Podcasts > Shawn Ryan Show > #107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

By Shawn Ryan Show

In this episode of the Shawn Ryan Show, the discussion centers on allegations that the U.S. has been sending millions of dollars weekly to Afghanistan, with funds potentially ending up with the Taliban regime. Legend raises concerns about potential funding of terrorist activities, oversight issues, and the vetting process for Afghan evacuees entering the U.S.

The conversation also delves into the roles of China, Pakistan, and certain U.S. State Department officials in supporting or sympathizing with the Taliban. Legend highlights the work of the Afghan National Resistance Front, led by Ahmad Massoud, as the sole democratic opposition fighting against extremist groups like the Taliban.

#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Apr 29, 2024 episode of the Shawn Ryan Show

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

1-Page Summary

U.S. Funding to the Taliban Regime

The U.S. has allegedly been sending $40 million weekly to Afghanistan, with funds potentially ending up in Taliban hands, according to Legend. This lack of oversight raises concerns about funding terrorist activities, despite the Taliban violating the Doha Agreement.

State Department Taliban Sympathizers

Certain State Department officials like Zalmay Khalilzad, Thomas West, and Karen Decker are accused of sympathizing with and whitewashing the Taliban by trying to differentiate them from al-Qaeda through the notion of a "Taliban 2.0."

Taliban Control of Key Afghan Institutions

The Taliban's passport department, headed by the internationally wanted terrorist Sirajuddin Haqqani, profits from issuing documents to extremist groups on "Holy Warrior Day." Additionally, the Taliban-controlled central bank bidding process is dominated by Taliban and Haqqani Network affiliates.

Terrorist Entry Through Southern Border

Legend highlights the failure to properly vet around 120,000 evacuees from Afghanistan, suggesting the potential for terrorists to enter the U.S. He cites apprehensions of individuals on terror watch lists illegally crossing from Mexico as evidence of this threat.

Chinese and Pakistani Taliban Support

China began backing the Taliban militarily around 2005-2007 to pressure the U.S., according to Legend and Shawn Ryan. China's Norinco has provided arms to the Taliban in exchange for accessing Afghanistan's lithium and rare-earth minerals through illegal mining camps. Huawei has also installed surveillance systems for the Taliban.

Pakistan allegedly provided the Taliban with $3 billion meant for counterterrorism and materials like ammonium nitrate for IEDs used against U.S. troops.

The National Resistance Front

Led by Ahmad Massoud, the Afghan National Resistance Front (NRF) is the sole democratic opposition to terrorist groups like the Taliban, according to Legend. Comprised of former Afghan commandos and volunteers, the NRF desperately needs supplies and political support from U.S. veterans and lawmakers to continue fighting for freedom against extremist ideology.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Taliban's control of key Afghan institutions, such as the passport department and the central bank bidding process, allows them to exert influence and profit from these critical functions. This control raises concerns about how these institutions are being used to support extremist activities and groups. The involvement of internationally wanted terrorists like Sirajuddin Haqqani in managing these institutions adds to the complexity and security risks associated with the Taliban's grip on Afghan infrastructure. Understanding these dynamics is crucial in assessing the broader implications of the Taliban's governance and its impact on regional stability.
  • China's support for the Taliban is linked to gaining access to Afghanistan's valuable minerals like lithium and rare-earth minerals. This support includes providing arms to the Taliban in exchange for access to these resources through illegal mining activities. Additionally, Chinese companies like Norinco and Huawei have been involved in supporting the Taliban through arms provision and installing surveillance systems, respectively. This strategic support is part of China's broader geopolitical interests in the region and its efforts to counter U.S. influence.
  • The National Resistance Front (NRF) is a group led by Ahmad Massoud in Afghanistan, opposing the Taliban. Comprised of former Afghan commandos and volunteers, the NRF seeks to fight against extremist groups and uphold democratic values. They require support, including supplies and political backing, to continue their resistance efforts. The NRF represents a significant opposition force to the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Counterarguments

  • Oversight of U.S. funding to Afghanistan may be more complex and nuanced than presented, with efforts to ensure aid does not support terrorist activities.
  • State Department officials may have legitimate diplomatic strategies aimed at stabilizing the region rather than sympathizing with the Taliban.
  • The relationship between the Taliban and al-Qaeda could be more intricate, and efforts to differentiate them might be part of a broader political strategy.
  • The vetting process for evacuees from Afghanistan may have been thorough and in line with international standards, despite the challenges posed by the evacuation circumstances.
  • The apprehension of individuals on terror watch lists at the southern border may not be directly linked to the Afghan evacuees or indicative of a widespread issue.
  • China's involvement in Afghanistan could be part of international economic competition rather than direct military backing of the Taliban.
  • Pakistan's relationship with the Taliban is complex, and the support provided may be part of regional security dynamics rather than direct assistance to terrorist activities.
  • The Afghan National Resistance Front's characterization as the sole democratic opposition may overlook other groups or political dynamics within Afghanistan.
  • The NRF's need for supplies and political support from the U.S. may require careful consideration of the potential long-term implications for regional stability and U.S. foreign policy.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

U.S. funding of and providing support to the Taliban regime

U.S. involvement and financial support of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan are raising serious concerns and questions about adherence to the Doha Agreement and the oversight of funds that could potentially be aiding terrorist activities.

The Taliban violating the terms of the Doha Agreement

The guests discuss the Taliban's violation of the Doha Agreement, which stipulated that they should not harbor al-Qaeda, negotiate in good faith with the Afghan government, and agree to a cease-fire; conditions the Taliban failed to uphold, resulting in a significant al-Qaeda presence and protection of bin Laden's sons in Afghanistan.

U.S. taxpayer funds being funneled weekly to the Taliban from various sources

Legend alleges that the U.S. has been sending $40 million weekly to Afghanistan. This money is purportedly moving through the Afghanistan International Bank to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan, headed by a sanctioned terrorist. Bidding sessions held by the central bank are reportedly dominated by individuals affiliated with the Taliban or the Haqqani Network, with a portion of the funds going to the network and the rest to local NGOs that are licensed and likely controlled by the Taliban.

State Department officials with long histories of Taliban sympathies and whitewashing

Various individuals within the State Department, such as Zalmay Khalilzad who has had historical interactions with the Taliban, along with Thomas West and Karen Decker, are noted for their alleged sympathies towards the Taliban. The speaker criticizes these officials for attempts to differentiate the Taliban from Al-Qaeda through the notion of a "Taliban 2.0," an ideology which they suggest is no different from Al-Qaeda, despite some individuals' claims.

Lack of oversight allowing funds to go directly to terrorist organizations and activities

Legend expresses that a lack of oversight in the funds provided to Afghanistan has resulted in U.S. tax dollars potentially directly funding the Taliban, raising concerns about the transparency and destination of the funds. Joh ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

U.S. funding of and providing support to the Taliban regime

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Doha Agreement was a deal signed in 2020 between the U.S. and the Taliban, outlining conditions for peace in Afghanistan. It required the Taliban to prevent terrorist groups like al-Qaeda from operating in areas under their control, engage in talks with the Afghan government, and work towards a ceasefire. The agreement aimed to pave the way for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and promote stability in the region. Violations of the agreement, such as sheltering al-Qaeda members, have raised concerns about the Taliban's commitment to its terms and the implications for peace efforts in Afghanistan.
  • The lack of oversight in funds provided to Afghanistan means there is insufficient monitoring or control over how the money is being used. This lack of supervision raises concerns that the funds could be ending up in the hands of terrorist organizations like the Taliban, potentially fueling their activities. The implications include a lack of transparency in where the money is going and the possibility of U.S. tax dollars inadvertently supporting terrorist groups. This situation highlights the need for better oversight and accountability in the distribution of funds to prevent unintended consequences.
  • Sir ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

Terrorist infiltration of the U.S. enabled by the southern border crisis

There are increasing concerns regarding the potential for terrorist infiltration through the U.S. southern border, exacerbated by the crisis at the border and the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

Failure to properly vet evacuees and immigrants enabling terrorist entry

Legend underscores the problem with vetting the large number of individuals evacuated during the chaotic circumstances in Afghanistan. He casts doubt on the feasibility of properly vetting approximately 120,000 people evacuated by the Biden administration, hinting at concerns about the evacuees' identities and backgrounds.

Further, Legend alleges that about 70% of those evacuated were not eligible for visas, were not vetted, and are only having their identities confirmed after their arrival in the U.S. This raises alarms about the potential for individuals with malicious intent to slip through the cracks.

Apprehensions of terror watch list individuals after illegally entering from Mexico

Supporting the concern over potential threats, Legend cites occasions when individuals on terror watch lists have been apprehended following illegal entry into the United States from Mexico. This indicates that efforts are being made by some on watch lists to enter or be present in the country.

Lone wolf style attacks on U.S. soil inevitable without intervention

Additional ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Terrorist infiltration of the U.S. enabled by the southern border crisis

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The chaotic evacuation from Afghanistan raised concerns about the ability to properly vet the large number of individuals evacuated, potentially allowing individuals with malicious intent to enter the U.S. The rapid and disorderly nature of the evacuation process may have led to gaps in screening processes, increasing the risk of individuals with extremist backgrounds slipping through. This situation has heightened worries about the potential for terrorists to exploit the chaos at the U.S. southern border to gain entry into the country. The connection lies in the challenges posed by the hasty evacuation in effectively screening and vetting individuals, creating vulnerabilities that could be exploited by those seeking to infiltrate the U.S. for nefarious purposes.
  • The text mentions concerns about properly vetting individuals evacuated from Afghanistan due to the chaotic circumstances. There are doubts about the feasibility of vetting around 120,000 people evacuated by the Biden administration. Allegations suggest that a significant portion of evacuees were not eligible for visas and were not vetted before arriving in the U.S., raising concerns about potential security risks.
  • Lone wolf-style attacks typically involve individuals acting alone, ...

Counterarguments

  • The vast majority of migrants at the southern border are seeking asylum or better economic opportunities, not engaging in terrorism.
  • Rigorous vetting processes are in place for refugees and evacuees, and the U.S. has a history of successfully integrating refugees from conflict zones.
  • The percentage of evacuees not eligible for visas does not necessarily correlate with a security threat; many may be at risk individuals such as women and children.
  • Apprehensions of individuals on terror watch lists are indicative of the effectiveness of border security and intelligence operations.
  • The instances of extremism cited may not be representative of broader trends and could be isolated incidents rather than indicative of a widespread issue.
  • The presence of foreign extremist symbols in the U.S. does not necessarily translate to direct connections with international terrorist organizations or an increased threat of attacks.
  • Lone wolf a ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

Chinese and Pakistani government direct military and economic support of the Taliban regime

Legend and Shawn Ryan discuss the multifaceted support that China and Pakistan have provided to the Taliban, which directly impacts military and economic dynamics in the region.

Extraction of lithium and rare earth minerals from illegal Chinese mining camps

It is reported that China began backing the Taliban with weapons and funding around 2005-2007, primarily to exert pressure on the United States. Beyond military support, China has economic interests, with Legend and Ryan revealing negotiations concerning lithium, inferring that China’s economic involvement started before August 31st, 2021.

The Chinese have signed contracts worth billions with the Taliban for extracting minerals, an illegal operation. Afghanistan possesses the world's largest deposit of lithium, and the Chinese are tapping into this wealth, along with gold, copper, and other rare earth minerals.

Provision of state-of-the-art surveillance and defense technologies

Norinco, a Chinese defense company, has had numerous engagements with the Taliban's defense ministry, particularly with Mullah Yaqub, the son of the Taliban’s founder and the current defense minister. These meetings have reportedly led to arms for minerals deals, where Norinco provides the Taliban with arms, military equipment, and surveillance gear in exchange for access to mineral resources.

Furthermore, Huawei, in collaboration with Norinco, is said to have installed over a hundred thousand cameras in Kabul and other strategic locations, equipping the Taliban with a sophisticated surveillance system analogous to the one used in China.

Pakistan's central role in harboring Taliban leadership and waging proxy war on U.S. troops

...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Chinese and Pakistani government direct military and economic support of the Taliban regime

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • China has reportedly been involved in illegal mining operations in Afghanistan to extract valuable minerals like lithium, gold, copper, and rare earth minerals. These minerals are crucial for various industries, including technology and defense. The extraction of these resources by China from illegal mining camps in Afghanistan has raised concerns about environmental damage and exploitation of the country's natural wealth. The involvement of China in these activities has geopolitical implications and adds complexity to the dynamics in the region.
  • Norinco, a Chinese defense company, has been involved in interactions with the Taliban's defense ministry. These engagements reportedly include discussions and agreements related to arms deals and the exchange of military equipment for access to mineral resources. The collaboration between Norinco and the Taliban's defense ministry has implications for the military capabilities and resources available to the Taliban. This relationship underscores the multifaceted nature of China's involvement with the Taliban, encompassing both military and economic dimensions.
  • Norinco, a Chinese defense company, has engaged with the Taliban to provide arms, military equipment, and surveillance technology. Huawei, in collaboration with Norinco, has installed a significant number of cameras in strategic locations in Afghanistan to enhance the Taliban's surveillance capabilities. This partnership has equipped the Taliban with a sophisticated surveillance system similar to those used in China. The provision of these technologies by Norinco and Huaw ...

Counterarguments

  • The extent and nature of the support provided by China and Pakistan to the Taliban are often based on intelligence reports, which may not always be fully accurate or may be influenced by geopolitical biases.
  • China's engagement in Afghanistan could be seen as part of its broader economic strategy rather than direct support for the Taliban, focusing on stabilizing the region to protect its investments.
  • The term "illegal mining camps" may not accurately reflect the complexity of international law and the sovereignty of the Afghan government, which may have its own agreements with foreign companies.
  • The provision of surveillance technology by Huawei and Norinco could be part of commercial contracts rather than a strategic military alliance, and the technology could be used for legitimate security purposes.
  • Pakistan's relationship with the Taliban could be viewed as a complex interplay of regional security dynamics, where Pakistan seeks to manage its own security concerns regarding India and instability in the region.
  • The claim that Pakistan diverted funds intended for counterterrorism to support the Taliban requires substantiation, and there may be alternative explanations for the use of such funds.
  • The suggestion that infrastructu ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#107 Legend - Biden Admin Sends Your Tax Dollars to the Taliban

Afghanistan's National Resistance Front led by Ahmad Massoud as the sole opposition to terrorism

The Afghan National Resistance Front (NRF), as presented by an individual identified as Legend and supported by U.S. veterans and lawmakers, stands as the last democratic force in Afghanistan under the leadership of Commander Ahmad Massoud, opposing terrorism and espousing aspirations for freedom and democracy.

Comprised of former Afghan special forces, commandos, and volunteer fighters

The NRF is built from the remnants of the Afghan military forces, including commandos and regular soldiers from across Afghanistan – places as far-reaching as Helmand and Kandahar. Members of the Afghan government, intelligence commandos, and local volunteers have also rallied, focusing their efforts in the Panjshir Valley, north of Kabul, to initiate counter-operations against the Taliban. Legend, who still travels to Afghanistan to fight, emphasizes that these individuals have congregated in Panjshir, once under siege from multiple fronts, to protect and fight for their nation.

In dire need of supplies, equipment, training, and political support

Legend articulates the desperate need for equipment and political support. By bringing their own equipment as provinces fell to the Taliban, the fighters have shown resourcefulness, but remain inadequately supplied to sustain prolonged resistance. The items they need most include sniper rifles, drones, surveillance equipment, medical kits, and uniforms. Moreover, what they seek is not direct military intervention but rather a cessation of support to the Taliban, which Legend argues would naturally lead to the extremist group's decline, thereby benefiting the resistance.

U.S. veterans who have served in the Afghan War, including Congressman Tim Burchett and colleagues like Mike Walsh, Brian Mast, Dan Crenshaw, and James Crow, are vocal supporters of the resistance. They refuse to accept the Taliban as anything less than a terrorist group, based on their direct experiences. Chairman Michael McCaul of the House Foreign Affairs Committee also aligns with this view, openly denouncing the Taliban's actions and supporting the NRF.

Carrying out ongoing operations against Taliban and terrorist forces

Commander Massoud and acting president Amrullah Saleh are identified as key figures, representing opposition to terrorism and ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Afghanistan's National Resistance Front led by Ahmad Massoud as the sole opposition to terrorism

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Legend is an individual who supports the Afghan National Resistance Front (NRF) led by Commander Ahmad Massoud. Legend is not explicitly identified by name in the text but is described as a key figure who emphasizes the need for supplies, equipment, and political support for the NRF. Legend, along with U.S. veterans and lawmakers, advocates for backing the NRF in its opposition to terrorism and its fight for freedom and democracy in Afghanistan. Legend's role seems to involve rallying support for the NRF and highlighting the importance of international assistance in their struggle against extremist groups like the Taliban.
  • The National Resistance Front (NRF) is composed of former Afghan military personnel, including special forces and volunteers from various regions. They are based in the Panjshir Valley and are led by Commander Ahmad Massoud and acting president Amrullah Saleh. The NRF opposes terrorist groups like the Taliban, al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Haqqani network, engaging in ongoing operations against them. The NRF emphasizes the importance of international support to sustain their resistance efforts and uphold their vision for a democratic Afghanistan.
  • The conflict in Afghanistan has deep roots, including the Soviet invasion in the 1980s, the subsequent civil war, the rise of the Taliban in the 1990s, and the U.S.-led invasion in 2001 following the 9/11 attacks. The Taliban, an extremist group, controlled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, enforcing strict Islamic laws. The country has faced ongoing instability due to the presence of various armed groups, ethnic divisions, and struggles for power. The recent withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2021 led to the rapid takeover of the country by the Taliban, sparking renewed resistance efforts like the National Resistance Front in Panjshir.
  • The NRF, led by Ahmad Massoud, opposes the Taliban and other terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Haqqani network. They are engaged in ongoing operations to counter these extremist forces in Afghanistan, aiming to uphold democratic values and resist the influence of terrorist ideologies. The NRF's struggle against these gro ...

Counterarguments

  • The effectiveness of the NRF in establishing a democratic Afghanistan may be limited by the complex tribal and ethnic dynamics of the country, which have historically hindered centralized governance and democracy.
  • The NRF's reliance on former military personnel and the need for foreign equipment and support could be seen as a continuation of Afghanistan's dependency on external forces, which may not lead to a sustainable or autonomous national security strategy.
  • The support of U.S. veterans and lawmakers for the NRF might be influenced by their own experiences and biases, and may not necessarily reflect the broader interests or will of the Afghan population.
  • The narrative of the NRF as the sole democratic force may oversimplify the political landscape of Afghanistan, which includes a variety of other groups and factions with their own interests and visions for the country's future.
  • The call for cessation of support to the Taliban could have geopolitical implications, potentially exacerbating tensions in the region and affecting international relations, especially with countries that may view the Taliban as a legitimate governing entity.
  • The focus on military resistance against the Taliban might overshadow the need for diplomatic and ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA