Podcasts > Morbid > Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

By Morbid Network | Wondery

Dive deep into a complex true crime saga with Ash Kelley and Alaina Urquhart in "Morbid," where the troubling case of William Heirons, also known as The Lipstick Killer, is meticulously unraveled. In this episode, the hosts scrutinize alarming hints of police evidence tampering that played a pivotal role in Heirons' conviction. Debates surrounding the authenticity of the fingerprints and handwriting on a ransom note question the integrity of the evidence, while the unusual methods of evidence collection suggest possible foul play within the investigation. The revealing expert analysis confronts the legitimacy of the conviction, hinting at potential miscarriages of justice and a darker narrative where truth becomes victim to fabrications.

The episode further explores the coercion behind Heirons' confession—a desperate measure to escape the death penalty prompted by an interrogation riddled with harsh tactics and psychological manipulation. State Attorney Toohey's admission of a flimsy case against Heirons and the subsequent denials of parole paint a troubling portrait of a justice system more focused on securing confessions than uncovering truth. The hosts reflect on the harrowing reality of Heirons' 66-year imprisonment, a life spent behind bars resisting the admission of guilt for crimes he staunchly denied committing. This episode of "Morbid" challenges listeners to ponder the balance of justice and the dire consequences when that balance is severely tipped.

Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 25, 2024 episode of the Morbid

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

1-Page Summary

Evidence Tampering by Police

Police evidence tampering is suggested in the case of William Heirons, specifically concerning fingerprints and a ransom note used to convict him. Matches between fingerprints at various crime scenes and Heirons were announced by Captain Emmett Evans, but doubts have been raised about their authenticity. The technology at the time was not advanced, and the evidence, including a rolled fingerprint at the crime scene—which is unusual—raises the possibility of being planted.

FBI agents found the fingerprints on the ransom note impossible to classify, undermining their reliability in the investigation. Furthermore, Sergeant Thomas Laffey's failure to match these prints with anyone else arrested during the relevant period and the premature announcement of a match in the press add to the skepticism regarding the evidence's legitimacy.

An expert analysis disclosed that the ransom note's handwriting didn't match Heirons but resembled another individual, Richard Thomas. Additionally, inconsistencies in Heirons' confessions and the suggestion that a police officer wrote a message at one crime scene insinuates further misconduct.

A false confession story planted in a newspaper breaks Heirons, illustrating the worrying influence of police in manipulating evidence and public perception.

Plea Deal and Confession Coerced

William Heirons confessed to three murders in a deal to avoid the death penalty, after being subjected to harsh interrogation tactics and torture. The validity of this confession is questioned due to the inconsistencies and the manner in which Heirons was treated during the interrogation.

State Attorney Toohey admitted the evidence against Heirons was weak and without the confession, convicting him would have been challenging. This weak case pressured Heirons into accepting the deal.

Moreover, Heirons' parole was continually denied because he wouldn't confess to crimes he claimed he did not commit, reflecting a system that seemed to value admissions of guilt over evidence of innocence.

Failure of Justice System

The case of William Heirons highlights grave issues within the justice system. Despite indications of his innocence, he spent 66 years in prison and died at age 83 without ever obtaining freedom, reflecting a miscarriage of justice. Heirons' expectation for parole was crushed when he was denied release due to his refusal to admit guilt.

The possibility that the real culprit(s) went unaccountable and continued to be a danger to society is of great concern. The discussion suggests that not only was William Heirons failed by the justice system, but so were potential future victims of the actual perpetrator(s). His case underscores the critical need for a just and reliable legal system.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • William Heirons was a man convicted of multiple murders based on questionable evidence, including fingerprints and a ransom note. Doubts were raised about the authenticity of the evidence, suggesting possible police tampering. Heirons confessed to the crimes under duress and coercion, leading to a plea deal to avoid the death penalty. Despite indications of his innocence, Heirons spent decades in prison, highlighting flaws in the justice system and the importance of fair legal processes.
  • Plea deals are agreements between the prosecution and the defendant where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions, such as a reduced sentence. Confessions are statements where a person admits to committing a crime. In legal proceedings, the validity of confessions can be challenged if they were coerced or obtained improperly. Coerced confessions can raise doubts about the truthfulness and reliability of the statements made by the accused.
  • State Attorney Toohey is a legal official responsible for prosecuting criminal cases on behalf of the state. They play a crucial role in determining the strength of evidence against a defendant and deciding whether to pursue charges. In the context of William Heirons' case, State Attorney Toohey acknowledged the weakness of the evidence against Heirons and negotiated a plea deal based on this assessment. This highlights the significant influence and decision-making power that State Attorney Toohey holds in criminal proceedings.
  • Parole denial can be linked to an inmate's admission of guilt as it is often a requirement for release. In cases like William Heirons', maintaining innocence can hinder parole eligibility despite potential evidence supporting innocence. This dynamic can create a dilemma for inmates who refuse to admit to crimes they claim they did not commit, impacting their chances of being granted parole.
  • The justice system can be complex, involving various legal processes and actors like law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, and juries. Miscarriages of justice occur when errors or misconduct lead to wrongful convictions or failures to hold the true perpetrators accountable. These miscarriages can result from factors like flawed evidence, coerced confessions, biased investigations, or inadequate legal representation. Such injustices highlight systemic flaws and the need for reforms to ensure fair and reliable outcomes in the legal system.

Counterarguments

  • Doubts about fingerprint technology at the time may not fully account for the possibility that the matches were accurate despite the technology's limitations.
  • The inability of FBI agents to classify fingerprints does not necessarily mean that the prints were not Heirons'; it could indicate a lack of clarity in the prints or limitations in the classification system.
  • The failure of Sergeant Thomas Laffey to match prints with other suspects does not inherently indicate evidence tampering; it could also be due to the uniqueness of the prints to Heirons.
  • An expert's analysis of handwriting is subjective and can vary between experts; another expert might have concluded that the handwriting did match Heirons.
  • Inconsistencies in confessions can sometimes be attributed to factors other than police misconduct, such as the psychological state of the suspect or misunderstandings during interrogation.
  • The use of harsh interrogation tactics, while ethically questionable, does not always invalidate a confession if it can be corroborated by other evidence.
  • The plea deal accepted by Heirons could be seen as a strategic legal decision rather than solely as a result of coercion.
  • The denial of parole based on a lack of confession could be interpreted as a standard procedure to ensure that only remorseful individuals are released.
  • The justice system's failure in Heirons' case, if true, does not necessarily reflect systemic issues but could be an isolated incident of judicial error.
  • The possibility that the real culprit(s) remained at large is concerning, but without definitive evidence to exonerate Heirons, the justice system must rely on the evidence presented at trial.
  • The case underscores the need for a just and reliable legal system, but it also highlights the challenges faced by the system in dealing with complex cases involving potentially unreliable evidence.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

Evidence Tampering by Police

Discussion arises around the case of William Heirons, involving indications of police evidence tampering, particularly concerning fingerprints and a ransom note that did not match Heirons but were used to convict him.

Fingerprints do not match William Heirons

Captain Emmett Evans reported to the press that fingerprints in the case matched, but this was not due to a police initiative—James Gavin, a reporter, was the one who suggested the comparison of William Heirons’ prints. The hosts cast doubts on the fingerprint match, considering the technology of the time and suspecting the evidence might have been fabricated.

FBI agents labeled the fingerprints found on the ransom note in the Suzanne Degnan case as "impossible to classify," according to Sergeant Thomas Laffey. The hosts suggest that the print evidence, pivotal in making William Heirons the main suspect, was perhaps faked. The match was considered too weak to be reliable, failing to meet the minimum standard for fingerprint identification. The mismatch is further implied when a rolled fingerprint, akin to those on a police card, was found at the Brown crime scene, unusual for natural prints at a crime scene, raising the possibility that it was planted.

Details emerge regarding the suspicious circumstances under which the police officers claimed to have matched Heirons' prints, as well as Laffey's failure to find a match between the Degnan case prints and those arrested between January and June, even though Heirons was in custody in May. Three days post Heirons' arrest, Laffey informed the press about a print match on the ransom note, which was later disclosed to be non-existent, casting significant doubt on the legitimacy of the evidence.

Ransom note handwriting does not match Heirons; matches Richard Thomas

Police officer likely wrote lipstick message on Brown crime scene wall

It is later revealed through expert analysis that the ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Evidence Tampering by Police

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • William Heirens was a man convicted of a series of murders in the 1940s in Chicago. The case against him was controversial due to allegations of evidence tampering by the police, including discrepancies in fingerprint evidence and handwriting analysis. Heirens' case raised concerns about the reliability of the evidence used to convict him and the possibility of police misconduct in the investigation.
  • Fingerprint analysis involves comparing the unique patterns found in fingerprints to determine if they match. Experts use specific points of comparison, such as ridge endings and bifurcations, to identify similarities between prints. Classifying fingerprints involves categorizing them based on their patterns, such as loops, arches, and whorls. The process of fingerprint analysis is crucial in forensic investigations to link individuals to crime scenes or objects.
  • A "rolled fingerprint" is a method where a person's fingerprint is taken by rolling each finger from one side to the other on a special card. A "rans ...

Counterarguments

  • The technology for fingerprint analysis, while not as advanced as today, was still a reliable forensic tool at the time, and experts could accurately match prints to individuals in many cases.
  • The FBI's classification of fingerprints as "impossible to classify" does not necessarily indicate tampering; it could mean the prints were of low quality or incomplete.
  • The presence of a rolled fingerprint at a crime scene, while unusual, could have alternative explanations other than planting, such as accidental transfer from a document the suspect handled.
  • The suspicious circumstances around the matching of Heirons' prints could be due to miscommunication or procedural errors rather than deliberate tampering.
  • The failure to find a match between the Degnan case prints and those arrested could be due to limitations in the scope of the search or the quality of the prints, rather than evidence of innocence.
  • The handwriting analysis linking the ransom note to Richard Thomas might not be conclusiv ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

Plea Deal and Confession Coerced

William Heirons's case raises questions about the tactics used to secure his confession and the implications for his parole eligibility.

Heirons confesses only after manipulated and tortured

After William Heirons is subjected to interrogation and torture, his attorney, without consulting him, agrees to a deal where Heirons would confess to three murders but only be charged with burglary. This results in a life sentence with the possibility of parole. Although not explicitly mentioned, the confessions are referred to as having numerous inconsistencies, which suggests coercion might have been involved during the relentless questioning Heirons faced during his recovery.

State attorney admits evidence was weak for conviction without confession

The state's attorney, Toohey, conceded that the case against Heirons was entirely built on circumstantial evidence, and without Heirons' confession, it was not strong. A jury trial, therefore, would have been risky for the prose ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Plea Deal and Confession Coerced

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Plea deals are agreements between the defendant and the prosecution where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions, like reduced charges or sentencing. Parole eligibility is the opportunity for a prisoner to be released before completing their full sentence, based on meeting specific criteria set by the parole board. These concepts are crucial in the criminal justice system as they impact the legal outcomes and potential release of individuals involved in criminal cases.
  • The state attorney, Toohey, is a legal representative for the government in criminal cases. In this context, Toohey plays a crucial role in prosecuting the case against William Heirons. Toohey's acknowledgment that the evidence against Heirons was weak without his confession highlights the importance of Heirons' admission in the legal proceedings. Toohey's assessment influenced the decision-making process regarding the plea deal and parole eligibility for Heirons.
  • The parole board's requirement for Heirons to ask for forgiveness is a condition that suggests a moral acknowledgment of guilt and remorse for the crimes he was convicted of. This requirement is often seen as a ...

Counterarguments

  • The plea deal may have been the best option available to Heirons's attorney given the circumstances, and it could have been a strategic decision to avoid the risk of a death penalty.
  • The inconsistencies in the confession could be due to factors other than coercion, such as confusion, memory issues, or miscommunication.
  • The state attorney's admission of weak evidence does not necessarily mean that Heirons was innocent; it may simply reflect the challenges of proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt without a confession.
  • The parole board's requirement for Heirons to ask for forgiveness could be seen as a standard procedure to ensure that individuals show r ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 549: The Lipstick Killer (Part 2)

Failure of Justice System

The hosts critically explore the case of William Heirons, who was imprisoned for life, suggesting that critical evidence pointing to his innocence was overlooked. Heirons' case spotlights the justice system's shortcomings and the tragedy of potential true perpetrators evading accountability.

Over 66 years in prison though evidence shows his innocence

William Heirons was convicted and imprisoned despite evidence suggesting his innocence. Tracks of the conversation reveal that Heirons, who was a minor at the time of his conviction, spent a staggering 66 years behind bars. Ash Kelley highlights the unfortunate end of Heirons’ life, dying in prison at the age of 83, never having been released. The discussion also touches on Heirons' expectation for parole in 2007 after 61 years of his sentence. Despite hopes for freedom, his parole was denied when he refused to admit guilt to the crimes.

The narrative unfolds the tragedy of a possibly innocent man who was never informed about a plea and was allegedly coerced into confession — not through torture or constant interrogation but by a Chicago Tribune article falsely asserting he had confessed.

True killer(s) escaped accountability and may have killed others

The conversation provides insights into an alternative narrative, where Thomas confessed to writing a ransom note and details about seeing a man with blood on his hands, positionin ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Failure of Justice System

Additional Materials

Clarifications

...

Counterarguments

  • The evidence of Heirons' innocence may not be as clear-cut as suggested; the justice system relies on the balance of evidence, and his conviction may have been based on the preponderance of evidence available at the time.
  • The denial of parole for refusing to admit guilt is a standard practice in many justice systems, as it is often seen as a lack of remorse or acceptance of responsibility.
  • The article by the Chicago Tribune, while potentially influential, may not have been the sole factor in Heirons' confession; other evidence could have played a role in his conviction.
  • The mention of Thomas as an alternate suspect does not necessarily exonerate Heirons; it is possible for multiple individuals to be involved in a crime, or for there to be confusion or misdirection during an investigation.
  • Concerns about the true perpetrator(s) being free to commit more crimes are speculative; without concrete evidence linking them to further crimes, it rema ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA