In this episode of Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin, host Nicole Lapin and guest Ed Elson examine the current state of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and their impact on retail investors. They analyze recent high-profile IPOs that haven't met expectations and discuss how the practice of underpricing IPOs tends to benefit insiders and institutions rather than individual investors.
The conversation explores how successful companies now stay private longer, affecting wealth-building opportunities for average investors. Elson and Lapin examine how this trend, combined with current economic conditions, creates unique challenges for younger generations. They discuss how factors such as high stock market valuations, rising housing costs, and increasing college expenses impact the ability of young investors to build wealth compared to previous generations.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Nicole Lapin and Ed Elson discuss concerns about recent high-profile IPOs, highlighting that many haven't met investor expectations. Companies like Circle, Coreweave, and Chime face significant business challenges post-listing. Elson suggests that many IPOs are deliberately underpriced to create hype, benefiting insiders and institutions rather than supporting sustainable growth.
While Lapin shares success stories of retail investors profiting from early IPO entry, Elson points out that regular investors often receive minimal opportunities compared to institutional investors. He uses Airbnb as an example, where insiders bought at $60 before the surge, while retail investors faced higher entry prices.
The trend of successful companies staying private longer is significantly affecting retail investors' opportunities. Elson notes that transformative companies like OpenAI, ByteDance, and SpaceX are choosing to raise funds through venture capital instead of going public. Unlike past tech giants such as Apple and Microsoft, today's companies often reach massive valuations while private, with OpenAI reportedly valued at $300 billion before any public offering.
Lapin and Elson discuss how this privatization of wealth creation, combined with accredited investor requirements, restricts average retail investors from participating in early-stage investments, thereby widening the wealth gap.
Elson expresses serious concerns about recent legislation that could add three to five trillion dollars to the deficit over the next decade. He argues that this bill, along with tax cuts for the wealthy, effectively shifts the debt burden onto younger generations.
The economic landscape presents unprecedented challenges for young investors, according to Elson. He points out that unlike previous generations who enjoyed more favorable conditions, today's young investors face high stock market valuations and housing costs that far exceed traditional income ratios. The average age of homeowners has risen to 50, while college costs have increased from 13% to 42% of annual income, creating significant barriers to wealth accumulation for younger generations.
1-Page Summary
The IPO market is buzzing with activity, but Nicole Lapin and Ed Elson express concerns about the actual value and long-term sustainability of recent high-profile listings.
Recent IPOs have not lived up to the hype, stirring debate over their value creation and prospects.
Nicole Lapin and Ed Elson note 2025 as a significant year for IPOs, with high expectations. Companies like Circle, Coreweave, and Chime have faced issues post-listing. Circle, largely dependent on the stability of US treasuries, is not seen as an exciting prospect. Coreweave, an AI company tied to Nvidia, might struggle as a standalone company. Similarly, Klarna is dealing with rising losses due to defaults, mirroring concerns of traditional credit card companies.
The hosts are skeptical about the long-term value of recent IPOs. Elson questions whether offerings meet the high standards of tech giants like Google and Apple. He suggests that IPOs might be underpriced to create a buzz, which benefits insiders and institutions. Post-IPO, stocks like Airbnb dropped from their initial price, highlighting that gains may be based more on hype than sustainable growth.
Retail investors have a place in the IPO market, but they're up against various hurdles and disproportionate gains.
Lapin shares her achievements with IPO investments, such as CoreWeave and Reddit, attributing her gains to early entry. However, Elson points out that while insiders often benefit from substantial short-term profits, regular investors seem to receive the "scraps" after institutional allocations.
Ipo Market Overview: Recent High-Profile Listings
The conversation with Ed Elson and Nicole Lapin centers on how the growing trend of companies staying private longer affects ordinary investors and widens the wealth gap.
Elson argues that many valuable companies are opting to stay private longer, thus denying retail investors a chance to invest.
He expresses his desire to invest in high-quality, transformative companies like Stripe, OpenAI, ByteDance, and SpaceX. These companies have not gone public, instead raising funds through venture capital, limiting opportunities for retail investors like him to participate in their growth.
The trend of successful companies like OpenAI and ByteDance staying private and resorting to venture capital excludes regular investors from the investing process. This trend restricts the options retail investors have when seeking long-term wealth through transformative companies.
The privatization of wealth creation, as Lapin points out, may leave loopholes for retail investors through secondary platforms. However, Elson criticizes the legal framework, which requires individuals to be accredited investors to participate in these private investments, arguing that this unfairly excludes average retail investors.
Elson notes that companies now reach high valuations like OpenAI's reported $300 billion while still private, meaning most growth takes place before the public can invest, which ...
Impact of Longer Private Status on Retail Investors
Ed Elson voices deep concerns regarding the economic future of young investors in light of recent government policies and the challenging economic climate.
Elson expresses unease over the "big beautiful bill," which he implies could have long-term negative implications for younger generations. He indicates that the legislation will add three to five trillion dollars in deficits over the next decade, resulting in increased national debt service, expected to grow significantly by 2034. This situation, exacerbated by tax cuts for the wealthy, shifts the debt repayment burden onto the younger population, making them subsidize the lifestyles of older generations.
Elson criticizes the same bill, pointing out that its impacts will include a wealth shift from the young to the older population, thereby hindering the financial security of younger generations. He warns of the immediate adverse effects on poorer individuals through the cutting of Medicaid and SNAP benefits, along with long-term challenges posed by sustained fiscal policies that neglect to balance spending with adequate revenue, essentially passing the deficit to the young.
The economic landscape presents formidable barriers to wealth accumulation for the younger generations today, Elson remarks. He contrasts the present situation with that of previous generations, noting high stock market va ...
Government Policies and Economic Factors in Young Investors' Wealth-Building Opportunities
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser