In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, Sarah Sanger-Katz explores the historical practice of tarring and feathering—a brutal form of public humiliation and torture. She details the harrowing process in which victims were stripped, coated in hot tar, and covered in feathers, making them resemble "giant chickens." Sanger-Katz provides examples of notorious cases, including an 18th-century customs officer who was nearly drowned after being tarred and feathered.
The episode sheds light on how tarring and feathering evolved from a criminal punishment to a tool of political dissent and class discrimination during the American Revolution. While largely abandoned today, Sanger-Katz recounts a chilling 1981 incident that illustrates the brutality's modern resurgence. Overall, the episode offers an eye-opening look at this shocking historical practice.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
As Sanger-Katz explains, tarring and feathering served as a form of public humiliation and torture that was as painful as it was degrading, often accompanied by additional violence.
Victims would be stripped, sometimes fully nude, then have hot, sticky pine tar brushed onto their body. While not as hot as petroleum-based tar today, Sanger-Katz notes it was still hot enough to blister and burn the skin painfully.
After applying the tar, the mob would dump feathers on the victim, making them appear like a "big chicken." They would then parade the victim through town on a cart or rail, further humiliating them. Mobs also commonly beat, whipped, or otherwise physically abused victims during these processions.
In 1766, a sea captain named William Smith was tarred and feathered in Norfolk, Virginia for allegedly informing a royal official about smuggling activity. Beyond the tarring and feathering itself, Smith was also nearly drowned when tossed off a wharf.
Customs official John Malcolm was brutally attacked by a mob in Boston in 1774. In addition to the tarring and feathering, Barbaro details how Malcolm was punched with poles, beaten with clubs, dragged to the gallows, and whipped repeatedly, causing his flesh to blister and tear off his back.
Tarring and feathering initially served as formal punishment for criminals, but Sanger-Katz explains it was later co-opted by revolutionary groups like the Sons of Liberty to target British loyalists, customs officials, and those unsympathetic to colonial independence.
There was a class element to who was targeted. Sanger-Katz notes British officers and wealthy colonists loyal to the crown were generally spared the brutality of tarring and feathering, which was reserved for punishing those of lower social status.
While tarring and feathering declined after the American Revolution as legal systems developed, Sanger-Katz highlights a shocking 1981 case in Alabama where two sisters tarred and feathered a woman at gunpoint, illustrating the brutal practice's resurgence centuries later.
1-Page Summary
Tarring and feathering served as a form of public humiliation and punishment that was as painful as it was degrading, often accompanied by additional acts of violence.
The process of tarring and feathering would often begin by stripping the victim. Most commonly, this meant removing the victim's shirt, but at times it could involve stripping them of all their clothes, leaving them exposed and vulnerable. Following this, the perpetrators would brush hot pine tar, a sticky substance used for waterproofing ships and sails as well as on baseball bats, onto the victim's body. While this pine tar wasn't as hot as the petroleum-based tar we’re familiar with today, it was nonetheless hot enough to blister and burn the skin, causing severe pain and discomfort.
The next step in this cruel ordeal was to dump feathers on the tar-covered victim, sticking to the hot tar and adding to the humiliation by making the individual appear like a bizarre, human-sized chicken.
Once the victi ...
The mechanics and process of tarring and feathering
Tarring and feathering was a form of public humiliation and punishment used in colonial America. Here are two historical cases where this punishment was infamously applied.
Smith was accused of informing a royal official about smuggling, which led to his tarring and feathering. During the ordeal, Smith was humiliated by being carted through every street in the town with two drums beating to draw attention. In addition to this public embarrassment, Smith was tossed off a wharf and nearly drowned as part of his punishment.
One of the most brutal episodes of tarring and feathering involved John Malcolm, a customs official, in Boston. Malcolm had struck a supporter of the Patriots in 1774. His action angered a mob, which led to a vicious cycle of retaliation. The mob took things into their own hands by not only tarring and feathering him but also punching him with a long pole, beating him with clubs, lead ...
Notable historical cases and examples of tarring and feathering
The heinous practice of tarring and feathering in colonial America had its roots in criminal justice but evolved into a tool of mob retribution wielded by revolutionary groups.
Initially, tarring and feathering served as punishment for criminals, but with the political climate intensifying, particularly after the enactment of the Townsend Acts, the practice was co-opted by revolutionary factions. The Sons of Liberty and other revolutionaries began using this brutish method approximately three years after an incident involving one Mr. Smith, targeting individuals they identified as loyal to British rule or unsupportive of the colonial cause for independence.
As tensions grew in the colonies, particularly in Boston, customs officials, British loyalists, and others who did not display support for the revolutionary movement increasingly became victims of tarring and feathering. This violent act of retribution became a public spectacle that served as a warning to others.
The savage practice was not administered indiscriminately. There was a clear class-based discrimination in its application, as it was widely regarded as a punishment for those of lower social standing. British officers and wealthy colonists loyal to the crown were often spared from such humiliation, indicating the intent ...
The social and political context behind the use of tarring and feathering in colonial America
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser