Podcasts > SERIALously > 187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

By 10 to LIFE

The SERIALously podcast explores the disturbing case of Ellen Greenberg, a 27-year-old teacher found with 20 stab wounds to her head, neck, and torso. While the death was initially ruled a suicide, new forensic evidence raises doubts. The summary details the unusual crime scene details that experts believe are inconsistent with suicide. It also chronicles the Greenberg family's ongoing legal battle to change the death certificate's ruling, amid concerns over potential conflicts of interest.

The parents have hired private investigators, filed lawsuits, and appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The case highlights the family's determination to uncover the truth about Ellen's death and expose what they believe was a rush to judgment influenced by powerful connections.

Listen to the original

187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Aug 26, 2024 episode of the SERIALously

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

1-Page Summary

The Mysterious Death of Ellen Greenberg

Doubts Over Initial Suicide Ruling

Ellen Greenberg, a 27-year-old teacher, was found with 20 stab wounds—to her torso, neck, and back of her head—suggesting homicide, according to her family and experts. Yet the initial ruling was suicide. New forensic evidence, including bloodstains contradicting the official narrative, has raised doubts.

Unusual Crime Scene Details

The apartment was locked from the inside with no signs of break-in, and the wounds' brutality and locations, including 10 to the back of Ellen's neck, were highly inconsistent with suicide by stabbing, experts hired by the family found. Her mother, Sandee, expressed disbelief that Ellen could have stabbed herself 20 times.

Experts Suggest Homicide

Multiple experts, including private investigators, renowned pathologists, and forensic scientists, concluded the case was "strongly suspicious of homicide" based on evidence like lack of hemorrhaging in some wounds. Two neuropathologists determined Ellen couldn't have taken her own life.

Family's Pursuit of Justice

Despite the new findings, the medical examiner stubbornly maintains the suicide ruling. Ellen's parents have hired experts, filed lawsuits against entities like the medical examiner's office, and appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to change the death certificate's ruling.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Concerns surround Ellen's fiancé Samuel Goldberg's possible connections to influential legal and political figures in Philadelphia. His uncle, a lawyer, was permitted to remove potential evidence from the crime scene. And though the case was transferred from local authorities due to suspected conflicts of interest, the state's then-Attorney General Josh Shapiro, now governor, declined to reopen it despite the family's efforts, fueling worries over his own ties to Samuel's family.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The initial suicide ruling may have been based on evidence and protocols that were not fully detailed in the text.
  • Locking mechanisms can fail or be manipulated in ways that are not immediately apparent, potentially explaining the locked apartment.
  • Self-inflicted wounds, while seemingly inconsistent with common patterns, can vary widely and may not always align with expectations.
  • The lack of hemorrhaging in some wounds could have alternative explanations not related to homicide.
  • The family's disbelief, while understandable, is not conclusive evidence of homicide.
  • The involvement of multiple experts does not inherently invalidate the findings of the medical examiner.
  • Legal processes have safeguards to prevent conflicts of interest, and the presence of familial connections does not necessarily imply impropriety.
  • The decision by the Attorney General not to reopen the case could be based on a comprehensive review of the evidence rather than any alleged ties to the family.

Actionables

  • You can enhance your critical thinking skills by practicing analyzing complex scenarios, like the case mentioned, through online courses or puzzle games that focus on deduction and reasoning.
    • By engaging with interactive platforms that simulate crime scene investigations or offer complex problem-solving exercises, you'll develop a keener eye for detail and improve your ability to assess situations that require a deep analysis of facts versus assumptions. For example, apps like "Criminal Case" or websites like Braingle offer a variety of puzzles and scenarios that challenge users to think critically and make informed decisions based on available evidence.
  • You might start a journal where you document and reflect on daily decisions, noting any biases or preconceived notions you encounter.
    • This self-reflection exercise will help you become more aware of your own cognitive processes, particularly how you form opinions and judgments. Over time, you'll be able to identify patterns in your thinking and work to correct any biases, which is especially useful when faced with complex situations that require objectivity and open-mindedness.
  • You can volunteer with local community organizations that support families seeking justice, offering your time to help with administrative tasks or community awareness campaigns.
    • By contributing to these causes, you not only provide valuable assistance to those in need but also gain a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by individuals fighting for justice. This hands-on experience can be enlightening and empowering, as you'll see the real-world impact of persistence and advocacy, much like the family in the case pursued their quest for answers.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

The mysterious circumstances surrounding Ellen Greenberg's death and the initial suicide ruling

Ellen Greenberg, a 27-year-old first-grade teacher, was found dead in her apartment with 20 stab wounds, leading to an initial ruling of suicide that her family and experts have since vehemently contested.

Ellen Greenberg was discovered by her fiancé, Samuel Goldberg, in their apartment with a knife sticking out of her chest. Ellen had stab wounds in her torso, the back of her head, the neck, and her spine. The brutality and positioning of the wounds, particularly the 10 to the back of her neck—one of which penetrated her brain—have raised doubts about the suicide ruling.

Ellen Greenberg, a 27-year-old first grade teacher, was found dead in her apartment with 20 stab wounds, yet the initial ruling was suicide.

New forensic evidence suggests that the crime scene may have been staged. Blood evidence found in the kitchen alongside a fruit salad she was making contradicts the official narrative that Ellen took her own life. The knife used was consistent with one that would have been used for making the fruit salad.

Ellen's mother, Sandee Greenberg, has articulated disbelief that her daughter could stab herself 20 times. She points out that on the night of Ellen's death, there was a snowstorm, the balcony was covered in undisturbed snow, and the door to Ellen's unit was locked from the inside with a swing bar latch, suggesting that exit or entry would have been impossible.

The apartment was locked from the inside, with no signs of a break-in or struggle, suggesting the death could not have been self-inflicted.

When Samuel returned from working out, he found Ellen unresponsive. After waiting roughly half an hour with no reply from her despite texts, calls, and shouting, and with the doorman refusing to assist, he broke the door down. This violent entry was corroborated by the fact that the door had been secured from the inside, an action that the coroner later indicated would have prevented him from changing his ruling from homicide to suicide in a civil suit deposition.

The brutality and location of the wounds, including 10 to the back of her neck, were highly unusual for a suicide by stabbing.

Experts consulted by Ellen's family, including private investigators and renowned pathologists, found the stab wounds inconsistent with suicide. Two neuropathologists concluded that Ellen could not have taken her own life after reviewing her autopsy report and brain tissue samples. A Pittsburgh forensic pathologist determined the case was “strongly suspicious of homicid ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The mysterious circumstances surrounding Ellen Greenberg's death and the initial suicide ruling

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can enhance your critical thinking skills by analyzing complex scenarios through writing. Start a blog or journal where you dissect intricate situations, like the case mentioned, by considering alternative explanations and questioning apparent inconsistencies. This practice will sharpen your ability to assess information critically and recognize when to seek further evidence before drawing conclusions.
  • Develop a keener eye for detail by playing detective games or using mystery-solving apps. These interactive experiences simulate crime scene investigations, requiring you to piece together evidence, which can improve your observational skills and ability to spot inconsistencies in real-life sit ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

The family's fight to have the case reopened and the ruling changed from suicide to homicide or undetermined

Ellen Greenberg's family has been steadfast in their pursuit of justice, tirelessly seeking to change the official ruling of their daughter's death from suicide to homicide.

Ellen's parents, Joshua and Sandy Greenberg, have been relentlessly pushing for a thorough, unbiased investigation into their daughter's death.

Since Ellen Greenberg’s passing, her parents Joshua and Sandy Greenberg have not accepted the ruling of suicide. Asserting that the ruling is absurd, they have embarked on a decade-long journey to seek the truth. The family encountered a jurisdictional shift from the Philadelphia Police Department to the office of then Attorney General Josh Shapiro, who declined to take over in 2022, citing insufficient evidence to overturn the suicide ruling. Despite the ongoing struggle, the Greenbergs have been proactive, engaging private investigators, forensic experts, and a renowned pathologist who have all suggested the death was a homicide.

They have hired private investigators, forensic experts, and a renowned pathologist to review the case, all of whom have concluded that the evidence points to homicide, not suicide.

With the help of an attorney, the Greenbergs pursued legal action against the medical examiner's office, aiming to have the cause of death changed to homicide. New evidence from private investigators and experts like the use of photogrammetry to create a 3D recreation of Ellen's wounds has supported the argument that not all wounds could have been self-inflicted. Sandee Greenberg's statement about straight edge wounds suggested the possibility of multiple knives and assailants.

The family has filed multiple lawsuits and appeals, including a recent appeal that has reached the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in their ongoing quest for the truth.

This fight for truth found its way to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in July when the court agreed to hear the Greenbergs' appeal concerning the manner of Ellen's death indicated on her death certificate. The persistence of the Greenbergs, in hiring experts and ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The family's fight to have the case reopened and the ruling changed from suicide to homicide or undetermined

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Photogrammetry is a technique that uses photographs to create accurate 3D models or reconstructions of objects or scenes. In forensic investigations, photogrammetry can be used to analyze wounds by capturing detailed images from different angles. By creating a 3D model of the wounds, investigators can better understand the nature, dimensions, and trajectories of injuries, aiding in determining whether they are consistent with self-infliction or external force. This method provides a visual representation that can assist in evaluating the plausibility of various scenarios related to the cause of injuries.
  • Sandee Greenberg's statement about straight edge wounds suggests the possibility of multiple knives and assailants in the case, indicating that not all wounds could have been self-inflicted. This observation raises questions about the initial ruling of suicide and supports the argument for a homicide investigation. The mention of straight edge wounds implies a level of precision and consistency in the injuries that may be difficult to achieve in a self-inflicted scenario.
  • The Greenbergs pursued legal action agai ...

Counterarguments

  • The medical examiner's office may have access to information or expertise that supports the suicide ruling, which might not be publicly available or disclosed due to privacy and legal considerations.
  • The legal system relies on evidence that meets specific standards for admissibility and burden of proof, and the ruling of suicide may reflect those standards rather than a dismissal of the family's concerns or evidence.
  • The jurisdictional shift and the decision by the Attorney General not to take over the case could be based on procedural norms or legal constraints rather than an oversight or lack of interest in the case.
  • The lower court's siding with the Medical Examiner’s Office might be based on a comprehensive review of the case that balances all evidence, rather than an inherent flaw in the system.
  • The persistence of the Greenbergs, while commendable for seeking justice, does not in itself invalidate the findings of the official investigation.
  • The use of private investigators and expert ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
187: Stabbed 20x to Head, Neck & Torso - But She Did It Herself? | The Disturbing Case of Ellen Greenberg

Potential political and institutional biases that may have influenced the investigation and rulings

Concerns have arisen about possible political and institutional biases in the investigation into Ellen Greenberg's death and the subsequent legal proceedings, particularly involving her fiance, Sam Goldberg, and his connections to high-profile individuals in Philadelphia’s legal and political circles.

Sam Goldberg, Ellen's fiance, is tied to prominent figures in Philadelphia, leading to speculation that these connections may have influenced the course of the investigation. Uncertainty stems from actions taken by Sam's family members at the crime scene and subsequent legal decisions made by officials who had previous relationships with the Goldberg family.

Sam's uncle, a lawyer, was allowed to enter the crime scene and remove Ellen's personal belongings, including her computer and phone, which could have compromised the investigation.

The Greenberg family has raised concerns about the handling of Ellen Greenberg's case by the Philadelphia Police Department, particularly noting that Sam Goldberg's uncle, who is a lawyer (and supposedly a judge on the state attorney's disciplinary board), was permitted to enter the crime scene and remove Ellen's personal belongings. This included her computer, phone, wallet, and other critical items. Private investigator Thomas Brennan pointed out that the removal of these items interfered with the chain of evidence, potentially compromising the investigation.

The case was initially handled by the Philadelphia Police Department and Medical Examiner's Office, but the Greenberg family argued that there was a conflict of interest and fought to have it transferred to the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office.

Ellen's parents, Joshua and Sandee Greenberg, questioned why the Philadelphia Police Department failed to immediately secure Ellen's belongings and why it took several days for the police to take action. This delay and the breach in securing evidence led the Greenberg family to suspect a conflict of interest and campaign for the case to be transferred away from local authorities to the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office.

When the case was presented to the Attorney General, Josh Shapiro, who is now the Governor of Pennsylvania, he declined to reopen the investigation, citing a lack of evidence, despite the family's persistent efforts.

Further allegations have emerged, suggesting that Josh Shapiro, who was the state's attorney general ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Potential political and institutional biases that may have influenced the investigation and rulings

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Sam Goldberg's connections to influential figures do not necessarily imply wrongdoing or influence over the investigation; such connections are common in many communities.
  • The presence of Sam's uncle at the crime scene could be explained by immediate family concern and involvement during a crisis, rather than an attempt to interfere with the investigation.
  • The Philadelphia Police Department and Medical Examiner's Office may have followed standard procedures in their initial handling of the case, and any perceived delays or conflicts of interest could be due to bureaucratic processes rather than intentional bias.
  • Josh Shapiro's decision not to reopen the investigation might have been based on a thorough review of the evide ...

Actionables

  • You can educate yourself on the basics of the legal system to better understand how connections might influence legal proceedings. Start by reading accessible resources like "The Law for Dummies" or visiting websites like LegalZoom that offer layman's explanations of legal processes. This knowledge can help you form your own opinions on cases you hear about and understand the significance of certain actions, such as the removal of personal belongings from a crime scene.
  • Enhance your critical thinking skills to evaluate potential conflicts of interest in decision-making. Engage in daily practices like reading opinion pieces from multiple sources on the same topic, which can train you to identify biases and relationships that might affect judgments. For example, if you read about a local official making a controversial decision, research their background and connections to see if there might be a conflict of interest.
  • Advocate for transparency and accountabil ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA