Dive deep into a complex true crime saga with Ash Kelley and Alaina Urquhart in "Morbid," where the troubling case of William Heirons, also known as The Lipstick Killer, is meticulously unraveled. In this episode, the hosts scrutinize alarming hints of police evidence tampering that played a pivotal role in Heirons' conviction. Debates surrounding the authenticity of the fingerprints and handwriting on a ransom note question the integrity of the evidence, while the unusual methods of evidence collection suggest possible foul play within the investigation. The revealing expert analysis confronts the legitimacy of the conviction, hinting at potential miscarriages of justice and a darker narrative where truth becomes victim to fabrications.
The episode further explores the coercion behind Heirons' confession—a desperate measure to escape the death penalty prompted by an interrogation riddled with harsh tactics and psychological manipulation. State Attorney Toohey's admission of a flimsy case against Heirons and the subsequent denials of parole paint a troubling portrait of a justice system more focused on securing confessions than uncovering truth. The hosts reflect on the harrowing reality of Heirons' 66-year imprisonment, a life spent behind bars resisting the admission of guilt for crimes he staunchly denied committing. This episode of "Morbid" challenges listeners to ponder the balance of justice and the dire consequences when that balance is severely tipped.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Police evidence tampering is suggested in the case of William Heirons, specifically concerning fingerprints and a ransom note used to convict him. Matches between fingerprints at various crime scenes and Heirons were announced by Captain Emmett Evans, but doubts have been raised about their authenticity. The technology at the time was not advanced, and the evidence, including a rolled fingerprint at the crime scene—which is unusual—raises the possibility of being planted.
FBI agents found the fingerprints on the ransom note impossible to classify, undermining their reliability in the investigation. Furthermore, Sergeant Thomas Laffey's failure to match these prints with anyone else arrested during the relevant period and the premature announcement of a match in the press add to the skepticism regarding the evidence's legitimacy.
An expert analysis disclosed that the ransom note's handwriting didn't match Heirons but resembled another individual, Richard Thomas. Additionally, inconsistencies in Heirons' confessions and the suggestion that a police officer wrote a message at one crime scene insinuates further misconduct.
A false confession story planted in a newspaper breaks Heirons, illustrating the worrying influence of police in manipulating evidence and public perception.
William Heirons confessed to three murders in a deal to avoid the death penalty, after being subjected to harsh interrogation tactics and torture. The validity of this confession is questioned due to the inconsistencies and the manner in which Heirons was treated during the interrogation.
State Attorney Toohey admitted the evidence against Heirons was weak and without the confession, convicting him would have been challenging. This weak case pressured Heirons into accepting the deal.
Moreover, Heirons' parole was continually denied because he wouldn't confess to crimes he claimed he did not commit, reflecting a system that seemed to value admissions of guilt over evidence of innocence.
The case of William Heirons highlights grave issues within the justice system. Despite indications of his innocence, he spent 66 years in prison and died at age 83 without ever obtaining freedom, reflecting a miscarriage of justice. Heirons' expectation for parole was crushed when he was denied release due to his refusal to admit guilt.
The possibility that the real culprit(s) went unaccountable and continued to be a danger to society is of great concern. The discussion suggests that not only was William Heirons failed by the justice system, but so were potential future victims of the actual perpetrator(s). His case underscores the critical need for a just and reliable legal system.
1-Page Summary
Discussion arises around the case of William Heirons, involving indications of police evidence tampering, particularly concerning fingerprints and a ransom note that did not match Heirons but were used to convict him.
Captain Emmett Evans reported to the press that fingerprints in the case matched, but this was not due to a police initiative—James Gavin, a reporter, was the one who suggested the comparison of William Heirons’ prints. The hosts cast doubts on the fingerprint match, considering the technology of the time and suspecting the evidence might have been fabricated.
FBI agents labeled the fingerprints found on the ransom note in the Suzanne Degnan case as "impossible to classify," according to Sergeant Thomas Laffey. The hosts suggest that the print evidence, pivotal in making William Heirons the main suspect, was perhaps faked. The match was considered too weak to be reliable, failing to meet the minimum standard for fingerprint identification. The mismatch is further implied when a rolled fingerprint, akin to those on a police card, was found at the Brown crime scene, unusual for natural prints at a crime scene, raising the possibility that it was planted.
Details emerge regarding the suspicious circumstances under which the police officers claimed to have matched Heirons' prints, as well as Laffey's failure to find a match between the Degnan case prints and those arrested between January and June, even though Heirons was in custody in May. Three days post Heirons' arrest, Laffey informed the press about a print match on the ransom note, which was later disclosed to be non-existent, casting significant doubt on the legitimacy of the evidence.
It is later revealed through expert analysis that the ...
Evidence Tampering by Police
William Heirons's case raises questions about the tactics used to secure his confession and the implications for his parole eligibility.
After William Heirons is subjected to interrogation and torture, his attorney, without consulting him, agrees to a deal where Heirons would confess to three murders but only be charged with burglary. This results in a life sentence with the possibility of parole. Although not explicitly mentioned, the confessions are referred to as having numerous inconsistencies, which suggests coercion might have been involved during the relentless questioning Heirons faced during his recovery.
The state's attorney, Toohey, conceded that the case against Heirons was entirely built on circumstantial evidence, and without Heirons' confession, it was not strong. A jury trial, therefore, would have been risky for the prose ...
Plea Deal and Confession Coerced
The hosts critically explore the case of William Heirons, who was imprisoned for life, suggesting that critical evidence pointing to his innocence was overlooked. Heirons' case spotlights the justice system's shortcomings and the tragedy of potential true perpetrators evading accountability.
William Heirons was convicted and imprisoned despite evidence suggesting his innocence. Tracks of the conversation reveal that Heirons, who was a minor at the time of his conviction, spent a staggering 66 years behind bars. Ash Kelley highlights the unfortunate end of Heirons’ life, dying in prison at the age of 83, never having been released. The discussion also touches on Heirons' expectation for parole in 2007 after 61 years of his sentence. Despite hopes for freedom, his parole was denied when he refused to admit guilt to the crimes.
The narrative unfolds the tragedy of a possibly innocent man who was never informed about a plea and was allegedly coerced into confession — not through torture or constant interrogation but by a Chicago Tribune article falsely asserting he had confessed.
The conversation provides insights into an alternative narrative, where Thomas confessed to writing a ransom note and details about seeing a man with blood on his hands, positionin ...
Failure of Justice System
...
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser