In this episode of the Rotten Mango podcast, Kaya Henderson and Myles E. Johnson examine the harrowing case of Hannah, a young girl subjected to prolonged captivity and sexual abuse by groups of high school boys. They delve into the failures of the justice system that allowed the perpetrators to evade appropriate consequences.
The fallout is explored, including the victim-blaming and harassment Hannah's family faced within their community. The hosts also discuss the controversial decision of internet vigilantes to expose the identities of the perpetrators, sparking renewed public outcry and calls for justice decades after the abuse occurred.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Hannah, just 13 years old, endured over a year of horrific captivity and sexual torture by groups of high school boys. Lured with false pretenses, she was gang-raped by 12 boys who violently assaulted her with objects. Using threats and recordings, they relentlessly coerced her into further abuse over 11 months.
The repercussions for Hannah and her family were catastrophic. Their trauma disrupted education, leading to Hannah's intellectual disability diagnosis and struggle for employment. Donations cover housing and treatment for Hannah's PTSD, disorders, and decades of medication needs. Her family faced victim-blaming and harassment within the community.
As Kaya Henderson and Myles E. Johnson discuss, the handling of Hannah's case highlights appalling justice system failures. Police leaked victims' identities, interrogated Hannah insensitively, and made victim-blaming comments like implying the assaults were her fault.
Only 10 of 44 perpetrators faced juvenile court, receiving minor punishments like community service. The judge presiding displayed pro-perpetrator biases, emphasizing their futures over Hannah's trauma and downplaying the crimes' severity.
Twenty years later, vigilante YouTubers revealed the identities and current lives of the perpetrators, leading to professional consequences like job dismissals. Though legally questionable, it sparked renewed attention and public calls for justice.
The perpetrators largely responded by denying involvement, issuing pro-forma apologies, or threatening defamation suits against those exposing them.
The exposure prompted the local government to issue an official apology, while Hannah and her sister rallied for access to court documents. Donations poured in, reflecting public desire to support Hannah and reckon with systemic failings in handling sexual violence cases.
1-Page Summary
The case of Hannah's sexual assault provides a distressing glimpse into the escalating abuse and torture that she endured for over a year, leading to severe and lasting effects on her and her family's lives.
Hannah, who was only 13 at the time, found herself in contact with an 18-year-old named Pak after misdialing a phone number. Over six months, their communication continued intermittently, and eventually, Pak and his friends persuaded Hannah to meet up. Together with her younger sister, Hannah boarded a bus with the expectation of friendship but was instead met by Pak and several of his friends. Stranded in a rural area with no buses running after 4 p.m. and the false security of a motel room paid for by the boys, Hannah was subject to a brutal gang rape by 12 high school students. The perpetrators used wooden sticks and iron pipes to inflict physical harm and recorded the assault.
After the initial incident, the perpetrators used the recorded footage as blackmail, threatening to expose Hannah by releasing the videos if she did not continue to meet them. The coercion was relentless; they phoned her house to prove they could reach her family and used threats of violence and public humiliation to maintain control over her. They even stooped to harassing Hannah's family, contacting her home and speaking with her father, which triggered violence from him as well.
Hannah suffered through 11 grim months of torture and sexual assault. She was dragged to various locations, including motel rooms and tennis courts, where the abuse continued. The horror inflicted by the perpetrators included sexual torture with objects causing serious health complications, as well as beatings with an iron pipe whenever she resisted.
The trauma of the ordeal proved insurmountable for Hannah and her sister, as both were unable to complete high school. Years later, in 2019, the excessive trauma led to a diagnosis of an intellectual disability for Hannah, making steady employment a challenge. She has only been able to secure part-time jobs requiring manual labor.
The donations Hannah received are set aside for a deposit on public housing and treatments. Since being discharged from the hospital in 2004 with a list of prescriptions, Ha ...
The horrific details and trauma of the sexual assault case
The discussion led by Kaya Henderson and Myles E. Johnson highlights the gross mishandling and underwhelming judicial responses in a challenging and complex case, illustrating the failures of the justice system in delivering justice.
The conversation sheds light on multiple police missteps, from information leaks to victim-blaming interrogation techniques.
Henderson and Johnson go over severe breaches of privacy in the case, where the police leaked victims' full names to the media, wrongly revealing their identities and subjecting them to public scrutiny and endangering their safety. Just days after the crimes were reported, the authorities held a press conference where the victims’ information should have been redacted but wasn’t, leading to intense media attention and the victims feeling exposed in their neighborhood. There's also acknowledgment of a former police official’s hindsight observation that they did not anticipate the case's magnitude.
The discussion also critiques the abusive and insensitive manner of Hannah's interrogation. She endured prolonged questioning, was forced to repeat her trauma to male officers, and smoke was blown in her face. Others questioned her actions during the assaults and even accused her of flirting online. The treatment Hannah received was dehumanizing and disrespectful, including being scolded for causing trouble in the community and having to identify her perpetrators face-to-face, at one point being blamed for giving the town a bad name.
The conversation then turns to the shockingly lenient handling of the perpetrators by the justice system.
Despite the police initially sending 44 individuals for charges related to Hannah's case, the vast majority were not prosecuted. The transcript shows that only 10 faced juvenile court, and they faced minor consequences like community service. Some were only temporarily held in detention. One perpetrator is now reputedly working at the Park Sports Team and preparing to file a defamation suit, while another became a police officer, indicating their unperturb ...
The failure of the justice system to properly investigate and punish the perpetrators
As the identities of the perpetrators involved in the Myriang incident are revealed two decades later, the aftermath ripples through their personal and professional lives, with questions surrounding the ethics and legality of the vigilante actions taken by YouTubers.
A wave of YouTube videos has systematically unveiled individuals involved in the Mi-Riang case, with videos titled provocatively like "Pak, Did You Think I Wouldn't Find You?" The YouTubers, some of whom use voice distortion software to stay anonymous, revealed the perpetrators' identities, prompting a public reckoning and leading to both professional and personal consequences for those exposed. For example, Perpetrator M was dismissed from his job at BMW, and an individual working at a Volvo dealership was also fired after exposure.
The legality and ethics of these actions are contentious, as revealing personal information without consent is considered defamation in South Korea. Some YouTubers have been sued, and the sexual violence center working with Hannah stated they were not in contact with these YouTubers, suggesting a complex relationship between justice and privacy.
The perpetrators have responded in various ways, from issuing formulaic apologies to filing defamation lawsuits against those who have exposed them. Some, like Perpetrator M, have threatened legal action, denying involvement, and one named Joe, who even changed his name and underwent facial surgery, is suing commentators exposing him. Shin’s online statements suggest overwhelm by the renewed attention, which he believes may harm the victim. Other perpetrators have been quick to threaten lawsuits or demand that Hannah help declare their innocence.
There is a palpable disconnect between the public's desire for accountability and the perpetrators’ self-protective reactions and minimization of their ...
The exposure and aftermath of the perpetrators' identities being revealed 20 years later
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser