On Morning Wire, the upcoming 2024 presidential election takes center stage, with a close contest shaping up between former President Trump and Vice President Harris. The podcast analyzes the candidates' debate preparation strategies and voter registration reforms aimed at ensuring election integrity.
Additionally, the episode explores the fallout from Brazil's ban on Musk's X platform, seen by protesters as an attack on free speech. This raises concerns over potential censorship policies by a future US administration. Listen to stay informed on the latest developments in these pivotal political stories.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The upcoming 2024 presidential election race is shaping up as a close contest between former President Donald Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris, with recent polls giving Trump a slight lead nationally.
The New York Times-Ciena poll positions Trump marginally ahead at 48% to Harris's 47%. However, as Sanger-Katz notes, many voters view Harris as too liberal and seek a major shift from Biden's policies - which could favor Trump. The 538 polling aggregator calculates Trump's chances of winning the Electoral College at 63.8%.
The campaigns are preparing for the high-stakes debates differently. The Harris camp is rigorously staging mock debates, while Trump seems to be taking a more laid-back approach focused on refreshing policy knowledge rather than extensive rehearsals.
House Republicans are advancing a proposal to mandate proof of citizenship for new voter registrations, aiming to tie it to the federal budget bill. This could provoke a government shutdown.
The move follows several states removing thousands of improperly registered non-citizens from voter rolls. Republicans view roll integrity as crucial after some recent close election margins.
Massive protests have erupted in Brazil over the government's ban of Musk's X platform, seen by protesters as an attack on free speech linked to blocking supporters of former President Bolsonaro.
This situation parallels Kamala Harris's past advocacy for platforms to censor "misinformation" and "hate." Rumors suggest Harris may appoint an AG who supported Brazil's X ban, raising free speech concerns.
1-Page Summary
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the candidates are closely matched in poll standings and are preparing in varying degrees for the impending debates, which are seen as highly consequential for the final outcome.
A New York Times-Ciena poll positions former President Donald Trump marginally ahead of Harris, holding a 48% to 47% lead nationally. The poll indicates that a significant portion of likely voters, over 60%, is seeking a president who would signify a major shift away from current President Joe Biden's policies. However, only a quarter of these voters see Harris as the embodiment of that change. Harris is further challenged by perceptions of her political stance, with 47% considering her too liberal.
There is also an information gap among voters, as evidenced by the fact that 28% of likely voters feel they need to learn more about Harris, in contrast to only 9% who need to know more about Trump. This disparity suggests an advantage for Trump in terms of voter familiarity and comfort.
The 538 polling aggregator supports the view of Trump's advantage, calculating his chances of winning the Electoral College at 63.8%, over Harris's 36%.
The Harris campaign appears to be devoting significant resources to debate preparation, emphasizing the importance they place on the televised clashes. They’ve staged mock debates, featuring staff members acting out Trump's likely responses and strategies. Notably ...
The 2024 presidential election race, including poll standings and debate preparation
In light of debates over election integrity, House Republicans are advancing a proposal that could intertwine the fate of the federal budget with voter registration policies and potentially lead to a government shutdown.
House Republicans are pushing to attach a requirement to the imminent government funding bill that mandates proof of citizenship for new voter registrations. This move comes amid heightened concerns about the potential for non-citizens to influence election outcomes and could lead to a standoff threatening a government shutdown.
Recently, several states have acted to ensure the integrity of their voter rolls by removing thousands of non-citizens who were improperly registered. Texas, for example, has eliminated 6,500 such registrations, while Alabama and Louisiana have also conducted clean-ups, purging over 3,000 and identifying around 600 non-citizens respectively, with 138 of them appearing to have participated in elections.
Republicans consider the integrity of the voter rolls a crucial issue. Senator Rick Scott has been vocal about the significance of preventing non-citizen voting, citing his own narrow victory margin to h ...
Election integrity and voter registration requirements
An examination of the current tension over free speech and online censorship is emerging, centering on the situation in Brazil regarding the banning of a social media platform and the responses it has elicited, juxtaposed with Kamala Harris's past stances on online censoring.
Brazil faces internal conflict as thousands demonstrate in São Paulo, rallying for free speech and democracy. These protests sparked as a reaction to the Brazilian government's decision to ban Elon Musk's social media platform X.
Protesters, backed by former President Jair Bolsonaro, view the ban as an infringement on democratic principles. They argue that Brazil should become a beacon for freedom across the globe. This comes after Bolsonaro, prohibited from re-running until 2030 by the current administration, became emblematic of the free speech movement following an alleged coup attempt that led to the storming of the Brazilian Congress.
The government cited online speech's role in organizing the coup as a reason for policing the internet, with Bolsonaro labeled a democracy threat. The ban on platform X was partially attributed to Musk's refusal to suppress pro-Bolsonaro sentiments.
Drawing parallels to the United States, Vice President Kamala Harris previously advocated for the policing of online platforms. During her 2019 presidential campaign, Harris warned of holding platforms accountable for what she labeled as misinformation or hate, indicating that those profiting from or amplifying such content could face repercussions.
The U.S. administration, however, has not publicly commented on the ongoing situat ...
Free speech and online censorship, with a focus on the situation in Brazil and Kamala Harris's past positions
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser