Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > SYSK Live in Nashville: The Biosphere II Experiment | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

SYSK Live in Nashville: The Biosphere II Experiment | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

By iHeartPodcasts

Join Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant in a riveting episode of "Stuff You Should Know," as they delve into the extraordinary tale of the Biosphere 2 project—a vision of environmental utopia that evolved into a notorious scientific saga. Financed by billionaire Ed Bass and spurred by the eco-conscious 1980s, this ambitious experiment aimed to forge self-sustaining enclosed ecosystems. Josh and Chuck unravel the fascinating journey from the crew’s origins at Synergia Ranch to constructing what became the largest private science project of its era, and the ensuing struggles that tested the very foundations of their closed-world.

The story that unfolds is one of human perseverance amidst ecological miscalculations, atmospheric anomalies, and psychological hardships that shook the futuristic habitat and its inhabitants. As problems arose, secrecy led to a backlash from the press, casting a shadow over the project's scientific contributions. Yet, through the storms of criticism, the crew endured, and the resulting insights on closed ecosystems and environmental issues offered a silver lining. Clark and Bryant walk us through how these trials and revelations sparked a renewed emphasis on environmental stewardship, demonstrating how even flawed experiments can illuminate the path toward sustainability.

Listen to the original

SYSK Live in Nashville: The Biosphere II Experiment | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 3, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

SYSK Live in Nashville: The Biosphere II Experiment | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

1-Page Summary

Failed experiment, renewed environmentalism

Eccentric group builds futuristic enclosed habitat to study ecosystems

Billionaire Ed Bass finances John Allen's ambitions and establishes the Biosphere 2 project in Oracle, Arizona, aimed at creating self-sustaining closed ecosystems. They draw upon their experience from Synergia Ranch in New Mexico, where they lived self-sufficiently and engaged in creative ventures such as the construction of the Heraclitus ship. Specifically, the Biosphere 2 is built as the largest private science project of its time, spurred by the environmental worries of the 1980s.

Multiple issues plague habitat and crew

The project faces a suite of issues, from structural glitches affecting the biospheres to atmospheric imbalances due to excessive CO2 absorption by concrete, leading to oxygen scarcity. Resultingly, the ecosystem experiences unwanted species growth, leading to nutritional deficits and psychological strain amongst the crew. Critical incidents, such as Jane Poynter’s exit for medical reasons, undermine the experiment’s integrity, while the lack of wind weakens tree growth, mirroring high-altitude living conditions.

Negative publicity as problems hidden from media

Publicity turns sour as the media catches wind of the hidden struggles within Biosphere 2, with Time Magazine going so far as to decry it as one of the "100 worst ideas of the 20th century." The lack of transparency and protocol breaches, such as Poynter’s exit, exacerbate the experiment's scientific credibility issues.

Crew perseveres but site never closes again

Despite widespread criticism, the crew completes the two-year stint, and the project yields significant scientific data, with breakthroughs in understanding closed ecosystems, wastewater management, and coral behaviors. Importantly, Biosphere 2 reignites the environmental movement, drawing increased attention to global ecological issues.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Synergia Ranch in New Mexico was a communal living experiment and creative hub founded by John Allen. It served as a precursor to the Biosphere 2 project, where individuals lived self-sufficiently and engaged in various innovative projects. The experience gained at Synergia Ranch influenced the development of Biosphere 2's enclosed ecosystems.
  • The Biosphere 2 project was an ambitious experiment in the 1990s that aimed to create a self-sustaining closed ecosystem. It involved constructing a large, enclosed habitat in Oracle, Arizona, where a team of researchers lived for two years. The project faced challenges such as structural issues, atmospheric imbalances, and ecosystem disruptions, leading to both scientific breakthroughs and public scrutiny. Despite its flaws, Biosphere 2 contributed valuable insights into closed ecosystems and environmental sustainability.
  • Environmental worries of the 1980s were primarily driven by concerns over pollution, deforestation, and the depletion of the ozone layer. This decade saw a growing awareness of human impact on the environment, spurred by events like the Chernobyl disaster and increased scientific research on climate change. The 1980s marked a turning point in environmental activism, leading to the push for policies and initiatives to address these pressing ecological issues. The era set the stage for increased public consciousness about environmental conservation and sustainability.
  • Jane Poynter was a member of the Biosphere 2 crew who had to leave the project for medical reasons during the experiment. Her departure raised concerns and impacted the dynamics within the enclosed habitat.
  • High-altitude living conditions typically involve reduced oxygen levels due to the lower air pressure at higher elevations. This can lead to challenges like altitude sickness, decreased physical performance, and difficulties in acclimatizing to the environment. People living at high altitudes may experience symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and headaches due to the body's struggle to adapt to the lower oxygen levels. The effects of high-altitude living can vary depending on factors like individual health, duration of exposure, and altitude level.
  • Time Magazine's scathing criticism of Biosphere 2 as one of the "100 worst ideas of the 20th century" stemmed from the project's ambitious goals clashing with the numerous technical and operational challenges it faced, leading to public skepticism and negative perceptions. The magazine's inclusion of Biosphere 2 in this list highlighted the significant shortcomings and failures associated with the project, which garnered widespread attention and criticism. This categorization underscored the magnitude of the issues experienced by Biosphere 2, contributing to its reputation as a high-profile example of a well-intentioned but ultimately flawed endeavor.

Counterarguments

  • The financing by a billionaire like Ed Bass could be seen as a vanity project rather than a serious scientific endeavor.
  • The aim to create self-sustaining closed ecosystems might be overly ambitious and not entirely feasible with current technology and understanding.
  • Being the largest private science project of its time does not necessarily equate to success or scientific value.
  • Structural glitches and atmospheric imbalances suggest a lack of adequate planning and understanding of the complexities involved in creating a closed ecosystem.
  • Oxygen scarcity and unwanted species growth indicate a failure to accurately simulate Earth's ecosystems, which could question the validity of the findings.
  • Jane Poynter's exit for medical reasons could be seen as a failure to maintain a closed system, which was a fundamental goal of the project.
  • The lack of wind and its effect on tree growth could be interpreted as an oversight in the design of the Biosphere 2, which compromises the experiment's conditions.
  • Negative publicity and the label from Time Magazine could be considered a reflection of the public's skepticism about the practicality and scientific rigor of the project.
  • The lack of transparency and protocol breaches could be viewed as serious flaws that undermine the integrity and reliability of the scientific data collected.
  • While the crew completed the two-year stint, the psychological and physical strains they endured might have affected the quality of their work and observations.
  • The claim that the project yielded significant scientific data could be contested if the data is not widely recognized or utilized by the broader scientific community.
  • The breakthroughs in understanding closed ecosystems, wastewater management, and coral behaviors might not be as groundbreaking or applicable outside of the unique conditions of Biosphere 2.
  • The assertion that Biosphere 2 reignited the environmental movement could be challenged, as the movement has many facets and drivers beyond this single project.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
SYSK Live in Nashville: The Biosphere II Experiment | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

Failed experiment, renewed environmentalism

Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss the ambitious Biosphere 2 project, an experimental closed ecosystem in Oracle, Arizona, designed to study what would happen in a sealed-off Earth environment. Despite being laden with issues, the endeavor led to valuable studies and a resurgence in the environmental movement.

Eccentric group builds futuristic enclosed habitat to study ecosystems

John Allen leads Theater of All Possibilities performance art troupe

They build ships and retreat to NM ranch to live self-sufficiently

Billionaire Bass funds Biosphere 2 project to create closed ecosystems

The project, led by John Allen and his ambitious albeit eccentric group, received a massive funding boost from billionaire Ed Bass, whose intention was to make money from potential scientific developments. The Synergia Ranch in New Mexico became a hub of creativity, with roots in performance art and ambitious building projects like the research vessel Heraclitus.

The Biosphere was constructed to be fully enclosed and maintain human life in order to monitor Earth's ecosystems. It became the largest privately funded science project in history, financed by Bass's $150 to $200 million investment and conceived as a response to growing concerns about Earth's environmental imbalances in the early '80s.

Multiple issues plague habitat and crew

Design flaws like open biomes and concrete alter conditions

Extinctions and uncontrolled growth disrupt balance

Atmospheric issues risk health until fixed

Despite the project's goals, the crew encountered significant challenges, including design flaws such as the proximity of different biomes, which altered natural conditions, and concrete that acted as a carbon sink absorbing CO2, creating an imbalance in the atmosphere. The nutrient-rich soil led to an overgrowth of microbes that consumed oxygen faster than plants could produce it.

Species extinctions and the outgrowth of unintended species like morning glory vines and ants disrupted the planned biosphere interactions. The ambitious but flawed nature of the project resulted in crop failures, and hunger among the crew who struggled to reach the 2,500-calorie daily goal initially set, often consuming as little as 1,800 calories a day. Limited supplies of luxuries like coffee fueled discontent, leading to strained group dynamics.

Jane Poynter, responsible for farming, had to break the sealed condition for medical treatment, raising controversy and undermining the project's rules. Wind's absence resulted in trees growing tall but weak, and low oxygen and high carbon dioxide levels mirrored conditions at high altitudes, causing crew members to struggle with simple tasks.

Negative publicity as ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Failed experiment, renewed environmentalism

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The research vessel Heraclitus was a ship built by the Theater of All Possibilities group led by John Allen. It was part of their self-sufficient living experiments and was used for various projects before the Biosphere 2 endeavor. The Heraclitus was a significant project that showcased the group's innovative and ambitious approach to sustainable living. It was a key part of their activities at the Synergia Ranch in New Mexico.
  • Morning glory vines disrupting biosphere interactions: Morning glory vines, known for their rapid growth and ability to smother other plants, can disrupt the balance of an ecosystem by outcompeting native species for resources like sunlight, water, and nutrients. In the context of Biosphere 2, the unintended proliferation of morning glory vines could have altered the planned interactions between different plant species, potentially leading to ecological imbalances within the closed system. This disruption could have contributed to the challenges faced by the crew in maintaining a stable and sustainable environment within the biosphere.
  • Jane Poynter breaking the sealed condition for medical treatment means that she had to leave the closed environment of Biosphere 2 to receive medical care outside of the sealed ecosystem. This action was necessary for her health but went against the original plan of maintaining a completely closed system. Her departure raised controversy and highlighted the challenges of sustaining life within a sealed environment for an extended period.
  • Time Magazine's designation of Biosphere 2 as one of the "100 worst ideas of the 20th century" reflects the negative publicity and criticism the project received due to its significant challenges and shortcomings during the mission. The magazine's inclusion of Biosphere 2 in this list highlights the widespread perception of the project's failures and the imp ...

Counterarguments

  • The leadership of John Allen and the Theater of All Possibilities may not have been the most scientifically rigorous choice for leading a project like Biosphere 2, which required complex ecological and biological expertise.
  • While Ed Bass's funding was crucial, the focus on potential financial returns from scientific developments might have influenced the project's direction and priorities, potentially compromising its scientific integrity.
  • The title of "largest privately funded science project in history" does not necessarily equate to success or scientific value, and the emphasis on this aspect could be seen as an attempt to legitimize the project despite its flaws.
  • The design flaws, such as open biomes and the use of concrete, suggest a lack of thorough planning and understanding of ecological systems, which could be criticized as a fundamental oversight for a project of this nature.
  • The occurrence of extinctions and uncontrolled growth within Biosphere 2 could be interpreted as a failure to accurately replicate Earth's ecosystems, raising questions about the validity of the studies conducted within the biosphere.
  • The crew's health risks due to atmospheric issues could be seen as a serious ethical concern, as the well-being of participants should be a top priority in any experimental setting.
  • The struggle with crop failures and hunger points to a possible underestimation of the complexity of sustainable agriculture within a closed system, which could be criticized as a lack of adequate preparation and research.
  • The decision to hide problems from the media may be viewed as a lack of transparency, which is critical for the credibility of sc ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA