In this episode of Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News, the summary explores the pro-Nazi editorial stance of the influential Chicago Tribune newspaper under Robert McCormick in the 1930s and 1940s. It examines how McCormick and the Tribune promoted a pro-fascist and anti-democratic narrative, praising Mussolini and criticizing the prosecution of Nazi war criminals after World War II.
The summary also delves into the efforts made by Senator Joseph McCarthy and Senator Bill Langer to defend Nazi war criminals and spread disinformation about the Allied forces' handling of the Malmedy trial. It reveals how McCarthy hijacked Senate hearings to validate false claims of torture against the Nazi defendants, as well as the role played by the America First movement in attempting to revive German nationalism and rehabilitate the image of the Nazis in the post-war years.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Throughout the 1930s and 1940s, the Chicago Tribune, under the direction of Robert McCormick, wielded significant influence with an editorial stance that was seen as pro-fascist and anti-democratic.
McCormick, who had inherited control of the Chicago Tribune, was known for his reactionary views, particularly his praise of Mussolini during the 1920s. His newspaper was also critical of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and voiced support for the America First Committee, which sought to keep America from engaging in war against the Nazis. Following World War II, the Tribune advocated for Nazi war criminals, garnering sympathy and opposing their prosecution. They infamously editorialized on one Easter Sunday that the Nuremberg trial would have "gagged Pontius Pilate."
Notably, after the Nuremberg verdicts were pronounced, the Chicago Tribune published a front-page cartoon that depicted a Nazi soldier as a "German martyr," denouncing the trials as biased and illegitimate.
The spread of the Tribune's pro-Nazi rhetoric was not contained within its own pages but extended to affiliated publications. The Chicago Tribune and the New York Daily News, in particular, became platforms for spreading fabricated reports of torture against Nazi defendants in the Malmedy trial. Claims about Nazis en ...
The pro-Nazi editorial stance of the Chicago Tribune and its influence
...
In the years following World War II, some conservative politicians, including Joe McCarthy and Bill Langer, were notable for their efforts to defend Nazi war criminals, sometimes echoing Nazi propaganda and making baseless accusations against U.S. institutions and personnel.
Joe McCarthy stood prominently in this effort, leveraging his position in the Senate to challenge the legitimacy of the Malmedy Massacre trial. He accused the U.S. Army of committing "brutalities greater than any we have ever accused Hitler Germany of employing" against the Nazi defendants, allegations which were not supported by evidence. McCarthy spread pro-Nazi propaganda, using horror story fabrications as factual in his statements, despite them being lies concocted in Germany to undermine the United States.
In a blatant display, McCarthy claimed that the Nazi defendants, some of whom he erroneously stated were teenagers, had been "crippled for life" by supposed torture at the hands of U.S. soldiers, which was not true. McCarthy targeted Jewish investigators with accusations of revenge-driven brutalities against these Nazi officers, suggesting the investigators possessed an intense hatred for Germans as a race.
Furthermore, McCarthy stormed out of the Senate's investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial, claiming that the U.S. Army's treatment of Nazi war criminals was worse than any atrocity committed by the Nazis themselves. His statements were seen as nothing less than the amplification of Nazi talking points.
Parallel to McCarthy's actions, Senator Bill Langer took up the defense of Nazi war criminals and American fascists. The Republican Senator from North Dakota expressed support on the Senate floor for defendants in wartime sedition trials and played a role in securing their legal defense. He was instru ...
Efforts by conservative politicians like Joe McCarthy and Bill Langer to defend Nazi war criminals
...
In April 1949, the Senate Armed Services Committee, with Senators Raymond Baldwin, Estes Kefauver, and Lester Hunt, launched a thorough investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial amid accusations of torture and mistreatment of the Nazi defendants. The inquiry concluded that the torture claims were unfounded and were part of an organized effort by ex-Nazis to revive German nationalism and undermine the trials.
The committee embarked on a fact-finding mission, traveling to Germany to hear firsthand from the Nazis who had alleged torture. They examined medical records and spoke with medical personnel, uncovering no evidence to support the physical injury claims made by the defendants. With over 100 witnesses interviewed, including the investigators of the defendants, it became clear that the claims of torture were baseless. Furthermore, U.S. army counterintelligence in Germany delved into the roots of these false allegations, revealing that former high-ranking ex-Nazis were financing campaigns to discredit the Malmedy case and negate war crimes trials. The committee determined that the allegation was part of an effort to subvert de-Nazification and promote German victimhood at the hands of Jews.
Joe McCarthy, who had inserted himself into the committee as a special observer, displayed disruptive behavior throughout the investigation. His belligerence included interrupting senators, speaking over and berating witnesses, thereby turning the entire investigation into a public spectacle. McCarthy also attempted to influence the committee's work by relaying the Nazi defendants' exaggerated claims of torture, which were proven false by multiple U.S. reviews. His speeches in Germany e ...
The Senate investigation into the Malmedy Massacre trial and McCarthy's disruptive more
...
An exploration into the post-World War II activities of the America First movement reveals efforts to defend and rehabilitate the image of Nazi war criminals and rekindle a nationalistic spirit in Germany.
After disbanding due to the Pearl Harbor attack, some members of the pre-war America First Committee continued to meet in secret during the war. Notably, Charles Lindbergh, who was a leader of the America First Committee before the war, urged members to be prepared to reengage after the expected defeat to negotiate peace with Hitler.
Henry Regnery, another prominent member, established himself in the publishing landscape with ventures such as Human Events, a right-wing magazine that criticized the Nuremberg Trial as a "travesty of justice." Furthermore, Regnery founded a conservative publishing company that released books defending Nazis, asserting the acts committed by the Nazi regime were not worse than those of the Allies. Historian John Jackson highlighted that most of the authors published by Regnery were fascists or aligned with the fascist cause. Regnery Publishing also published works suggesting that Nazis were treated unfairly during the Malmedy trial.
This section underscores how some key individuals associated with the America First movement played a role in advocating for a more sympathetic treatment of Nazi war criminals through various publications and public stances.
Congressman Claire Hoffman of Michigan and Senator Robert Taft were instrumental in the push against the prosecution of Nazis. Hoffman, during World War II, defended Americans ch ...
The America First movement's attempts to rehabilitate Nazism after World War II
...
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser