Short Stuff: History of OK | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW
Delve into the ubiquity of a mundane yet indispensable term in the English language with hosts Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant in the "Stuff You Should Know" podcast. Their "Short Stuff: History of OK" episode meticulously unpicks the threads of the word "OK's" etymology, emphasizing its chameleonic adaptability across various grammatical roles. From its days as a humorous 1830s abbreviation trend to a staunch staple of the American lexicon, the hosts explore the word's capacity for shifting significance, mellowing into a universally recognized sign of tepid agreement.
Beyond just the origin story, this episode also highlights the social implications and the stylistic nuances of "OK" in contemporary usage. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication, where tone and intent are paramount, the choice between "OK" and "okay" can be significant. Encouraging listeners to engage with language evolution, Josh and Chuck blend linguistic insights with personal anecdotes, inviting you to consider the impact that even the smallest parts of our vocabulary can have in our day-to-day interactions.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 7, 2023 episode of the Stuff You Should Know
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Tracing the Etymology of "OK"
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant, hosts of the "Short Stuff: History of OK" episode from "Stuff You Should Know," dissect the etymology and sociolinguistic evolution of the word "OK." They begin by examining "OK" as a versatile linguistic construct, capable of serving as an adjective, interjection, verb, or noun.
The Versatile Nature of "OK"
While initially possessing a zestful nature, according to linguist Allan Metcalf, "OK" has mellowed into a universally understood signal of mid-level affirmation, fitting squarely between emphatic approval and indifference. This neutral expression is ideal for conveying agreement without the emotional intensity of "yes," "good," "fine," "excellent," or "all right," thus providing a subtle form of acknowledgment.
The 1830s Abbreviation Trend
The hosts attribute the origins of "OK" to a humor-driven abbreviation fad from the 1830s, notably among penny presses that favored cost-effectiveness and marked the early blending of news and entertainment akin to today's internet. Allen Walker Read, an etymologist from the 1960s, meticulously traced "OK" back to this period, pinpointing its birth from a jest among editors.
"Oll Korrect": A Linguistic Fad's Role
A parallel linguistic fad that contributed to the survival of "OK" was the intentional misspelling of phrases, turning "all correct" into "oll korrect," abbreviated as "O.K." by Green in a satirical piece on March 21, 1839.
The Evolution of "OK" in American Language
These initial abbreviated expressions—such as "D-L-E-C" for "Do Let Them Come"—were first vocalized in Boston during the summer of 1838, and later rose to prominence through Charles Gordon Green of the Boston Morning Post, eventually spreading nationwide.
The Jest That Became a Staple
Chuck and Josh compare these humorous exchanges to the friendly banter and occasional mix-ups with acronyms they have with fellow podcaster John Strickland.
Political Campaigns Cementing "OK"
The term was subsequently immortalized via the 1840 presidential campaign of Martin Van Buren, nicknamed "Old Kinderhook," who adopted "OK" within his slogan, ensuring its permanence in American vernacular, despite his own electoral defeat.
The Mellowing of "OK" Over Time
In the second part of the discussion, Chuck and Josh address the varied representations of "OK" in written form, spanning editorial guidelines such as uppercase usage mandated by the AP style, and flexibility allowed by the Chicago Manual of Style.
Contemporary Use and Perceptions of "OK"
Grammarly's stance on "OK" reflecting an uppercase standard at sentence starts, but preferring "okay" in lowercase mid-sentence is also mentioned. Josh notes his preference for the lowercase "okay," seeing it as less aggressive than the uppercase "OK," which can come off as shouting in digital communication, associating the lowercase usage with a sort of textual warmth.
Editorial Guidelines for "OK"
The conversation touches upon the varied style guides' approaches to the term, indicating the flexibility and continued evolution in formal writing contexts.
Digital Communication: Uppercase vs. Lowercase
As digital communication norms develop, the nuances in the representation of "OK" versus "okay" highlight interpersonal nuances that are becoming more significant in conveying tone and intent over text.
"Stuff You Should Know": A Podcast's Take on "OK"
The interactive and explorative nature of language is a theme that permeates the podcast episode, with hosts sharing personal insights and engaging with the linguistic topic in an accessible manner.
Hosts' Personal Preferences and Anecdotes
Chuck and Josh offer personal perspectives on language use, sharing anecdotes that bring the topic closer to the listener's everyday experience.
Engaging the Listener with Language Evolution
The hosts wrap up the podcast by expressing the potential for listener engagement, framing "OK" as a case study in the informal evolution of language, all the while situating their discussion within the broader content strategy of "Stuff You Should Know" and its educational goals.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The humor-driven abbreviation fad from the 1830s was a trend where people playfully shortened phrases or words for amusement and efficiency. This fad led to the creation of abbreviations like "OK" from "oll korrect," which was a humorous misspelling of "all correct." It was a lighthearted and creative way for people to communicate and connect through language during that time period. This trend reflected the playful and inventive spirit of the era, influencing the evolution of language and communication styles.
- The intentional misspelling of "all correct" as "oll korrect" was part of a humorous trend in the 1830s where people deliberately spelled words incorrectly for fun. This intentional misspelling was a way to play with language and create a sense of whimsy or satire. By changing "all correct" to "oll korrect," individuals were engaging in a playful and light-hearted linguistic practice. This intentional misspelling contributed to the emergence and popularization of the abbreviation "O.K." as a term used to signify approval or agreement.
- In the summer of 1838 in Boston, there was a trend of using abbreviated expressions like "OK." These abbreviations were part of a linguistic fad that involved intentionally misspelling phrases for humor and brevity. The use of such abbreviations, including "OK," gained popularity and were first vocalized in Boston during this time. Charles Gordon Green of the Boston Morning Post played a significant role in popularizing these abbreviated expressions.
- During Martin Van Buren's 1840 presidential campaign, his nickname "Old Kinderhook" led to the adoption of "OK" as a slogan. The term "OK" was used to represent both Van Buren's nickname and the phrase "oll korrect." This association with Van Buren helped popularize and cement the term "OK" in American vernacular. Despite Van Buren's electoral defeat, "OK" continued to be widely used and recognized.
- In written form, editorial guidelines for "OK" vary, with some style guides preferring uppercase "OK" at the start of sentences. However, lowercase "okay" is often favored mid-sentence for a more casual tone. These guidelines reflect evolving norms in language usage and the flexibility allowed in formal writing contexts. The choice between uppercase and lowercase can impact the perceived tone and formality of the text.
- Grammarly's preference for "OK" at the start of sentences and "okay" mid-sentence reflects a stylistic choice to adhere to traditional grammar rules. This distinction helps maintain consistency and readability in written communication. By using "OK" at the beginning of a sentence, it aligns with capitalization norms, while using "okay" mid-sentence follows standard lowercase conventions. This approach aims to enhance clarity and professionalism in written content.
- In digital communication, using "okay" in lowercase is often perceived as less intense or aggressive compared to using "OK" in uppercase. The lowercase form is seen as conveying a more casual and friendly tone, while the uppercase version can sometimes be interpreted as more forceful or emphatic. This distinction in tone is becoming increasingly important in conveying nuances and emotions through written text. The choice between "okay" and "OK" can influence how a message is received and the perceived attitude of the sender in online interactions.
- In digital communication, the use of "OK" in uppercase can sometimes convey a more assertive or emphatic tone, akin to shouting. On the other hand, "okay" in lowercase is often perceived as more casual and friendly, with a softer tone. These subtle differences in capitalization can influence how the message is interpreted by the recipient. The choice between "OK" and "okay" can impact the overall tone and perceived attitude in written conversations.
Counterarguments
- While "OK" is widely understood, its interpretation can still vary across different cultures and contexts, and it may not be as universally understood as suggested.
- The humor-driven abbreviation fad of the 1830s is a popular theory for the origin of "OK," but there are alternative theories that suggest different origins, such as the Choctaw word "okeh" or a West African origin.
- The claim that "OK" originated from "oll korrect" is widely accepted, but some linguists may argue for a more complex etymology that involves multiple influences converging over time.
- The spread of "OK" may not be solely attributed to its use in Boston and by Charles Gordon Green; other factors and regions may have played a role in its dissemination.
- The role of Martin Van Buren's presidential campaign in immortalizing "OK" is significant, but it may not be the sole reason for the term's permanence in American vernacular.
- Editorial guidelines are indeed varied, but the text does not account for the possibility that some publications or style guides may have different standards or may not address the term "OK" at all.
- Grammarly's preference for "OK" at the start of sentences and "okay" mid-sentence is one approach, but other style guides or language experts may have different recommendations or may not see a need for such distinctions.
- The perception of lowercase "okay" as less aggressive in digital communication is subjective, and some individuals may not perceive a difference in tone between "OK" and "okay."
- The nuances between "OK" and "okay" in digital communication are context-dependent, and not all readers may interpret these variations in the same way.
- While "Stuff You Should Know" aims to explore language evolution interactively, some listeners may prefer a more structured or academic approach to linguistic topics.
- Personal anecdotes and perspectives on language use enrich the podcast, but they may not resonate with all listeners, and some may seek more empirical evidence or research-based discussions.
- Framing "OK" as a case study in the informal evolution of language is an interesting approach, but it may oversimplify the complex processes involved in language change and evolution.
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Tracing the Etymology of "OK"
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant, hosts of the "Short Stuff: History of OK" episode from "Stuff You Should Know," dissect the etymology and sociolinguistic evolution of the word "OK."
They begin by examining "OK" as a versatile linguistic construct, capable of serving as an adjective, interjection, verb, or noun.
The Versatile Nature of "OK"
While initially possessing a zestful nature, according to linguist Allan Metcalf, "OK" has mellowed into a universally understood signal of mid-level affirmation, fitting squarely between emphatic approval and indifference.
This neutral expression is ideal for conveying agreement without the emotional intensity of "yes," "good," "fine," "excellent," or "all right," thus providing a subtle form of acknowledgment.
The 1830s Abbreviation Trend
The hosts attribute the origins of "OK" to a humor-driven abbreviation fad from the 1830s, notably among penny presses that favored cost-effectiveness influenced by the surge in cost-effective printing. These presses, an early mashup of news and entertainment reminiscent of today's internet, laid the groundwork for the abbreviation trend.
Allen Walker Read, an etymologist from the 1960s, meticulously traced "OK" back to this period, pinpointing its birth from a jest among editors. He disc ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Tracing the Etymology of "OK"
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The sociolinguistic evolution of the word "OK" involves how its meaning and usage have changed over time in different social contexts, reflecting shifts in language and culture. This evolution includes how "OK" has transitioned from a more enthusiastic expression to a commonly understood signal of agreement or acceptance. It also encompasses the various roles "OK" plays in communication, such as conveying a moderate level of approval without strong emotional emphasis. The term's evolution highlights its adaptability and versatility in modern language usage.
- Penny presses were early newspapers that catered to the masses due to their low cost, combining news and entertainment. These presses were influential in popularizing abbreviation trends in the 1830s. The affordability of printing during this time led to a surge in humorous abbreviations, reflecting the playful and cost-effective nature of the era. This environment fostered the emergence of abbreviations like "OK" as a part of a broader linguistic trend.
- Allen Walker Read was an etymologist who extensively researched the origins of the word "OK." In the 1960s, he traced "OK" back to the 1830s abbreviation trend, where it emerged as a playful abbreviation among editors. Read's work helped establish the connection between "OK" and its humorous origins, shedding light on its evolution into a widely recognized term. His findings provided valuable i ...
Counterarguments
- The assertion that "OK" is universally understood might be challenged by noting that its meaning and usage can vary across different cultures and languages, and it may not be as universally recognized as suggested.
- The idea that "OK" is ideal for conveying agreement without emotional intensity could be countered by pointing out that in some contexts, "OK" can carry different connotations, such as resignation or lack of enthusiasm, rather than mere agreement.
- While the 1830s abbreviation trend is a well-documented origin of "OK," some might argue that there could be earlier, less documented origins or additional contributing factors to the word's etymology that have not been fully explored or recognized.
- The role of Allen Walker Read in tracing "OK" back to the 1830s might be critiqued by those who suggest ...
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Evolution of "OK" in American Language
These initial abbreviated expressions—such as "D-L-E-C" for "Do Let Them Come"—were first vocalized in Boston during the summer of 1838. Later, they rose to prominence through Charles Gordon Green of the Boston Morning Post, eventually spreading nationwide.
The Jest That Became a Staple
Chuck and Josh contextualize these historical lingual trends by comparing them to the playful nature of their banter, particularly with fellow podcaster John Strickland.
Through this lens, they illustrate the dynamics of historic editorial exchanges, drawing parallels to their lighthearted interactions today.
Political Campaigns Cementing "OK"
The term "OK" was subsequently immortalized via the 1840 presidential campaign of Martin Van Buren, nicknamed "Old Kinderhook," who adopted the catchy slogan "OK is okay" within his campaign, ensurin ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Evolution of "OK" in American Language
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Charles Gordon Green, a journalist at the Boston Morning Post, played a significant role in popularizing these abbreviated expressions nationwide. His work helped these linguistic trends gain widespread recognition and usage beyond Boston. Green's efforts contributed to the broader adoption and understanding of these expressions across the United States.
- Martin Van Buren's 1840 presidential campaign played a role in popularizing the term "OK" through the slogan "OK is okay." This catchy phrase helped embed "OK" into American culture, despite Van Buren's electoral loss. The term's association with Van Buren's campaign contributed to its enduring presence in the American lexicon.
- The term "OK" became a staple in the American lexicon despite Van Buren's electoral defeat because it was popularized during his campaign and associated with his nickname "Old Kinderhook." The term's widespread adoption and catchy slogan ensured its lasting presence in American language, transcending the outcome of the election. The cultural impact and historical context surrounding the term "OK" helped solidify its place in everyday usage, independent of Van Buren's political fate.
- Chuck and Josh delve into the different ways "OK" is written, including var ...
Counterarguments
- The attribution of "OK" to the Boston Morning Post and Charles Gordon Green might be oversimplified, as the etymology of "OK" is complex and there are multiple theories regarding its origin.
- The comparison between historical lingual trends and modern banter, while illustrative, may not fully capture the cultural and social context in which these abbreviations became popular.
- The claim that Martin Van Buren's campaign slogan "OK is okay" ensured the term's permanence might be contested, as "OK" could have survived and thrived in the lexicon due to its utility and simplicity rather than a political campaign.
- The discussion on the varied representations of "OK" in written form might benefit from a broader p ...
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Contemporary Use and Perceptions of "OK"
Grammarly's stance on "OK" reflecting an uppercase standard at sentence starts, but preferring "okay" in lowercase mid-sentence is also mentioned.
Josh notes his preference for the lowercase "okay," seeing it as less aggressive than the uppercase "OK," which can come off as shouting in digital communication, associating the lowercase usage with a sort of textual warmth.
Editorial Guidelines for "OK"
In the second part of the discussion, Chuck and Josh address the varied representations of "OK" in written form, emphasizing specific editorial guidelines such as the Associated Press style which mandates an uppercase "OK" without periods.
On the other hand, the flexible stance of the Chicago Manual of Style permits both the uppercase "OK" and the spelled-out lowercase "okay", reflecting varying degrees of formality and preference in written English.
Digital Communication: Uppercase ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Contemporary Use and Perceptions of "OK"
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Josh perceives the lowercase "okay" as less aggressive in digital communication due to its softer visual appearance compared to the uppercase "OK." He believes that using lowercase "okay" conveys a sense of warmth and friendliness, contrasting with the potential intensity associated with the uppercase form. This distinction in capitalization influences the tone and emotional impact of the message, with lowercase "okay" being seen as a gentler alternative for conveying agreement or approval in online interactions.
- The Associated Press style typically mandates using "OK" with uppercase letters and no periods. On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style allows for both "OK" in uppercase and "okay" spelled out in lowercase. These editorial guidelines provide specific rules for how to format and present the term "OK" in written content. The differences between these guidelines reflect varying preferences in formal writing styles and the evolving nature of language conventions.
- In digital communication, the choice between uppercase "OK" and lowercase "okay" can convey different tones and intentions. Using lowercase "okay" is often perceived as more casual, friendly, and less assertive compared to the uppercase "OK," which can sometimes be interpreted as more formal or even aggressive. This distinction in capitalization can influence how a message is rec ...
Counterarguments
- Grammarly's preference for "OK" at the start of sentences and "okay" mid-sentence may not align with all style guides or personal preferences, as some may argue for consistency in using either "OK" or "okay" throughout a text.
- While Josh perceives "okay" as less aggressive than "OK," others might not interpret uppercase usage as shouting, especially when context and common usage suggest that "OK" is a neutral affirmation.
- The discussion of editorial guidelines might overlook the fact that individual or organizational style guides could deviate from AP or Chicago styles, suggesting a broader range of acceptable uses for "OK" and "okay."
- The assertion that uppercase "OK" affects tone and intent in digital communication could be challenged by the idea that tone is often inferred from t ...
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
"Stuff You Should Know": A Podcast's Take on "OK"
The interactive and explorative nature of language is a theme that permeates the podcast episode, with hosts sharing personal insights and engaging with the linguistic topic in an accessible manner.
Hosts' Personal Preferences and Anecdotes
Chuck shares a personal observation noting that in formal writing, uppercase "OK" is less common than he expected, illustrating the divergence between individual habits and broader conventions.
Josh, contrarily, prefers the all caps "OK" but opts for the lowercase "okay" in digital communications to avoid the perception of shouting, demonstrating how online etiquette influences language use.
Engaging the Listener with Language Evolution
The hosts foster potential listener engagement through their explorative discussion, which includes meta-comm ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
"Stuff You Should Know": A Podcast's Take on "OK"
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Online etiquette influences language use by shaping how individuals communicate in digital spaces. For instance, using all caps like "OK" can be perceived as shouting, leading to the preference for lowercase "okay" in online interactions. This adaptation showcases how social norms in online environments impact language choices, reflecting a blend of traditional grammar rules and digital communication customs.
- Meta-commentary in a podcast involves hosts discussing their own dialogue, production choices, or the impact of their content on the audience. It can include reflections on the podcast's format, style, or the underlying themes being explored. Thi ...
Counterarguments
- While the hosts discuss the evolution of language, it could be argued that their personal anecdotes may not necessarily reflect broader linguistic trends or academic research on language use.
- The observation about the use of uppercase "OK" in formal writing might be anecdotal and not supported by a comprehensive analysis of formal writing across different contexts and style guides.
- Josh's preference for lowercase "okay" in digital communications to avoid the perception of shouting is a subjective strategy and may not align with how all individuals interpret text-based communication.
- The use of meta-commentary and puns might enhance engagement for some listeners, but others may find such approaches distracting or less infor ...
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
