In this episode of the Shawn Ryan Show, Lue Elizondo discusses his early career background and pivotal experiences with remote viewing in intelligence gathering. He delves into past U.S. government programs investigating unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), including concerning instances where UAPs displayed advanced capabilities near sensitive military sites.
Elizondo reveals details of his efforts to raise awareness about UAP threats during his time in a Pentagon program, facing bureaucratic obstacles in advocating for increased transparency balanced with national security concerns. His resignation aimed to promote openness around these issues within appropriate boundaries.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Elizondo shares his difficult childhood influenced by his Cuban revolutionary father's volatile nature and time in Castro's prisons. This anger fueled Elizondo, per Elizondo, to join the military, pivoting toward counter-intelligence after exposure to remote viewing's effectiveness.
Elizondo experienced remote viewing firsthand through a special military program. He cites examples demonstrating its capabilities in locating targets like a downed Russian plane and a kidnapped general. Elizondo argues remote viewing complements other intelligence methods like SIGINT and ELINT.
Elizondo reveals past congressional support for programs like OSAP and ATIP investigating UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). He reviewed 1950s classified documents detailing New Mexico UAP activities near military sites. Elizondo references the Stargate and Grill Flame psychic espionage programs, asserting the government wouldn't abandon a proven intelligence method.
Elizondo describes alarming cases where UAPs interfered with U.S. and Russian nuclear capabilities, posing grave threats by entering restricted airspace undetected. He criticizes government secrecy on UAPs out of political concerns, suggesting honesty maintains public trust.
Elizondo resigned in 2017 aiming to raise awareness of UAP threats and increase transparency. He faced bureaucratic obstacles briefing leadership like Secretary Mattis despite briefing their staffers. Elizondo advocates balancing national security with informing the public.
1-Page Summary
Lue Elizondo shares a detailed account of his challenging upbringing under the influence of his father, a volatile Cuban revolutionary, which turned into a journey of self-discovery and an impressive career in intelligence and counterterrorism.
Elizondo's early years were marked by the tumultuous history of his father who was deeply involved in Cuba's political strife.
Elizondo grew up influenced by his father's volatile temper and involvement in the Bay of Pigs invasion. Captured by Castro's forces, his father spent two years in Castro's prisons under harsh conditions, such as surgery without anesthesia and inadequate nutrition. Upon settlement in the United States with Elizondo's mother, a former Playboy bunny, the violence and volatility continued, contributing to the dysfunctionality of his family life. Elizondo, who was bullied at school, describes his younger self as an angry man. It was this anger he later recognized as the driving force behind several of his life choices.
To defy his disapproving extended family, Elizondo studied microbiology and immunology in college, though he found himself enjoying it. After accruing debt and deciding against a career in his chosen field, Elizondo joined the army, setting him on a path to counter-intelligence. While there is no explicit mention in the provided content about his later work specifically in intelligence and counterterrorism, his decision to join the military was a turning point in redirecting his anger and finding purpose.
Elizondo's military career led him to cross paths with remote viewing, an unconventional intel ...
Elizondo's Personal and Professional Background
Elizondo critiques the government’s dismissal of UAP sightings as drones, while highlighting the lengthy history of U.S. investigations into these phenomena and the confidential nature of such programs.
Elizondo recounts that ATIP, which focused on UAP, originated from OSAP, the broader Advanced Aerospace Weapons Special Application Program established in 2007.
Harry Reid, Ted Stevens, and Daniel Inouye endorsed the creation of a program dedicated to UAP research, attracting bipartisan support. Stevens himself had a UAP experience, and other private experiences by members of Congress have been relayed, albeit confidentially.
During his career, Elizondo was charged with shredding outdated classified documents. This included 1950 reports detailing UAP activities in New Mexico close to sensitive military sites.
Elizondo reveals the existence of the Stargate and Grill Flame programs financed by taxpayer dollars for remote viewing. He refers to Hal Puthoff as the godfather of the CIA’s psychic espionage program. Elizondo asserts that he himself has seen the effectiveness of remote viewing and contends the U.S. government wouldn’t abandon a proven method. He describes these ...
U.S. Government Research and Investigations Into Uap
Lue Elizondo delves into the national security concerns associated with Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and the bureaucratic and political challenges in addressing and publicly discussing these issues.
Elizondo describes alarming incidents where UAPs have interfered with both U.S. and Russian nuclear missile systems. In the United States, UAPs reportedly took an entire flight of nuclear missiles offline, while in Russia, they have caused nuclear weapons to switch to a ready position. These actions indicate UAPs' capacity to disrupt critical military technologies and pose a serious national security threat. Elizondo stresses the threat posed by UAPs that can enter restricted airspace unchallenged, originating from unknown sources, which constitutes a major vulnerability to national security. He highlights the gravity of the situation by stating that it would be the greatest intelligence failure since 9/11 if a foreign entity had developed such advanced technology undetected.
Elizondo laments the government officials' reticence to openly discuss UAP occurrences due to political hesitancy as well as concerns about public reaction and admitting to uncertainties. He reflects on his own frustrations and bureaucratic resistance encountered when attempting to brief senior leadership on UAP issues. This political hesitancy can lead to a lack of transparency and, potentially, the public being misled.
Government reluctance to inform leadership or the public about UAPs stems from an unwillingness to admit to phenomena beyond their understanding, including their intent and control. Elizondo criticizes this stance, suggesting that it results in government contradictory statements and essentially treating citizens like they are incapable of handling the truth.
Elizondo points to the broader implications this stance on UAPs has for government credibility. He suggests that honesty and openness, even in the face of uncertainty, are critical to maintaining public trust, as recent elections have shown pe ...
Uap Phenomenon: National Security Implications and Challenges
Elizondo, who resigned from the Department of Defense on October 4th, 2017, sought to bring attention to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) issues and the need for transparency. Throughout the podcast, Elizondo emphasizes that if UAPs are of foreign adversarial origin, national security is glaringly insufficient and immediate changes are necessary. This argument underscores the critical need for high-level briefings on the matter.
Elizondo faced barriers while attempting to inform senior leadership, including Secretary Mattis, about the UAP situation. His resignation memo highlighted the need for leadership to be aware of UAPs and their potential to affect nuclear capabilities and military readiness. Despite briefings and eagerness on his part, there was reluctance from others to inform Secretary Mattis until an Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence was confirmed by the Senate. Elizondo circumvented his direct supervisor, who was under several Inspector General investigations, to brief the Secretary's staff and high-level advisors, including those from the CIA and National Security Council.
Although the specifics of Elizondo's attempts to communicate with the Trump administration were not detailed in the transcript, the overall conversation suggests that he remains optimistic about the prospects for transparency under the new administration. He alludes to knowing cabinet members personally who are sincerely interested in UAP disclosure, balancing the need to protect secrets and ...
Efforts to Address Uap Issues and Transparency
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser