In this episode of the PBD Podcast, guest Roland G. Fryer, Jr. shares findings from his controversial 2016 study on racial bias in police shootings. The episode delves into Fryer's research, which challenged narratives around systemic racism in policing, and the backlash it sparked within academia and beyond.
The conversation also touches on broader issues like college admissions policies, affirmative action, and strategies for improving economic mobility among underserved populations. Throughout, Fryer and host Patrick Bet-David stress the importance of intellectual honesty, open debate, and following evidence – even when it challenges accepted narratives on sensitive topics like race.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Roland G. Fryer, Jr.'s research in 2016 revealed no racial bias in police shootings, challenging widespread narratives about systemic police racism. Despite reproducing the study with additional research teams, which confirmed the initial results, his work sparked intense controversy. Black individuals were found to be 50% more likely to have force used against them in other interactions, a significant but less discussed finding. The backlash following the study's publication led to Fryer requiring police protection. He faced resistance from the academic community, with colleagues even cautioning him against publishing his research due to potential damage to his reputation. Fryer held firm on the necessity of transparency in research, regardless of the implications for accepted narratives or his career.
Roland G. Fryer and Tom Ellsworth critique affirmative action and college admissions, promoting a holistic evaluation of applicants that accounts for a wider range of skills and life experiences beyond standardized test scores. They argue against current practices which benefit privileged families and overlook students who, despite lower scores, may possess high latent talent. Fryer advocates for a market-based admissions approach that seeks out the most capable students without focusing solely on racial background or SAT scores. Ellsworth echoes these sentiments, illustrating the issues with his daughter's experience with Duke's admissions and the limits placed on students from the same high school. Both emphasize the need to appreciate the full spectrum of applicant experiences and talents.
Education and psychological factors like grit and resilience are at the center of Fryer's research on poverty and economic mobility. He aims to use markets and entrepreneurship to unlock talent in underserved populations. Education is identified as a key predictor for escaping poverty, with psychological attributes also playing a crucial role. Fryer has founded a venture capital firm intended to invest in people and ideas that enhance social mobility, integrating a financial approach with the goal of creating widespread opportunities to change the trajectory for minorities in America.
Patrick Bet-David and Roland G. Fryer highlight the importance of maintaining intellectual honesty and enabling open debates, particularly in academic circles. They discuss the suppression of diverse viewpoints and the academic community's resistance to research that challenges established opinions, as evidenced by the reaction to Fryer's police bias study. Both bet-David and Fryer call for the courage to follow evidence and have honest conversations, especially on sensitive topics like race and religion. Fryer asserts that addressing uncomfortable truths openly is essential for progress, and he advocates for truth and evidence-based discussion in studying racial inequality and other critical issues.
1-Page Summary
Roland G. Fryer, Jr., a Harvard economics professor, conducted a 2016 research study that led to surprising and controversial findings regarding racial bias in police use of force.
Fryer describes his own surprise at finding no racial bias in police shootings, a result that contradicted his initial expectations. His research did, however, indicate significant racial differences in lower-level uses of force, with black civilians being 50% more likely to experience force even when compliant and not arrested. In response to his unexpected findings regarding shootings, Fryer decided to retest the data, hiring eight new research assistants to replicate the study. Once again, they confirmed the original results showing no racial bias in police shootings.
The response to Fryer's findings was immediate and intense. Before the paper was officially published, he received emails dismissing the study purely based on its abstract. Colleagues cautioned him against publishing it, fearing it could harm his reputation and career due to the results contradicting the pervasive narrative of systemic police racism. Some suggested that if the second part of the study demonstrated bias, then it might be more palatable to release.
Despite the external pressures, Fryer followed through with publishing the research. Subsequently, he faced severe backlash and threats that led to him living under police protection for approximately a month at a time when he had a newborn daughter at home. He recounts the strange experience of having an armed escort even for mundane tasks like buying diapers.
Fryer's work attracted broad ...
Systemic racism and police bias findings from Roland Fryer's 2016 research study
In discussions about college admissions, Roland G. Fryer and Tom Ellsworth analyze the flaws of the current system, advocating for a holistic and nuanced approach to applicant evaluation that extends beyond test scores to include a full range of skills and life experiences.
Roland G. Fryer emphasizes the importance of assessing the full spectrum of an applicant’s capabilities. He critiques affirmative action practices that nonchalantly benefit affluent families with low test scores, suggesting their application neglects to discover students with the highest latent talent. This latent talent, according to Fryer, is not always showcased through standardized test scores. Citing personal experiences with his daughters’ privileged educational backgrounds, Fryer highlights the untapped potential in students from less fortunate circumstances who have demonstrated grit and endurance despite their hardships.
Fryer argues that current college admissions systems fail to properly evaluate the resilience and grit of applicants because they do not have the right data to do so and instead rely on "silly metrics." He calls for an overhaul of the system to gather better information on an applicant's true range of abilities. Fryer suggests the process should not only evaluate hard work and high scores but also a combination of qualities that reflect something akin to the determination and fortitude seen in the "Mamba mentality" of the late Kobe Bryant.
Tom Ellsworth remarks on the college admissions experience of his daughter, highlighting systemic flaws where institutions like Duke limit admits from the same high school regardless of how many candidates may be deserving. He notes that SAT scores may not be fair indicators of a student's ...
Affirmative action, meritocracy, and college admissions policies
Renowned scholar Fryer is on a mission to alter the economic trajectory for minorities in America, focusing on bridging the gap in economic mobility. He believes that markets and entrepreneurship can play a pivotal role in uncovering talent in often overlooked communities.
Fryer’s research centers on the pivotal role of education and personal attributes such as grit and resilience. This pairing is seen as essential in understanding what allows some individuals to escape poverty while others remain within its grip.
In discussing his research, Fryer discovered that education stands as the primary predictor of escaping poverty. Following closely, psychological factors—namely loci of control, grit, and resilience—emerge as significant indicators of one's ability to move up the economic ladder. He noted that five of the seven top predictors of economic mobility, after education, were such psychological factors.
Fryer’s goal is to change the odds for the underprivileged by systemically creating genuine opportunities rather than helping a few outliers beat the system. His vision extends to the glo ...
Understanding what drives poverty and lack of economic mobility
Patrick Bet-David and Roland G. Fryer emphasize the necessity of engaging in open debates and maintaining intellectual honesty, particularly within academic institutions like Harvard.
Patrick Bet-David expresses concerns about the suppression of diverse viewpoints and the lack of genuine support for debate in academic settings. He exemplifies this with his personal experience at Harvard, where he noticed a deficiency in the entertainment of opposing ideas. Bet-David illustrates a scenario where studies that contradict popular belief are dismissed without consideration, which undermines the process of honest inquiry. He finds it problematic when politics or obligations tied to affirmative action suppress the ability to follow evidence wherever it may lead.
Roland G. Fryer reflects on different reactions to his research, suggesting a discomfort within the academic community with open debate, especially when findings contradict established views. He points out a change from his college days, where direct discussions were common, to a current tendency for students to use anonymous chat rooms instead of engaging face to face. Fryer underlines the value of having open conversations about sensitive topics like race and religion.
Fryer emphasizes the importance of honesty in research, the integrity of communicating findings, and respect for the affected communities. He stresses that reporting research with transparency and empathy is essential, regardless of the potential public reaction or career impact. Fryer is steadfast in his belief that making real progress requires addressing uncomfortable truths openly.
He underscores the necessity of following evidence to the truth, irrespective of ...
Importance of open debate and intellectual honesty
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser