Smith was also nearly drowned when tossed off a wharf.

John Malcolm in 1774

Customs official John Malcolm was brutally attacked by a mob in Boston in 1774. In addition to the tarring and feathering, Barbaro details how Malcolm was punched with poles, beaten with clubs, dragged to the gallows, and whipped repeatedly, causing his flesh to blister and tear off his back.

Social and Political Context

Originally Criminal Punishment, Then Revolutionary Tool

Tarring and feathering initially served as formal punishment for criminals, but Sanger-Katz explains it was later co-opted by revolutionary groups like the Sons of Liberty to target British loyalists, customs officials, and those unsympathetic to colonial independence.

Class-Based Discrimination

There was a class element to who was targeted. Sanger-Katz notes British officers and wealthy colonists loyal to the crown were generally spared the brutality of tarring and feathering, which was reserved for punishing those of lower social status.

A Rare Modern Case

While tarring and feathering declined after the American Revolution as legal systems developed, Sanger-Katz highlights a shocking 1981 case in Alabama where two sisters tarred and feathered a woman at gunpoint, illustrating the brutal practice's resurgence centuries later.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding of historical punishments by comparing tarring and feathering to modern-day cyberbullying. Reflect on the similarities in public humiliation and the psychological impact on victims, and consider writing a blog post or social media thread to share your insights and raise awareness about the long-term effects of public shaming.
  • Explore the theme of class-based discrimination by volunteering at a local legal aid organization. By assisting with cases or administrative tasks, you'll gain firsthand experience of how socio-economic status can still influence the treatment of individuals within the legal system, drawing parallels to historical practices.
  • To grasp the evolution of punitive practices, create a visual timeline that includes tarring and feathering alongside other historical and contemporary forms of punishment. Use this as a tool to educate others or as a personal reference to understand how societal values and methods of discipline have changed over time.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

The mechanics and process of tarring and feathering

Tarring and feathering served as a form of public humiliation and punishment that was as painful as it was degrading, often accompanied by additional acts of violence.

Tarring and feathering involved stripping the victim down and applying hot, sticky pine tar to their body

The process of tarring and feathering would often begin by stripping the victim. Most commonly, this meant removing the victim's shirt, but at times it could involve stripping them of all their clothes, leaving them exposed and vulnerable. Following this, the perpetrators would brush hot pine tar, a sticky substance used for waterproofing ships and sails as well as on baseball bats, onto the victim's body. While this pine tar wasn't as hot as the petroleum-based tar we’re familiar with today, it was nonetheless hot enough to blister and burn the skin, causing severe pain and discomfort.

After applying the tar, the mob would dump feathers on the victim, making them appear like a "big chicken"

The next step in this cruel ordeal was to dump feathers on the tar-covered victim, sticking to the hot tar and adding to the humiliation by making the individual appear like a bizarre, human-sized chicken.

The victim would then be paraded through town on a cart or wooden rail, further humiliating them

Once the victi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The mechanics and process of tarring and feathering

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Tarring and feathering was a form of public humiliation and punishment commonly practiced in the American colonies during the 18th century, particularly leading up to and during the American Revolutionary War. This method was often used by colonists to punish individuals seen as betraying the community or supporting British authorities. It was a brutal and degrading practice that aimed to shame and intimidate those who were perceived as going against the interests of the local population. The act of tarring and feathering declined in usage as the United States gained independence and established a more formal legal system.
  • The hot pine tar used in tarring and feathering was typically heated in a large metal container over a fire until it reached a viscous, spreadable consistency. Once sufficiently heated, the pine tar was applied to the victim's body using brushes or other tools, ensuring it covered the skin evenly. The heat of the tar, although not as extreme as modern petroleum-based tar, was still enough to cause burns and blisters on the victim's skin. This process was a crucial part of the humiliation and pain inflicted during tarring and feathering.
  • Tarring and feathering was used as a form of public humiliation and punishment, often targeting individuals seen as traitors or criminals. It aimed to shame and intimidate dissenters or those who went against community norms. The act was a way for a group to assert power and control over individuals deemed as threats to social order. It was a brutal method to enforce conformity and discourage behavior considered unacceptable.
  • ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

Notable historical cases and examples of tarring and feathering

Tarring and feathering was a form of public humiliation and punishment used in colonial America. Here are two historical cases where this punishment was infamously applied.

In 1766, a sea captain named William Smith was tarred and feathered in Norfolk, Virginia for allegedly tipping off a royal official about smuggling

Smith was accused of informing a royal official about smuggling, which led to his tarring and feathering. During the ordeal, Smith was humiliated by being carted through every street in the town with two drums beating to draw attention. In addition to this public embarrassment, Smith was tossed off a wharf and nearly drowned as part of his punishment.

In 1774, customs official John Malcolm was brutally tarred and feathered by a mob in Boston

One of the most brutal episodes of tarring and feathering involved John Malcolm, a customs official, in Boston. Malcolm had struck a supporter of the Patriots in 1774. His action angered a mob, which led to a vicious cycle of retaliation. The mob took things into their own hands by not only tarring and feathering him but also punching him with a long pole, beating him with clubs, lead ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Notable historical cases and examples of tarring and feathering

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Tarring and feathering was a brutal form of public humiliation and punishment used in colonial America to shame and intimidate individuals who were seen as betraying the community or going against popular sentiment. It involved covering a person in hot tar and then feathers, which caused extreme discomfort and often physical harm. This practice was a way for the community to enforce social norms and maintain order through public spectacle and violence. Tarring and feathering was often carried out by mobs or vigilante groups outside the official legal system.
  • The Liberty Tree was a famous elm tree in Boston that became a symbol of resistance against British rule. It was a gathering place for colonists protesting against British policies, serving as a focal point for revolutionary activities. The tree was adorned with flags, effigies, and notices of protest, becoming a powerful visual representation of colonial defiance. The Sons of Liberty often met under the Liberty Tree to plan their resistance efforts and organize protests against British authorities.
  • The Patriots were American colonists who supported the independence of the Thirteen Colonies from British rule. They opposed British policies and taxation without representation, leading to the American Revolutionary War. Patriots were often in conflict with Loyalists, who remained loyal to the Bri ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Tarring and Feathering

The social and political context behind the use of tarring and feathering in colonial America

The heinous practice of tarring and feathering in colonial America had its roots in criminal justice but evolved into a tool of mob retribution wielded by revolutionary groups.

Tarring and feathering was initially used as a form of punishment against criminals, but was later co-opted by the Sons of Liberty and other revolutionary groups

Initially, tarring and feathering served as punishment for criminals, but with the political climate intensifying, particularly after the enactment of the Townsend Acts, the practice was co-opted by revolutionary factions. The Sons of Liberty and other revolutionaries began using this brutish method approximately three years after an incident involving one Mr. Smith, targeting individuals they identified as loyal to British rule or unsupportive of the colonial cause for independence.

They used it to target loyalists, customs officials, and others seen as sympathetic to the British crown

As tensions grew in the colonies, particularly in Boston, customs officials, British loyalists, and others who did not display support for the revolutionary movement increasingly became victims of tarring and feathering. This violent act of retribution became a public spectacle that served as a warning to others.

There was a class-based element to who was targeted, as higher-status British officers and wealthy colonists were generally spared

The savage practice was not administered indiscriminately. There was a clear class-based discrimination in its application, as it was widely regarded as a punishment for those of lower social standing. British officers and wealthy colonists loyal to the crown were often spared from such humiliation, indicating the intent ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The social and political context behind the use of tarring and feathering in colonial America

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Townsend Acts were a series of British laws passed in the late 1760s to regulate trade and raise revenue in the American colonies. They were named after Charles Townshend, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer who proposed them. These acts imposed taxes on various goods imported into the colonies and were met with resistance, contributing to the growing tensions that eventually led to the American Revolution.
  • The Sons of Liberty was a clandestine political organization in the American Colonies that opposed British taxation and sought to advance colonial rights. They played a significant role in resisting measures like the Stamp Act and were known for their sometimes violent tactics. The group operated in a decentralized manner and used symbols like the Liberty Tree to organize resistance against British rule. Their motto, "No taxation without representation," encapsulated their core belief in colonial self-governance.
  • In the context of tarring and feathering in colonial America, there was a clear class-based element ...

Counterarguments

  • The practice of tarring and feathering may not have been as uniformly applied as suggested; there could have been instances where individuals of higher status were targeted under specific circumstances.
  • The adoption of tarring and feathering by revolutionary groups might have been more complex, with some factions possibly opposing its use on moral or strategic grounds.
  • The targeting of individuals by revolutionary groups could have been more nuanced, with some people being targeted not only for loyalty to the British crown but also for personal disputes or local politics.
  • The decline of tarring and feathering after the American Revolution might not have been as sharp or complete as implied, with the practice potentially li ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA