Podcasts > Morbid > Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

By Morbid Network | Wondery

Dive into a chilling narrative with "Morbid," as hosts Ash Kelley and Alaina Urquhart unravel the harrowing 1963 case known as The Career Girl Murders. Through meticulous recounting, they explore the gruesome details of the fatal attack on Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert by Ricky Robles. The podcast paints a vivid scene of a burglary turned deadly, its aftermath, and the cascade of events that led to the conviction of the true perpetrator after an initial miscarriage of justice.

The somber tale continues with a critical examination of George Whitmore Jr.'s wrongful conviction, shedding light on the prejudicial conduct of law enforcement, specifically Detective Eddie Bulger. "Morbid" doesn't just recount the details of a historic crime; it delves into the far-reaching impact of this case on the American judicial landscape. By dissecting how this injustice prompted significant changes like the introduction of Miranda rights, the episode underscores the profound transformations in legal protocols and the abolition of the death penalty in New York that arose from this infamous case.

Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 11, 2024 episode of the Morbid

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

1-Page Summary

The brutal murders of Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert in 1963 by Ricky Robles

In 1963, Ricky Robles commits a heinous crime, murdering Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert during a burglary for drug money. Selecting an Upper East Side building for its lack of a doorman, Robles breaks into the apartment through an open window. Inside, he sexually assaults Wiley and, when Hoffert intervenes, ties them together. Under the pressure of being identified, Robles panics and stabs both women to death, using a bottle and knives. He then steals money to purchase heroin. Initially the wrong man, George Whitmore, is charged with the murders until Robles’s eventual confession leads to his arrest. Tried in 1965, Robles is found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment, only admitting the murders to a parole board in 1986.

Racist detective Eddie Bulger targeted 19-year-old George Whitmore and pushed for wrongful conviction of assault and murders

Detective Eddie Bulger, notorious for his racism, wrongfully targets George Whitmore Jr. for the murder of Wiley and Hoffert. Whitmore is coerced into a false confession after 26 hours of interrogation, during which his rights are not communicated, nor is he offered legal representation. Despite incoherences in the confession and an alibi confirmed by his coworkers, Bulger manipulates evidence and authorities pursue prosecution doggedly. Photos wrongfully purported as being of Wiley are a pivotal point in the case. Whitmore faces years in prison for crimes he did not commit until Robles admits to the murders, highlighting a profound miscarriage of justice attributable to Bulger and others, who faced no accountability for their actions.

Whitmore's wrongful conviction helped lead to reforms such as Miranda rights and death penalty abolition in New York

George Whitmore's wrongful conviction is instrumental in catalyzing legal reforms within the United States. His case becomes a significant factor in the suspension of the death penalty in New York and influences the historic Supreme Court ruling on Miranda rights in 1966. This ruling transforms legal procedures by mandating that criminal suspects are informed of their right to an attorney, ensuring that such miscarriages of justice do not reoccur. Whitmore's experience, while tragic, marks a turning point in the history of the American legal system, leading to more stringent guidelines for police interrogations and suspects' rights.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The timeline of events in the text is as follows: Ricky Robles commits the murders in 1963, George Whitmore is wrongfully charged, and Robles eventually confesses to the crimes, leading to Whitmore's exoneration. Legal reforms, including the Miranda rights and the abolition of the death penalty in New York, follow Whitmore's case. The Supreme Court ruling on Miranda rights in 1966 is influenced by Whitmore's wrongful conviction.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

The brutal murders of Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert in 1963 by Ricky Robles

Alaina Urquhart and Ash Kelley discuss the appalling murders of Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert, which shook the city in 1963.

Ricky Robles admitted to killing Janis Wiley and Emily Hoffert while looking for drug money. His taped confession was submitted to the prosecutor, contributing to a warrant for his arrest. During the commission of a burglary, Robles entered an apartment on East 88th Street. He chose the building because it had no doorman. After finding the doors locked, he spotted an open window, climbed onto the ledge, and entered apartment 3C.

Inside, he encountered Janis Wiley in her bedroom and decided to sexually assault her. When Emily Hoffert walked in and resisted, Robles tied the two women together after Janice tried to calm Emily down, suggesting compliance to avoid harm. Hoffert wanted a good look at Robles, presumably for identification, which panicked Robles. He deliberated for about five minutes before stabbing both women to death with a glass bottle and two knives, grabbing different implements from the kitchen as he did so.

After the murders, Robles stole money from Emily's purse to buy heroin. He was tried for the murders in October 1965, f ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The brutal murders of Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert in 1963 by Ricky Robles

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • A warrant is a legal document issued by a court that authorizes law enforcement to take a specific action, such as making an arrest. Jury deliberation is the process where a jury discusses the evidence presented in a trial and reaches a verdict. Parole is the release of a prisoner before the completion of their sentence, under certain conditions and supervision.
  • Robles's mother lying to detectives was significant because her false alibi initially shielded him from suspicion and led to the wrongful arrest of another man, Whitmore, for the murders of Janice Wiley and Emily Hoffert. Her deception delayed the investigation's focus on Robles as the true perpetrator until further evidence emerged, ultimately leading to his confession and convic ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

Racist detective Eddie Bulger targeted 19-year-old George Whitmore and pushed for wrongful conviction of assault and murders

Detective Eddie Bulger, described as being incredibly racist, fixated on 19-year-old George Whitmore Jr., pursuing his wrongful conviction for crimes he didn't commit.

George Whitmore falsely confessed after 26 hours of coercive interrogation

George Whitmore endured 26 hours of interrogation without being informed of his rights or given the option to have a lawyer present. In an exhausted and vulnerable state, Whitmore signed a 61-page confession which included intimate details about the Wiley-Hoffert murders — details supposedly known only to the police and the perpetrator. However, the confession was riddled with inaccuracies, such as the claim that the door to the victims' apartment was unlocked, whereas it was actually found locked.

Despite alibi and lack of evidence against Whitmore, authorities pushed forward with prosecution

Even though Whitmore had an alibi, which was confirmed by his co-workers, who stated that he was working at a New Jersey restaurant during the March on Washington and watching Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s televised speech, authorities still pushed forward with prosecution. Detective Bulger claimed that photographs found in Whitmore's possession were of one of the murder victims, Janice Wiley, which Whitmore denied, and Janice's father confirmed they were not of his daughter. Despite the confession's doubtful credibility, authorities pursued the case against Whitmore relentlessly. Deputy Police Commissioner Walter Arm noted that Whitmore provided details that should only be known by the killer or detectives, casting a shadow on the legitimacy of the confession.

Whitmore's case continued to push ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Racist detective Eddie Bulger targeted 19-year-old George Whitmore and pushed for wrongful conviction of assault and murders

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom took place on August 28, 1963. It was a historic civil rights event where Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech, advocating for racial equality and an end to discrimination. The televised broadcast of King's speech reached a wide audience, amplifying the message of the civil rights movement and inspiring many across the nation. The March on Washington is considered a pivotal moment in the fight for civil rights in the United States, symbolizing unity and the quest for justice and equality.
  • Detective Bulger's lack of accountability means that he faced no consequences or punishment for his actions in wrongfully targeting George Whitmore. This lack of accountab ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 545: The Career Girl Murders (Part 2)

Whitmore's wrongful conviction helped lead to reforms such as Miranda rights and death penalty abolition in New York

Whitmore's case, which was one of the catalysts for significant reforms in legal procedures and the justice system, serves as an important chapter in legal history.

The case of Whitmore played a pivotal role in sparking changes that have had far-reaching consequences. It not only aided in the movement towards suspending the death penalty in New York but also influenced the landmark Supreme Court Miranda rul ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Whitmore's wrongful conviction helped lead to reforms such as Miranda rights and death penalty abolition in New York

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Whitmore's case led to reforms such as the establishment of Miranda rights, ensuring suspects have the right to consult with an attorney. Additionally, it played a role in the abolition of the death penalty in New York. These changes had a significant impact on legal procedures and the justice system, influencing how criminal cases are handled in the United States.
  • The Miranda ruling in 1966 established that criminal suspects must be informed of their rights before police interrogation, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court aimed to protect individuals from self-incrimination and ensure fair treatment during the legal process ...

Counterarguments

  • While Whitmore's case may have contributed to legal reforms, it was not the sole factor leading to the establishment of Miranda rights or the abolition of the death penalty in New York; other cases and societal factors also played significant roles.
  • The causal link between Whitmore's wrongful conviction and these legal reforms could be seen as correlative rather than causative; legal reforms often result from a broader context of multiple cases and evolving legal thought.
  • The text implies a direct influence of Whitmore's case on the Miranda ruling, but the Supreme Court decision was based on a different case (Miranda v. Arizona); Whitmore's case might have been part of the zeitgeist but was not the legal precedent for the ruling.
  • The abolition of the death penalty in New York cannot be attributed to a single case; it was the result of a complex interplay of political, legal, and moral arguments that extended beyond Whitmore's experience.
  • The statement that Whitmore's case "changed the course of legal proceedings in the United States" could be seen as an overstatement, as legal proceedings are influenced by a multitude of ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA