Podcasts > No Stupid Questions > 185. Do You Need Closure?

185. Do You Need Closure?

By Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Dive into the intricacies of the human mind with "No Stupid Questions," where Stephen Dubner and Angela Duckworth unravel the psychological strings tied to the concept of closure. Their discussion on the Zeigarnik effect reveals the compelling ways our brains cling to incomplete tasks, and the methods we might employ to mitigate the mental clutter they cause. Through anecdotes and studies, they demonstrate how the brain's preoccupation with unfinished work can disrupt focus and affect our cognitive capacities. Duckworth offers practical advice on how to ease the tension of these mental loops, while the duo acknowledges the pivotal contributions of early experiments documenting this cognitive bias.

Transitioning from the realm of tasks to the emotional landscape, the speakers dissect how the quest for closure impacts our feelings and relationships. Unresolved issues, they argue, can exert a persistent hold on our emotions, but strategic communication and processing of negative events within our personal spheres could usher in needed resolution. While exploring the nuances of closure, Mike Maughan addresses its paradoxical effect on positive emotions, and how the pursuit of understanding may inadvertently compress the lifespan of our joy. The podcast presents an intriguing look at how closure, despite its capacity for resolution, might also trim the wings of elation in both mundane and extraordinary aspects of life.

Listen to the original

185. Do You Need Closure?

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 3, 2024 episode of the No Stupid Questions

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

185. Do You Need Closure?

1-Page Summary

The Zeigarnik effect and how incomplete tasks stay in our minds better than completed tasks

Shreya Bhargava explores the Zeigarnik effect, a psychological phenomenon where people tend to remember incomplete tasks more than completed ones. Angela Duckworth and Maughan confirm that our brains focus on tasks that are still in progress. The idea stems from an observation by Bluma Zeigarnik about waiters who could recall details of unpaid orders more vividly than completed ones. Although the anecdote has been debated, the principle underlying it remains relevant. Duckworth explains writing tasks down as a way to counteract the preoccupation with in-progress tasks, and studies reinforce this effect, showing that uncompleted tasks can hinder attention and comprehension. The importance of the initial experiments by Zeigarnik and Lewin in documenting this cognitive bias is acknowledged.

How the Zeigarnik effect lingers in our emotions and relationships

The discussion around the Zeigarnik effect extends to emotional health and relationships, addressing how unresolved issues can contribute to enduring frustration and other negative feelings. Understanding the reason behind frustrating events can lessen these emotions, and similarly, resolving misunderstandings through direct communication reduces frustration. John Gottman emphasizes the necessity of processing negative events in relationships to avoid continuous mental reevaluation. Without attunement—reaching emotional closure—these issues fester and can lead to further conflict. When closure is achieved, however, negative emotions become less significant and less likely to cause internal strife.

The role of closure in diminishing positive emotions and moods

Closure, while beneficial for resolving tasks and focusing on the present, has a paradoxical effect on emotions. According to Mike Maughan, writing down tasks provides this sense of closure, but Tim Wilson and Dan Gilbert's research suggests that uncertainty can actually extend positive feelings. By understanding an event, we may emotionally resolve it, inadvertently shortening the duration of positive emotions. Examples of this phenomenon include how secret admirers or ambiguous situations sustain interest, while explanations and resolutions can deflate the emotional intensity. Maughan and Duckworth discuss scenarios such as lottery anticipation and a story about a man receiving anonymous chocolates, highlighting how the revelation of certain outcomes can slash the duration of positive moods. Closure might serve to conclude the event neatly, but it also has the power to bring premature endings to positive emotions.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Zeigarnik effect is a psychological phenomenon where people remember incomplete tasks better than completed ones. It suggests that interrupted tasks create a sense of tension that enhances memory retention. This effect has implications for learning and memory, showing that taking breaks during study sessions can improve recall. The concept was first studied by Bluma Zeigarnik in the 1920s and has since been widely researched in psychology.
  • Bluma Zeigarnik observed that waiters could remember unpaid orders more clearly than completed ones, leading to the concept of the Zeigarnik effect. This phenomenon suggests that our brains prioritize incomplete tasks over finished ones, impacting memory and attention. The anecdote serves as a foundational example of how uncompleted tasks can linger in our minds. Researchers like Angela Duckworth and Maughan have further explored this cognitive bias in various contexts.
  • John Gottman is a prominent psychologist known for his research on divorce prediction and marital stability. He co-founded The Gottman Institute, which focuses on improving relationships through counseling and training programs. Gottman's work has influenced the field of relationship therapy and social sequence analysis.
  • A cognitive bias is a systematic deviation from rationality in judgment, leading to perceptual distortion and inaccurate decision-making. These biases can stem from mental shortcuts, processing limitations, or emotional influences, impacting how we interpret information and make choices. While some biases can be adaptive in certain situations, they can also result in illogical conclusions and irrational behavior. Understanding cognitive biases is crucial in various fields like psychology, economics, and management to improve decision-making processes and outcomes.
  • Emotional closure is the process of resolving unresolved issues or emotions, bringing a sense of finality and peace to a situation. It involves acknowledging and accepting the end of something, allowing individuals to move forward without lingering emotional attachments. Achieving emotional closure can help reduce negative feelings and internal conflicts, promoting emotional well-being and clarity in relationships. It often involves understanding the reasons behind past events, communicating openly, and finding resolution to lingering emotional issues.

Counterarguments

  • The Zeigarnik effect may not be universally applicable; some individuals might have different cognitive styles or strategies that allow them to remember completed tasks just as well or better than incomplete ones.
  • The original studies by Zeigarnik and Lewin were conducted under specific conditions that may not reflect real-world scenarios, and replication studies have sometimes failed to reproduce the same results, suggesting that the effect might not be as robust as initially thought.
  • Writing tasks down as a way to counteract preoccupation with in-progress tasks might not work for everyone; some people may find that this strategy does not alleviate their mental load or help them focus better.
  • The extension of the Zeigarnik effect to emotional health and relationships is based on a theoretical framework that may not account for the complexity of human emotions and the multitude of factors that influence emotional memory and processing.
  • The idea that understanding and resolving frustrating events always lessens negative emotions may be too simplistic, as some individuals might experience lingering feelings despite resolution, due to personality traits or the nature of the event.
  • The emphasis on closure might overlook the benefits of leaving certain issues open-ended, as some psychological theories suggest that ambiguity can lead to personal growth and better coping strategies in the long term.
  • The research suggesting that uncertainty can extend positive feelings may not take into account individual differences in tolerance for ambiguity, with some people possibly experiencing anxiety or discomfort from uncertain situations, which could negate the positive emotional effects.
  • The notion that closure brings premature endings to positive emotions assumes that all individuals derive pleasure from anticipation in the same way, but some might find more satisfaction in resolution and certainty than in prolonged uncertainty.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
185. Do You Need Closure?

The Zeigarnik effect and how incomplete tasks stay in our minds better than completed tasks

Shreya Bhargava raises the question of the Zeigarnik effect, which reflects our tendency to better remember unfinished or interrupted tasks than completed ones. Experts Angela Duckworth and Maughan delve into this phenomenon, confirming that our minds are preoccupied by active tasks.

Bluma Zeigarnik's observation that waiters remember orders better before they're served than after

Bluma Zeigarnik initially observed that waiters had a sharper memory for unpaid orders, remembering various details about them, yet this ability significantly declined once the meal was served and the order was no longer active. Duckworth refers to this historic observation to illustrate the concept of the Zeigarnik effect. However, the conversation touches on a fact check suggesting that the anecdote about Zeigarnik's observation might be more folklore than fact, proposing that it was Kurt Lewin, Zeigarnik's mentor, who might have been inspired by the memory of waitstaff.

Modern studies confirming the Zeigarnik effect and how active tasks preoccupy our minds

Duckworth describes how writing things down before going to bed can help to remember tasks, acting as an antidote to the obsession with incomplete tasks, which aligns with the Zeigarnik effect. They discuss an experiment where participants who wrote down a plan for what they needed to do did not exhibit the typical symptoms of the Zeigarnik effect.

Modern research also confirms the Zeigarnik effect. E.J. Masicampo and Roy Baumeister conducted experiments to see if unfulfilled goals linger i ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Zeigarnik effect and how incomplete tasks stay in our minds better than completed tasks

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Zeigarnik effect is a psychological phenomenon where people remember unfinished or interrupted tasks better than completed ones. It suggests that the mind keeps incomplete tasks active, leading to better recall. This effect has implications for memory, task management, and cognitive processes.
  • Kurt Lewin was a German-American psychologist known for his work in social psychology, group dynamics, and organizational development. He made significant contributions to applied research and action research during his career. Lewin is often regarded as the founder of social psychology and was influential in studying how groups function and interact within organizations.
  • Cognitive resources in psychology refer to mental capacities like ...

Counterarguments

  • The Zeigarnik effect may not be universally applicable, as individual differences in memory and attention can influence how well someone remembers incomplete tasks.
  • Some research suggests that the Zeigarnik effect may be more nuanced, with factors such as task importance, personal relevance, and anxiety levels affecting the likelihood of remembering incomplete tasks.
  • The original studies by Zeigarnik were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, which may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios where multiple competing tasks and distractions are present.
  • The replication crisis in psychology has led to increased scrutiny of classic findings, and some studies have failed to replicate the Zeigarnik effect, suggesting that it may not be as robust or widespread as initially thought.
  • The anecdote about waiters remembering orders may be an oversimplification of the cognitive processes involved in task management and memory, and it may not provide a complete explanation for the Zeigarnik effect.
  • Writing tasks down as a countermeasure to the Zeigarnik effect might not be effective for everyone, as some people may still experience intrusive thoughts ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
185. Do You Need Closure?

How the Zeigarnik effect lingers in our emotions and relationships

Shreya Bhargava’s inquiries lead to a discussion about the Zeigarnik effect's impact on our emotional health and inter-personal relationships, particularly when incidents lack closure.

The influence of the Zeigarnik effect on frustration and other negative feelings

Duckworth explains that emotions, such as frustration, are significantly influenced by closure or the lack thereof. When individuals understand the reason behind frustrating events, that specific frustration tends to diminish. Additionally, closure regarding misunderstandings, like the lack of direct communication, can also lead to a decrease in frustration levels, indicating that the Zeigarnik effect also extends to our emotional responses.

Attuning in relationships to avoid the Zeigarnik effect, per John Gottman

John Gottman suggests that negative events in relationships are inevitable and the failure to process these events, which he refers to as attunement or getting closure, can lead to a mental loop where the incidents are continuously remembered and rehashed. This unprocessed negativity, blamed and allowed to spiral out of control, illustrates the powerful role the Zeigarnik effect can play i ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

How the Zeigarnik effect lingers in our emotions and relationships

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Zeigarnik effect is a psychological phenomenon where people remember unfinished or interrupted tasks better than completed ones. It suggests that incomplete tasks create a cognitive tension that enhances memory and recall. This effect was first studied by Bluma Zeigarnik in the 1920s and has implications for memory retention and task management.
  • Attunement in relationships involves actively listening, understanding, and empathizing with your partner's emotions and experiences. It requires being emotionally present and responsive to your partner's needs and feelings to create a strong emotional connection. Attunement helps in building trust, fostering intimacy, and resolving conflicts effectively in relationships. It is about tuning into your partner's emotional world to enhance communication and deepen the bond between both individuals.
  • John Gottman is a renowned psychologist known for his work on marital stability and relationship analysis ...

Counterarguments

  • While understanding the reason behind frustrating events can diminish frustration, it's not always possible or practical to find closure for every situation, and individuals may need to develop coping mechanisms for unresolved issues.
  • The Zeigarnik effect may not apply uniformly to all individuals; some people might not experience lingering thoughts about unfinished tasks or unresolved emotions to the same extent.
  • The concept of closure is subjective, and what constitutes closure can vary greatly from person to person; some may find peace without the need for explicit resolution.
  • The emphasis on closure might inadvertently lead to an overemphasis on finality in relationships, potentially dismissing the value of ongoing dialogue and the natural ebb and flow of emotions.
  • The idea that unprocessed negativity becomes an "improvised explosive device" may not account for the resilience and adaptability of some individuals and relationships, which can sometimes handle unresolved issues without severe consequences.
  • The notion that attuning to negative incidents is crucial to prevent perpetual internal conflict could be seen as oversimplifying complex emotional dynamics; some individuals or couples may find that certain issues resolve themselves over ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
185. Do You Need Closure?

The role of closure in diminishing positive emotions and moods

Uncertainty prolongs positive feelings; certainty curtails them

  • Mike Maughan expresses his preference for closure, implying that it helps him resolve matters and focus on the present. He believes that externalizing memory, such as writing tasks down, provides a sense of closure, whether the tasks are done or not. Duckworth adds that by doing so, the brain is freed up for more immediate activities, relating this to the Zeigarnik effect, where tasks that have been started but not completed remain in our active memory.
  • Tim Wilson and Dan Gilbert's theory suggests that emotions linger when there is a lack of closure and end when there are explanations. Duckworth uses this theory to explain why students who were given uncertain information about receiving a dollar coin from a stranger maintained a positive mood longer than those who were given a clear explanation—it's the uncertainty that prolongs the positive feelings.
  • Angela Duckworth speculates that understanding an event can lead to its emotional resolution; she extends the French saying "To understand is to forgive" to emotions, with "to understand is to have it finished."

Examples of closure cutting positive emotions short

  • Maughan shares that receiving closure on an issue, like getting an explanation for a delayed introduction, can diminish the intensity of emotions but may also give rise to new frustrations. Similarly, Duckworth illustrates how ambiguity, such as not knowing who a secret admirer is, can sustain interest and positive emotions.
  • Building on Duckworth's discussion, the idea of having a secret admirer is brought up again as an example of how uncertainty and lack of closure can prolong positive feelings. Students in a study received positive messages, and those who didn't know who the message was from reported prolonged positive moods compared to those who knew the sender.
  • Talking about lottery tickets, Maughan and Duckworth agree that the positive feelings stemming from ant ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The role of closure in diminishing positive emotions and moods

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Zeigarnik effect is a psychological phenomenon where people remember unfinished or interrupted tasks better than completed ones. It suggests that the interruption of a task creates a tension that keeps the task in our active memory, making it more easily recalled. This effect can lead to improved memory retention for incomplete activities compared to those that have been finished. The concept was first studied by Bluma Zeigarnik in the 1920s and has implications for understanding memory and task completion.
  • Wilson and Gilbert's theory suggests that emotions can persist when there is a lack of closure or explanation for an event. They propose that closure, in the form of understanding or explanation, can ...

Counterarguments

  • While externalizing memory might provide a sense of closure, it could also lead to over-reliance on external systems and a decrease in mental agility or memory strength.
  • The prolongation of positive feelings due to uncertainty might not always be beneficial; prolonged uncertainty can also lead to anxiety or stress, which can overshadow any positive emotions.
  • Understanding an event might lead to emotional resolution, but it could also result in overthinking or rumination, which can have negative psychological effects.
  • Closure might diminish the intensity of emotions, but it can also bring relief and a sense of peace, which are positive emotional states in their own right.
  • Ambiguity can sustain interest and positive emotions, but it can also create confusion and insecurity, which might not be conducive to overall well-being.
  • The anticipation of winning a lottery might end with the reveal of results, but the experience of anticipation itself can be a source of joy and a valuable part of the human experien ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA