Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

By iHeartPodcasts

The Stuff You Should Know hosts explore the puzzling phenomenon of "pruney" fingers after extended water exposure. They delve into the humble origins of the topic and trace how early theories gave way to our current understanding of the vasoconstriction process behind skin pruning.

The episode examines the evolutionary debate surrounding pruning. While some scientists propose that pruning evolved to enhance grip in wet conditions, skeptics argue it may simply be a byproduct of conserving body heat and blood flow. By presenting perspectives from various experts, the hosts offer listeners an insightful overview of this peculiar biological response and the scientific discussions around its purpose.

Listen to the original

Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Aug 7, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

1-Page Summary

The Origin of the Topic

Chuck shares how his daughter's 7-hour bath sparked his curiosity about skin pruning - the extreme wrinkling of her fingertips prompted him to research whether it was harmful.

Historical Theories

  • Early 1900s scientists believed pruning was caused by osmosis and outer skin expansion (Josh Clark).
  • But this was disproven in the 1930s when nerve-damaged skin didn't prune despite soaking (Josh Clark).

Current Understanding

The modern interpretation, per Chuck Bryant, is that skin pruning results from vasoconstriction - the shrinking of blood vessels under the skin triggered by the autonomic nervous system in response to prolonged water exposure.

Proposed Evolutionary Advantages

Improved Grip

  • Some scientists, like Marc Cangisi, believe pruning evolved to improve grip in wet conditions (Chuck Bryant).
  • Newcastle University found pruned fingers could grasp wet objects 12% faster than un-pruned fingers.
  • The wrinkles act like tire treads, channeling water away for better friction (Newcastle University scientists).

Heat/Blood Flow Conservation

However, the evolutionary advantage is still debated. Skeptics suggest pruning may simply be a byproduct of the body conserving heat and blood flow in water (Chuck Bryant).

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Skin pruning is the wrinkling of fingertips after prolonged water exposure. It is now understood to result from vasoconstriction, where blood vessels under the skin shrink due to the autonomic nervous system's response. This process is believed to potentially aid in grip by channeling water away for better friction. Some debate exists on whether this phenomenon primarily serves an evolutionary purpose or is a byproduct of heat and blood flow conservation in water.
  • Vasoconstriction is the narrowing of blood vessels, reducing blood flow. In skin pruning, vasoconstriction occurs due to prolonged water exposure. This process is triggered by the autonomic nervous system. Vasoconstriction in skin pruning helps improve grip in wet conditions.
  • Skin pruning, the wrinkling of fingertips after prolonged water exposure, is thought to have evolutionary advantages. One theory suggests it enhances grip in wet conditions by channeling water away like tire treads. Another perspective proposes that pruning may help conserve heat and blood flow in water, though this is still debated among scientists.
  • Skin pruning, the wrinkling of fingertips after prolonged water exposure, is debated for its evolutionary advantages. Some believe it aids grip in wet conditions, as pruned fingers can grasp wet objects faster. Skeptics argue it may be a byproduct of heat and blood flow conservation in water. The discussion centers on whether skin wrinkling serves a specific purpose or is a side effect of physiological responses to water immersion.

Counterarguments

  • The idea that skin pruning is an evolutionary adaptation for improved grip could be challenged by pointing out that not all evolutionary traits have to serve a current functional purpose; they could be vestigial or incidental.
  • The 12% faster grip in pruned fingers might not be statistically significant or could be influenced by other variables not accounted for in the study.
  • The comparison of wrinkles to tire treads might oversimplify the complexity of human skin and its interaction with water.
  • The suggestion that pruning is a byproduct of heat and blood flow conservation could be criticized for lack of direct evidence linking the two phenomena.
  • The research might not account for the full range of activities humans perform in wet conditions, and therefore the evolutionary advantage might be overstated or too narrowly defined.
  • The historical theories and current understanding do not consider the full range of biological diversity among humans and how different populations might exhibit varying degrees of skin pruning, which could suggest different evolutionary pressures or lack thereof.
  • The studies mentioned may not have been replicated sufficiently to be considered conclusive, and further research might be necessary to support or refute the claims made.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

The origin story of the topic and personal anecdote

Chuck shares a personal story about his daughter's long bath time, which sparked his curiosity about skin pruning.

Chuck's daughter spent an unusually long time in the bathtub, which prompted him to wonder about the phenomenon of skin pruning

One day, Chuck's daughter decided to partake in an extended bath session that lasted over seven hours. During this marathon soak, she was happily engaged, playing with her bath toys and listening to her favorite podcasts. When she finally emerged from the bathtub, Chuck was struck by the extreme degree of pruning on her hands, a seemingly exaggerated version of what most people experience after a short soak.

Faced with his daughter's wrinkled fingertips, Chuck was prompted to delve into whether this unusually long bath and the resulta ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The origin story of the topic and personal anecdote

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Concern about supervision: Spending over seven hours in a bathtub, especially for a child, raises questions about adequate supervision and safety.
  • Health considerations: While skin pruning itself is not harmful, extended exposure to water can potentially lead to other issues such as skin maceration, which can increase susceptibility to infection or irritation.
  • Environmental considerations: Taking such a long bath may not be environmentally sustainable due to the excessive use of water and the energy required to keep the water warm.
  • Psychological aspects: An unusually long bath time might be an indicator of stress or a coping mechanism for the child, which coul ...

Actionables

  • Monitor your own skin's reaction to water by timing how long it takes for your fingers to prune during a bath or while washing dishes, and note any differences in time or pattern.
  • This self-observation can help you understand your body's response to water exposure. For example, you might find that your fingers prune faster in warmer water or that certain fingers wrinkle more quickly than others.
  • Use the concept of skin pruning to teach children about the human body's reactions to different environments.
  • Create a simple experiment for kids where they dip their hands in water and observe the changes over time. This can be a fun and educational activity that demonstrates how our bodies adapt to being in water.
  • Experiment with different moisturizing products to see if ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

Historical theories about why skin prunes

The science behind pruney skin has evolved over time, changing the way we understand this common experience.

Early 20th century scientists believed skin pruning was caused by osmosis and the expansion of the skin's outer layers

Early scientists theorized that skin pruneyness was due to osmosis affecting the skin's outer layers, causing them to expand. However, as Josh Clark points out, this theory was disproven in the 1930s when it was observed that nerve damage could prevent pruney fingers even after soaking in water for an extended period.

The osmosis theory was disproven when it was observed that skin with nerve damage does not prune, even when submerged in water

This discovery led researchers to question their previous osmosis theory, as it became clear that skin pruning did not occur in all circumstances. Skin with nerve damage did not exhibit the wrinkling response, contradicting the idea that osmotic expansion of the skin's outer layer was the sole reason behind the phenomenon.

The current scientific understanding is that skin pruning is caused by vasoconstriction, or the shrinking of blood vessels under the skin

As Chuck Bryant explains, the modern interpretation is that the wrinkling of skin, or vasoconstriction, is a response triggered by the autonomic nervous system due to prolonged exposure to water.

The autonomic nervous system triggers this vasoconstriction as a response to prolonged water exposure, causi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Historical theories about why skin prunes

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The osmosis theory proposed that skin pruning occurred due to osmosis affecting the skin's outer layers, causing them to expand. However, this theory was disproven when it was observed that skin with nerve damage did not exhibit the wrinkling response, suggesting that osmotic expansion was not the sole cause of skin pruning.
  • When skin is submerged in water for a prolonged period, it typically wrinkles due to vasoconstriction, a process controlled by the autonomic nervous system. However, in cases where there is nerve damage, this wrinkling response may not occur, as the nerves play a crucial role in signaling the blood vessels to constrict. This observation led to the understanding that intact nerve function is necessary for the typical pruney response to water exposure.
  • Vasoconstriction is the narrowing of blood vessels, which reduces blood flow. In the context of skin wrinkling, vasoconstriction occurs under the skin's surface due to the autonomic nervous system's response to prolonged water exposure. This process causes the blood vessels in the skin to shrink, leading to the characteristic appearance of pruney skin.
  • The autonomic nervous system controls involuntary bodily functions like heart rate, digestion, and vasoconstriction. Vasoconstriction is the narrowing of blood vessels, which can be triggered by the autonomic nervous system in response to various stimuli. In the context of skin pruning, vasoconstriction occurs in the blood vessels under the skin due to prolonged wa ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Short Stuff: Pruney Skin

The proposed evolutionary advantages of pruning

Scientists have been studying the phenomenon of skin pruning and propose that it might be an evolutionary advantage, evolving as an adaptation to improve grip and traction in wet conditions. However, the specific benefits associated with pruning are still subject to debate.

Some scientists believe skin pruning may have evolved as an adaptation that improves grip and traction in wet conditions

Marc Cangisi and his colleagues are among those who consider skin pruning as a potential evolutionary adaptation that could provide practical benefits when handling objects in wet environments.

Studies have shown that people with pruned fingers can pick up wet objects about 12% faster than those with normal, un-pruned fingers

The UK group from Newcastle University conducted studies to test this hypothesis. In one of their experiments, they found that people with pruned fingers could pick up wet marbles roughly 12% faster than people with un-pruned fingers.

The wrinkled skin creates channels that allow water to be dispersed, similar to the treads on tires, providing better friction and grip

The biologists from Newcastle University described that the wrinkled skin on pruned fingers acts much like the treads on tires. These treads create channels allowing for water to be evacuated, which doesn't necessarily increase contact with the road but gives better traction. This analogy is used to explain how wrinkled skin pruned by water exposure helps to channel water away, thus enhancing grip in wet conditions.

Chuck Bryant also comments on the benefits of pruning, using the metaphorical "Tuk Tuk in the rain" situation. He suggests that evolutionary advantages might include not just the ability to grasp wet objects more effectively but also maintaining better traction to prevent slips and falls, potentially when gathering wet berries or navigating slippery surfaces.

Howe ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The proposed evolutionary advantages of pruning

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Skin pruning, the wrinkling of skin after prolonged exposure to water, is proposed to be an evolutionary advantage as it may improve grip and traction in wet conditions. This adaptation could have developed to help our ancestors handle objects more effectively in wet environments, potentially aiding activities like gathering food or navigating slippery surfaces. Scientists suggest that the wrinkled skin creates channels that disperse water, enhancing friction and grip, similar to the treads on tires. However, the evolutionary benefit of skin pruning is still debated, with some arguing it may be a byproduct of the body's response to water exposure rather than a specific adaptation for improved grip.
  • The specific benefits associated with pruning relate to improved grip and traction in wet conditions. Pruning creates channels that disperse water, enhancing friction and grip like tire treads on a road. This adaptation may help individuals handle objects more effectively and prevent slips in wet environments. However, the evolutionary advantage of pruning is still debated, with some suggesting it could be a byproduct of the body's response to water exposure.
  • The analogy of skin pruning to tire treads is used to explain how the wrinkled skin on pruned fingers acts like the treads on tires. Just as tire treads create channels for water evacuation to enhance grip on wet roads, the wrinkled skin channels water away to improve traction in wet conditions. This comparison helps illustrate how the physical structure of pruned skin aids in dispersing water, similar to how tire treads help maintain grip on wet surfaces.
  • Pruning, the wrinkling of skin in water, may offer evolutionary benefits by improving grip and traction in wet conditions, potentially aiding in preventing slips and falls. The wrinkled skin channels water away, enhancing friction and grip, akin to tire treads on wet roads. This improved traction could help individuals maintain stability on slippery surfaces, reducing the risk of accidents. However, the debate continues as some argue that pruning might primarily be a physiological response to water exposure rather than a specifically evolved trait for enhancing grip.
  • Pruning of the skin, often observed after prolonged exposure to water, has been suggested to be a byproduct of the body's response to conserve heat and regulate blood flow. Some researchers argue that this wrinkling of ...

Counterarguments

  • Pruning may not be an evolutionary adaptation but rather a coincidental side effect of other physiological processes.
  • The 12% faster grip might not be statistically significant or may not translate to a meaningful advantage in natural settings.
  • The analogy of pruned skin to tire treads may oversimplify the complex interactions between skin and surfaces in various conditions.
  • Improved grip due to pruning could be less relevant for our ancestors who did not have to handle small, smooth objects like marbles.
  • The hypothesis that pruning helps prevent slips and falls is speculative and lacks direct evidence linking pruned skin to enhanced mobility or stability.
  • The evolutionary advantage of pruning might be context-dependent, offering benefits only in specific en ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA