In this Stuff You Should Know episode, the hosts delve into the intriguing phenomenon known as the "call of the void"—the inexplicable urge to jump from high places. The summary examines philosophical perspectives on this human experience, including existentialist views that link it to the anxiety sparked by our freedom of choice.
It also explores psychological research shedding light on the underlying mechanisms that may trigger these intrusive thoughts. The hosts discuss theories about the potential involvement of primitive "lizard brain" impulses and the role of the prefrontal cortex's ability to suppress dangerous urges. Overall, the episode provides an illuminating look into this perplexing yet common human experience.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
According to Josh Clark, the existentialists viewed the call of the void as a manifestation of the underlying anxiety stemming from our freedom of choice in life. Kierkegaard called it the "dizziness of freedom," while Sartre expanded on this with the "vertigo of possibility" - the dread from realizing our future selves carry the same boundless freedom to act.
Philosopher Garry Coxe argued that the call of the void exposes the "bad faith" or self-delusions by which we fool ourselves about our true freedom to make choices, as Josh Clark explains.
The call of the void, or urge to jump from high places, is experienced by over 30% of people, according to Chuck Bryant. Studies show a strong link between anxiety and these intrusive thoughts.
While common, Jennifer Hames and colleagues found that a genuine urge to jump is much rarer than merely thinking about it. Contrary to Freud's theory of an innate self-destructive drive, research indicates these urges are often fleeting and reflective of appreciating being alive.
Josh Clark discusses a theory that the call of the void stems from a conflict between primitive fear instincts interpreted erroneously by the "lizard brain" as urging us to jump to safety, while our rational mind overrules this impulse.
Neuroscientist Emil Gabriel Bruno speculates that damage to the prefrontal cortex, essential for impulse control, could potentially impair one's ability to suppress the dangerous urges associated with the call of the void, leading people to act on them inappropriately.
1-Page Summary
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into the existential interpretations of the philosophical phenomenon known as the call of the void. They examine views from prominent existentialists Søren Kierkegaard and Jean-Paul Sartre, and reflect on philosopher Garry Coxe's contributions to the understanding of this intriguing experience.
Josh Clark expresses his agreement with existentialists about the nature of the self and our choices. He explains that there is no solid self, but a series of ongoing decisions, highlighting the fluidity of our identities.
Kierkegaard believed that anxiety arises not from external threats but from internal, existential ones. He suggested that what we commonly refer to as the call of the void is the "dizziness of freedom," a reaction to the realization of the vast array of choices before us without clear direction on which paths to take.
Both Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant discuss the "vertigo of possibility," a phrase that encapsulates the anxiety related to the multitude of choices one has throughout life. Sartre's expansion on Kierkegaard's idea brings forth the notion that our future selves continuously carry the weight of this freedom, leading to dread about the unpredictability and responsibi ...
Philosophical perspectives on the call of the void
Recent psychological research sheds light on the perplexing phenomenon known as the "call of the void," revealing its prevalence and the nature of the experience.
Studies have found that the call of the void, an urge to jump from high places, is experienced by over 30% of people, according to Chuck Bryant.
Among those who had never experienced suicidal ideation, 17% reported having the urge to jump at least one time. This rate increased among individuals with a history of suicidal feelings, with half reporting the urge to jump. In the general population, 74% of people with suicidal ideation and 43% of non-suicidal individuals have thought about jumping.
Research shows a strong correlation between the call of the void and experiences of anxiety, suggesting anxious individuals are more prone to these intrusive thoughts. Tobias Teissmann and his colleagues at Ruhr-University Bochum surveyed people with and without suicidal ideation, as well as patients with a fear of flying. They found that 80% of people with suicidal ideation had experienced the call of the void, with 45% of non-suicidal individuals also reporting the experience.
Researchers are working to differentiate between mere thoughts of jumping and a genuine urge to do so.
Jennifer Hames and her colleagues at Florida State University termed this urge the "high places phenomenon" after a study of FSU students revealed that over 30% had experienced the urge to jump, distinguishing it from actual suicidal ideation. They affirm that merely thinking about jumping is much more common than the rarer genuine urge or impulse to do so.
Past theories, such as Freud's interpretation of this urge as an innate drive to harm oneself, have been largely disp ...
Psychological research on the call of the void
The phenomenon known as the "call of the void" may originate from conflicts between our primitive instincts and our rational mind, and the condition of our brain's prefrontal cortex could influence how these impulses are managed.
The term "call of the void" refers to the unsettling desire some people experience to jump from high places despite not being suicidal. Josh Clark points to a theory that suggests this sensation comes from a kind of miscommunication between one's instinctual fear response and the rational mind. This response is attributed to what's colloquially known as the "lizard brain," a part of our mind driven by primitive instincts.
Clark explains that when someone is in a high place, an innate fear response is triggered, sending a signal of danger. The "lizard brain" interprets this fear and erroneously assesses that the ground is safe, giving a false impulse to jump. Fortunately, our rational mind usually catches up and corrects this impulse, recognizing that jumping would be harmful, not safe. This moment when our rational mind overrules the primitive instinct is what Clark believes to be the call of the void.
Theories on the underlying mechanisms
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser