Trump's Triumph and the Legacy Media’s Blind Spots | 11.23.24
The Morning Wire podcast critiques the legacy media's persistent failure to accurately represent Donald Trump's diverse base of supporters and understand their perspectives. It examines how the media's geographic and demographic insularity, coupled with a shift towards subscription-based revenue models, have fueled partisan and biased coverage of Trump.
The blurb also delves into the factors contributing to declining public trust in the media's objectivity, such as the increasing ideological homogeneity among journalists and the financial pressures driving outlets to align coverage with their subscribers' political views. The discussion highlights the media's inflammatory labeling of Trump supporters as well as its lack of meaningful engagement with differing viewpoints.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Nov 23, 2024 episode of the Morning Wire
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
The Legacy Media's Failure to Understand Trump Supporters
The legacy media has persistently failed to accurately portray and understand Donald Trump's supporters, reflecting a profound disconnect from a significant portion of the American electorate.
A Failure to Learn from 2016
Gerard Baker and Bickley discuss how, despite Trump's unexpected 2016 victory over Clinton, the media did not attempt to meaningfully engage with the motivations of his supporters. Instead, Baker argues, the media continued a "campaign of vilification" against Trump and his diverse base.
The Media's Geographic and Ideological Insularity
According to Baker, the media's narrow geographic and demographic makeup, concentrated in highly educated coastal areas, has prevented journalists from grasping the perspectives of Trump voters outside their "bubbles." He contends this insularity fueled the media's inability to understand Trump's expanded success in the 2024 election.
Partisan and Biased Coverage of Trump
The pundits critique the extreme partisanship and bias that characterize the legacy media's portrayal of Trump and his supporters.
Inflammatory Labeling of Trump and His Base
Baker challenges the media's aggressive labeling of Trump's diverse supporters as "fascists" and "racists," arguing that such inflammatory characterizations reflect the media's own political biases and refusal to genuinely engage with differing viewpoints.
Subscription Model Reinforces Partisan Narratives
According to Baker, the shift toward subscription-based revenue models has incentivized media outlets to cater to the political preferences of their subscriber base, exacerbating partisan coverage and eroding public trust in journalism.
Factors Contributing to Declining Public Trust
Several key factors have contributed to the waning public trust in the media's objectivity and neutrality.
Ideological Homogeneity and Activism Among Journalists
Baker criticizes the increasing ideological homogeneity among journalists, who he argues have shifted from fact-finding to shaping public opinion through a predominantly left-of-center worldview. This shift has transformed journalism into an advocacy profession.
Collapse of Ad-Based Business Model
With the decline of traditional advertising revenue, Baker explains that subscriptions have become crucial for outlets like The New York Times. This reliance on subscriptions incentivizes outlets to produce coverage that aligns with subscribers' political views over objective reporting.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The media's portrayal of Trump supporters may reflect the actions and statements of a visible subset, rather than bias or misunderstanding.
- Some argue that the media did engage with Trump supporters' motivations but found that those motivations often aligned with controversial policies or rhetoric.
- Journalists from various backgrounds and regions cover political events, and many outlets make concerted efforts to understand and report on all demographics.
- Claims of partisan bias often overlook the media's role in holding public figures accountable, regardless of political affiliation.
- The use of labels like "fascists" and "racists" may sometimes be based on specific behaviors or statements that are consistent with those ideologies, rather than being unfounded accusations.
- Subscription models can also lead to more in-depth, quality journalism as outlets are less dependent on generating high volumes of click-driven content.
- Ideological diversity exists within journalism, and many journalists and outlets strive for objectivity and balance in their reporting.
- Journalism has a long history of advocacy and opinion-based reporting, which can coexist with fact-based journalism.
- The shift to subscription models is also a response to consumer demand for ad-free content and can lead to a more sustainable business model for journalism.
Actionables
- Diversify your news sources to include independent and international outlets to gain a broader perspective on political coverage.
- By exploring a variety of news sources, especially those outside of your usual preferences, you can challenge the echo chamber effect and understand different viewpoints. For example, if you typically read national news, try following a local newspaper from a region with differing political leanings or an international news site that covers U.S. politics from an outside perspective.
- Start a media literacy journal where you note biases and framing in the news articles you read.
- Keeping a journal helps you become more aware of the language and framing used in news stories. When you come across an article, jot down any emotionally charged words or instances where the coverage seems to lean towards opinion rather than fact. This practice can sharpen your critical thinking skills and help you recognize patterns of bias.
- Engage in conversations with individuals who have different political views without trying to debate or convince them.
- By simply listening and asking open-ended questions, you can better understand the motivations and beliefs of others without the pressure of changing their minds. For instance, if you know someone who has a different political stance, invite them for a coffee with the goal of understanding their perspective, not arguing. This can foster empathy and provide insights into the diversity of political opinions.
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The legacy media's failure to understand and accurately cover the Trump phenomenon
The legacy media’s coverage of Donald Trump, from his unexpected victory in 2016 to his even more decisive success in 2024, has been marked by an apparent inability to grasp the motives and mindset of his supporters, revealing a serious disconnect with a significant portion of the American electorate.
The media was shocked by Trump's 2016 victory despite projections of a Clinton win, leading to a brief period of self-examination about understanding the country better.
After Trump's triumph in 2016, which came as a shock to media outlets that had given Hillary Clinton a 90% chance of winning, there was a short-lived introspection in the press about the necessity to better comprehend the country. There was an acknowledgement that they had overlooked the sentiments of a large group who voted for Trump.
However, the media ultimately failed to meaningfully engage with or comprehend the motivations of Trump supporters, instead continuing a "campaign of vilification" against Trump and his supporters.
This moment for reflection did not translate into a substantial understanding of Trump's support base. By the time of the 2024 election, media organizations continued to misunderstand the motivations of Trump supporters. Trump’s even more decisive win in that election highlighted the media’s ongoing estrangement from a substantial segment of the American populace.
The media's continued inability to grasp the widespread appeal of Trump, even as he won an even more decisive victory in 2024, demonstrates a profound disconnect between the media and a large segment of the American electorate.
Bickley points to the prominence of red on the electoral map, indicating an expansion of Republican support even into traditionally Democratic urban areas such as New York City, Chicago, Sa ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The legacy media's failure to understand and accurately cover the Trump phenomenon
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Legacy media's coverage of Donald Trump refers to how traditional, established media outlets like newspapers, TV networks, and magazines reported on Trump's political activities and campaigns. These outlets have been criticized for their handling of Trump's rise to power and his interactions with the public, particularly in terms of understanding and accurately representing his supporters' perspectives and motivations. The coverage has highlighted a perceived disconnect between the media and a significant portion of the American electorate, especially in relation to comprehending the appeal and sentiments of those who support Trump.
- Trump's unexpected victory in 2016 referred to his win in the U.S. presidential election against Hillary Clinton. Polls and many analysts had predicted a Clinton victory, but Trump secured key states to win the Electoral College, despite losing the popular vote. This outcome surprised many observers and highlighted divisions within the American electorate. Trump's victory reshaped political expectations and strategies for future elections.
- In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, many polls and forecast models predicted a high likelihood of Hillary Clinton winning due to factors like her lead in national polls, historical voting patterns, and demographic analysis. However, these predictions did not account for the complexities of the Electoral College system, where winning individual states is crucial. This led to a surprise outcome when Donald Trump secured key swing states, despite losing the popular vote.
- After Donald Trump's unexpected victory in the 2016 presidential election, many media outlets were surprised as they had predicted a win for Hillary Clinton. This outcome prompted some self-reflection within the media about their understanding of the American electorate and the sentiments of Trump supporters. The media briefly questioned their ability to accurately gauge public opinion and recognized the need to better comprehend the diverse viewpoints present in the country. This introspection was a response to the discrepancy between their predictions and the actual election results, leading to a moment of reckoning regarding their coverage and understanding of political dynamics.
- The lack of substantial understanding of Trump's support base by the media indicates a failure to deeply comprehend the motivations, beliefs, and concerns of the people who consistently support Donald Trump. This disconnect highlights a significant gap in the media's ability to accurately represent and engage with a large portion of the American electorate. The media's failure to grasp the complexities of Trump's support base has led to a continued misrepresentation and oversimplification of the diverse reasons why individuals align themselves with Trump and his policies. This lack of understanding has perpetuated a cycle of miscommunication and alienation between the media and a significant segment of the population.
- The expansion of Republican support into traditionally Democratic urban areas signifies a shift in political preferences within these regions towards the Republican Party, which historically had less influence in these urban centers. This change in voting patterns reflects a ...
Counterarguments
- The media's projections of a Clinton win in 2016 were based on polling data and analytics that historically had been reliable, suggesting that the issue may have been with the polling methods rather than media interpretation.
- The media's role is to question and scrutinize public figures, and their critical coverage of Trump could be seen as fulfilling this duty rather than a campaign of vilification.
- The media landscape is diverse, and while some outlets may have biases, others strive for balanced reporting and do engage with a wide spectrum of political opinions.
- The assertion that the media has a geographic, demographic, and ideological insularity might overlook the efforts by many journalists and outlets to reach out and understand different communities, including Trump supporters.
- The expansion of Republican support in traditionally Democratic urban areas could be due to a variety of factors, not solely a disconnect between the media and the electorate.
- The idea that the media failed to engage with or comprehend the motivations of Trump supporters is a generalization that may not accou ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
The partisan and biased nature of the legacy media's coverage of Trump and his supporters
Gerard Baker and Bickley discuss the legacy media's portrayal of Trump and his supporters, highlighting the extreme partisanship and bias that influences coverage.
The media has repeatedly and aggressively labeled Trump and his supporters as "fascists" and "racists," despite evidence that his support comes from a diverse array of voters.
Baker points to a concerning trend in legacy media where labels such as "fascist" and "racist" are frequently used to describe Trump and by extension, his supporters. He argues that the tendency to characterize Trump and his base in these extreme, inflammatory terms reflects media’s political biases and a reluctance to engage with perspectives outside their own framework.
Baker emphasizes Trump’s broad base of support, which includes Hispanic and black male voters, and Jewish voters. He challenges the accusations of fascism and racism generally associated with Trump's followers by highlighting this diversity, arguing that it contradicts the claims often made by the media.
This tendency to characterize Trump and his supporters in the most extreme, inflammatory terms reflects the media's own political biases and unwillingness to engage with perspectives that challenge their worldview.
Baker and Bickley touch upon the extreme degree of partisanship depicted in media portrayal of Trump. They critique this bias as hyperbolic, equating Trump to historical figures like Hitler, which serves as an inflammatory and sweeping judgment of Trump’s supporters as well. Baker accuses the media of not only misunderstanding the Trump phenomenon but also showing a lack of interest in attempting to understand it. He suggests that the media's monolithic view stems from their social, demographic, and intellectual uniformity.
The media's shift toward a more subscription-based business model has exacerbated its partisan tendencies, as outlets cater to the pol ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The partisan and biased nature of the legacy media's coverage of Trump and his supporters
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The use of terms like "fascists" and "racists" may be based on specific statements or policies that some individuals interpret as aligning with such ideologies, rather than being purely partisan labels.
- While Trump's support base does include diverse voters, the majority demographic of his supporters may still align with certain ideological or racial profiles that the media reports on.
- Characterizing Trump and his supporters in extreme terms could be seen as a reflection of the media's role in holding public figures accountable rather than simply a display of bias.
- Comparisons to historical figures like Hitler are often used in political discourse to draw parallels with authoritarian tendencies, not necessarily to equate individuals directly with such figures.
- The media may have dedicated significant resources to understanding and reporting on the Trump phenomenon, with some outlets providing nuanced and in-depth coverage.
- Ideological homogeneity in the media could be a reflection of broader societal trends rather than a deliberate bias.
- Catering to subscribers' political leanings can also be seen as media outlets responding to market demands and audien ...
Actionables
- You can diversify your news sources to challenge media bias by regularly reading or listening to outlets that differ from your usual preferences, aiming to understand various perspectives.
- By actively seeking information from a range of media outlets, including those with differing political leanings, you expose yourself to a variety of viewpoints. This can help you form a more nuanced understanding of political figures and movements. For example, if you typically read a conservative newspaper, try also reading a liberal one, or vice versa.
- Engage in conversations with individuals who have different political views without trying to change their minds, focusing on understanding their perspectives.
- This practice encourages open dialogue and can lead to a deeper comprehension of why people support certain political figures, like Trump, beyond media portrayals. For instance, you might talk to a coworker or neighbor with differing political views and ask genuine questions about their opinions, listening more than you speak.
- Start a personal media consum ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Factors contributing to the decline in public trust in the media
Public trust in the media is waning, and Gerard Baker points to specific reasons why the objectivity and perceived neutrality of journalists are under scrutiny.
The increasing ideological homogeneity of journalists
Gerard Baker reflects on the current media landscape, noting a lack of ideological diversity among journalists and an inclination toward promoting a specific ideological viewpoint. He comments on the media's portrayal of Trump, suggesting that their views as racist and supportive of white supremacy come from a prevailing ideological perspective rather than objective analysis.
Shift from trade to profession and the rise of activism
Baker zeroes in on the transformation of journalism from a fact-finding trade to an educated, elite profession more concerned with shaping public opinion. He notes that journalists now emerge from costly, elite educational institutions with more advocacy-based ambitions rather than a dedication to unbiased reporting. This has effectively turned reporting into a profession where many hold and promote left-of-center perspectives, influencing the kind of stories that get told and reinforcing a singular ideological narrative.
Collapse of traditional advertising-based business model
With the rise of the internet, digital giants like Google and Facebook disrupted the media's traditional revenue models, leading to a critical shift in how news organizations survive. ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Factors contributing to the decline in public trust in the media
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Gerard Baker is a British journalist known for his work at publications like The Times and The Wall Street Journal. He served as the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal from 2013 to 2018. Baker has been noted for his conservative viewpoints and has been critical of what he perceives as liberal bias in the media. His perspectives often focus on issues related to media objectivity, ideological diversity, and the changing landscape of journalism.
- The perceived lack of ideological diversity among journalists suggests a dominance of certain political perspectives within the profession, potentially leading to a narrower range of viewpoints in news coverage. This can impact how news stories are framed and presented to the public, influencing the overall narrative that is conveyed. The concern is that a lack of diverse ideological perspectives among journalists may result in a homogenized approach to reporting, potentially affecting the objectivity and balance of news coverage. This issue can contribute to public skepticism about the neutrality and fairness of the media.
- The impact of digital disruption on traditional media revenue has been significant, with digital platforms like Google and Facebook changing how news organizations generate income. This disruption has led to a decline in traditional advertising revenue for media outlets as more advertising dollars shift to online platforms. News organizations have had to adapt their business models to account for this shift ...
Counterarguments
- Ideological diversity among journalists may still exist, with a range of perspectives represented in various media outlets, not all of which promote a specific viewpoint.
- Journalism as a profession can still prioritize fact-finding and objective reporting, with many journalists and outlets upholding high standards of journalistic integrity.
- Not all journalists hold left-of-center perspectives, and there are numerous media outlets that cater to centrist or right-of-center viewpoints.
- Digital disruption has also created opportunities for a more diverse range of voices to be heard and for independent journalism to thrive outside traditional models.
- Some publications strive to maintain objectivity ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
