Trump renews request to have Special Counsel Jack Smith held in contempt
In a groundbreaking episode of "Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News," host Katie Phang takes an incisive look at Newark, New Jersey's monumental decision to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local school board elections. This pioneering move, making Newark the largest city to implement such a measure post-26th Amendment era, embodies a bold stride in youth civic engagement. Legal expert Ryan Haygood dives into the constitutional nuances that support New Jersey's groundbreaking ordinance, as he highlights the prospect of empowering approximately 7,000 young voters of color in the community.
Listen closely as students like Brianna Campbell share their fervor for participating in formulating the educational fabric of their city. Backed unanimously by the city council and celebrated by Council President LaMonica McIver, this initiative champions the growing readiness of young people to tackle significant societal issues. As Phang and other speakers on the show explore the implications, they reveal an infectious optimism for the future of political participation, hinting at the potential for a ripple effect that could spark a wave of similar reforms nationwide.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 13, 2024 episode of the Rachel Maddow Presents: Déjà News
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Newark, NJ Passing Initiative Allowing 16-17 Year Olds to Vote in Local Elections
The Newark City Council has recently passed an ordinance allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local school board elections. Initiated on a Wednesday night and set to take effect in April, this new regulation is a first in New Jersey since the 26th Amendment and makes Newark the largest city to enact such a measure post-amendment era.
Local advocates such as Nate Esubonteng stress the importance of incorporating young voices in decision-making, especially on issues like gun reform. School student, Brianna Campbell and her peers express enthusiasm over having a say in crucial educational policies. Their history teacher is among the educators backing this encouragement for youth voice.
Legal expert Ryan Haygood points out the constitutional backing New Jersey provides for cities to lower the voting age, emphasizing the impact on approximately 7,000 young people of color. This shift is particularly relevant to boosting participation in school board elections that typically see low voter turnout.
The city council's unanimous backing of the initiative is applauded by Council President LaMonica McIver, who argues against criticism by emphasizing the readiness of youth to engage with significant societal issues. Katie Phang praises McIver and the City Council on her show for their trailblazing action, suggesting that it could inspire similar initiatives across the country.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18, ensuring that American citizens aged 18 and older cannot be denied the right to vote based on their age.
- In New Jersey, state law allows cities to set the minimum voting age for local elections, which can be lower than the standard voting age for state and federal elections. This legal provision gives municipalities the flexibility to expand voting rights for specific local matters, such as school board elections. It enables cities like Newark to implement initiatives like allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local elections within the framework of state laws.
- LaMonica McIver is the Council President of Newark, New Jersey. As the Council President, McIver holds a leadership position within the city council, overseeing its operations and often playing a key role in decision-making processes. In the context of the text, McIver is mentioned as supporting the initiative to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local school board elections. This indicates that McIver is in favor of engaging youth in the democratic process and believes in their readiness to participate in important societal issues.
Counterarguments
- Concerns about the maturity and informed decision-making ability of 16 and 17-year-olds.
- The potential for increased influence by parents or educators over the voting choices of young voters.
- The difference in legal responsibilities and rights between minors and adults, such as the age of majority for contracts and other legal commitments.
- The historical rationale for the voting age being set at 18 in many jurisdictions.
- The need for a broader discussion and possibly a referendum to ensure community consensus on changing the voting age.
- The possibility that this change may not significantly increase voter turnout or engagement among young people.
- The challenge of ensuring that young voters have access to unbiased and comprehensive civic education.
- The potential for this initiative to set a precedent that could lead to further debates on the appropriate voting age for other types of elections.
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Newark, NJ Passing Initiative Allowing 16-17 Year Olds to Vote in Local Elections
In a trailblazing move, the Newark City Council has unlocked voting rights in school board elections for individuals as young as 16, signifying a historic shift in youth electoral engagement.
On Wednesday night, the Newark City Council passed a landmark ordinance permitting 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local school board elections starting in April. This initiative marks the first of its kind statewide since the ratification of the 26th amendment in 1971. Notably, this legislation has positioned Newark as the largest community to bestow such rights upon younger populations post-amendment.
Advocates like Nate Esubonteng highlight the critical need for the younger demographic to participate in decisions, with a particular focus on policies surrounding gun reform. Brianna Campbell captures the sentiment among her peers, exhibiting palpable excitement to vote on pivotal issues like educational equity. The support they receive from educators like their history teacher further underlines the community's push for youth empowerment.
Ryan Haygood delves into the legal particulars, citing the constitutional authority granted to New Jersey cities to reduce the voting age. Not only is this change a powerful democratic tool for about 7,000 black and brown young people, but it also addresses issues such as historically low voter participation in school board elections.
New York City Council President LaMonica McIver celebrated the initiative's unanimous city c ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Newark, NJ Passing Initiative Allowing 16-17 Year Olds to Vote in Local Elections
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. This amendment was a response to the Vietnam War era, where young adults were being drafted to fight but couldn't vote. It aimed to ensure that all citizens aged 18 and older had the right to vote in federal, state, and local elections. The amendment was quickly ratified by the states, reflecting the widespread support for granting voting rights to younger Americans.
- New Jersey cities have the legal authority to lower the voting age due to their ability to regulate local elections and governance within their jurisdictions. This authority allows cities like Newark to enact changes such as permitting 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in local school board elections. This power is granted to municipalities to tailor electoral processes to better reflect the needs and demographics of their communities. The decision to lower the voting age in Newark aligns with the city's efforts to increase ...
Counterarguments
- Concerns about maturity and experience: Some may argue that 16 and 17-year-olds lack the life experience and maturity to make informed decisions about complex political issues.
- Potential for undue influence: Critics might suggest that younger voters are more susceptible to influence from parents, teachers, or peers, which could impact the impartiality of their vote.
- Consistency with other legal age limits: There may be arguments about the inconsistency of allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote when they are not legally considered adults for other purposes, such as signing contracts or serving on juries.
- Impact on election outcomes: Some might worry that the inclusion of younger voters could disproportionately affect election outcomes, particularly if their voting patterns differ significantly from older voters.
- Civic education concerns: Opponents could argue that the current state of civic education may not adequately prepare young people for the responsibilities of voting.
- Administrative and logistical challenges: Implementing a lower voting age could pose practical challenges, such as updating vote ...
Learn more
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
