Philip K. Dick's novel "Variable Man," a tale of an unpredictable hero in a predictable AI-driven world, poses a challenge for screenwriters tasked with adapting it into an AI-driven dystopia. The screenwriters' struggles mirror the novel's narrative on the limitations of artificial intelligence and its inability to comprehend human agency and complex storytelling.
In an ironic turn, the film executives' reliance on an algorithm to predict the project's success led to their company's bankruptcy following the failure of an AI-recommended script. This real-world narrative prompted skepticism about AI's capabilities in creative fields from co-screenwriter Angus Fletcher, who went on to advocate against AI's ability to genuinely understand and generate intricate narratives and human complexities in his academic work.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Screenwriters tasked with adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia face the intricate concepts of free will and the dominance of artificial intelligence. The futuristic screenplay introduces Cole, an action hero from a bygone era, as an unpredictable factor in a world that relies on AI, like Plato, to predict everything including outcomes of wars and personal relationships. This narrative centers around Cole facing a paradox as Plato's statistical matchmaking inadvertently leads him to a love that could either save or destroy humanity. The plot challenges actors to reconcile the notion of free will with the expertise of AI, a struggle epitomized by the character of Cole, whose instincts from a time of unfettered human agency conflict with the certainty of AI predictions. Amidst this existential crisis, even seasoned actors like Bradley Cooper found the emotional depth and dilemma of the lead role daunting, eventually leading to their decision to pass on the project.
Reflecting its own thematic undertones about the limitations of artificial intelligence, the screenplay's journey became a real-world narrative of the AI's potential shortcomings. When film executives used an algorithm to predict the project's success, their trust was misplaced as the technology ultimately led the company to bankruptcy following the failure of another endorsed script. Co-screenwriter Angus Fletcher, affected by this irony, began advocating against the reliance on AI in creative processes. After the incident, he utilized academia to express his skepticism, publishing works that argue against computers' ability to understand or generate complex narratives, emphasizing a hardware limitation that precludes such capabilities. One of his notable papers forcefully titled "Why Computer AI Will Never Do What We Imagine It Can," argues for the intrinsic and insurmountable gap in AI's narrative comprehension and creativity, affirming a domain that remains distinctly human.
1-Page Summary
In the ambitious task of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into a modern, AI-driven dystopia, screenwriters confront the complexities of free will versus the omnipotence of artificial intelligence.
In the screenplay developed by Gary and his team, they envision a future where computers, such as the AI named Plato, not only predict outcomes of wars but also personal preferences, down to selecting soulmates for individuals. The narrative introduces a "Variable Man," a character from the past named Cole, who represents an unpredictable element in a world grown dependent on AI predictions.
The heart of the story revolves around a poignant paradox: the AI computer Plato, which orchestrates human relationships based on its flawless predictions, informs Cole that humanity is on the brink of destruction. It then orchestrates a plan where Cole, inexplicably paired with his predicted perfect match, faces the dire choice of either saving the world by rejecting his love or following his heart, potentially leading to humanity's end.
The screenplay complicates Cole's mission further when he falls in love with a girl as part of Plato's plan to place him adjacent to his target—her father. Cole's mission to kill this target, under the AI's guidance, becomes mired in complexity when he must choose whether to reject the love Plato's predictions have manifested.
The existential dimension of the plot presents a significant challenge to actors, forcing them to grapple with a world where the cherished Hollywood notion of "following your heart" is turned on its head by the unerring predictions of AI.
The challenge of adapting Philip K. Dick's "Variable Man" into an AI-driven dystopia
In a twist of fate, a screenplay that questioned the capabilities of AI experienced real-world challenges that paralleled its narrative, leading its co-screenwriter, Angus Fletcher, down a path of exploring the limitations of artificial intelligence in storytelling.
Bob Shea had taken a screenplay to a company that utilized a computer algorithm to gauge the potential success of film projects. The executives, trusting the algorithm's capabilities, were seriously considering backing the film based on its predictions. However, that same technology caused the company's downfall when the last script it endorsed failed to succeed financially, leading to bankruptcy.
Angus Fletcher, confronted with this ironic outcome, became an outspoken critic of AI and its role in the creative process. Fletcher turned to academia to voice his skepticism and has published papers critiquing the application of AI in storytelling. One of his papers, decisively titled "Why Computer AI Will Never Do What We Imagine It Can," argues strongly against the notion that co ...
The screenplay's fate mirrored its own narrative about the limitations of AI
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser