In this episode of Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News, Rachel Maddow and Steven Remy examine the Malmedy Massacre, where Nazi SS soldiers brutally executed American POWs during World War II. They delve into the high-profile trial that followed, which saw all defendants convicted despite the lackluster defense efforts of Willis Everett.
Maddow and Remy then explore Everett's subsequent campaign against the trial's integrity, making baseless claims of coerced confessions. They also discuss the role of ex-Nazi lawyer Rudolf Aschenauer, who worked with convicted Nazis to manufacture stories of abuse aimed at overturning convictions and discrediting the war crime trials themselves.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Nazi SS soldiers brutally executed American POWs in Malmedy, Belgium during World War II's Battle of the Bulge in 1944, as Steven Remy and Rachel Maddow explain. Over 80 bodies were later discovered, with evidence of close-range killings. The graphic details and images shocked Americans, setting the stage for a high-profile trial.
At Dachau, the trial saw all defendants ultimately convicted, with U.S. lawyer Willis Everett serving as an ineffective defense counsel. Everett knew the detailed confessions made arguing innocence futile, as Remy notes. Most received death sentences.
After the trial, the humiliated Everett baselessly claimed investigators had abused the defendants into false confessions, motivated by anti-Semitic beliefs of a "Jewish conspiracy," as Maddow and Remy observe. Despite U.S. Army investigations refuting the allegations, Everett perpetuated them publicly.
Everett's shocking fabrications unexpectedly gained traction in media and with some Congress members, though Remy confirms four reviews found no misconduct. His accusations challenged the trial's integrity.
The ex-Nazi lawyer Aschenauer worked with convicted Nazis to manufacture stories of torture to undermine the trials, as Remy and Maddow explain. He helped defendants make up tales of coerced confessions to discredit the prosecutions.
Maddow highlights Aschenauer's dual motives: overturning Malmedy convictions and discrediting all Nazi war crime trials to enable a revival of Nazi ideology and power, which Remy confirms Aschenauer overtly pursued through organizations.
1-Page Summary
The Malmedy massacre was a chilling episode of World War II where Nazi SS troops brutally killed American prisoners of war. Its repercussions resonated through the war trials and left an indelible mark on public consciousness.
On December 17, 1944, during the Battle of the Bulge, American soldiers in Malmedy, Belgium, were captured and killed by a Nazi SS tank unit known as the Blowtorch Battalion. The troop lined up the American prisoners, disarmed them, and executed them with machine guns, rifles, and other weapons. Survivors who escaped immediately reported the grisly events to American reporters, providing graphic details of the massacre.
A month after the incident, American troops found the frozen bodies of 84 American soldiers, evidencing a mass execution rather than casualties of combat. The event, documented through eyewitness accounts and confirmed by a US Army autopsy, revealed that over half the soldiers were killed at close range. Press reports in Stars and Stripes, Yank magazine, and a series of photos in Life magazine informed the American public about the massacre, with the images so violent that some had to be censored.
The American reaction was one of shock and outrage, compelling the supreme commander of Allied forces in Europe to pledge to bring the perpetrators to justice. US Army investigators compiled evidence against the members of the German panzer unit responsible for the killings.
The trial was held at Dachau in Germany. Willis Everett, a lawyer inexperienced in criminal trials, served as the defense counsel despite the clear evidence against the accused SS men. The evidence included detailed confessions obtained by US Army investigators, which made it impossible for Everett to argue the crimes did not occur or that his clients were not involved. ...
The Malmedy Massacre and its aftermath
...
Following a high-profile trial, defense lawyer Willis Everett embarked on a mission to publicly criticize the proceedings, claiming mistreatment and coercion of defendants into false confessions, which he attributed to a "Jewish conspiracy," despite investigations refuting his allegations.
Everett, spurred by both a desire to salvage his professional reputation after losing the case and his anti-Semitic convictions, scrutinized the legal process. Initially, Everett had heard rumors of prisoner abuse by American interrogators before the trial and was concerned about the reliability of the confessions that were integral to the prosecution's case.
He discovered, however, that the claims of abuse and coercion were unfounded, with the prosecution's confessions standing up to scrutiny. Investigations revealed that the accusations of beating to obtain confessions were baseless, leading Everett to concede to this fact. Despite some of the accused later admitting to fabricating stories of being beaten, Everett drafted a lengthy petition distorting the trial record, insinuating misconduct during the investigation.
Everett's skepticism about the trial's integrity was deep-seated, as he believed it was marred by corruption, primarily orchestrated by Jewish parties with a thirst for retribution. He was convinced the entire process, from the investigation to the courtroom, was masterminded as a Jewish plot, rooted in both a desire to vindicate himself and his prejudiced worldview.
Steven Remy reports that the U.S. Army conducted four thorough reviews of the Malmedy case, all confirming that there had been no torture, and the claims of torture were unfounded. Contrastingly, Rachel Maddow observes that an American colonel, likely referring to Everett, perpetuated the narrative of misconduct during the investigation, casting the convicted Nazi war criminals as victims.
Everett's campaign against the trial's validity seemed to resonate with certain segments of the American public. His sensationa ...
The defense lawyer's efforts to undermine the trial
...
After World War II, a coordinated effort by former Nazis, including lawyers, was initiated to overturn the convictions of war criminals. Among these individuals was Rudolf Aschenauer, a persistent figure who used his legal expertise to try to rehabilitate the image of the Nazi regime and its followers.
Rudolf Aschenauer, a lawyer who had not renounced his allegiance to National Socialism, took an active role in the post-war period both as a legal advocate for Nazi war criminals and as a political agitator attempting to revive Nazi ideology.
Aschenauer worked closely with Nazi convicts to fabricate allegations of torture and abuse by the American prosecutors during the trials. He helped the Malmedy defendants concoct false stories of coercion, which were then used to challenge the legitimacy of the prosecutions. These fabricated accounts were smuggled out of Landsberg prison where the condemned men were being held, with the assistance of Aschenauer and other ex-Nazi lawyers.
Steven Remy and Rachel Maddow highlight Aschenauer's ulterior motives. Maddow emphasizes that these false allegations served Aschenauer's twin goals of overturning the convictions of the Malmedy defendants and, more broadly, discrediting the entire war crimes prosecution process. This, in turn, played into Aschenauer's political agenda aimed at r ...
The involvement of Nazi lawyers in attempting to overturn the convictions
...
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser