Podcasts > PBD Podcast > Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

By Patrick Bet-David

In this PBD Podcast episode, a range of current events and controversies are discussed. The University of Texas at Austin's decision to eliminate its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs following a new Texas law is examined. The episode also covers NATO's efforts to secure long-term military aid for Ukraine, Denver officials' advice to migrants to seek better resources in other states, and Stephen A. Smith's critique of Hillary Clinton's dismissive comments about Republican voters during her 2016 presidential campaign.

The various topics touch on issues surrounding diversity and inclusion policies, national security strategies, the challenges of accommodating migrants, and the importance of political candidates connecting with voters across all demographics. The discussions offer insight into the complex dynamics surrounding these subjects from different perspectives.

Listen to the original

Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Apr 4, 2024 episode of the PBD Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

1-Page Summary

Elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at University of Texas

In adherence to Texas Senate Bill 17 (SB 17), the University of Texas at Austin terminates its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs and lays off employees. Texas lawmaker Tom Ellsworth supports this decision, commending University President Jay Hartzell for aligning with the legislators' intent to promote a merit-based system. Despite the cessation of DEI programs, University of Texas at Austin retains student-facing roles for the remainder of the semester to provide immediate student support while affected employees are encouraged to apply for other positions within the university. President Hartzell emphasizes the university's commitment to being welcoming and supportive while complying with the legal requirements of SB 17.

Efforts by NATO to secure military aid for Ukraine regardless of election outcomes

NATO aims to create a "Trump-proof" $100 billion fund to ensure continued military aid for Ukraine that would withstand political changes in member countries, including a potential re-election of Donald Trump. Adam Sosnick views this initiative as a strategic insurance policy against Russian aggression, especially for neighboring nations. This fund would grant NATO control over weapon support for Ukraine for the next five years, marking a significant change in defense strategy since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022. With NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg leading the proposal, the plan seeks an international agreement to maintain a steady flow of military support to Ukraine regardless of shifting political landscapes.

Colorado officials telling migrants to go to other blue states with more resources

Denver officials, grappling with the city's strained resources due to the high influx of migrants, are advising them to consider moving to other blue states with more to offer, such as New York and Chicago. These cities are purported to have better provisions in terms of shelter and job opportunities. This redirection is indicative of Denver's acknowledgement of its limited capacity to accommodate and assist the growing number of migrants.

Stephen A. Smith's critique of Hillary Clinton's remarks about voters

Stephen A. Smith criticizes Hillary Clinton for her 2016 presidential campaign comments, particularly the negative reference to some Republican voters as "deplorables." Smith asserts that such comments can create voter discontent and contribute to election losses. He also criticizes Clinton for not campaigning in key Midwest states late in the race, potentially contributing to her defeat. Smith argues that candidates often appear disconnected from voter sentiments, urging a greater focus on issues that resonate with the electorate. Tom Ellsworth reiterates the strategic importance of understanding and addressing voter concerns to avoid alienating any voter bloc.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Texas Senate Bill 17 (SB 17) is a legislative measure that impacts diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in Texas universities. It led to the termination of such programs at the University of Texas at Austin, aligning with a shift towards a merit-based system. The bill's implications include layoffs of employees involved in DEI initiatives and a focus on compliance with legal requirements while maintaining student support services. The decision to end DEI programs reflects a broader policy shift in Texas towards promoting merit-based practices in educational institutions.
  • Blue states are regions in the United States that typically vote for the Democratic Party in elections. The term "blue" is used to represent the Democratic Party, while "red" represents the Republican Party. Blue states are often associated with more progressive policies and tend to have larger urban populations compared to red states. In the context of migration, referring to blue states suggests that these areas may have more resources and support systems in place for newcomers, such as migrants seeking shelter and job opportunities.
  • Stephen A. Smith criticized Hillary Clinton for calling some Republican voters "deplorables" during her 2016 presidential campaign. Smith believed that such comments could alienate voters and contribute to election losses. He also highlighted Clinton's absence from key Midwest states late in the race as a potential factor in her defeat. Smith emphasized the importance of candidates understanding and addressing voter concerns to avoid disconnecting from the electorate.

Counterarguments

  • The termination of DEI programs at the University of Texas at Austin could be criticized for potentially undermining efforts to create an inclusive environment for all students, particularly those from historically marginalized groups.
  • Some may argue that a merit-based system, while seemingly fair, does not account for systemic inequalities that DEI programs aim to address.
  • Critics might suggest that retaining student-facing roles is not a sufficient replacement for comprehensive DEI programs and may not adequately support the needs of a diverse student body.
  • There could be concerns that encouraging laid-off DEI staff to apply for other positions does not address the loss of their specialized expertise in fostering diversity and inclusion.
  • The establishment of a NATO fund for Ukraine could be criticized for potentially escalating military tensions rather than focusing on diplomatic solutions to the conflict.
  • Some may argue that the creation of a "Trump-proof" fund undermines the democratic process by attempting to circumvent the policy decisions of elected leaders.
  • Critics might point out that advising migrants to move to other states could be seen as passing the responsibility rather than developing long-term solutions to support migrants.
  • There could be a counterargument that Denver's approach to redirecting migrants might not be in the best interest of the migrants themselves, who may have settled in the community and started to build their lives there.
  • Regarding Stephen A. Smith's critique of Hillary Clinton, some might argue that Clinton's "deplorables" comment, while controversial, was a candid expression of her views and that political discourse should allow for frank discussions.
  • Others might counter that Clinton's campaign strategy, including her focus on certain states, was based on a multitude of factors and that her loss cannot be solely attributed to the lack of campaigning in the Midwest or her comments.
  • It could be argued that addressing voter concerns is important, but politicians should not pander to voters at the expense of their principles and policy positions.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

Elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at University of Texas

The University eliminates DEI programs and lays off employees to adhere to Texas law SB 17

The University of Texas at Austin responds to state legislation by terminating DEI staff and programs, prompting reactions from various stakeholders.

Tom Ellsworth expresses support for the elimination of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. Texas Senate Bill 17 (SB 17), leads to the cessation of DEI programs at public universities. He commends University President Jay Hartzell for adhering to SB 17 and aligning with the lawmakers' intent.

The rationale behind SB 17's support is argued to be the promotion of a merit-based environment within higher education. The move to dissolve DEI programs is seen as an endorsement for meritocracy.

Consequently, the University of Texas at Austin has terminated dozens of employees within their diversity, equity, and inclusion branch. This action follows the enactment of SB 17 and the resulting policy changes.

Specifically, the division of campus and community engagement saw the elimination of 60 positions related to DEI ini ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at University of Texas

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Texas law SB 17, also known as Senate Bill 17, mandates the elimination of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs at public universities in Texas. The law aims to promote a merit-based environment in higher education by discontinuing DEI initiatives. This legislation has led to the termination of DEI staff and programs at the University of Texas at Austin, aligning with the legal requirements set forth in SB 17. The university's response to SB 17 includes laying off employees within the DEI branch and emphasizing compliance with the law while striving to maintain a welcoming environment for all individuals on campus.
  • The rationale behind the support for Texas Senate Bill 17 (SB 17) is to promote a merit-based environment in higher education by eliminating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. Supporters argue that dissolving DEI programs aligns with the concept of meritocracy. This move is seen as a response to legislative requirements and a shift in policy priorities. The impact of SB 17 on ...

Counterarguments

  • DEI programs are often established to address systemic inequalities and may enhance meritocracy by providing equal opportunities to all students, regardless of their background.
  • The elimination of DEI programs could potentially overlook the unique challenges faced by underrepresented groups in higher education.
  • Compliance with SB 17 may be legally necessary, but it could be argued that the law itself is not in the best interest of fostering a diverse and inclusive educational environment.
  • While the university maintains student-facing roles, the removal of dedicated DEI staff may reduce the capacity to address specific concerns related to diversity and inclusion.
  • Offering affected employees the chance to apply for other roles does not guarantee equivalent employment, potentially leading to financial and professional instability for those individuals.
  • The assertion that DEI programs are contrary to meritocracy could be challenged by evidence that such programs can contribute to a more equitable assessment of mer ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

Efforts by NATO to secure military aid for Ukraine regardless of election outcomes

NATO is taking steps to establish a substantial fund intended to secure military aid for Ukraine, aiming to make it resilient against potential shifts in political leadership among its member nations.

NATO plans $100 billion Trump-proof fund for Ukraine military aid to shield it from political changes like Trump re-election

NATO is reported to be planning a $100 billion fund for Ukraine that is designed to be "Trump-proof." This means that the aid is intended to be safeguarded even if there were political changes, such as the potential re-election of Donald Trump, who may not support Ukraine as strenuously as the current administration.

Seeks international agreement on 5-year $100 billion aid package to give NATO control of weapons support for Ukraine

The fund proposal is a long-term aid package, with a five-year horizon, amounting to $100 billion to support Ukraine irrespective of who holds office in the United States or any other NATO member country. Adam Sosnick notes that establishing this NATO fund can be seen as a strategic insurance policy, potentially protecting Ukraine's interests against any changes with a Trump re-election, who Sosnick fears might let Russia take over.

Sosnick suggests that the initiative is especially critical for nations neighboring Russia who feel threatened by potential Russian aggression. Tom Ellsworth echoes this sentiment, viewing NATO's move as an effort to secure its interests, sustain its influence, and protect its member cou ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Efforts by NATO to secure military aid for Ukraine regardless of election outcomes

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The mention of a potential Trump re-election in the context of support for Ukraine implies concerns about how a change in U.S. leadership could impact aid and assistance to Ukraine. This concern stems from differing foreign policy approaches between administrations, with some speculating that a future Trump administration might not prioritize support for Ukraine as much as the current one. The proposed fund aims to ensure consistent aid for Ukraine regardless of political changes, providing a safeguard against potential shifts in U.S. policy towards Ukraine.
  • NATO's influence and interests are focused on maintaining stability and security in Europe, deterring aggression, and promoting democratic values among member nations. By supporting Ukraine with a substantial aid package, NATO aims to strengthen its strategic position in the region and prevent potential Russian influence from expanding further. This initiative also serves to demonstrate NATO's commitment to collective defense and solidarity among its members in the face of evolving geopolitical challenges. NATO's sustained interests lie in upholding the rules-based international order and safeguarding the security of its member countries against external threats.
  • When NATO takes over management of the aid package, it means that NATO will be responsible for ...

Counterarguments

  • The establishment of a "Trump-proof" fund could be seen as undermining the democratic process by attempting to circumvent the foreign policy decisions of future elected leaders.
  • A $100 billion fund could raise concerns about the opportunity cost, as these resources could be allocated to other pressing global issues or domestic programs within NATO member countries.
  • The long-term commitment to a single country may limit NATO's flexibility to respond to other emerging crises or shifts in the global security landscape.
  • The focus on military aid might overshadow the need for diplomatic solutions, potentially prolonging conflict rather than encouraging peaceful resolution.
  • Centralizing control of military aid through NATO could lead to disagreements within the alliance if member states have differing views on the approach to Ukraine.
  • The creation of such a fund could escalate tensions with Russia, potentially leading to a more dangerous security situation in Europe.
  • There may be concerns about accountability and oversight in the management of su ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

Colorado officials telling migrants to go to other blue states with more resources

Denver officials urge migrants to leave for New York and Chicago which offer more shelter and job opportunities

As Carrera reports, Denver officials are currently advising migrants to consider relocating to other blue states, such as New York and Chicago, which are said to offer more shelter and job opportunities.

Official says Denver lacks resources after receiving too many migrants

The advice comes as officials acknowledge that Denver has exhausted its r ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Colorado officials telling migrants to go to other blue states with more resources

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Denver is facing challenges in providing assistance to migrants due to the large number of arrivals, which has strained the city's resources. The influx of migrants has overwhelmed the city's capacity to offer necessary support, leading officials to suggest that migrants consider relocating to other cities with more resources. This strain on resources has prompted Denver officials to advise migrants to seek shelter and job opportunities in other blue states like New York and Chicago.
  • "Blue states" is a term commonly used in the United States to describe states that typically vote for the Democratic Party in national elections. These states are ...

Counterarguments

  • The strategy of redirecting migrants to other cities may not be a sustainable long-term solution, as it could lead to similar resource strains in those destinations.
  • There may be concerns about the lack of coordination between states, which could result in an uneven distribution of resources and support for migrants.
  • Encouraging migrants to move to other cities might not address the root causes of migration and could potentially disrupt the support networks that migrants have built.
  • The advice to relocate could be seen as passing the responsibility to other cities rather than developing a comprehensive, multi-state or federal approach to migration.
  • There could be potential legal or ethical issues related to advising migrants to move to specific locations without ensuring that those cities have consented to and are prepared for ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Andrew Schulz CALLS OUT Ben Shapiro & Stephen A. Smith vs Hillary Clinton | PBD Podcast | Ep 390

Stephen A. Smith's critique of Hillary Clinton's remarks about voters

Stephen A. Smith has fired back at Hillary Clinton's past remarks about voters, scrutinizing the impact and wisdom of her language during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Smith criticizes Clinton for calling some Republican voters "deplorables", saying that will agitate voters

Smith targeted Clinton’s infamous "basket of deplorables" comment, suggesting that such labeling of Republican voters would provoke agitation among the electorate. His critique indicates that this approach to addressing voters is strategically flawed and could alienate potentially swayable members of the voting public.

Notes her 2016 loss after not campaigning in key Midwest states late in the race

He also pointed to Clinton’s campaign missteps, such as not campaigning in critical Midwest states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania towards the latter stages of her 2016 campaign. This lack of presence in key areas could have been a contributing factor to her loss.

Says candidates seem detached from what voters feel and think

Furthermore, Smith contends that politicians, including Clinton, sometimes come across as detached from the genuine concerns a ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Stephen A. Smith's critique of Hillary Clinton's remarks about voters

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables" comment referred to a statement she made during the 2016 presidential campaign, where she characterized some of Donald Trump's supporters as belonging to a "basket of deplorables." This remark was widely criticized as being divisive and disrespectful towards a portion of the electorate, potentially alienating voters. Clinton later expressed regret for the comment, acknowledging that it was a misstep in her campaign messaging.
  • The connection between Clinton's "deplorables" comment and voter agitation lies in how labeling a group of voters in a negative manner can potentially anger and alienate them, affecting their willingness to support a candidate. This criticism suggests that such language can backfire by stirring negative emotions among voters, leading to a strategic misstep in engaging with the electorate.
  • Understanding voter perspectives involves candidates empathizing with the concerns and priorities of the electora ...

Counterarguments

  • While Smith criticizes Clinton for using the term "deplorables," one could argue that her comment was taken out of context and that she was referring to a specific subset of voters with extreme views, not the entire Republican electorate.
  • Regarding the critique of Clinton not campaigning in key Midwest states, it could be countered that hindsight is 20/20, and campaign strategies are complex decisions made with the information available at the time, which may not always predict the outcome accurately.
  • In response to the claim that candi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA