The Stuff You Should Know podcast examines the troubling phenomenon of coercive control, a form of domestic abuse that goes beyond physical violence. Coercive control involves systematically depriving a partner of autonomy through intimidation, isolation, and control tactics like financial restrictions, constant criticism, and restricting movements.
The episode explores the origins of coercive control, tracing it back to techniques used to coerce prisoners of war. It delves into landmark cases that brought non-physical abuse to light and the gender dynamics surrounding coercive control, looking at concerns regarding laws potentially being weaponized by abusers.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Coercive control stems from Albert Bitterman's study on techniques like isolation, monopolizing perception, and intermittent indulgences used for coercing POWs - methods later seen as non-physical abuse in domestic relationships. Sociologist Evan Stark coined the term to describe systematically depriving a partner's autonomy through intimidation and control, not solely physical violence.
As Bitterman outlined, isolation from family/friends, restricting movements, financial control, and constant criticism/humiliation are key tactics used to dominate a victim's life, restricting their independence and self-worth.
The "Burning Bed" case brought domestic abuse to light after Francine Hughes killed her abusive husband, illuminating coercive control dynamics. This influenced "battered women's syndrome" - justifying actions against abusers through psychological impacts of control, evolving into a gender-neutral "reasonable person" defense.
While often male-to-female, researchers note coercive control isn't inherently gendered - occurring across all gender boundaries, though societal structures then may have shaped observed patterns per Stark and Anderson. However, concerns exist about current laws being potentially weaponized by abusers.
1-Page Summary
Understanding of coercive control has roots tracing back to Albert Bitterman's study of the coercion used in brainwashing techniques on POWs, evolving into recognition as a form of non-physical domestic abuse.
Post-Korean War analysis of POWs led to the investigation into methods that appeared to turn American soldiers into collaborators with their captors. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss how social scientist Albert Bitterman delved deeper than the initial explanation of brainwashing, studying the specific tactics employed by Chinese and Korean captors. His research transcended the notion of brainwashing, identifying a set of tactics that could induce the appearance of voluntary action under coercion.
Bitterman's study shed light on methods including isolation, monopolization of perception, and intermittent indulgences. These techniques were operationalized not through sheer physical power but through psychological manipulation. His comprehensive list of these tactics not only influenced understanding within military contexts but has also reportedly played a role in practices at locations such as Guantanamo Bay.
Coercive control in intimate relationships is now recognized as a specific kind of domestic abuse where domination and control over a partner are exerted typically through non-physical means.
While coercive control can involve physical abuse, the core of this violation lies in the pervasive control and manipulation of a partner's life. It is an act of persuasion through the threat of violence or other penalties, leading to a deprivation of freedom and autonomy. The term was c ...
The origins and definition of coercive control
...
Coercive control is a strategy used to dominate a person's life, often seen in abusive relationships. Bitterman's research sheds light on these tactics which include isolation, financial control, and humiliation, all designed to compromise the victim's independence and self-esteem.
Isolation is a primary technique of coercion that captors use to maintain control. Bitterman explains that isolation can involve completely cutting off the victim from the outside world, preventing any form of outside contact or the receipt of information. This may start with the abuser isolating their partner from family and friends and controlling social activities. The abuser might spread lies about the victim, or even move to another state to deepen the isolation. Additionally, abusers may use technology such as cameras, spyware, and GPS tracking to monitor the victim's movements and social interactions closely, further cementing their power and influence.
Financial control is another tool used to enforce coercive control. The abuser may restrict the victim's access to money and resources, exemplified by traditional family dynamics where the male partner could have absolute control over checkbooks, credit cards, cars, and house ownership. By keeping their spouse financially reliant, the abuser ensures that the victim feels incapable of leaving due to a lack of resources, thereby creating a dependency on the abuser. Monopolization of perception is also part of this tactic, wherein the abuser might control the environment, such as keeping lights on constantly, to limit the victim's social interactions and movements.
The tactics and dynamics of coercive control
...
The "Burning Bed" case, highlighted by Francine Hughes' harrowing experiences, brought domestic abuse to the forefront, impacting legal perspectives and public awareness.
The "Burning Bed," which became widely known through a book and a 1984 television movie, detailed the abuse Francine Hughes endured at the hands of her husband, Mickey Hughes, during the 1970s. Her experiences of being beaten, raped, and controlled by him were dramatized and helped shift public perception of spousal abuse from a private family matter to an issue of criminal justice.
On the night of the incident, Francine killed her abusive husband by setting their bed on fire while he was asleep, after years of enduring his abuse. When she went to the police station to confess, this act brought significant attention to the reality of domestic abuse. The case illustrated the dynamics of coercive control and challenges that victims faced, both within their personal lives and the legal system. Even on the night of the final act, when authorities arrived, they did not arrest her husband despite witnessing his threats.
Francine's story, especially as portrayed by Farrah Fawcett in "The Burning Bed," underscored the severity of coercive control within abusive relationships. Chuck Bryant referred to this as a landmark case that profoundly influenced the understanding of domestic violence and underscored the need for changes in the law. The TV movie also shed light on the continued abuse Francine suffered after her divorce, including threats, forced dropout from secretarial school, the destruction of her belongings, and the killing of a family pet, all of which underlined the coercive control she was under.
The Francine Hughes case was pivotal in developing legal strategies to protect victims of chronic spousal abuse. Psychologist Lenore ...
Landmark cases and their impact
The concept of coercive control has sparked discussions about its gender-specific nature, with researchers noting that while often seen as a male-on-female dynamic, it can and does occur across all gender boundaries.
Researchers such as Evan Stark, who coined the term "coercive control," alongside sociologist Kristin L. Anderson, primarily link coercive control to a dynamic where males dominate females, stemming from established social structures. Stark’s book "Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life" reflects a gender-specific view on this issue. Despite this, there is an acknowledgment in the academic field that coercive control is not exclusive to one gender, being present within same-sex and female-on-male relationships as well.
Anderson posits that men may engage in coercive control as a means to affirm their masculinity, especially when it is threatened, for instance, by a female partner outearning them. Conversely, while studies indicate earning more can increase a woman's risk of domestic violence, perhaps reinforcing the traditional male-centric view of coercive control, further research shows that women can also exert coercive control, albeit with potentially less physical violence and more emphasis on psychological aspects such as monitoring, isolation, and humiliation.
Research also points out that coercive control is present in same-sex relationships, challenging the notion that such control is solely a byproduct of the male-female dynamic. It's inferred that the social and cultural context during Stark's earlier studies, a period when women typically had restrictive access to institutional power and adhered to rigid household roles, shaped the obser ...
Debate around the gender-specificity of coercive control
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser