Podcasts > Morbid > Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

By Morbid Network | Wondery

Dive into the enigmatic case of George Saxton's murder in Canton, Ohio, with "Morbid" hosts Ash Kelley and Alaina Urquhart. The episode delves into the troubled relationship between Saxton and Annie George, a romance that ended tumultuously with public disputes and litigation. Annie's intense focus on her former lover, which resulted in her engaging in lawsuits and public confrontations, paints a picture of a woman driven more by heartbreak than hatred, earning her the community's empathy amidst her alarming behavior.

In a twist of fate, when Saxton is found murdered, suspicion turns toward Annie, due primarily to her prior threats and some incriminating, yet circumstantial, pieces of evidence. The subsequent trial becomes a polarizing affair, with the defense and prosecution painting vastly different portraits of both the victim's morals and Annie's potential for murder. "Morbid" gives listeners a detailed account of a trial that shook a community, where Annie's acquittal leaves more questions than answers, especially after conflicting testimonies emerge post-trial. Join the journey through this tangled web of emotion, law, and enduring mystery in this episode of "Morbid."

Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 22, 2024 episode of the Morbid

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

1-Page Summary

The murder of George Saxton

George Saxton's murder in Canton, Ohio, was marked by his fraught relationship with Annie George—their breakup had led to a series of confrontations and legal issues. Despite their split, Annie became fixated on Saxton, resorting to public confrontations and multiple lawsuits against him and her ex-husband Sample George for alienation of affection and breach of promise. Although her behavior was seen as obsessive, the public sympathized with her, viewing her actions as driven by emotion rather than malicious intent.

Murder of George Saxton

Saxton was fatally shot and circumstances pointed towards Annie because of her known threats against his life. Witnesses spotted a figure presumed to be a woman acting suspiciously at the scene. Despite these observations, police had no solid evidence, and Annie's arrest was based on circumstantial evidence, such as a discoloration on her hand and burrs on her dress matching the crime scene. The defense argued that Saxton could have been killed by a man disguised as a woman, adding to the public doubt regarding Annie's guilt.

Trial and acquittal of Annie George

The trial of Annie George was influenced by the community's mixed opinions of George Saxton's character, viewed by some as justification for his murder. The prosecution argued Annie's guilt based on her history, threats, and circumstantial evidence. The defense focused on Saxton's mistreatment of Annie, suggesting her threats were due to emotional distress. Despite Annie's acquittal, additional witnesses later claimed they saw her commit the murder. However, due to double jeopardy, she could not be retried, leaving her legally absolved of the crime.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Annie was suspected in George Saxton's murder due to her history of making threats against his life. These threats, combined with witnesses seeing a suspicious figure at the crime scene believed to be a woman, led to suspicion falling on Annie. However, the lack of concrete evidence made the case against her primarily circumstantial. The prosecution used these threats as part of their argument to establish Annie's motive for the crime.
  • The defense's argument that Saxton could have been killed by a man disguised as a woman suggests that someone other than Annie George might have been responsible for the murder. This theory aimed to create doubt about Annie's involvement by proposing an alternative scenario where the perpetrator could have disguised themselves to mislead witnesses. It was a strategy to challenge the prosecution's case and raise questions about the evidence pointing towards Annie as the suspect. This argument added complexity to the trial by introducing the possibility of a different perpetrator with a different motive.
  • Double jeopardy is a legal principle that prevents a person from being tried for the same crime after being acquitted. Once a person has been acquitted of a crime, they cannot be retried for that same offense, even if new evidence emerges. This principle is designed to protect individuals from being subjected to multiple prosecutions for the same alleged conduct. Double jeopardy ensures that once a person has been found not guilty of a crime, they cannot be tried again for that specific offense.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

The murder of George Saxton

The tale of George Saxton's murder unfolds against a backdrop of his turbulent relationship with Annie George, whose obsession after their breakup led to a series of confrontations, legal battles, and public outcries that rattled the community of Canton, Ohio.

Annie George's obsession with George Saxton after their affair and breakup

Annie stalking and threatening George

Despite their split, Annie George remained resolutely committed to winning George Saxton back, going as far as standing outside his residence, screaming for him to return to her, and hurling obscenities about his new partner, Eva Outhouse. The community became aware of the toxic nature of the relationship after the breakup, and Annie was known to make threats against George's life. Her obsession took the form of stalking, with Annie accosting Saxton publicly, beseeching him to return to her, and waiting for him outside his block and even his room.

Multiple lawsuits between George, Annie, and Annie's ex-husband Sample George

Annie's refusal to let go led her to show up outside George's residence and his new partner's home, stalking them, and causing public scenes. Her behavior escalated to alarming levels, demonstrated by waiting for George near Eva's house, pleading with him not to enter or standing outside for hours, flipping between pleading cries and hurling abuse at Eva. In the legal arena, multiple lawsuits ensued, including one where Sample George, Annie's estranged husband, filed a $30,000 lawsuit against George Saxton for alienation of affection. Annie herself filed her own breach of promise suit against George, demanding $50,000, though it was thrown out of court, only for her to immediately refile it.

Annie’s legal pressure on George suggested an obsession rather than legitimate legal complaints. George was concurrently fighting a lawsuit Sample George had taken to the Supreme Court. The legal battles were not just about the relationship but also included allegations of stolen belongings, forcing George to defend himself on multip ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The murder of George Saxton

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • During the time period discussed in the text, societal attitudes towards stalking, mental illness, and legal disputes were often less informed and understanding compared to contemporary perspectives. Stalking behaviors were sometimes dismissed as overzealous or romantic gestures rather than serious threats. Mental illness was frequently stigmatized, leading to misunderstandings and lack of appropriate support for individuals like Annie George. Legal disputes, especially those involving personal relationships, were often seen as private matters rather than issues that could have broader implications for the individuals involved.
  • The community in Canton, Ohio, reacted to the events surrounding George Saxton and Annie George with a mix of curiosity, gossip, and limited understanding of stalking and mental health issues. Despite the public scenes and l ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

Murder of George Saxton

The murder of George Saxton and the doubts over Annie's guilt involve tangled relations and an array of evidence that drew sustained public intrigue.

Evidence and doubts over Annie's guilt

Circumstantial evidence points to Annie

George Saxton, fatally shot on his way to his girlfriend's house, was believed to be targeted due to his fraught relationship with Annie. Witnesses described a figure in dark clothing, presumed to be a woman, who leaned down to Saxton after the shooting, grabbed his arm, and fired additional shots before fleeing. At the scene, there were no obvious signs of violence aside from the gunshot wounds, and Saxton’s satchel was found nearby with its contents scattered.

Annie's reputation for making threats against Saxton's life became a focus of the investigation. She had publicly assaulted him and had been heard shouting at him about not entering a house with his girlfriend. In the aftermath of Saxton’s murder, the public instantly suspected Annie, and she was arrested at Cora Oberlin’s rooming house after being found at Florence Klinger’s home roughly half an hour after the shooting.

Annie was seen calm and unagitated while walking through town, in contrast with her usual demeanor. After her arrest, police noticed a discoloration on Annie's hand resembling gunpowder residue, and the right side of her dress had burrs matching those at the crime scene. Her previous visit to Chicago where she purchased a .38 caliber revolver, which she allegedly planned to use on Saxton after a legal case with a person named Sample George, was also disclosed by the prosecution.

Significant public doubts that Annie would be convicted

Despite these allegations, the prosecution had little physical evidence and no eyewitnesses to directly place Annie at the scene with a gun. They relied heavily on circumstantial elements such as Annie’s threats, her physical assault on Saxton, and ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Murder of George Saxton

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Annie's fraught relationship with George Saxton was characterized by conflict and tension, stemming from reported threats, public altercations, and personal animosity. Their interactions were marked by instances of violence and verbal confrontations, leading to a strained and contentious dynamic between the two individuals. Annie's actions and behavior towards Saxton, including public assaults and confrontations, contributed to the perception of a troubled and turbulent relationship. The complexities of their association, including legal disputes and personal vendettas, added layers of complexity to their already strained connection.
  • Annie had a history of publicly threatening George Saxton's life, which became a focal point in the investigation following his murder. Witnesses and acquaintances attested to her aggressive behavior towards Saxton, including physical assaults and verbal confrontations, indicating a strained relationship between the two. These threats and confrontations contributed to the suspicion surrounding Annie after Saxton's death, shaping public perception and the direction of the case.
  • Annie's purchase of a .38 caliber revolver in Chicago was a significant detail in the case as it was revealed that she had bought the firearm prior to the murder of George Saxton. This purchase raised suspicions about her intentions and potential involvement in the crime, as it suggested premeditation. The prosecution used this information to support their argument that Annie had planned to harm Saxton. The revolver purchase added a layer of complexity to the case, indicating a possible motive for the crime.
  • The prosecution's reliance on circumstantial evidence means they are using indirect clues to suggest Annie's guilt, such as her threats towards the victim and physical evidence linking her to the crime scene, instead of direct proof like eyewitnesses or a confession. This type of evidence builds a case based on inference and deduction rather than explicit proof of guilt. It requires the jury to draw conclusions based on the circumstances surrounding the crime rather than direct observation of the crime itself. In this case, the prosecution lacked concrete physical evidence directly connecting Annie to the murder but aimed to convince the jury of her guilt through the accumulation of circumstantial details.
  • Attorney James Rice's defense proposing that a man in disguise committed the murder of George Saxton was a legal strategy aimed at creating doubt about Annie's involvement in the crime. Rice suggested that the physical evidence lin ...

Counterarguments

  • Circumstantial evidence may not be sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The figure in dark clothing presumed to be a woman could have been misidentified by witnesses.
  • Making threats does not necessarily equate to committing a crime.
  • Being calm and unagitated is not an unequivocal indicator of guilt or innocence.
  • Gunpowder residue on Annie's hand could have come from sources other than firing a weapon at Saxton.
  • Burrs on clothing can be picked up in various locations and may not be unique to the crime scene.
  • Owning a firearm is not direct evidence of having used it in a crime.
  • The absence of physical evidence and eyewitnesses directly placin ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 540: Anna George and the Murder of George Saxton

Trial and acquittal of Annie George

Annie George’s trial was a complex weave of public sentiment, character judgments, and circumstantial evidence, culminating in an acquittal that was later called into question by a surprise eyewitness account.

Mixed public opinions on George's character affect the trial

Public opinions played a significant role in the trial of Annie George, affecting the sentiment around the case. The local press, mindful of their reputation, exercised restraint in reporting Annie’s accusations against George Saxton. The report implied that George Saxton’s less than honorable departure from Annie influenced the public to empathize less with his murder. Saxton was widely regarded as someone most people only pretended to respect, and an individual who was not genuinely liked within the community. A journalist wrote that Canton residents were glad of Saxton's demise, labeling him a home wrecker. This social bias affected the jury's perceptions, as George's history with women was considered by some as a justification for the shooting.

Prosecution argues Annie's guilt based on history, threats, and circumstantial evidence

The prosecution presented a scenario in which Annie, overcome with indignation and jealousy, shot George Saxton multiple times outside the home of another woman. They based their argument on circumstantial evidence, which included powder on Annie’s hands and her previous threats towards Saxton.

Defense highlights George's treatment of Annie to justify her threats and behavior

The defense, spearheaded by attorney John Welty, did not dissuade the circulation of rumors about George Saxton’s character, using these innuendos to build a case that justified Annie's actions. Welty detailed the turbulent legal history between Saxton and Annie, including Saxton’s failure to marry Annie after a promise, seduction, and deception. The defense claimed that the threats she had made were outbursts of passion resulting from Saxton’s abandonment, painting the picture of a woman pushed to the brink by a man who was cruel and abusive. They firmly stood by the notion that threats alone did not constitute evidence for murder, focusing instead on Saxton's reputation as a self-centered playboy ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Trial and acquittal of Annie George

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The trial of Annie George involved her being accused of shooting George Saxton multiple times. The prosecution argued she was motivated by indignation and jealousy, presenting circumstantial evidence like powder on her hands and previous threats towards Saxton. The defense portrayed George as a victim of Saxton's mistreatment, justifying her actions as a response to his abandonment and deception. Despite being acquitted initially, new eyewitness testimonies emerged later, suggesting her guilt, but the legal system could not reopen the case due to double jeopardy protections.
  • Annie George and George Saxton had a complex relationship marked by promises of marriage, seduction, and deception. George Saxton's failure to fulfill his promise to marry Annie, coupled with his reputation as a self-centered playboy, contributed to the tension between them. The defense argued that Annie's threats and actions were reactions to Saxton's mistreatment and abandonment. This history of tumultuous interactions between Annie and Saxton was a central point in the trial's narrative.
  • Annie George was acquitted despite new eyewitness evidence due to legal constraints preventing the reo ...

Counterarguments

  • Public sentiment should not influence the outcome of a trial, as justice should be based on evidence and the rule of law rather than public opinion.
  • The restraint exercised by the local press could be seen as responsible journalism, ensuring that reporting does not interfere with the right to a fair trial.
  • Regardless of George Saxton's character or likability, his murder is a separate legal issue that should be addressed independently of public sentiment.
  • Being glad about someone's demise and labeling them negatively does not provide legal justification for murder and should not influence a jury's decision.
  • The jury's perceptions should be based solely on the evidence presented in court, not on social biases or justifications for the crime.
  • Circumstantial evidence can be compelling and should not be dismissed outright, as it can contribute to a broader understanding of the case when corroborated by other facts.
  • Rumors about a victim's character should not be used to justify criminal actions, as the focus should be on the defendant's behavior and the legality of their actions.
  • While the turbulent legal history between Saxton and Annie may provide context, it does not legally justify threats or violent behavior.
  • Outbursts of passion can explain behavior but do not excuse criminal acts, and the legal system must differentiate between understanding motives and condoning actions.
  • An eyewitness account coming forward after a trial could be subject to scruti ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA