Podcasts > NPR's Book of the Day > The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

By NPR (podcasts@npr.org)

In their new book, "Pseudoscience: An Amusing History of Crackpot Ideas and Why We Love Them," authors Nate Peterson and Dr. Lydia Kang explore a range of intriguing pseudoscientific concepts from extraterrestrial life and flat earth theories to polygraph lie detection and the enigmatic phenomenon of spontaneous human combustion.

The authors delve into the roots of pseudoscience, tracing knowledge gaps and mistrust of institutions that allow conspiracy theories to thrive. Through the lenses of science and history, they debunk pseudoscientific ideas while examining their widespread appeal—all in an amusing and light-hearted approach that avoids lending credence to harmful pseudoscience.

Listen to the original

The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 27, 2025 episode of the NPR's Book of the Day

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

1-Page Summary

Pseudoscientific Ideas Explored in New Book

Nate Peterson and Dr. Lydia Kang dive into the world of unscientific beliefs with their book "Pseudoscience, an Amusing History of Crackpot Ideas and Why We Love Them."

Book Covers Aliens, Flat Earth, Lie Detection, and Spontaneous Human Combustion

The book explores a range of intriguing pseudoscientific concepts in four parts, from extraterrestrial life and the flat earth myth to polygraph lie detection and the enigma of spontaneous human combustion.

Demystifying Spontaneous Human Combustion

Kang: "Spontaneous Human Combustion Is Not Real"

Kang clarifies that spontaneous human combustion, where people supposedly burst into flames for no apparent reason, is not a real phenomenon.

"Wick Effect" Fuels Internal Fires

She explains the "wick effect" - clothing acts as a wick and body fat as wax, fueling internal fires that seem spontaneous.

Peterson notes the myth's strange origins in the temperance movement. The discovery of oxygen's role in both breathing and burning led to a theory that alcohol consumption could ignite one's "internal fires," discouraging drinking.

Knowledge Gaps and Trust Issues Breed Pseudoscience

Kang: Knowledge Gaps and Distrust Fuel Conspiracy Theories

Kang says gaps in public knowledge on topics like UFOs, combined with distrust in institutions, allow pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to flourish as people seek alternative explanations.

Maintaining an Amusing Tone

Light Topics Chosen, Avoiding Dangerous Pseudoscience

The authors purposefully select lighthearted pseudoscientific topics like Mothman and maintain an "amusing history" framing, per Kang. They avoid treating serious, harmful pseudoscience like Holocaust denial with humor.

Debunking with Science and History

Through science and history, the book aims to debunk pseudoscientific ideas while exploring their popular appeal, without lending credibility to dangerous subjects.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can sharpen your critical thinking skills by starting a "Mythbuster Journal" where you document and investigate one pseudoscientific claim each week. Use online scientific resources and historical context to assess the claim's validity, and write down your findings. This practice will help you develop a habit of questioning and researching rather than accepting unusual claims at face value.
  • Enhance your media literacy by creating a "Trust Checklist" for evaluating the credibility of information sources. Include criteria such as the presence of references to scientific studies, the qualifications of the author, and the use of sensationalist language. Before believing or sharing information, run it through your checklist to see if it meets your standards for trustworthiness.
  • Foster community awareness by organizing a "Science Cafe" in your local library or coffee shop, where you invite experts to discuss the science behind popular pseudoscientific beliefs. This can be a casual, monthly event that encourages learning and discussion in a relaxed environment, helping to bridge knowledge gaps and build trust in scientific institutions.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

Pseudoscientific Ideas and Conspiracy Theories Explored

Nate Peterson and Dr. Lydia Kang dive into the fascinating world of unscientific beliefs with their new book titled "Pseudoscience, an Amusing History of Crackpot Ideas and Why We Love Them."

The Book Explores Pseudoscience: Aliens, Flat Earth, Polygraphs, and Spontaneous Human Combustion

The comprehensive book by Peterson and Kang is structured in four parts, each part tackling a range of intriguing pseudoscientific concepts, from extraterrestrial life and the myth of a flat earth to lie detection through polygraphs and the enigma of spontaneous human combustion.

History of Cr ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Pseudoscientific Ideas and Conspiracy Theories Explored

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • Start a critical thinking journal to sharpen your ability to discern fact from fiction by documenting daily encounters with information and evaluating their credibility. Each day, jot down notes about news stories, social media posts, or conversations that include claims or beliefs. Assess these using basic critical thinking questions: What is the source? Is there evidence? Could this be biased? This practice will enhance your ability to spot pseudoscience in everyday life.
  • Create a "Myth vs. Fact" game night with friends or family to make learning about pseudoscience fun and interactive. Design a simple card game where one side presents a common pseudoscientific claim and the other side has the scientific explanation. Players guess whether the statement is a myth or a fact and explain their reasoning, encouraging everyone to discuss and learn about scientific skepticism in a social setting.
  • Engage in online courses or webinars about ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

Spontaneous Human Combustion and Its Explanation

Spontaneous Human Combustion Is Not Real

A common and sensational myth that has captured public imagination is the concept of spontaneous human combustion. However, Nate Pedersen and Dr. Lydia Kang clarify that spontaneous human combustion is not a real phenomenon.

"Wick Effect" Explains how Clothing and Body Fat Fuel Internal, Seemingly Spontaneous Burns

Dr. Lydia Kang offers an explanation for cases that have been mistaken for spontaneous human combustion. She details the "Wick effect," in which clothing acts like the wick of a candle and the person's body fat serves as the wax. This combination fuels the fire, leading to an internal burn that seems spontaneous but is not.

Spontaneous Human Combustion Linked To Temperance Movement to Discourage Alcohol

Nate Pedersen delves into the background of the spontaneous human combustion myth, noti ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Spontaneous Human Combustion and Its Explanation

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Spontaneous human combustion is a widely debunked theory that suggests individuals can suddenly burst into flames without an external heat source. Scientifically, there is no credible evidence to support this phenomenon. Cases attributed to spontaneous human combustion can be explained by the "Wick effect," where a person's clothing and body fat act as fuel for a slow-burning fire.
  • The "Wick effect" is a theory that explains how clothing can act as a wick, drawing melted body fat to fuel a fire on a person's body. This process mimics a candle, where the clothing acts like the wick and the body fat like the wax. The heat from a small external flame can ignite the clothing, leading to the melting of body fat and sustaining the fire. This phenomenon can create the appearance of spontaneous human combustion, but it is actually a result of the body's fat acting as fuel in the presence of an external ignition source.
  • The connection between the spontaneous human combustion myth and the temperance movement lies in the belief that alcohol consumption could ignite internal fires due to the discovery of oxygen's role in burning. Advocates of temperance used this theory to discourage alcohol consumption by associating it with the idea of internal combustion, thus promoting sobriety and warning against the perceived dangers of drinking. ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

Historical and Social Contexts Contributing To Pseudoscientific Beliefs

The spread of pseudoscientific beliefs can be attributed to complex social dynamics, including knowledge gaps and institutional distrust.

Knowledge Gaps and Institutional Distrust Fuel Conspiracy Theories and Pseudoscience

Lydia Kang attributes the existence of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to gaps in public knowledge. Understanding why people lie or what Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) are can be challenging and leave room for speculation. When accompanied by distrust in large institutions, these gaps in knowledge become fertile ground for pseudoscience to take root and spread. People who don't trust 'offic ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Historical and Social Contexts Contributing To Pseudoscientific Beliefs

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While knowledge gaps and institutional distrust can contribute to the spread of pseudoscience, it's also important to consider the role of cognitive biases and heuristics that lead individuals to faulty reasoning.
  • The attribution of pseudoscience solely to gaps in public knowledge might overlook the complexity of why individuals believe in pseudoscience, which can include cultural, psychological, and emotional factors.
  • It's possible that some individuals who believe in pseudoscience do so not because of a lack of trust in institutions but due to a search for identity, community, or a sense of control in an uncertain world.
  • The relationship between institutional distrust and pseudoscience might be bidirectional; pseudoscientific beliefs can also lead to increased distrust in institutions.
  • Some pseudoscientific beliefs may aris ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The authors of 'Pseudoscience' explore and debunk your favorite conspiracy theories

Authors' Approach To Selecting and Presenting Content

Understanding the distinction between harmless fun and potentially dangerous theories is crucial in the authors’ curated examination of pseudoscience.

Authors Adopt a Humorous Tone for Light Pseudoscientific Topics, Avoiding Serious or Harmful Subjects

Decision to Maintain "Amusing History" Framing Rather Than Exploring Dangerous Pseudoscience

The authors purposefully choose lighthearted topics in the realm of pseudoscience. Lydia Kang explains that their book adopts an "amusing history" framing. The content selection is intentional; they avoid serious topics like Holocaust denial and gay conversion therapy. These subjects are considered inappropriate for a humorous take, aligning with the authors' goal to maintain an entertaining tone without delving into harmful pseudoscience.

Authors Debunk Crackpot Ideas With Science and History, Exploring Their Appeal

By intertwining science and humor, the auth ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Authors' Approach To Selecting and Presenting Content

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The distinction between harmless and dangerous pseudoscience can be subjective and culturally sensitive; what is considered "harmless fun" in one context may be offensive or problematic in another.
  • Humor can sometimes trivialize serious scientific inquiry and may inadvertently reinforce misconceptions about pseudoscience.
  • Avoiding serious or harmful subjects could be seen as a missed opportunity to educate readers about the dangers and ethical implications of certain pseudoscientific beliefs.
  • Debunking pseudoscientific ideas with science and history is valuable, but it may not always address the underlying psychological or social reasons why people are drawn to these beliefs.
  • Exploring the appeal of pseudoscientific co ...

Actionables

  • You can sharpen your critical thinking by playing a "fact or fiction" game with friends using bizarre but harmless myths. Gather a group of friends and take turns presenting odd, non-harmful pseudoscientific claims you've heard or read about. Everyone then uses their knowledge of science and history to assess whether the claim could be plausible or is outright fiction. This encourages learning and applying critical thinking in a social and entertaining context.
  • Develop a personal humor scale to gauge the lightness of various pseudoscientific topics you come across. When you read an article or hear a claim that seems pseudoscientific, rate it on your humor scale based on how ridiculous or amusing you find it. This can help you maintain a sense of humor about less serious topics while recognizing the potential harm in others.
  • Create a "myth-busting" blog where you write about playful pseudoscientific ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA