Karen Read Says She’s “Framed For Murder” -No One Believes Til Shady Cops CAUGHT Editing CCTV Video

The situation surrounding John O'Keefe's death is both tragic and mysterious, with a myriad of evidence and witness accounts that conflict and raise questions about what truly happened.

Mysterious Circumstances Surrounding O'keefe's Death

O'keefe was found deceased with a fatal laceration to the back of his head, which had caused multiple skull fractures and bleeding in the brain. The body was discovered on Albert's lawn, and these alarming details have prompted further investigation into the actual cause of his death.

Conflicting Eyewitness Accounts and Evidence

Witnesses Give Conflicting Reports on O'keefe's Condition Before Death

Paul O'Keefe described John's appearance in a distressing manner, explaining that he looked as though he had endured a severe beating, with significant swelling around his eyes. Similarly, Karen mentioned that John's mother thought he looked like he had been struck by a vehicle.

Evidence on Vehicle Condition and Taillight Fragments Questions Injury Cause

Trooper Proctor and Buchanan noted that a significant piece was missing from the right rear tail light of Karen Reed's Lexus. This observation strengthened their belief that Reed may have backed her vehicle into John O’Keefe. In support of this theory, over forty-five pieces of Karen Reed's tail light were found in the snow on the property where John O’Keefe's body was discovered. However, the circumstances in which these pieces were found have raised suspicions; they were discovered later in the day amid heavy snowfall and continued to be found weeks later.

Chief Berkowitz noticed a shiny piece of tail light on the lawn, and although Trooper Proctor collected most of them, some argue that they may have been planted at the scene. Moreover, Sergeant Nicholas Barros testified that while Reed's car's taillight was damaged, it was not entirely broken when he observed it, contradicting the photo presented in court showing a completely smashed taillight.

Complicating matters, a piece of tail light from Karen Reed's car suggests ...

Photographic evidence, questionable evidence collection practices, and troubling conflicts of interest are at the heart of the concerns surrounding an investigation by Canton police.

Unprofessional and Questionable Evidence Collection Practices

Photographs taken at the crime scene lacked adequate context, leaving the exact location of evidence like a cocktail glass, tail light pieces, and blood spots uncertain. Officer Gallagher used a leaf blower to expose blood but did not follow standard procedures for collecting blood samples, which suggests his actions were not part of a routine practice.

Blood collected at the scene was scooped into red Solo cups, which were unsealed and typically not used for such purposes. The blood, mixed with melted snow and debris, was transported in these cups placed inside an open brown grocery bag to the police headquarters, where it was put in an evidence refrigerator. Without proper sealing, the blood samples were at risk of melting.

Sergeant Gallagher arrived at the scene inadequately equipped, without an evidence bag and only a reflective jacket. His attempts to put up crime scene tape were unsuccessful, and the tape blew away. He also considered putting up a tent but decided against it because he thought it would blow away as well. Gallagher did not canvas the neighborhood and did not have direct knowledge of the body's location, relying instead on hearsay from other officers.

Conflicts of Interest and Lack of Transparency

There were clear connections between investigators and the Albert family. Michael Proctor perjured himself regarding the timeline of seizing a car, hinting at a fabricated timeline. The Canton cops, first to talk to Jennifer McCabe and Brian Albert, did not recuse themselves from the investigation despite the conflict of interest involving Kevin Albert's tenure on the force and the body being found on Brian Albert's lawn.

Sergeant Gallagher seeking assistance from Tom Keller, deputy of the Canton Police Department and his boss, poses a conflict of interest. Sergeant Lenk, known to have a close relationship with Chris Albert, was later promoted with a considerable salary increase.

The inversed and incomplete CCTV footage further clouds the investigation. The defense revealed that footage from Sallyport was inverted, hiding important details, such as Trooper Proctor’s proximity to the passenger side taillight. A mechanic could not identify individuals after the inversion was revealed, and a 20-seco ...

This article explores the intricate connections between the Albert family and their local law enforcement, particularly the Canton Police Department, leading to allegations of favoritism and potentially obstructed investigations due to these connections.

Albert Family's Ties to Canton Police

Multiple Family Members Affiliated With Canton PD

The Albert family has an extensive affiliation with the Canton Police Department. It is reported that Kevin Albert, a detective at the police department, was one of the people to whom John O'Keefe reported suspicious drug activity. Furthermore, Brian Albert, also a member of the Canton Police Station, received a phone call from Chief Berkowitz amidst a critical situation but did not answer. Brian Haynes and Brian Haha Higgins, other members of the Canton Police, were also involved in the unfolding events on the morning in question. Tom Keller, who is second in command at the Canton Police Department after Chief Berkowitz, lives across from the crime scene.

Favoritism Allegations and Obstructed Investigations due to Connections

There is a clear suggestion of favoritism, potentially leading to obstructed investigations, stemming from the Albert family's ties with law enforcement. Julie Albert is connected to one of the investigators on the case, Michael Proctor, who is the brother of her close friend. Julie's sister, Jill Daniels, went to school with Sergeant Goode and is also a lifelong best friend of the same person connected to the investigation, Courtney Proctor. These connections call into question the impartiality of the investigation.

The Alberts' Influential Position in the Local Com ...

As the trial unfolds, questions arise around the conduct of the investigator's and the behavior of certain family members, which could impact the credibility of the evidence and testimony being presented.

Questionable Conduct by Canton Police Officers

Sergeant Paul Gallagher and Trooper Proctor's actions during the investigation have been met with scrutiny and doubt.

Sergeant Gallagher's Unorthodox Evidence Collection Methods

Sergeant Gallagher employed unconventional methods for collecting evidence, such as using a leaf blower to uncover blood in the snow. His decision-making around evidence collection, with the assistance of Deputy Tom Keller, was questionable given their proximity to the crime scene. Gallagher, who hadn't processed a snowy scene before despite his 30 years in the area, defended his use of a leaf blower after it successfully revealed blood spots. He arrived at the scene late and did not follow standard practices for evidence documentation or collection.

Trooper Proctor's Bias Against Defendant

Trooper Proctor, a lead investigator in the case, displayed bias against Karen Reed, suggesting she was to blame for the death of Mr. O'Keefe, despite any firm evidence implicating her at the time. Proctor admitted that his comments regarding Karen Reed were unprofessional. Depth in his investigative skills was brought into question as he did not take adequate notes or record interactions during key interviews. Furthermore, Proctor's unprofessional conduct extended to searching for nude photos on the deceased's girlfriend's phone and sharing his inappropriate findings and comments with colleagues. The defense team observed Proctor near the taillight of the vehicle in question, and when the corrected footage was shown in court, it raised concerns about potential evidence tampering or bias.

Concerning Behavior and Evasiveness of Albert Family Members

The Albert family's behavior has also drawn attention for its potential impact on the case.

Julie Albert provided evasive testimony and was deemed as having an inconsistent story. She visited the scene unexpectedly during a blizzard with a questionable explanation. In court, she struggled to recall the numerous phone conversations she had with Courtney Proctor, despite the call logs indicating frequent communication on significant case-related dates. Julie's nervousness about ta ...

Multiple theories are circulating about the tragic death of John O’Keefe, with speculation encompassing drug allegations, potential motives, and conflicting evidence.

Theory: Alberts Involved In Drug-Related Incident With O'keefe

Speculation surrounds the Albert family's potential involvement in illicit activities, drug dealing, and organized crime, particularly at D&E Pizza, owned by Chris Albert. Netizens suggest the pizzeria could be a front for drug distribution given its continued operation despite poor reviews and a clientele allegedly composed of police and young kids. John O'Keefe's presence at D&E Pizza on the day of his death adds to suspicions. A netizen alleges that a fight broke out between Colin Albert and O'Keefe over drug activities, resulting in a deadly head injury.

Drug Allegations at D&e Pizza Owned by Alberts

Rumors claim that drugs are sold out of D&E Pizza, with Colin Albert actively involved and his father possibly aware. Theories on social media tie the pizzeria to O'Keefe's death, suggesting a hidden agenda beyond selling food.

Suspicions About Alberts' Motives and O'keefe's Death Circumstances

Chris Albert invited O'Keefe to the Waterfall Bar on the night of his untimely death, which amplifies doubts surrounding the death circumstances. Chris Albert’s alleged connections and the past accusation of murder point to a potential motive. Moreover, tension between the Alberts and O’Keefe, failed neighborly relations, and the partygoers' intent to intimidate rather than kill, have generated a complex web of speculation.

Theory: Karen Reed Hit O'keefe With Her Car

Another prevalent theory is that Karen Reed was directly involved in the incident, with her damaged car playing a central role.

Reed's Vehicle Damage and Taillight Fragments Found

Karen Reed's Lexus showed tail light damage consistent with fragments found where O’Keefe’s body was discovered. Curiously, a piece of O’Keefe's hair was found on Reed's bumper even after the car was towed several times. Reed was also confused about the origin of the damage to her tail light, fueling the theory that her vehicle made contact with O'Keefe.

Conflicting Accounts and Evidence Tampe ...