Why Trump - Harris Polls Might be Misleading | 9.1.24
This Morning Wire podcast episode explores the challenges faced by Vice President Kamala Harris in her campaign against Trump, who has historically staged late surges to close polling gaps. While Harris underperforms compared to past Democratic nominees, her perceived vulnerabilities in debates and connections with key voter groups may pose hurdles in battleground states like Pennsylvania and North Carolina.
The episode delves into the potential impact of economic woes and RFK Jr.'s endorsement on voters' choices. It also examines predictions for Congressional races, where Republicans aim to gain Senate control while Democrats brace for an uphill battle to flip House seats.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 1, 2024 episode of the Morning Wire
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Kamala Harris's Underperformance Compared to Past Democratic Nominees
Brent Buchanan notes that polling data shows Vice President Kamala Harris performing significantly worse than Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton during the same point in their respective campaigns against Trump. Despite her perceived efforts to address Biden's deficiencies in certain voter groups, her level of support still lags behind that of her predecessors.
August Struggles and Late Republican Surges
Buchanan highlights a pattern of Republican candidates underperforming in August polls compared to election day numbers, citing Trump's ability to close the gap after trailing by over 7 points in August 2020. This late surge could impact the electoral landscape for Harris.
Debate Risks and RFK Jr.'s Endorsement
Harris has agreed to only one presidential debate, likely to minimize risks associated with her perceived lack of debating skills off-script. Meanwhile, RFK Jr.'s endorsement of Trump poses challenges, especially in battleground states like Pennsylvania, where his supporters showed a preference for Trump over Harris.
Economic Concerns on Voters' Minds
Voters' top concerns surround economic woes and cost of living issues. Buchanan suggests Republicans could capitalize on Harris's struggle connecting with working-class families by highlighting personal stories of economic hardship.
Key Battleground State Challenges
In Pennsylvania, Harris's progressive profile might not resonate with the moderate, working-class electorate. North Carolina has shown Republicans consolidating votes late in campaigns, potentially countering early Democratic leads. Meanwhile, Georgia's Republican lean and Kemp's landslide victory indicate uphill battles for Harris despite increasing competitiveness.
Congressional Election Predictions
While Democrats defend current House seats, Buchanan notes the uphill battle to flip Republican-held seats for a majority. Conversely, Republicans appear positioned to gain Senate control, potentially reaching 52-53 seats by prevailing in key races like Montana, Maryland, and Ohio.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Kamala Harris's polling may not fully reflect her potential performance; polls can be influenced by many factors and may not accurately predict election outcomes.
- The pattern of Republican candidates surging late in the campaign could be disrupted by various factors, such as changes in voter turnout or the impact of current events closer to the election.
- Limiting debates could be a strategic move that allows Harris to focus on other effective campaign strategies rather than an indication of poor debating skills.
- RFK Jr.'s endorsement of Trump might not have a significant impact on the overall electorate or could be countered by endorsements Harris receives from other influential figures.
- Economic concerns are indeed important to voters, but Harris's policies and proposals could resonate with voters concerned about these issues once they are fully understood and communicated.
- Harris's ability to connect with working-class families could improve as the campaign progresses and as she tailors her messaging to address their specific concerns.
- Harris's progressive profile might appeal to a broader range of voters in Pennsylvania, including those who are looking for change or who prioritize progressive policies.
- The trend of Republicans consolidating votes late in North Carolina could be countered by effective Democratic campaigning and voter mobilization efforts.
- Georgia's political leanings are subject to change, especially as demographic shifts and political engagement evolve, offering opportunities for Harris to make inroads.
- The battle for control of the House and Senate is dynamic, and unexpected events or shifts in public opinion could lead to different outcomes than predicted.
Actionables
- You can deepen your understanding of political trends by tracking poll numbers from various sources over time to observe patterns like the historical surges of Republican candidates. Create a simple spreadsheet where you log poll results from different sources each week, noting any significant changes or trends. This will give you a clearer picture of how public opinion shifts throughout a campaign season.
- Enhance your critical thinking by analyzing the impact of endorsements on election outcomes. Choose a recent election where a notable figure endorsed a candidate, and research the voting patterns in the areas where that figure is influential. Compare these patterns with previous elections to see if the endorsement might have swayed the results.
- Educate yourself on the economic issues that influence voting behavior by volunteering for a local political campaign or community organization focused on economic development. Engaging with voters and community members will provide firsthand insight into the economic concerns that are most important to them, which can differ from what is reported in the media or emphasized in political campaigns.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Polling and historical data comparisons on Kamala Harris' performance vs. past Democratic candidates
Brent Buchanan analyzes Vice President Kamala Harris' polling data in comparison to past Democratic nominees, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, and explores the implications for Harris' potential performance in future elections.
Kamala Harris is performing significantly worse than past Democratic nominees like Biden and Clinton at the same point in the campaign.
Buchanan notes that Harris is underperforming compared to where Clinton and Biden stood at the same point in their respective campaigns against Trump. Despite her efforts to address some of Biden's deficiencies with certain voter groups, Harris still doesn't match the level of support Biden and Clinton enjoyed during August of their campaign years. Put simply, historical data suggests Harris may face an uphill battle in attempting to replicate the narrow victories of her predecessors.
In a recent YouGov national survey, Harris holds only a one-point lead over Trump, a margin that virtually mirrors the tight race when Biden was tied with Trump. Moreover, polling from Arizona reveals significant differences in Harris's appeal to critical voter groups when contrasted with Biden's 2020 performance in the state.
The polling trends show a consistent pattern of Republicans underperforming in August but making a late surge closer to election day.
Buchanan recalls the pattern from previous election c ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Polling and historical data comparisons on Kamala Harris' performance vs. past Democratic candidates
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Polling data may not fully capture the current political climate or the effectiveness of campaign strategies that could be employed closer to the election.
- Comparisons with past candidates may not account for unique factors affecting Harris's campaign, such as changes in the political landscape, voter demographics, or issues of national importance.
- The one-point lead in the YouGov survey could be within the margin of error, suggesting the race may be even closer or not as close as the poll indicates.
- Differences in appeal to critical voter groups in Arizona may not necessarily predict outcomes in other battleground states with different demographics and political issues.
- Late surges in support for Republicans noted in historical trends may not necessarily repeat in the same pattern in future elections, as each election cycle has its own d ...
Actionables
- You can analyze trends by creating a simple spreadsheet to track and compare your personal project milestones with those of similar projects you admire. For instance, if you're writing a book, note down your word count progress and compare it with the average progress reported by authors you follow. This can give you insight into how you're performing relative to a standard you aspire to, similar to how poll comparisons are made between political candidates.
- Develop a habit of reviewing your past decisions and their outcomes around the same time each year to prepare for better decision-making. Just as political analysts observe patterns in election cycles, you might notice personal trends, such as times when you're more likely to make successful decisions or take risks. This self-awareness can help you plan significant actions during your peak decision-making perio ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Factors that could impact the 2024 presidential election outcome, including debates, endorsements, and the economy
Looking ahead at the 2024 presidential election, several factors including debate performances, key endorsements, and the state of the economy could significantly influence the election outcome.
Debate Risks and Strategies
The debate formats are considered to be a higher risk for Harris than Trump. Harris has agreed to only one presidential debate, set to be hosted by ABC on September 10th, a decision likely driven by her team to minimize the risk of potential missteps. In contrast, Trump has agreed to participate in at least three debates.
Single Debate Decision for Harris
Buchanan points out that while debates are high-risk for any politician, avoiding them can be the best strategy to not worsen a candidate's position. He suggests that Harris's campaign is limiting debates because she may feel the need to play cleanup afterward, indicating potential concerns over her debating skills. This concern stems from her performance in the 2020 Democratic primary debates, where critics suggested she was not effective off the script.
Influence of Endorsements
RFK Jr.'s endorsement of Trump is seen as a significant factor that might sway the election, especially in battleground states such as Pennsylvania.
RFK Jr.'s Support for Trump
RFK Jr. previously captured about 12% of the electorate, mainly consisting of young voters and progressives who were disaffected with Biden. Although his supporter base leaned toward progressive candidates, his endorsement of Trump implies a significant shift that could affect Harris's campaign. His electorate, about 4-5% of voters, showed a strong preference for Trump over Harris, and with RFK Jr.’s endorsement and his removal from the ballot in Pennsylvania ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Factors that could impact the 2024 presidential election outcome, including debates, endorsements, and the economy
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Harris's decision to limit debates could be a strategic move to focus on direct voter engagement or other campaign strategies that her team deems more effective.
- Harris's performance in the 2020 Democratic primary debates might not be indicative of her current debating skills, which could have improved over time.
- Endorsements, while influential, do not guarantee voter behavior, and voters may not necessarily follow RFK Jr.'s endorsement of Trump.
- RFK Jr.'s endorsement might not have a uniform effect across all demographics, and some of his supporters could still prefer Harris or other candidates.
- Economic concerns are indeed important, but Harris's policies and proposals cou ...
Actionables
- You can enhance your critical thinking by analyzing the debate strategies of public figures. Start by watching a variety of political debates, not just presidential ones, and take notes on the techniques used by the debaters. Observe how they handle tough questions, their body language, and how they manage to stay on message or deflect criticism. This will help you develop your own debating skills and understand the strategic use of public speaking.
- Develop a deeper understanding of political endorsements by researching the impact of past endorsements on election outcomes. Create a simple spreadsheet to track notable endorsements in recent elections and their subsequent effect on polls or voter turnout. This exercise can give you insight into the power dynamics and influence in politics, which is useful if you're interested in political science or just want to be a more informed voter.
- To better connect with diverse groups of people, practice active listening and empathy in your daily inter ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Analysis of key battleground states and their importance in the election
The discussion on battleground states reveals that the electoral landscape presents unique and significant challenges for Harris, potentially influencing the election outcomes.
Pennsylvania remains a crucial and daunting challenge for Harris, as her progressive profile may not resonate with the state's more moderate, working-class electorate.
Buchanan pertains to new polling data from Arizona that reflect issues also applicable to Pennsylvania, where Harris is performing significantly worse than Biden did in 2020 with key voter groups such as independents, Hispanics, and young voters. Pennsylvania's electorate, which is described as white, working-class, and with an old-school union mindset, may not sympathize with Harris's progressive stance, thus posing a considerable challenge for her campaign.
North Carolina is a historically unpredictable state, where Republicans tend to surge late in the campaign, potentially offsetting any early Democratic advantages.
Brent Buchanan highlights that North Carolina, a largely rural state outside the Raleigh media market, has shown a pattern of Republicans consolidating votes late in the campaign cycle. This trend suggests that if a Republican candidate is within striking distance there, they usually win on Election Day. Buchanan also notes the absence of the same extensive absentee ballot outreach as in 2020, which could hinder Democratic turnout. Donald Trump would likely win North Carolina if polling within thre ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Analysis of key battleground states and their importance in the election
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Pennsylvania's electorate is dynamic, and shifts in voter priorities or external events could make Harris's progressive profile more appealing by election time.
- Harris's performance with key voter groups in Pennsylvania might improve with targeted campaigning and messaging that resonates with those demographics.
- North Carolina's unpredictability could also lead to a Democratic surge late in the campaign, especially if there are changes in the political climate or major events that mobilize Democratic voters.
- The absence of extensive absentee ballot outreach in North Carolina could be mitigated by other forms of voter mobilization and engagement strategies by the Democratic party.
- Georgia's increasing competitiveness suggests that demographic changes and v ...
Actionables
- You can deepen your understanding of electoral dynamics by comparing voter profiles and election results from different states. Start by selecting a few states with varying political landscapes, like Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia. Look at the demographic breakdown of voters and past election results, which are often available on state government websites or through non-partisan political analysis sites. This will give you a clearer picture of how different voter groups' preferences can shift election outcomes.
- Enhance your political forecasting skills by tracking late-stage campaign trends in historically unpredictable states. Choose a state like North Carolina and follow its local news outlets, political blogs, and social media pages of major political parties during an election cycle. Observe how messaging and campaign strategies change as Election Day approaches and how these adjustments correlate with shifts in polling data.
- You can contribute to voter turno ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Predictions for the congressional elections and control of the House and Senate
As the congressional elections approach, both parties are gearing up for a competitive battle for control of the House and Senate. While Democrats seem to focus on defense, Republicans appear to be in a strong position to gain the upper hand in the Senate.
Democrats may feel optimistic about their House prospects, but they face an uphill battle to flip the necessary Republican-held seats to regain a majority.
Democrats are primarily concentrating their financial resources on defending seats they currently hold, a strategy that underscores the difficulties they face in attempting to flip enough Republican seats to secure a majority in the House. The defensive posture in their spending suggests they are not as aggressive in challenging Republican incumbents as might be necessary to change the balance of power.
Republicans are well-positioned to gain control of the Senate, potentially reaching 52 or 53 seats.
Key Senate races in states like Montana, Maryland, and Ohio could tip the balance in the GOP's favor.
Joe Manchin's retirement in West Virginia has resulted in an evenly split Senate, with the Vice President poised to break ties. This delicate balance could shift in favor of the GOP based on incoming reports from several key states. In Montana, Democratic incumbent Jon Tester is facing substantial challenges, ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Predictions for the congressional elections and control of the House and Senate
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While Democrats are focusing on defense in the House, it's possible that their strategy could pay off by solidifying their hold on competitive districts, preventing further losses.
- Historical trends sometimes show that the party not in the presidency gains in midterms, but this is not a hard and fast rule, and Democrats could mobilize effectively to counter this trend.
- Predictions about Republican control of the Senate may be premature, as voter sentiment can shift rapidly in response to national events or local campaign developments.
- Reaching 52 or 53 seats in the Senate for Republicans assumes current polling is accurate and will hold until election day, which is not always the case.
- Key Senate races are often influenced by factors that may not be apparent early on, such as candidate debates, endorsements, or emerging issues that could change the electoral landscape.
- Jon Tester in Montana has faced tough races before and has a track record of winning in a state that leans Republican, suggesting he may again be resilient.
- Maryland's tied race could be an outlier or reflect a temporary fluctuation i ...
Actionables
- You can deepen your understanding of political dynamics by tracking the mentioned Senate races through a non-partisan election tracking website or app. By doing so, you'll gain insight into the factors that influence election outcomes, such as campaign spending, incumbent advantages, and state political leanings. For example, create a simple spreadsheet to record changes in polling data, campaign spending, and major news events affecting the races in Montana, Maryland, and Ohio, and observe how these factors correlate with shifts in the race standings.
- Engage in informed discussions by starting a virtual book club focused on political science and election analysis. Invite friends or community members to join, and select books that explore the intricacies of campaigning, voter behavior, and political strategy. This will help you contextualize the information from the races and understand the broader implications for future elections. For your first meeting, you might choose a book like "The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns" by Sasha Issenberg to kickstart the conversation.
- Enhance your critical thinking skills by writing ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
1-Page Summary- Polling and historical data comparisons on Kamala Harris' performance vs. past Democratic candidates
- Factors that could impact the 2024 presidential election outcome, including debates, endorsements, and the economy
- Analysis of key battleground states and their importance in the election
- Predictions for the congressional elections and control of the House and Senate
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
