#139 Nick Bryant - Disturbing Parallels Between P Diddy & Jeffrey Epstein’s Blackmail

Nick Bryant discusses the intricacies of the Jeffrey Epstein child trafficking network and asserts that there is a concerted effort by institutions and government entities to obscure the truth and protect the privileged.

The Epstein Victims Compensation Fund is a tool to cover up the government's involvement

Bryant suggests the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund is being used as a cover-up mechanism for government involvement in Epstein's activities.

The Victims Compensation Fund is overseen by lawyers with questionable ethics and a history of protecting the powerful, including David Boies and Stan Pottinger, who have used tactics like hiring private investigators to intimidate victims and journalists.

He calls into question the integrity of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, due to the involvement of Jordana Feldman and David Boies, who are known for dubious ethical practices. Bryant highlights Boies' previous engagement with Black Cube to discredit accusers and journalists in past high-profile cases involving Harvey Weinstein and Elizabeth Holmes, thus raising concerns regarding his role in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund.

Bryant also reveals that the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund compels recipients to sign non-disclosure agreements—NDAs—preventing them from pursuing legal action against other perpetrators. This raises red flags as a strategy that effectively silences victims. Out of 225 applicants, 150 were awarded settlements by the fund, with the actual criteria for these awards kept in the dark. Bryant recounts that therapists working with young clients who claimed they were trafficked were denied settlements, casting doubt on the funds' objectives.

The government has repeatedly obstructed attempts to hold Epstein's co-conspirators accountable

Bryant argues that the government has obstructed justice by failing to take action against key players in Epstein's trafficking network and by the cover-up of broader implications.

Key figures like Sarah Kellen, Epstein's number two lieutenant, have not faced the same level of prosecution as Ghislaine Maxwell despite significant evidence against them.

The focus of the government appears to ...

Nick Bryant raises doubts about the established account of the Watergate scandal, questioning the accuracy of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein's reporting, and suggesting deeper conspiracies at play in Nixon's downfall.

The official narrative of Watergate promoted by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein is heavily fabricated

Bryant contends that the popular narrative of the Watergate scandal, as reported by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post, is fraught with inaccuracies and fabrications.

Woodward and Bernstein, as well as their editor Ben Bradley, had connections to the CIA that enabled them to obtain information and shape the Watergate narrative.

According to Bryant, Bob Woodward had a cover story for entering journalism that didn't align with his lifestyle, suggesting he was known as a "spook" and had unexplained income. Bryant also alleges that Ben Bradley, the editor of The Washington Post, had ties to the CIA and produced content for them. Deborah Davis's book "Catherine the Great" pointed out Bradley's CIA connections, which were later confirmed through Freedom of Information Act requests after the publisher was pressured to pulp the book following threats from Bradley.

Claims about the identity of "Deep Throat" and the methods of communication between Woodward and his source do not hold up under scrutiny.

Bryant suggests inconsistencies and implausibilities in Woodward's account of his interactions with "Deep Throat," the moniker given to Woodward's informant. He indicates that "Deep Throat" was actually Alexander Haig, who had a prior relationship with Woodward and provided detailed information that led to Nixon's resignation.

Nixon was not solely responsible for the crimes and cover-up surrounding Watergate

Bryant proposes that there was a "conspiracy within a conspiracy," where the CIA and other entities were actually attempting to undermine Nixon's administration for reasons separate from the Watergate break-in, such as Nixon's effort to deescalate the Cold War.

There was a conspiracy within a conspiracy, with the CIA and Joint Chiefs of Staff attempting to undermine Nixon's administration due to his efforts to deescalate the Cold War.

Bryant details Nixon's intentions to become a peacemaker, drawing the ire of hawkish figures within the government. Nixon's National Security Decision Memorandum Two reduced the influence of the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the State Department on his geopolitical moves, leaving figures like Richard Helms without power in the national security arena. Nixon distrusted the CIA, and his outreach to communist nations did not sit well with hardliners.

Key figures like Alexander Haig played a role in funneling damaging information to Woodward and the special prosecutors to bring down Nixon, despite Nixon not directly order ...

Bryant extrapolates parallels between the Jeffrey Epstein case and the historic Watergate scandal, observing patterns of government protection and media complicity in both events.

The same patterns of government obstruction and media collusion are present in both the Epstein and Watergate cases

Bryant’s analysis points to a similarity in the government’s behavior in the Epstein case to the obstructions seen during Watergate.

The Southern District of New York, under the leadership of Damian Williams, has overseen the Epstein and P. Diddy investigations in a way that suggests an effort to protect the powerful.

Bryant expresses skepticism over the Southern District of New York handling search warrants for P. Diddy in locales outside its typical jurisdiction, hinting at efforts to protect influential individuals. He underscores that the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, controlled by Damian Williams, conveniently avoided indicting any powerful associates. He insinuates that Williams’ oversight of the Epstein trial and P. Diddy investigation points toward a potential cover-up.

Furthermore, Bryant highlights Damian Williams' connection to the Paul and Daisy Soros Foundation and notes the link between Peter Soros, found in Epstein’s Black Book, and the foundation that granted funds for Williams’ education. Bryant questions the implications of these associations on the impartiality of the investigations handled by Williams.

The media's reluctance to pursue justice in the Epstein case mirrors their handling of the Watergate scandal, with key figures like Woodward and Bernstein providing cover for the government.

Drawing parallels with Watergate, Bryant suggests that renowned journalists like Woodward and Bernstein may deter justice in the Epstein case, indicating patterns of media reluctance similar to those witnessed during the political scandal.

The use of blackmail and honey traps to compromise and control powerful individuals appears to be a common tactic in both cases

Blackmail as a tool of power is a common thread Bryant sees running through several scandals, indicating its continuing prevalence.

Epstein and figures like Craig Spence in the Franklin scandal utilized hidden cameras and blackmail to maintain power over their high-profile associates.

Bryant points out that Epstein and Spence employed hidden cameras for ...