In this episode of Rotten Mango, the gruesome murder of eight-year-old Sarang is examined. The tragic details recount how the young victim followed a 16-year-old girl to her apartment, where she was strangled and dismembered. The killers, two high school students, had an online history of disturbing interests and shared role-play fantasies involving violence and gore.
The investigation reveals the chilling precision with which Sarang was killed and dismembered, along with the efforts of the killers to conceal the crime scene. Despite the severity of the case, the killers received lenient sentences, raising concerns about the influence of wealth and status. The episode explores the psychological factors, lack of remorse, and the aftermath experienced by Sarang's devastated family.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
In 2017, eight-year-old Sarang followed a 16-year-old girl, Kim, to her apartment, where Kim strangled and dismembered her. Investigators traced Kim's movements on CCTV, finding Sarang's remains and cleaned crime scene.
Police found Sarang's blood-soaked bathroom despite Kim's thorough cleaning. Kim dismembered Sarang with precision, severing her pinky finger and removing organs.
Kim's defense claimed mental illness, but an inmate testified Kim was feigning symptoms. Her wealthy family provided renowned attorneys, implying legal manipulation. Kim and accomplice Park received lenient sentences.
Kim had low empathy and an obsession with violence and gore. Her drawings, search history, and interests showed an unhealthy fascination with murder, cannibalism, and anatomy.
Kim and Park roleplayed violent scenarios online involving torture and consuming remains. Their fictional roles mirrored reality when Kim gifted Park organs.
Kim showed no remorse, blaming Park and feigning mental disorders to avoid responsibility. Psychiatrists doubted her claimed symptoms.
Park claimed the organs were props and said Kim manipulated her, despite evidence of involvement.
Both had elite legal teams using family wealth, enabling more lenient sentences than expected for such a crime, generating public outrage.
Sarang's family suffered profound grief, unable to forgive the offenders and requiring psychiatric help.
The public demanded accountability given the juveniles' involvement and crime severity. Sarang's mother petitioned for policy reform.
The community feared future crimes, doubting rehabilitation and worrying about recidivism upon release.
1-Page Summary
The brutal murder of an eight-year-old girl, pseudonymously named Sarang, has left South Korea grappling with issues of juvenile crime and mental health in the legal system.
On March 29, 2017, Sarang vanished within her apartment complex. CCTV footage captured her following an adult, who lured her into their apartment to use their phone. This adult was Kim, a 16-year-old girl disguised in her mother's suit and sunglasses, dragging a suitcase. After coaxing Sarang inside, Kim strangled her with a charging cord and then horrifically dismembered her body.
In the ensuing investigation, police meticulously traced Kim's movements. She was seen on CCTV disposing of Sarang's body parts and carrying bags of food waste. After being alerted by Sarang's mother to her daughter's disappearance, investigators searched Kim's apartment—finding it spotless—and eventually discovered Sarang's remains on the rooftop. They also found Sarang's organs in food waste bins, piecing together the full day of Kim's actions, which culminated in her arrest around midnight.
Despite the apartment's pristine condition, luminol revealed that the entire bathroom lit up, indicating an extensive clean-up of blood, especially in the bathtub. Kim had meticulously cleaned each drop of blood and even doused herself in bleach to rid her body of stains.
The dismemberment process was chillingly precise. Forensics teams found Sarang's remains in white bags void of any external blood stains. Kim severed Sarang's pinky finger, removed her organs, and continued her gruesome act with an unsettling level of efficiency, using six knives and leaving a lot of blood—though none that could initially be found.
The full magnitude of the crime became distressing for investigators and the victim's family when Sarang's mother had to cut up a dress to clothe her dismembered daughter for burial.
The details and investigation of Sarang's murder
The case study of Kim and Park highlights their disturbing descent into the blurring of online fantasy and grim reality. Authorities and psychologists analyze the evidence, revealing the extent of their troubling involvement in violent online narratives.
Classmates and teachers describe Kim as aloof, intelligent, and possessing a concerning lack of empathy. Kim's morbid fascination is evident in her hobbies and online activity.
Psychiatrists were worried about Kim's anti-social tendencies and her strong sense of superiority. Kim would watch gory, cruel movies and suggested that two-thirds of the human population disappearing would be better for humanity. Her online search history contained terms related to murder, showing an interest in methods of body disposal and killing. Kim also had a strong interest in medicine and anatomy and joked about her love for the American TV show "Hannibal."
Kim's drawings, found online, depicted gruesome scenes of violence, cannibalism, and murder. Authorities analyzed drawings featuring explicit gore, decapitation, and cannibalism. Psychologists analyzing these drawings noted signs of anxious and paranoid tendencies in Kim's psychological state, such as conflicted feelings about attention-seeking.
She dropped out of high school at the age of 16, citing nothing more to learn at school. Despite her exceptional intelligence, with an IQ of 140, classmates considered her calculated, using her intelligence in negative ways.
The partnership between Kim and Park takes a sinister turn as their online interactions become indicative of their real-life actions.
Park and Kim, thoroughly engaged in their violent role-playing scenarios, began as enemies in a fictional universe, with Kim approaching Park in a bar and a toxic relationship ensuing. In the chat rooms, they exchanged messages about hunting and bringing back body parts as gifts, a twisted part of their online personas' characteristics.
However, Kim takes this role-play off-screen, with reality mirroring their dark fantasies. Park alludes to prior discussions about committing a crime and suggests they claim the delivery was cookies if caught on CCTV.
Kim and Park's involvement in online role-playing communities and violent fantasies
The psychological profiles and defense tactics of Kim and Park during their criminal trials are dissected with insights into their lack of remorse, defense strategies, and the influence of their wealth and status.
Throughout the trial, Kim's behavior is described as brazen and unrepentant, without concern for the victim's family. Her defense team alleges that due to mental illnesses such as DID and schizophrenia, she was not fully responsible for her actions. They attribute the strangling and dismembering of the victim to her supposed alters named A and J. However, psychiatrists assess that Kim likely feigned these disorders and her symptoms matched someone pretending to have such disorders.
Despite a record of internal violence and previous expressions of wanting to harm animals, Kim shows no signs of remorse in court, often blaming Park and asserting her Asperger's syndrome diagnosis, though this was deemed unrelated to the crime and did not imply a likelihood of criminal behavior. Kim's unremorseful attitude was further evidenced by her defense team attempting to prevent Sarang's mother from testifying and her jailhouse complaints about being pressured to apologize to Sarang's parents. Her brazen demeanor in court, including casual interactions during her attorney's speech and the lack of guilt shown while witnesses testified, starkly contrasted with the solemnity expected in such settings.
Park takes a different defensive approach, initially claiming the body parts were props and later asserting she was manipulated by Kim. Her defense team sought to depict her as a victim of Kim's influence, despite her involvement in the planning and the aftermath, evidenced by her and Kim's deletion of their online conversations to conceal evidence. Park refuted Kim's claims in court, denying knowledge of the murder and labeling Kim as a cruel person.
The defense teams of both Kim and Park comprised elite, highly-connecte ...
The psychological profiles and defense strategies of Kim and Park during their trials
The loss of Sarang has deeply affected his family and has resonated with the public, leading to widespread calls for justice and accountability.
Sarang's tragic death has left his family in a state of profound despair. Sarang’s father openly declares that he cannot forgive the offenders, his anxiety palpable over the thought of their eventual release. Meanwhile, Sarang's grandparents are so overwhelmed by the ordeal that they resort to medication to find reprieve from insomnia. Sarang's parents, faced with debilitating grief, have received recommendations from doctors to take psychiatric medications, but they fear the harrowing visions that might haunt them.
Sarang's grandmother publicly sheds tears over the victimization of Sarang and the profound impact it has had on the family, while Sarang's uncle grapples with the distressing need to comprehend the perpetrators' motivations. During the trial, Sarang's mother tells the heart-wrenching tale of trying to navigate life in the wake of Sarang’s loss, referring to the "uncomfortable story" that still needs to be disclosed.
The public and specialists voiced their shock and concern about the heinousness of the crime and the juveniles involved, signaling a robust public response and a desperate call for accountability. Child trial specialists have commented on the case and on Park's actions, which indicates a level of public engagement and scrutiny regarding the trial and the offenders' attendant behavior.
In an impassioned plea for policy reform, Sarang’s mother has implored parents everywhere to sign a petition aimed at abolishing lenient juvenile sentencing laws. This collective outcry is not just a demand for puni ...
The impact of the crime on Sarang's family and the public response
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser