Podcasts > Morbid > Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

By Morbid Network | Wondery

In this disturbing episode about the horrific crimes of Edward Hickman, the hosts recount the appalling details of the 1927 kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Marion Parker. Their summary examines Hickman's attempts to fabricate insanity and the unprecedented media frenzy surrounding his trial.

As they describe, despite Hickman's arguments of mental instability, the jury swiftly found him guilty and sentenced him to death for his calculated actions against Marion. The hosts detail the disturbing account of Hickman's botched execution, which left spectators shaken.

Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jun 17, 2024 episode of the Morbid

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

1-Page Summary

The Horrific Crimes of Edward Hickman

Edward Hickman, a convicted criminal, kidnapped 12-year-old Marion Parker. As the hosts describe, Hickman murdered and mutilated her body in an appalling manner, sewing her eyes open and dismembering her limbs. Despite fabricating stories of accomplices, Hickman demonstrated strategic intelligence in trying to avoid responsibility.

Unprecedented Media Coverage and Public Engagement

The case drew unparalleled attention from California media, with Hickman's photo circulating heavily. According to the hosts, this intense coverage fostered a deep public connection to the young victim, with relief at Hickman's capture.

The Question of Hickman's Mental State

While Hickman attempted an insanity defense, psychiatrists found him highly intelligent and lacking true signs of insanity, as the hosts explain. The defense's portrayal of mental instability was disjointed and unconvincing.

Trial Proceedings and Rejection of Insanity

The jury swiftly found Hickman guilty and sentenced him to death, rejecting his insanity defense. As the hosts recount, testimonies depicted Hickman as calculating rather than insane in his criminal actions against Marion Parker.

Hickman's Disturbing Execution

Hickman faced execution on October 19th. The hosts detail how his hanging was horrifically botched, with Hickman strangling to death over 10 minutes as spectators watched in shock and horror, though some felt a sense of retributive justice.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding of criminal psychology by reading books or articles on the subject to gain insight into the minds of criminals like Hickman. By learning about different psychological theories and historical criminal cases, you'll be able to recognize patterns of behavior and the complexities of the insanity defense used in trials.
  • Enhance your media literacy by analyzing current news reports on crime cases, focusing on how the media portrays the victim and the accused. This will help you understand the impact of media coverage on public perception and the importance of responsible journalism.
  • Engage in community discussions or online forums about the ethical implications of capital punishment, using historical cases as a reference point. This will allow you to form a well-rounded opinion on the subject and understand the various viewpoints and arguments surrounding the death penalty.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

The kidnapping, murder, and mutilation of Marion Parker

In a grim recount of one of the most horrifying crimes of the early 20th century, the hosts discuss the chilling case of Marion Parker's kidnapping, murder, and mutilation by Edward Hickman, a man whose actions revealed a haunting lack of humanity.

Hickman's heinous crimes against the 12-year-old victim

Edward Hickman, who became infamous for his chilling crimes, kidnapped the 12-year-old Marion Parker, eventually murdering and mutilating her in a way that indicates an appalling absence of remorse. He dismembered her body, and in an act that exemplifies his grotesque attention to detail, he sewed Marion Parker’s eyes open and applied makeup to her face. The macabre state in which Marion’s body was discovered communicated a message of terror; her limbs were thrown into various locations by Hickman, who initially denied being involved in the girl's kidnapping or murder.

With a criminal record already including small-time armed robberies, Hickman's violence escalated. The podcast hosts share a declaration from Hickman expressing a disturbing desire to dismember a human being. Before his descent into infamy, Hickman killed a pharmacist and wounded an LAPD officer during a robbery. But the heinous acts he performed on Marion Parker were beyond comprehension, as Hickman sewed the little girl's eyes open to make it appear as if she was still alive when presenting her body to her father upon attempting to collect ransom.

Ash Kelley expresses justified contempt for Hickman, citing the horrific nature of his crimes, while the defense’s closing statement during his trial gave a graphic account of how he committed the murder.

Hickman's changing stories and attempts to evade responsibility

Throughout the investigation and trial, Hickman attempted to evade responsibility for his actions, initially fabricating stories of accomplices named Andrew Kramer and June Dunning, and claiming he never meant for Marion to be hurt. However, it was revealed that these supposed accomplices could not have been involved; one Andrew Kramer had been in jail since August 1927, and June Dunning was the sister of a former girlfriend of another incarcerated Andrew Kramer.

Hickman's multiplicity of stories and his attempt to strategize around his legal defense displayed a manipulative intelligence. Observers noted how he immediately began laying the groundwork for an insanity defense upon arrest. Despite his attempts to portray himself as religious and potentially ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The kidnapping, murder, and mutilation of Marion Parker

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

...

Actionables

  • You can enhance your critical thinking skills by analyzing criminal cases from a psychological perspective. Start by reading about different criminal cases and then write down potential psychological factors that could have influenced the criminals' behavior. This exercise can help you understand the complexity of human behavior and the importance of mental health awareness.
  • Develop empathy and understanding by volunteering with organizations that support victims' families. Engaging with people who have experienced loss can provide insight into the emotional impact of crime and the importance of community support in healing.
  • Improve your personal safety awar ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

The extensive media coverage and public interest in the case

The kidnapping case that unfolded in Los Angeles in 1927 captivated the public to an exceptional degree, with the media playing a critical role in the engagement and emotional investment of the population.

The case garnered unprecedented media attention, with Hickman's photograph plastered across California

From the onset, the kidnapping investigation became one of the largest in Los Angeles history, with newspapers offering extensive and fervent coverage. The daily deluge of information could span up to five pages, reflecting the public's growing anger and desire for justice. The sheer scale of the coverage was unparalleled for the time, drawing parallels to the intense media frenzy surrounding later high-profile cases like the OJ Simpson car chase and the disappearance of Gabby Petito.

William Hickman's photo became a ubiquitous part of Californian life; it was virtually impossible to avoid his likeness, such was the extent to which media had disseminated his image. As the manhunt for Hickman gained momentum, so too did the level of media attention, with front-page stories reaching audiences not only in California but across the Pacific Northwest.

The public was deeply invested in the case, feeling a personal connection to the young victim

This barrage of media coverage fostered a deep sense of emotional investment among the public. People felt personally ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The extensive media coverage and public interest in the case

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • William Hickman was a notorious criminal involved in the 1927 kidnapping case in Los Angeles. His photograph was widely circulated by the media, making him a recognizable figure across California and the Pacific Northwest. The intense manhunt for Hickman and the extensive media coverage surrounding him heightened public interest and emotional investment in the case. Hickman's capture on December 23rd marked a significant moment in the unfolding narrative of the kidnapping case.
  • The comparison to later high-profile cases like the OJ Simpson car chase and the disappearance of Gabby Petito highlights the intense media attention and public interest these cases generated, similar to the 1927 kidnapping case in Los Angeles. These cases became significant cultural touchpoints due to the widespread coverage and emotional impact on the public. The mention serves to underscore the lasting impact and historical significance of the 1927 kidnapping case in the context of media coverage and public engagement with criminal investigations.
  • The ...

Counterarguments

  • The extent of media coverage may have led to sensationalism, which can distort the public's perception of the case and overshadow important facts.
  • Extensive media attention can sometimes compromise the integrity of an investigation by spreading misinformation or influencing witness testimonies.
  • The focus on a single high-profile case might divert attention from other important news stories or issues that also merit public attention and media scrutiny.
  • The widespread circulation of Hickman's photograph could potentially bias the public and jury members, affecting the fairness of the trial.
  • The personal connection felt by the public to the young victim, while understandable, may be more a result of media manipulation than genuine empathy.
  • The emotional investment of the public, driven by media coverage, could lead to public opinion influencing legal proceedings, which should ideally be based on evidence an ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

The psychological evaluation and debate over Hickman's mental state

Psychological evaluations and courtroom strategies paint a conflicting picture of Hickman’s mental health during his trial.

Psychiatrists evaluated Hickman and found him to be intelligent and lacking signs of true insanity

Psychiatrist Dr. McNary's evaluation of Hickman revealed no evidence to support the claim that Hickman's criminal actions were a result of extreme religiosity. Despite Hickman's attempts to convince Dr. McNary that his aversion to women and religious beliefs had driven him to criminal acts, McNary dismissed these explanations. He told a reporter that Hickman’s religiosity wasn't strong enough to induce hallucinations prompting him to commit his crimes.

Moreover, psychiatrists concluded Hickman was sane, based on his coherent responses about the murder and dismemberment of Marion Parker. These responses painted a picture of a man who was not only sane but also intelligent, with advanced communication skills.

The defense tried to portray Hickman as mentally unstable, but their arguments were disjointed and unconvincing

T ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The psychological evaluation and debate over Hickman's mental state

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hickman attempted to attribute his criminal actions to extreme religiosity, claiming that his aversion to women and religious beliefs were driving forces behind his behavior. However, psychiatrist Dr. McNary dismissed these claims, stating that Hickman's religiosity was not strong enough to induce the hallucinations that would prompt such crimes. This attempt by Hickman to link his actions to religious motivations was refuted by the evaluation findings that suggested he was coherent, intelligent, and lacking signs of true insanity.
  • Dr. McNary played a crucial role in evaluating Hickman's mental state during his trial. His assessment was significant in determining whether Hickman was deemed sane or mentally unstable. McNary's findings contradicted Hickman's claims of extreme religiosity driving his actions, contributing to the conclusion that Hickman was intelligent and not insane. The defense's attempt to portray Hickman as mentally unstable was weakened by McNary's evaluation and Hickman's coherent responses during assessments.
  • ...

Counterarguments

  • The determination of sanity in a legal context can be quite different from a clinical diagnosis of mental health, suggesting that while Hickman may have been legally sane, he could still have had significant mental health issues that were not adequately considered.
  • The absence of evidence for extreme religiosity does not necessarily mean that religion played no role in Hickman's mindset or actions; it could indicate that the evaluation methods were not sensitive enough to detect subtler influences.
  • Coherent responses during an evaluation do not preclude the presence of a mental disorder; many individuals with mental illnesses can articulate their thoughts and actions clearly, especially outside of acute episodes.
  • The defense's failure to present a convincing narrative of mental instability does not prove that Hickman was stable; it could r ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

The trial proceedings and verdict

The trial and subsequent sentencing of Hickman for the kidnapping and murder of Marion Parker drew significant attention, culminating in a swift jury decision and the rejection of an insanity defense.

Hickman was found guilty and sentenced to death for the kidnapping and murder of Marion Parker

Hickman's trial date was set for January 25th. After the proceedings began on February 2nd, it did not take long for the case to reach its conclusion. The jury, after only 43 minutes of deliberation, found Hickman sane at the time he kidnapped and murdered Marion Parker and sentenced him to death. Despite facing a separate trial with a friend for another murder, Hickman's sentence from his earlier conviction to death rendered the subsequent trial less significant. His execution date was set for October 19, following the exhaustion of his appeals.

The judge and jury rejected Hickman's insanity defense, concluding that he was a calculating criminal

Attempts to delay the trial were minimized as the presiding judge took on the task of examining jury members himself to expedite the process. This decision was spurred by the intensive news coverage and strong public sentiment that had the potential to impact the jury selection.

From the outset of the trial, the focus was on Hickman's mental state with DA Asa Keys presenting the theory that Hickman acted out of vengeance and not due to mental illness. Marion Parker met her tragic end as part of Hickman's scheme to retaliate against her father's bank, according to the state's argument. Detective Lieutenant Richard Lucas bolstered this claim by testifying that Hickman seemed to b ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The trial proceedings and verdict

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hickman's trial for the kidnapping and murder of Marion Parker began on February 2nd, following its scheduled date of January 25th. The trial swiftly concluded with a jury decision after only 43 minutes of deliberation, resulting in Hickman being found guilty and sentenced to death. The rejection of Hickman's insanity defense played a significant role in the trial proceedings, with the judge and jury emphasizing his calculated criminal actions over any claims of mental illness. Hickman's execution date was set for October 19, pending the exhaustion of his appeals.
  • The rejection of an insanity defense means that the judge and jury did not accept the argument that the defendant, in this case, Hickman, was not mentally responsible for his actions at the time of the crime due to a mental illness or defect. This decision indicates that the court believed Hickman was fully aware of his actions and their consequences when he committed the kidnapping and murder, and therefore, he was held accountable for his crimes.
  • The expedited trial due to intense news coverage and public sentiment was a response to the high level of attention and emotional involvement from the public and media regarding the case. The judge took on the task of personally vetting potential jurors to ensure a fair trial amidst this heightened scrutiny. This rapid process aimed to minimize any potential biases or external influences that could impact the trial's outcome. The goal was to conduct a swift and efficient trial to address the case promptly and fairly given the circumstances.
  • DA Asa Keys presented the theory that Hickman kidnapped and murdered Marion Parker as an act of vengeance, not due to mental illness. Keys argued that Hickman's actions were calculated and part of a scheme to retaliate against Marion's father's bank. This theory was supported by testimonies and evidence presented during the trial, painting Hickman as a calculating criminal driven by motives of revenge rather than insanity.
  • Hickman's calculated actions referred to his methodical planning and deliberate behavior in carrying out the kidnapping and murder, suggesting a level of premeditation and control over his actions. Lunacy, on the other hand, would imply a state of mental disorder or insanity that could potentially cloud judgment and lead to irrational behavior. The prosecution argued that Hickman's actions were driven by a desire for revenge and were executed with a clear purpose, indicating a level of rationality in his decision-making process. This contrast between calculated actions and lunacy was crucial in determining his culpability and the rejection of an insanity defense.
  • Detective Lieutenant Richard Lucas testified that Hickman appeared preoccupied with the idea of using an insanity defense during his time in jail. This suggests that Hickman may have been considering claiming mental illness as a defense strategy for his actions. Lucas's testimony indicated that Hickman's focus on this defense tactic was notable enough to be observed by law enforcement. This aspect of Hickman's behavior could have influenced perceptions of his mental state and intentions during the trial.
  • The testimonies that painted a chilling picture of the abduction day described the deceptive behavior of the abductor and highlighted how Marion Parker's teacher and expert witnesses perceived the actions of the perpetrator as calculated and not stemming from mental illness. These testimoni ...

Counterarguments

  • The speed of the jury's decision could be seen as potentially indicative of a rush to judgment, especially in a case involving the death penalty.
  • The rejection of the insanity defense might be critiqued if there were substantial evidence of mental illness that was not adequately considered.
  • The expedited trial proceedings due to media coverage and public sentiment could raise concerns about whether Hickman received a fair trial.
  • The theory that Hickman acted out of vengeance could be questioned if there was insufficient evidence to support the motive.
  • The interpretation of Hickman's preoccupation with an insanity defense could alternatively be seen as an understanding of his legal situation rather than evidence of his sanity.
  • The reliance on testimonies and characterizati ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 574: The Kidnapping & Murder of Marion Parker (Part 2)

Hickman's execution and the reaction of the floor crowd

The execution of Hickman was marked by a ghastly scene of botched justice that elicited varied reactions from the assembled spectators.

Hickman's execution was marked by a gruesome botched hanging, in which he strangled to death rather than having his neck broken

On the morning of October 19th, Hickman faced a grim fate as he was led to the gallows before a crowd. After fainting when the hood was placed over his head, Hickman's body collapsed just before the trap door release, lessening the force of his drop. Consequently, his neck failed to snap as intended. Instead, Hickman endured a prolonged and agonizing death by strangulation. The onlookers watched for nearly ten minutes as Hickman's body convulsed on the rope before he was finally pronounced dead, showcasing the morbid spectacle of a botched execution.

The crowd of onlookers reacted with mixed emotions to Hickman's fate

While the crowd had demonstrated a chilling sense of satisfaction at Hickman's sentencing—cheering upon hearing the guilty verdict—the actual execution elicited a mixture of responses. As some observed the executioner's missteps, the crowd's anticipation turned to shock. The b ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Hickman's execution and the reaction of the floor crowd

Additional Materials

Clarifications

...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA