#176 Andrew Bailey - Suing China for $25 Billion, Abolishing ATF, Fauci and Soros Crimes
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey sits down with Shawn Ryan in this episode to discuss his upbringing, family life, and the legal battles shaping his tenure. Bailey recounts his military service, adoption journey, and efforts to instill strong values in his children. The conversation then explores Bailey's legal offensives against perceived overreach, including lawsuits challenging government pressure on social media censorship, holding China accountable for COVID-19 damages, and curbing presidential executive actions.
Bailey also unpacks his defense of constitutional rights like the Second Amendment and his criminal justice reform goals, such as boosting prosecutions and supporting law enforcement. His removal of a controversial prosecutor accused of shirking duties provides a window into Bailey's vision for restoring law and order across Missouri.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 26, 2025 episode of the Shawn Ryan Show
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Andrew Bailey's Early Life and Military Service
Per the summary, Andrew Bailey was raised with strong patriotic values and constitutional principles in Columbia, Missouri. He was active in the Boy Scouts, enjoyed the outdoors, and participated in debate. After 9/11, Bailey's patriotism led him to serve as an armored cavalry officer, deploying to Iraq where he undertook dangerous missions securing bases and training Iraqi forces.
Faith, Family, and Fatherhood
According to the summary, Bailey views faith and family as his top priorities. He and his wife adopted three children to create a family of six. Bailey emphasizes instilling a sense of belonging through conversations about their family's formation and regular bonding activities centered around their shared beliefs.
Legal Battles Against Government and Corporate Censorship
The summary outlines Bailey's lawsuit Missouri v. Biden, which exposed government pressure on social media companies like Meta to censor COVID-19 content. Bailey aims to dismantle big tech's algorithmic monopoly using Missouri's consumer protection laws, allowing users more control over content curation. He believes corporate censorship surpasses the free speech threat of government censorship due to its unprecedented scale.
Actions Against China, Biden Administration Overreach, and Soros-Backed Prosecutor
Per the summary, Bailey sued China for $25 billion over alleged COVID-19 harm to Missourians, planning to seize Chinese assets in the U.S. to enforce the judgment. His office filed over 50 lawsuits challenging the Biden administration's purported undermining of the rule of law. Bailey also ousted a Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor accused of neglecting crime prosecution, using the legal tactic of "writ of quo warranto."
Defending Gun Rights and Reforming Criminal Justice System
The summary states that Bailey defends Missouri's constitutional protections for gun ownership against federal overreach, exemplified by the Second Amendment Preservation Act. It outlines his efforts to reform the criminal justice system by boosting prosecution rates, supporting law enforcement through legal defense, and backing Governor Kehoe's proposed reinstatement of the St. Louis police board.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- A "writ of quo warranto" is a legal action used to challenge a person's right to hold a public office or position. It requires the individual to prove their authority to perform specific duties. Missouri v. Biden is a lawsuit where Missouri challenged actions taken by the Biden administration, particularly related to government pressure on social media companies regarding COVID-19 content censorship.
- Andrew Bailey used the legal tactic of "writ of quo warranto" to challenge the authority of the Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor. This legal maneuver questions the individual's right to hold the position they currently occupy. It is a way to challenge the legitimacy of someone in a public office. Bailey employed this tactic to remove the prosecutor accused of neglecting crime prosecution.
- The Second Amendment Preservation Act is a state-level legislation aimed at protecting gun rights by prohibiting state and local cooperation with federal enforcement of certain gun control measures. It asserts that any federal laws or regulations infringing on the Second Amendment rights of Missouri residents are invalid within the state. This act is designed to safeguard gun ownership rights from perceived federal overreach and ensure that Missouri's gun laws take precedence over potentially conflicting federal regulations. The law typically includes provisions that restrict state resources from being used to enforce federal gun laws that are deemed unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Andrew Bailey's Background and Personal Life
Explore the multifaceted life of Andrew Bailey, from his strong patriotic roots in Missouri to his dedicated service as an armored cavalry officer and his profound family life grounded in faith.
Bailey Grew Up In Columbia, Missouri, With Strong Patriotism and Constitutional Principles
Andrew Bailey was raised in Columbia, Missouri, with a strong sense of patriotism and constitutional principles. His parents instilled in him and his brother a reverence for the United States and the belief that constitutional rights are divine rather than man-made. Columbia's community atmosphere and the cultural influence of the nearby University of Missouri had a role in his upbringing.
Participated In Scouts, Enjoyed Outdoors, Involved In Debate
As a young boy, Bailey was deeply involved in the Boy Scouts, achieving the rank of Eagle Scout, and took an active part in high school debate. He also enjoyed outdoor activities, such as fishing and hunting, embracing the natural world.
Bailey Served As an Armored Cavalry Officer, Deploying To Iraq During the War
Following the 9/11 attacks, Bailey's patriotism steered him toward an Army ROTC scholarship, despite previously considering a career as a JAG attorney. His choice of the armored cavalry was influenced by his admiration for George Patton and mounted warfare.
Bailey was deployed to Iraq, where he served as a second lieutenant, securing bases, patrolling, training Iraqi forces, and undertaking heroic missions such as Operation Restore Rights. His duties extended from vehicle command within the hatch of a Bradley fighting vehicle to on-ground tactics like door-kicking and setting up traffic control points. He served two deployments, facing intense conflicts and working alongside forces like the SEALs.
After his military service, Bailey faced the challenge of transitioning from military to civilian life. He worked in security at a courthouse and as an armed guard at a juvenile detention facility, which was a significant shift from his leadership roles in Iraq. Bailey returned to the University of Missouri as a law student at 30, bringing a mature and experienced perspective to his studies.
Bailey, Missouri's Attorney General, Adopted Three Children, Creating a Family of Six
Bailey is not only Missouri's Attorney General but also a family man who cherishes being a father above all else. He and his wife became ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Andrew Bailey's Background and Personal Life
Additional Materials
Actionables
- You can explore local volunteer opportunities to foster a sense of community and patriotism, such as participating in community clean-ups or helping at a veterans' organization, which can instill a sense of civic duty similar to what someone might experience growing up in a patriotic environment.
- Volunteering not only benefits your community but also connects you with like-minded individuals who share a commitment to common values. For example, you might volunteer to plant trees with a local environmental group or serve meals at a veterans' shelter, activities that can be both fulfilling and reflective of a patriotic upbringing.
- Consider joining or starting a book club focused on constitutional principles and civic education to deepen your understanding of the values that may have shaped someone like Bailey.
- A book club can be a casual way to engage with complex topics while building a community of learners. You could start by reading "The Federalist Papers" or a biography of a founding father, then meet monthly to discuss insights and contemporary applications of these principles.
- Engage in outdoor activities that can be done locally and witho ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Bailey's Legal Issues and Stance on Free Speech
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey discusses his legal battle against government censorship, his stance on promoting algorithmic competition, and the growing concern over corporate censorship on social media platforms.
Bailey's Lawsuit, Missouri V. Biden, Exposes Government Censorship of Social Media
Andrew Bailey points to the lawsuit Missouri v. Biden as evidence of government censorship, highlighting the suppression of stories such as the Hunter Biden laptop saga during the 2020 election cycle. Bailey uncovers interactions that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, where the Biden administration exerted pressure on social media executives at Meta to remove certain content. A preliminary injunction against this government censorship was upheld in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, indicating the courts recognize that censorship had occurred.
Biden Administration's Pressure on Social Media to Remove Covid-19 Content
Moving onto COVID-19 content, Bailey comments on the potential civil liability for suppression of information, including Dr. Anthony Fauci's alleged downplaying of the lab-leak theory. This suggests government involvement in managing narratives on social media and challenges to public trust.
Bailey Utilizes Missouri's Consumer Laws to Boost Algorithmic Choice and Competition for Social Media Users
Leveraging Missouri’s consumer protection laws, Bailey announces his intention to break up the algorithmic monopoly held by big tech and empower users to select their own algorithms. The goal is to enhance the consumer experience by allowing greater choice and promoting specific content types according to user preferences. Bailey also tackles antitrust issues, hinting at consumer deception by tech companies and suggesting the use of antitrust lawsuits to dismantle monopolistic practices in the technology sector.
Seeks to Dismantle Social Media Algorithm Monopoly, Empowering User Control
Bailey proposes using Missouri's consumer protection authority to require that large social media platforms offer users a selection of algorithms when they first engage with the service. This approach is designed to protect children and promote desired content, bypassing the need to amend Section 230 by fostering a competitive algorithm marketplace.
Censorship on Social Med ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Bailey's Legal Issues and Stance on Free Speech
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The Missouri v. Biden lawsuit involves Missouri's legal action against the Biden administration, alleging government censorship in collaboration with social media platforms. The lawsuit highlights instances where the government pressured social media companies to remove specific content, such as during the Hunter Biden laptop controversy and COVID-19 discussions. The legal battle aims to address concerns over censorship and government influence on social media narratives. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction in this case, indicating judicial recognition of potential censorship issues.
- The Hunter Biden laptop saga in October 2020 involved a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, with emails suggesting corruption. The New York Post published the story, but it faced skepticism and social media censorship. Questions arose about the laptop's authenticity and its potential ties to Russian disinformation.
- An algorithmic monopoly held by big tech refers to a situation where large technology companies dominate the market by controlling the algorithms that determine what content users see on their platforms. This control over algorithms can limit user choice, stifle competition, and influence the information and content users are exposed to. Breaking up this monopoly would involve giving users more control over the algorithms that shape their online experience, promoting competition, and potentially diversifying the content available on these platforms.
- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides immunity to online platforms for content posted by users. It shields platforms from being treated as the publisher of user-generated content and allows them to moderate content without facing legal repercussions. The law was enacted to foster the growth of the internet by protecting platforms from liability related to user-generated content. It has been subject to various legal interpretations and amendments over the years, including provisions related to illegal content like sex trafficking.
- Antitrust issues in the technology sector involve concerns about monopolistic practices, where dominant tech companies may stifle competition, limit consumer choice, and potentially harm innovation. These issues often revolve around market dominanc ...
Counterarguments
- The lawsuit Missouri v. Biden may not conclusively prove government censorship, as the interactions cited could be interpreted as public health measures rather than suppression of free speech.
- The suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story could be seen as a platform's decision to limit the spread of potentially unverified information rather than direct government censorship.
- The preliminary injunction in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals may not reflect the stance of all courts or the final outcome of the legal process.
- The civil liability for suppression of information, such as the lab-leak theory, may be difficult to establish, as public health guidance evolved with the available evidence.
- Breaking up the algorithmic monopoly might not necessarily lead to the desired increase in competition or consumer choice, as users may not have the expertise to select beneficial algorithms.
- Using consumer protection laws to enforce algorithmic choice could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased complexity for users or difficulty in moderating harmful content.
- Antitrust lawsuits may not be the most effective tool to address concerns about content curation and free speech, as they primarily focus on competition and market dynamics.
- The proposal to offer users a selection of algorithms might not be practical or effective, as it could overwhelm users with choices and complicate the user experience.
- Corporate censorship may not always pose a threat to free speech, as private companies have the right to moderate content on their platforms according to their policies and community stand ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Bailey's Actions Against China, Biden, and Soros-Backed Prosecutors
Andrew Bailey’s office has pursued aggressive legal actions against the Chinese government, the Biden administration, and a Soros-backed prosecutor in St. Louis, citing various reasons ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to undermining the rule of law.
Bailey Sued China For Covid-19 Harm To Missourians
Missouri Harmed by Alleged Chinese Ppe Cover-Up
Bailey went to trial in a lawsuit against the Chinese Communist government, accusing them of harming Missourians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lawsuit claims China caused the pandemic and hoarded PPE, preventing Americans and the state of Missouri from accessing the supplies needed to respond to the crisis.
$25 Billion Judgment Against China Enforceable By Seizing Assets In U.S
Bailey aims for a $25 billion judgment against China, expecting a proposed judgment to be signed soon. He plans to execute the judgment by identifying and seizing Chinese assets in the U.S., leveraging the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. He describes the process of identifying assets through records and potentially sifting through shell companies. Bailey notes challenges in the complexity of the case but insists on dedicated professionals working on it.
Bailey Challenges Biden Administration's Overreach With 50+ Lawsuits
Biden Administration Undermined Rule of Law and Constitution
Bailey's office has filed over 50 lawsuits against the Biden-Harris administration, alleging an undermining of the rule of law and constitutional structure. He discusses concerns about the legal validity of Biden’s actions in light of mental acuity for intentional acts and criticizes the administration’s handling of immigration law and its effect on border security. Bailey mentions the increase of the administrative state under Biden, using the example of a Missouri farmer facing harsh EPA regulations.
Bailey Ousted a Soros-Backed St. Louis Prosecutor Who Neglected Crime Prosecution, Causing Crime to Rise and Businesses to Leave
Novel Legal Theory "Quo Warranto" Shows Prosecutor Unlawfully Refusing Job
Bailey filed a lawsuit using the "writ of quo warranto," arguing a Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor unlawful ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Bailey's Actions Against China, Biden, and Soros-Backed Prosecutors
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Andrew Bailey's office pursued legal actions against China for allegedly causing harm during the COVID-19 pandemic by hoarding PPE. Bailey sought a $25 billion judgment against China, planning to seize Chinese assets in the U.S. to enforce it. Additionally, Bailey filed over 50 lawsuits against the Biden administration, challenging its actions on various legal grounds. He also used a legal strategy called "quo warranto" to oust a Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor for neglecting crime prosecution duties.
- Bailey's use of the "writ of quo warranto" is a legal action that challenges the authority of an individual holding public office. It questions whether the person has the legal right or warrant to hold that position. By filing a lawsuit using this legal strategy, Bailey aimed to remove the Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor from office due to alleged neglect of crime prosecution duties. This legal approach is significant as it can be used to address situations where an official is unlawfully holding office or not fulfilling their responsibilities. Governor Mike Kehoe's support of Bailey's actions underscores the importance of addressing issues related to crime prosecution and public safety.
- The denial of the prosecutor's motion to dismiss the case and the use of the quo warranto legal strategy signify a legal victory for Andrew Bailey. This decision allows the case against the Soros-backed prosecutor to proceed, establishing a legal precedent for challenging elected officials' neglect of their duties. The quo warranto legal strategy enables the removal of public officials who unlawfully hold office or fail to fulfill their responsibilities, emphasizing accountability and upholding the rule of law. Governor Mike Kehoe's support indicates a commitment to addressing issues o ...
Counterarguments
- The lawsuit against China may face significant legal and diplomatic challenges, as sovereign nations typically have immunity from lawsuits in other countries' courts.
- The enforceability of a $25 billion judgment against China is questionable, given the complexities of international law and the potential for such actions to provoke diplomatic tensions.
- The assertion that the Biden administration has undermined the rule of law and constitutional structure is a subjective claim that could be countered by legal experts who support the administration's actions as lawful and constitutional.
- The filing of over 50 lawsuits against the Biden administration could be seen as politically motivated rather than purely based on legal grounds, and some may argue that it is a misuse of state resources.
- The use of the "writ of quo warranto" against the Soros-backed St. Louis prosecutor may be criticized as an overreach of legal authority or an attempt to influence prosecutorial discretion.
- The claim that the Soros-backed prosecutor's approach to crime prosecution has led to an increase in crime could be challenged by data showing that crime rates are influenced by a multitude of factors, not solely prosecutorial practices.
- The link between the prosecutor's non-prosecution rate and a regional rise in crime could be disputed by studies that find no direct correlation between prosecution rates and crime rates.
- The criticism of prosecutors elected with Soros' support could be countered by the ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Missouri's Approach to Gun Rights and Criminal Justice
Andrew Bailey outlines Missouri's strong legal protections for gun rights and discusses efforts to reform the state's criminal justice system to support law enforcement and boost prosecution rates.
Missouri's Strong Legal Protections For Gun Rights, Including Preemption of Local Regulations
Bailey Defends Missouri's Second Amendment Act Against Biden Administration Lawsuit
Bailey elaborates on the robust constitutional protections in place for gun ownership in Missouri. He explains that the right to keep and bear arms is enshrined not only in the United States Constitution’s Second Amendment but also in Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution, ensuring the possession of firearms, ammunition, and accessories remains safeguarded. Missouri law preempts local regulations, prohibiting municipalities from enacting laws that undermine these constitutional rights. Any state action perceived as infringing on the right to keep and bear arms must undergo strict scrutiny, the most stringent form of constitutional review.
Missourians are legally empowered to defend themselves or others when they reasonably believe there is a danger to life. Property defense rights are recognized as well and were exemplified in the case of Mark McCloskey, who faced charges by a Soros-backed prosecutor for brandishing an AR-15 to guard his property against protesters. Bailey responded to McCloskey's conviction by preparing clemency paperwork, which Governor Mike Parson subsequently signed.
Bailey continues to stand against localities that pass ordinances violating the Missouri Constitution's provisions on gun ownership, defending the Second Amendment Preservation Act. This act, passed by the Missouri General Assembly and signed by the state’s governor, reinforces state authority over federal government overreach.
Bailey Aims to Reform Missouri's Criminal Justice System, Boost Prosecution Rates, and Support Law Enforcement
State Must Actively Protect Public Safety After Soros-Backed Prosecutor Damage
Bailey indicates Missouri has already seen a 133% increase in criminal prosecution and attributes this success partly to a mentorship program his office initiated. This program aimed to enhance trial outcomes and retention, successfully preventing the disbursement of taxpayer dollars to plaintiffs in civil ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Missouri's Approach to Gun Rights and Criminal Justice
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The Second Amendment Act may be seen as a barrier to implementing common-sense gun regulations that could potentially reduce gun violence.
- Preempting local regulations can be criticized for not allowing municipalities to address specific local concerns regarding gun safety and crime.
- The robust defense of property rights with firearms could be argued to escalate tensions and potentially lead to violence.
- The Second Amendment Preservation Act might be viewed as a challenge to the supremacy of federal law, which could lead to legal uncertainties and conflicts between state and federal authorities.
- Clemency for individuals like Mark McCloskey may be criticized as setting a precedent that could encourage vigilantism or the disproportionate use of force in property defense situations.
- The increase in criminal prosecution rates could be scrutinized for potentially prioritizing quantity over quality, possibly leading to wrongful convictions or a focus on easier-to-prosecute cases.
- The argument that the federal lawsuit lacks standing might be countered by concerns that state laws can have broader implications that affect federal law enforcement efforts and public safety.
- Advocating for state rights and autonomy i ...
Actionables
- You can educate yourself on your state's gun laws by visiting your state government's official website or contacting your local representative's office to request information. Understanding the specifics of your state's legislation, such as Missouri's Second Amendment Act, will help you become more informed about your rights and responsibilities as a gun owner.
- Consider enrolling in a certified firearm safety course if you're interested in gun ownership or want to ensure you're handling firearms correctly. These courses often cover the legal aspects of gun ownership, self-defense laws, and safe handling practices, which align with the principles of responsible gun ownership and self-defense recognized in Missouri law.
- If you're passionate about the balance of state and federal powers ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
