Podcasts > Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News > Episode 4: Spectacle

Episode 4: Spectacle

By Rachel Maddow

In this episode of Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News, the summary explores the pro-Nazi editorial stance of the influential Chicago Tribune newspaper under Robert McCormick in the 1930s and 1940s. It examines how McCormick and the Tribune promoted a pro-fascist and anti-democratic narrative, praising Mussolini and criticizing the prosecution of Nazi war criminals after World War II.

The summary also delves into the efforts made by Senator Joseph McCarthy and Senator Bill Langer to defend Nazi war criminals and spread disinformation about the Allied forces' handling of the Malmedy trial. It reveals how McCarthy hijacked Senate hearings to validate false claims of torture against the Nazi defendants, as well as the role played by the America First movement in attempting to revive German nationalism and rehabilitate the image of the Nazis in the post-war years.

Listen to the original

Episode 4: Spectacle

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jul 5, 2024 episode of the Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 4: Spectacle

1-Page Summary

The pro-Nazi editorial stance of the Chicago Tribune and its influence

The Chicago Tribune under Robert McCormick promoted a pro-fascist and anti-democratic stance in the 1930s and 1940s. McCormick, who inherited the Tribune, praised Mussolini and criticized the prosecution of Nazi war criminals after WWII.

The Tribune and its sister publications like the New York Daily News spread fabricated reports of torture against Nazi defendants from the Malmedy trial. Regnery Publishing, founded by a former America First member, helped promote this revisionist narrative.

Efforts by McCarthy, Langer to defend Nazi war criminals

Senator Joseph McCarthy parroted Nazi propaganda, accusing the U.S. Army of torturing the Malmedy Nazi defendants. He disrupted Senate investigations into the trial to validate the defendants' false claims.

Senator Bill Langer championed the cause of defending Nazi war criminals like American fascist leader William Dudley Pelley. He described the Malmedy case as a miscarriage of justice based on disproven torture allegations.

The Senate Malmedy investigation and McCarthy's disruption

The Senate Armed Services Committee thoroughly investigated the Malmedy trial's torture claims and found them baseless, determining they were part of an ex-Nazi campaign to revive German nationalism.

McCarthy hijacked the hearings, berating witnesses and pushing the defendants' exaggerated torture claims, which were proven false. Senator Lester Hunt condemned McCarthy as an "opportunist" and "liar."

The America First movement's Nazi rehabilitation efforts

After WWII, America First members like Henry Regnery and Charles Lindbergh sought to defend Nazi war criminals and rekindle German nationalism through publications and political influence.

Regnery's publishing company released books arguing the Nazis were treated unfairly. Lindbergh hoped for a "negotiated peace" with Hitler. Politicians like Taft and Hoffman opposed Nuremberg prosecutions as unjust vengeance against Germany.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can enhance your critical thinking skills by analyzing historical narratives in current media. Start by selecting a few current news articles or opinion pieces that discuss historical events. Compare the narratives presented with reputable historical sources and research to identify any biases or inaccuracies. This practice will sharpen your ability to discern fact from revisionism in modern contexts, much like the historical examples you heard about.
  • Develop a habit of questioning the source by creating a "trust checklist" for evaluating information. Whenever you encounter a new piece of information, especially regarding historical events, run it through your checklist. Questions might include: "Who is the author?", "What is their background?", "Are they associated with any interest groups?", and "What sources do they cite?". This will help you assess the credibility of information, similar to how you would evaluate the claims made about the Malmedy trial.
  • Engage in community discussions to foster awareness about the importance of historical accuracy. You don't need to be an expert; simply start conversations with friends or on social media about the impact of historical narratives on current events. Share insights on how past events are sometimes misrepresented and the consequences that can have, drawing parallels to the examples of historical revisionism you've learned about. This encourages a collective understanding of the past and its ongoing influence on society.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 4: Spectacle

The pro-Nazi editorial stance of the Chicago Tribune and its influence

Throughout the 1930s and 1940s, the Chicago Tribune, under the direction of Robert McCormick, wielded significant influence with an editorial stance that was seen as pro-fascist and anti-democratic.

The Chicago Tribune under the leadership of Robert McCormick promoted a pro-fascist and anti-democratic editorial stance in the 1930s and 1940s.

McCormick, who had inherited control of the Chicago Tribune, was known for his reactionary views, particularly his praise of Mussolini during the 1920s. His newspaper was also critical of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and voiced support for the America First Committee, which sought to keep America from engaging in war against the Nazis. Following World War II, the Tribune advocated for Nazi war criminals, garnering sympathy and opposing their prosecution. They infamously editorialized on one Easter Sunday that the Nuremberg trial would have "gagged Pontius Pilate."

McCormick's newspaper repeatedly praised Mussolini and Nazism, and criticized the US government's efforts to prosecute Nazi war criminals after World War II.

Notably, after the Nuremberg verdicts were pronounced, the Chicago Tribune published a front-page cartoon that depicted a Nazi soldier as a "German martyr," denouncing the trials as biased and illegitimate.

The Chicago Tribune's pro-Nazi stance was amplified through its sister publication, the New York Daily News, and through a right-wing publishing company founded by a former member of the America First Committee.

The spread of the Tribune's pro-Nazi rhetoric was not contained within its own pages but extended to affiliated publications. The Chicago Tribune and the New York Daily News, in particular, became platforms for spreading fabricated reports of torture against Nazi defendants in the Malmedy trial. Claims about Nazis en ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The pro-Nazi editorial stance of the Chicago Tribune and its influence

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The America First Committee (AFC) was an influential isolationist group in the United States during World War II, advocating against the country's involvement in the conflict. It attracted a wide range of members but faced criticism for some leaders' anti-Semitic and pro-fascist views. The AFC disbanded shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, which led to the U.S. entering the war.
  • The Malmedy trial was a significant legal proceeding held after World War II to prosecute German soldiers for war crimes, including the massacre of U.S. prisoners of war at Malmedy, Belgium, during the Battle of the Bulge. The trial took place as part of the broader Dachau trials and focused on atrocities committed by the Waffen-SS, particularly the killing of American soldiers and civilians. The term "Malmedy massacre" encompasses not only the specific incident at the Baugnez crossroads but also other war crimes committed by the Waffen-SS in the region.
  • The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute major political, military, and economic leaders of Nazi Germany for their roles in the war and atrocities. These trials aimed to establish accountability for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and aggression, setting a precedent for international criminal law. The trials were significant for highlighting the systematic murder of millions ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 4: Spectacle

Efforts by conservative politicians like Joe McCarthy and Bill Langer to defend Nazi war criminals

In the years following World War II, some conservative politicians, including Joe McCarthy and Bill Langer, were notable for their efforts to defend Nazi war criminals, sometimes echoing Nazi propaganda and making baseless accusations against U.S. institutions and personnel.

Senator Joseph McCarthy used his position to disrupt and undermine the Senate's investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial, parroting Nazi propaganda about the mistreatment of the defendants.

Joe McCarthy stood prominently in this effort, leveraging his position in the Senate to challenge the legitimacy of the Malmedy Massacre trial. He accused the U.S. Army of committing "brutalities greater than any we have ever accused Hitler Germany of employing" against the Nazi defendants, allegations which were not supported by evidence. McCarthy spread pro-Nazi propaganda, using horror story fabrications as factual in his statements, despite them being lies concocted in Germany to undermine the United States.

McCarthy accused the U.S. Army of committing "brutalities greater than any we have ever accused Hitler Germany of employing" against the Nazi defendants, despite a lack of evidence.

In a blatant display, McCarthy claimed that the Nazi defendants, some of whom he erroneously stated were teenagers, had been "crippled for life" by supposed torture at the hands of U.S. soldiers, which was not true. McCarthy targeted Jewish investigators with accusations of revenge-driven brutalities against these Nazi officers, suggesting the investigators possessed an intense hatred for Germans as a race.

Furthermore, McCarthy stormed out of the Senate's investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial, claiming that the U.S. Army's treatment of Nazi war criminals was worse than any atrocity committed by the Nazis themselves. His statements were seen as nothing less than the amplification of Nazi talking points.

Senator Bill Langer also championed the cause of defending Nazi war criminals, including working to secure the parole of American fascist leader William Dudley Pelley.

Parallel to McCarthy's actions, Senator Bill Langer took up the defense of Nazi war criminals and American fascists. The Republican Senator from North Dakota expressed support on the Senate floor for defendants in wartime sedition trials and played a role in securing their legal defense. He was instru ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Efforts by conservative politicians like Joe McCarthy and Bill Langer to defend Nazi war criminals

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

...

Actionables

  • You can enhance your critical thinking skills by practicing how to identify bias and propaganda in historical and current events. Start by reading diverse news sources on a controversial topic and note the different angles and biases presented. Compare these with primary sources or fact-checking websites to see how information can be skewed. This will train you to spot discrepancies and question narratives, much like dissecting the historical accounts of politicians who defended questionable stances.
  • Develop a habit of fact-checking claims you come across in daily life to avoid spreading misinformation. Whenever you hear a significant claim, take a moment to verify it through credible sources before sharing it with others. This could be as simple as using a fact-checking app or website when you hear a new piece of information on social media or in conversation. By doing this regularly, you'll become more discerning and contribute to a culture of truth.
  • Engage in community discussions to foster awareness about t ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 4: Spectacle

The Senate investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial and McCarthy's disruptive more

In April 1949, the Senate Armed Services Committee, with Senators Raymond Baldwin, Estes Kefauver, and Lester Hunt, launched a thorough investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial amid accusations of torture and mistreatment of the Nazi defendants. The inquiry concluded that the torture claims were unfounded and were part of an organized effort by ex-Nazis to revive German nationalism and undermine the trials.

The Senate Armed Services Committee launched a thorough investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial in response to accusations of torture and mistreatment of the Nazi defendants.

The committee embarked on a fact-finding mission, traveling to Germany to hear firsthand from the Nazis who had alleged torture. They examined medical records and spoke with medical personnel, uncovering no evidence to support the physical injury claims made by the defendants. With over 100 witnesses interviewed, including the investigators of the defendants, it became clear that the claims of torture were baseless. Furthermore, U.S. army counterintelligence in Germany delved into the roots of these false allegations, revealing that former high-ranking ex-Nazis were financing campaigns to discredit the Malmedy case and negate war crimes trials. The committee determined that the allegation was part of an effort to subvert de-Nazification and promote German victimhood at the hands of Jews.

However, Senator Joe McCarthy hijacked the hearings, interrupting and berating witnesses in an attempt to validate the Nazi defendants' false claims.

Joe McCarthy, who had inserted himself into the committee as a special observer, displayed disruptive behavior throughout the investigation. His belligerence included interrupting senators, speaking over and berating witnesses, thereby turning the entire investigation into a public spectacle. McCarthy also attempted to influence the committee's work by relaying the Nazi defendants' exaggerated claims of torture, which were proven false by multiple U.S. reviews. His speeches in Germany e ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Senate investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial and McCarthy's disruptive more

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Malmedy Massacre trial was a legal proceeding held in 1946 to prosecute German Waffen-SS soldiers for war crimes committed during the Battle of the Bulge, specifically the massacre of American prisoners of war and Belgian civilians near Malmedy. The trial focused on the actions of the Waffen-SS Kampfgruppe Peiper, who were responsible for the killings. The trial aimed to bring justice for the victims and hold the perpetrators accountable for their actions during this tragic event.
  • Denazification was an Allied effort post-World War II to remove Nazi influence from German society by purging Nazis from positions of power, dismantling Nazi organizations, and holding prominent Nazis accountable for war crimes in trials like Nuremberg. The program aimed to eliminate Nazi ideology from various aspects of German life, such as politics, culture, and the economy. It began after the war's end and was formalized by the Potsdam Agreement in 1945. Denazification faced challenges due to the onset of the Cold War and waning interest from the Allies, leading to its gradual decline and eventual abolition by 1951.
  • Senator Joe McCarthy was a prominent American politician known for his role in the anti-communist movement during the Cold War era. He gained notoriety for making accusations of communist infiltration in various sectors of American society, leading to what is now termed "McCarthyism." McCarthy's controversial tactics and behavior ultimately led to his censure by the Senate in 1954.
  • Senator Lester Hunt was a Democratic politician from Wyoming who served as the state's governor before being elected to the U.S. Senate. He was known for his support of federal social programs and his opposition to Senator Joseph McCarthy's anti-Communist efforts. Hunt faced personal challenges, including his son's arrest, which influenced his political decisions and interactions with McCarthy. Hunt's confrontation with McCarthy during the Senate investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial showcased his strong stance against McCarthy's tactics.
  • Counterintelligence involves activities to protect intelligence programs from foreign threats. In the context of the U.S. Army, counterintelligence would focus on safeguarding military intelligence from espionage and other hostile actions. This branch works to prevent foreign powers or entities from gathering sensitive information that could harm national security. Counterintelligence efforts are crucial for maintaining the security an ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 4: Spectacle

The America First movement's attempts to rehabilitate Nazism after World War II

An exploration into the post-World War II activities of the America First movement reveals efforts to defend and rehabilitate the image of Nazi war criminals and rekindle a nationalistic spirit in Germany.

Members of the pre-war America First Committee, including figures like Henry Regnery and Charles Lindbergh, sought to defend and rehabilitate Nazi war criminals after the war.

After disbanding due to the Pearl Harbor attack, some members of the pre-war America First Committee continued to meet in secret during the war. Notably, Charles Lindbergh, who was a leader of the America First Committee before the war, urged members to be prepared to reengage after the expected defeat to negotiate peace with Hitler.

Henry Regnery, another prominent member, established himself in the publishing landscape with ventures such as Human Events, a right-wing magazine that criticized the Nuremberg Trial as a "travesty of justice." Furthermore, Regnery founded a conservative publishing company that released books defending Nazis, asserting the acts committed by the Nazi regime were not worse than those of the Allies. Historian John Jackson highlighted that most of the authors published by Regnery were fascists or aligned with the fascist cause. Regnery Publishing also published works suggesting that Nazis were treated unfairly during the Malmedy trial.

Regnery's publishing company released books arguing that the Nazis were being treated unfairly, while Lindbergh and other America First supporters expressed hope that the US would eventually negotiate a "negotiated peace" with Hitler.

This section underscores how some key individuals associated with the America First movement played a role in advocating for a more sympathetic treatment of Nazi war criminals through various publications and public stances.

Republican politicians like Congressman Claire Hoffman and Senator Robert Taft joined the effort to oppose the prosecution of Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg Trials, framing it as an unjust "spirit of vengeance."

Congressman Claire Hoffman of Michigan and Senator Robert Taft were instrumental in the push against the prosecution of Nazis. Hoffman, during World War II, defended Americans ch ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The America First movement's attempts to rehabilitate Nazism after World War II

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

...

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding of historical narratives by comparing different history books on the same events. Look for books on World War II and the post-war period from various authors and compare their perspectives on events like the Nuremberg Trials. This will help you see how narratives can differ based on the author's background or political stance.
  • Enhance your critical thinking skills by analyzing political speeches or statements for underlying biases. Whenever you come across a political speech, take note of any language that might suggest a bias towards a particular historical interpretation or nationalistic sentiment. This practice will sharpen your ability to detect bias and understand its potential impact on public opinion.
  • Foster informed discussions by starting a book club focused on historical a ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA