Podcasts > Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News > Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

By Rachel Maddow

In this episode of the Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News podcast, historians explore the often-overlooked role played by radical populists in securing American independence. They detail how this movement aimed for greater democracy and challenged the priorities of prominent Founding Fathers like Jefferson and Washington, who focused on building national power and wealth.

The historians argue that the prevailing narrative glorifies elite Founding Fathers while downplaying the populists' egalitarian visions and influence. They suggest recovering these suppressed histories provides nuance on the competing priorities shaping America's founding.

Listen to the original

Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jul 4, 2024 episode of the Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

1-Page Summary

The Radical Populist Movement's Role

In Pennsylvania during the American Revolution, the radical populist movement orchestrated what historians describe as a "bloodless military coup" to overthrow the existing government. Seeking greater democracy, they managed to get independence passed by the Continental Congress, though their key role has largely been ignored in traditional accounts, according to historians.

Founding Fathers' Priorities

While the radical populists aimed to leverage independence for securing power and economic/social equality, Founding Fathers like Jefferson, Washington, and Hamilton focused on building wealth and national power. Hogeland states they saw the populist "democracy" movement as a threat of "mob rule" to be suppressed, favoring the British industrialization model that exploited labor.

Mythologized Founding Narrative

Historians argue the prevailing narrative glorifies elite Founding Fathers while ignoring their clash with the egalitarian populist activists crucial to independence. O'Donnell and Hogeland say this presents the Founding Fathers' views as inevitable when in fact alternative visions were suppressed. Recovering populist histories provides nuance on the competing priorities shaping America's founding.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The term "bloodless military coup" may be an oversimplification or mischaracterization of complex political dynamics during the American Revolution.
  • The role of radical populists may not have been as central to the passing of independence as suggested, considering the multifaceted nature of the independence movement.
  • The focus on wealth and national power by the Founding Fathers could be interpreted as a necessary strategy for the nascent nation's survival and growth, rather than a mere preference for British industrial models.
  • The Founding Fathers' apprehension about "mob rule" might be seen as a legitimate concern for the stability and sustainability of the new government, rather than a simple aversion to democracy.
  • The narrative that glorifies the Founding Fathers could be argued to be a reflection of their significant contributions to the nation's founding, rather than a deliberate suppression of populist roles.
  • The suggestion that alternative visions were suppressed might overlook the historical debates and compromises that were part of the founding process.
  • The recovery of populist histories, while providing nuance, may not necessarily contradict the importance of the Founding Fathers' contributions but rather complement the broader historical understanding.

Actionables

  • Dive into local history by visiting your city or town's historical society to uncover stories of local activists and movements that contributed to the nation's development. By learning about the lesser-known figures in your area, you can gain a deeper appreciation for the diverse voices that shaped the community and the country.
  • Engage with your current political environment by attending town hall meetings or local government sessions to observe democracy in action. This firsthand experience can provide insight into how populist movements of the past have influenced the way local governance operates today.
  • Start a book club focused on biographies of lesser-known figures from the American Revolution to explore alternative narratives. By reading and discussing these stories with others, you can broaden your understanding of the different perspectives and forces that played a role in America's founding.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

The overlooked role of the radical populist "democracy" movement in the American Revolution

The radical populist movement in Pennsylvania during the American Revolution played a significant, yet often ignored role in shaping the movement towards greater democracy.

The radical populists in Pennsylvania orchestrated a "bloodless military coup" to overthrow the existing government and push for greater democratic reforms.

In a remarkable act that has since been largely forgotten in mainstream historical narratives, the radical populists in Pennsylvania carried out what has been described as a bloodless military coup. With the force of the state's armed working class behind them, they didn't just overthrow the assembly, they dismantled the entire government system that William Penn had established.

The radical populists were able to get a resolution of independence passed in the Continental Congress, but their central role in this process has been largely expunged from traditional accounts of the founding.

The radical populists continued their push for change at a national level, managing to get a resolution of independence passed in the Continental Congress. Despite their central involvement in this seminal moment of American history, their contribution has been largely erased from the popularly accepted accounts of the founding of the United States.

The radical populists sought to use American independence as an opportunity to cement their own new power and implement policies to foster social and economic equality.

The agenda of the radical populists extended beyond mere political restructuring. They aimed to leverage American independence to secure their newfound power and introduce reforms that would encourage social and economic equality.

The radical populists pushed for measures like regulating commerce and expanding voting rights, which were o ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The overlooked role of the radical populist "democracy" movement in the American Revolution

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • A "bloodless military coup" typically refers to a situation where a change in government or leadership occurs through the use of military force, but without significant violence or bloodshed. In the context of the radical populist movement in Pennsylvania during the American Revolution, it suggests that the existing government was overthrown by the armed working class without a large-scale conflict or loss of life. This term highlights the unconventional and relatively peaceful nature of the radical populists' actions in seizing power and reshaping the political landscape.
  • The reference to dismantling the government system established by William Penn in Pennsylvania during the American Revolution indicates that the radical populists took actions to completely break down and replace the existing political structures and institutions that had been put in place by Penn, a prominent historical figure known for founding the colony of Pennsylvania. This suggests a significant and radical departure from the established governance framework, signaling a profound shift in power dynamics and political organization within the state. The phrase highlights the extent to which the radical populists sought to upend the existing order and implement their own vision of governance, emphasizing their commitment to revolutionary change and the establishment of a new political system aligned with their democratic ideals.
  • The "resolution of independence passed in the Continental Congress" refers to the formal decision made by the Continental Congress on July 2, 1776, declaring the thirteen American colonies independent from British rule. This resolution, proposed by Richard Henry Lee of Virginia, laid the groundwork for the drafting and adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. The resolution marked a crucial step towards establishing a new nation separate from British authority.
  • "Expunged from traditional accounts of the founding" means that the significant role of the radical populist movement in the American Revolution has been deliberately left out or removed from the commonly accepted historical narratives about the founding of the United States. This exclusion has led to a lack of recognition for the contributions and impact of the radical populists in shaping the movement towards greater democracy during that period.
  • "Regulating commerce" involves creating and enforcing rules and laws that govern trade and business activities within a specific region or country. This can include setting standards for products, establishing tariffs or taxes on imports and exports, and ensuring fair competition among businesses. In the context of the American Revolution, the radical populists in Pennsylvania sought to implement regulations that would control and shape economic activities to benefit the broader population and promote equality.
  • The phrase "discarding the propert ...

Counterarguments

  • The term "bloodless military coup" may be an oversimplification or a mischaracterization of complex political dynamics that were at play during the period, which included negotiations and compromises among various factions.
  • The dismantling of the Penn government system could be seen as part of a broader trend of revolutionary change rather than a unique achievement of the radical populists.
  • While the radical populists contributed to the push for independence, it was a collective effort involving many groups and individuals with varying ideologies and motivations.
  • The claim that the radical populists' role has been "expunged" from traditional accounts may be overstated, as historical narratives are complex and multifaceted, with some accounts acknowledging the diversity of contributions to the founding of the United States.
  • The idea that the radical populists sought to use independence to cement their own power could be interpreted as a cynical view of their motives, which might alternatively be seen as genuine efforts to promote democratic principles.
  • The measures pushed by the radical populists, such as regulating commerce and expanding voting rights, could be argued to have unintended conseq ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

The Founding Fathers' priorities and views on democracy, equality, and economic policies

The Founding Fathers such as Jefferson, Washington, and Hamilton held particular views on democracy, economic policies, and the concept of equality, which shaped the early direction of the United States.

The Founding Fathers like Jefferson, Washington, and Hamilton were primarily focused on building national wealth and power, and were less concerned with promoting democratic equality.

The term "equality," as invoked in the Declaration of Independence, meant different things to different people. Founders like Jefferson did not see creating equality as a central role for government, particularly when it came to regulating commerce.

They saw the rise of the radical populist "democracy" movement as a threat of "mob rule" that needed to be suppressed.

There was a clear tension in Philadelphia in 1776. Many elite people sought independence from Britain but feared a social revolution that might disrupt the existing class structure in America. To them, democracy was equated with mob rule, and according to O'Donnell and Hogeland, figures like Washington and Hamilton viewed it as something to be suppressed.

The Founding Fathers did not believe in using centralized government policy to actively promote social and economic equality across the United States.

Instead, they largely adhered to the Britis ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Founding Fathers' priorities and views on democracy, equality, and economic policies

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The Founding Fathers had a complex view of democracy and equality, with some like Madison designing the Constitution to balance majority rule with minority rights, suggesting they were not entirely dismissive of democratic principles.
  • The term "equality" in the Declaration of Independence is often interpreted as a commitment to the principle of equal rights, and while the Founders' practices did not always align with this principle, it laid the groundwork for future legal and social reforms.
  • Jefferson's views on government's role in creating equality evolved over time, and he did express ideas about the importance of education and land ownership as means for individuals to achieve independence and self-sufficiency.
  • The fear of "mob rule" was not universally held by all Founding Fathers, and figures like Thomas Paine were more optimistic about the potential of democratic governance.
  • The Founding Fathers' attitudes towards economic policy were not monolithic; for instance, Hamilton's support for a strong central government and a national bank indicates a willingness to use centralized power to shape economic outcomes.
  • T ...

Actionables

  • You can explore the evolution of democratic equality by reading the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers to understand the contrasting views on government's role in equality.
  • Delving into these primary sources allows you to form your own interpretation of the Founding Fathers' intentions. For example, compare the perspectives in Federalist No. 10, which discusses the dangers of factionalism, with those in the Anti-Federalist Papers that often emphasize more direct forms of democracy.
  • Engage in a thought experiment by imagining how you would design a government if you were among the Founding Fathers.
  • Consider the balance between wealth, power, and equality. Sketch out a government structure on paper, deciding where you would stand on issues like commerce regulation and social hierarchy. This exercise can help you appreciate the complexities and trade-offs the Founders faced.
  • Reflect on your personal and professional life to identify where you might ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Biden-Harris campaign: There is no contingency plan for VP to take over

How the traditional narrative of the founding has been shaped to glorify the Founding Fathers and omit the populist movement

The story of America’s Founding Fathers is deeply ingrained in the country’s national identity, yet historians suggest that this narrative has been crafted in a way that glorifies these figures and neglects the significant role of populist movements.

Historians have been complicit in propagating a mythologized version of the founding that emphasizes the elite Founding Fathers at the expense of the radical populist movement.

This prevailing narrative celebrates the elite framers while ignoring the clash between these celebrated figures and the egalitarian populist activists who played a crucial role in the fight for American independence. Historians have been criticized for their role in perpetuating a mythologized history that focuses on a small group of elites.

This narrative ignores or downplays the clash between the elite Founding Fathers and the more egalitarian populist activists, and the latter's crucial role in driving American independence.

The significant contributions of radical populist movements are often expunged from the popular recounting of events like the Fourth of July. These groups held radical and democratic ideas that deeply influenced the path to independence, yet their stories are seldom told with the same reverence as those of the Founding Fathers.

The traditional founding narrative presents the Founding Fathers' views and policies as inevitable or natural, when in fact there were alternative visions for the new nation that were actively suppressed.

Critics argue that the dominant narrative presents the establishment of the American government as a foregone conclusion, the natural outcome of the Founding Fathers' enlightened policies. However, this ignores the vibrant debate and the alternative, often more egalitarian visions for the nation that w ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

How the traditional narrative of the founding has been shaped to glorify the Founding Fathers and omit the populist movement

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The traditional narrative focuses on the Founding Fathers because they were the primary architects of the foundational documents and governance structures.
  • Glorification of the Founding Fathers can be seen as a way to create a unifying national story that provides a sense of shared history and identity.
  • Historians often focus on figures like the Founding Fathers due to the availability of extensive documentation of their thoughts and actions, which is not always the case for populist movements.
  • The complexity of the founding period means that not all groups and perspectives can be equally represented in every narrative.
  • Some argue that the contributions of the Founding Fathers have had a more lasting and direct impact on the structure of the American government than the populist movements.
  • The narrative of the Founding Fathers as enlightened thinkers is based on their pioneering ideas about democracy and governance, which were revolutionary at the time.
  • The idea of a singular "populist movement" may oversimplify the diversity of grassroots activism and opinion during the founding period.
  • Some historians may contend that while populist movements were important, they did not have the same dir ...

Actionables

  • Dive into local library archives to uncover lesser-known stories about your area's history, focusing on grassroots movements and unsung heroes. By researching original documents, letters, and newspapers from the founding period, you can piece together narratives that challenge the mainstream account and share these findings through social media or a blog to spread awareness.
  • Start a book club with friends or community members that focuses on reading and discussing works by historians who have explored the populist movements of the founding era. This can lead to a deeper understanding of the diverse perspectives that contributed to the nation's inception and foster discussions that question the traditional historical narrative.
  • Engage with y ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA