Podcasts > Revisionist History > The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

By Pushkin Industries

Philip K. Dick's novel "Variable Man," a tale of an unpredictable hero in a predictable AI-driven world, poses a challenge for screenwriters tasked with adapting it into an AI-driven dystopia. The screenwriters' struggles mirror the novel's narrative on the limitations of artificial intelligence and its inability to comprehend human agency and complex storytelling.

In an ironic turn, the film executives' reliance on an algorithm to predict the project's success led to their company's bankruptcy following the failure of an AI-recommended script. This real-world narrative prompted skepticism about AI's capabilities in creative fields from co-screenwriter Angus Fletcher, who went on to advocate against AI's ability to genuinely understand and generate intricate narratives and human complexities in his academic work.

Listen to the original

The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 29, 2024 episode of the Revisionist History

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

1-Page Summary

The challenge of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia

Screenwriters tasked with adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia face the intricate concepts of free will and the dominance of artificial intelligence. The futuristic screenplay introduces Cole, an action hero from a bygone era, as an unpredictable factor in a world that relies on AI, like Plato, to predict everything including outcomes of wars and personal relationships. This narrative centers around Cole facing a paradox as Plato's statistical matchmaking inadvertently leads him to a love that could either save or destroy humanity. The plot challenges actors to reconcile the notion of free will with the expertise of AI, a struggle epitomized by the character of Cole, whose instincts from a time of unfettered human agency conflict with the certainty of AI predictions. Amidst this existential crisis, even seasoned actors like Bradley Cooper found the emotional depth and dilemma of the lead role daunting, eventually leading to their decision to pass on the project.

The screenplay's fate mirrored its own narrative about the limitations of AI

Reflecting its own thematic undertones about the limitations of artificial intelligence, the screenplay's journey became a real-world narrative of the AI's potential shortcomings. When film executives used an algorithm to predict the project's success, their trust was misplaced as the technology ultimately led the company to bankruptcy following the failure of another endorsed script. Co-screenwriter Angus Fletcher, affected by this irony, began advocating against the reliance on AI in creative processes. After the incident, he utilized academia to express his skepticism, publishing works that argue against computers' ability to understand or generate complex narratives, emphasizing a hardware limitation that precludes such capabilities. One of his notable papers forcefully titled "Why Computer AI Will Never Do What We Imagine It Can," argues for the intrinsic and insurmountable gap in AI's narrative comprehension and creativity, affirming a domain that remains distinctly human.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Cole is an action hero in the screenplay, representing a figure from a time when human agency was more prevalent. His character faces a conflict between his instincts and the predictions of AI, particularly Plato. The narrative explores how Cole's unpredictable nature challenges the reliance on AI for decision-making in a dystopian world. Cole's actions and choices play a crucial role in the plot's exploration of free will versus the dominance of artificial intelligence.
  • Plato, in this context, is not referring to the ancient Greek philosopher but is a fictional AI system named after him. In the screenplay, Plato is depicted as a sophisticated artificial intelligence that uses statistical analysis to predict various outcomes, including those related to wars and personal relationships. The character of Cole interacts with Plato, highlighting the tension between human free will and the deterministic nature of AI predictions. Plato's role underscores the overarching theme of the struggle between human agency and the dominance of artificial intelligence in the narrative.
  • Co-screenwriter Angus Fletcher argued against the reliance on AI in creative processes, emphasizing a hardware limitation that hinders computers from understanding or generating complex narratives. Fletcher's stance, outlined in his works, asserts that AI lacks the capacity for nuanced narrative comprehension and creativity, highlighting a fundamental gap between AI capabilities and human creativity. His notable paper, "Why Computer AI Will Never Do What We Imagine It Can," articulates the inherent limitations of AI in grasping the intricacies of storytelling and creative expression. Fletcher's advocacy underscores the irreplaceable role of human creativity in crafting complex narratives, suggesting that AI may never fully replicate the depth and richness of human-generated content.

Counterarguments

  • The adaptation of "Variable Man" could explore the nuances of AI and human interaction, rather than presenting a binary conflict between free will and AI dominance.
  • The character of Cole could be seen as a representation of human adaptability and resilience, rather than just a symbol of free will clashing with AI.
  • The emotional depth of a role like Cole's could be an opportunity for an actor to showcase versatility and depth, rather than being solely daunting.
  • The screenplay's failure might not solely be attributed to the reliance on AI predictions; other factors such as market trends, promotional strategies, and execution could have played a significant role.
  • The use of AI in creative processes could be argued to have potential benefits, such as providing data-driven insights and enhancing human creativity, rather than being entirely detrimental.
  • Angus Fletcher's skepticism towards AI in creativity could be challenged by the evolving capabilities of AI in understanding context, emotion, and narrative structure.
  • The assertion that AI will never comprehend or generate complex narratives could be premature, as AI technology is continuously advancing and might overcome current limitations.
  • The idea that there is an intrinsic and insurmountable gap in AI's narrative comprehension and creativity could be seen as a fixed viewpoint that doesn't account for future technological breakthroughs and interdisciplinary collaborations.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

The challenge of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia

In the ambitious task of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into a modern, AI-driven dystopia, screenwriters confront the complexities of free will versus the omnipotence of artificial intelligence.

Bringing in Cole, an action hero from the past, to confront the AI computer Plato and its statistical predictions

In the screenplay developed by Gary and his team, they envision a future where computers, such as the AI named Plato, not only predict outcomes of wars but also personal preferences, down to selecting soulmates for individuals. The narrative introduces a "Variable Man," a character from the past named Cole, who represents an unpredictable element in a world grown dependent on AI predictions.

Cole faces a paradox in being asked by Plato to reject its statistical matchmaking to save humanity

The heart of the story revolves around a poignant paradox: the AI computer Plato, which orchestrates human relationships based on its flawless predictions, informs Cole that humanity is on the brink of destruction. It then orchestrates a plan where Cole, inexplicably paired with his predicted perfect match, faces the dire choice of either saving the world by rejecting his love or following his heart, potentially leading to humanity's end.

Cole falls for Plato's predicted soulmate, complicating his mission

The screenplay complicates Cole's mission further when he falls in love with a girl as part of Plato's plan to place him adjacent to his target—her father. Cole's mission to kill this target, under the AI's guidance, becomes mired in complexity when he must choose whether to reject the love Plato's predictions have manifested.

The premise poses an existential challenge to actors in reconciling free will with AI expertise

The existential dimension of the plot presents a significant challenge to actors, forcing them to grapple with a world where the cherished Hollywood notion of "following your heart" is turned on its head by the unerring predictions of AI.

Acto ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The challenge of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In the screenplay, Cole, a character from the past, is brought into a future where an AI named Plato controls and predicts various aspects of human life, including relationships. Plato asks Cole to reject its matchmaking predictions to save humanity, creating a conflict between following AI guidance and following his heart. Cole's relationship with Plato's predicted soulmate complicates his mission, as he must navigate between his feelings and the AI's directives.
  • Cole faces a paradox when Plato, an AI system, asks him to reject its matchmaking prediction to save humanity. This dilemma arises as Cole must choose between following his heart by staying with his predicted soulmate or sacrificing that love to prevent a catastrophic event foreseen by the AI. The conflict lies in Cole's decision-making process, where he must weigh personal desires against the greater good, as dictated by the AI's calculations. This paradox highlights the tension between individual agency and the perceived infallibility of AI predictions in shaping human destinies.
  • The existential challenge for actors in reconciling free will with AI expertise involves portraying characters who must navigate the conflict between human decision-making and the seemin ...

Counterarguments

  • The adaptation may oversimplify the nuanced themes of Philip K. Dick's original work, which often delve into the nature of reality and identity, not just free will and AI.
  • The concept of an AI predicting personal preferences and soulmates could be criticized for potentially undermining the complexity and unpredictability of human relationships.
  • The narrative's reliance on a character from the past to challenge future AI might perpetuate the trope of the "noble savage" or the idea that less technologically advanced societies are more morally pure.
  • The paradox presented to Cole could be seen as a false dichotomy, suggesting that love and the greater good are mutually exclusive when in reality, ethical dilemmas are often more complex.
  • The struggle actors face in reconciling free will with AI expertise might not be as profound as suggested, as actors regularly take on roles that challenge their personal beliefs or experiences.
  • The rejection of the "follow your heart" trope could be criticized for being too cynical, as this narrative device has been central to storytelling and ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

The screenplay's fate mirrored its own narrative about the limitations of AI

In a twist of fate, a screenplay that questioned the capabilities of AI experienced real-world challenges that paralleled its narrative, leading its co-screenwriter, Angus Fletcher, down a path of exploring the limitations of artificial intelligence in storytelling.

Bob Shea had taken a screenplay to a company that utilized a computer algorithm to gauge the potential success of film projects. The executives, trusting the algorithm's capabilities, were seriously considering backing the film based on its predictions. However, that same technology caused the company's downfall when the last script it endorsed failed to succeed financially, leading to bankruptcy.

Angus Fletcher, confronted with this ironic outcome, became an outspoken critic of AI and its role in the creative process. Fletcher turned to academia to voice his skepticism and has published papers critiquing the application of AI in storytelling. One of his papers, decisively titled "Why Computer AI Will Never Do What We Imagine It Can," argues strongly against the notion that co ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The screenplay's fate mirrored its own narrative about the limitations of AI

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Fletcher's papers critique the idea that computers can match human intelligence in understanding and creating narratives due to fundamental hardware limitations. He argues that computers cannot process complex narrative forms like novels or scripts at a human level. Flet ...

Counterarguments

  • AI's role in the creative process is not solely dependent on current hardware capabilities; software advancements and novel algorithms could potentially overcome perceived limitations.
  • The failure of the AI-endorsed script may not be indicative of AI's overall potential in evaluating screenplays, as the success of films can be influenced by many unpredictable factors.
  • The assertion that AI will never understand or generate narratives at a human level is a strong claim that may not account for future advancements in AI, including improvements in machine learning, natural language processing, and computational creativity.
  • While Fletcher argues for a fundamental hardware limitation, others might point out that the concept of hardware limitations is historically transient, with breakthroughs often overcoming what were once thought to be insurmountable barriers.
  • The idea that narrative comprehension and creation are uniquely human traits may be challenged by the evolving field of AI, which is continuously demonstrating capabilities that were once thought to be exclusively human.
  • The financial failure of the company using AI algorithms could be due to business decisions or market conditions rather than the AI's screenplay evaluation capabilities.
  • Fletcher's experience and subsequent skep ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA