In this episode of the Money Rehab podcast, tariffs take center stage as Nicole Lapin and James Altucher delve into the history, implications, and potential impacts of increased tariffs on the US economy. They explore how tariffs, once a primary source of federal revenue, have played a pivotal role throughout US history, with cautionary tales like the Smoot-Hawley Tariff illustrating the risks of stringent protectionist policies.
The episode examines the intricate effects of tariffs on inflation, the stock market, and overall economic growth. Altucher and Lapin also analyze how tariffs could reshape US manufacturing and job prospects, assessing whether potential job gains from relocating production could be mitigated by increased automation and AI adoption. Overall, the episode unpacks the complex ramifications of tariffs, shedding light on their potential strategic benefits and drawbacks.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Tariffs were the primary source of federal revenue from the founding of the US until 1913, accounting for 97% of revenues. As James Altucher notes, this period coincided with the industrial revolution and the US becoming an economic powerhouse.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1929 set astronomically high import duties up to 60%. Initially aimed at protecting American industries, these tariffs backfired, prompting retaliatory tariffs from other countries. This strained international trade and contributed to the Great Depression, demonstrating the wide-reaching consequences of stringent protectionist trade policies.
Altucher argues tariffs have not historically led to inflation, as prices adjust elsewhere in the economy to offset the impact. He contends overall inflation stems from excess money printing and supply chain issues, not tariffs.
Nicole Lapin highlights how the stock market experienced significant declines in response to new "Liberation Day tariffs," worrying about impacts on company profits and economic growth. Altucher notes major indices like the S&P 500 fell 5%.
While uncertain about tariffs' effects, Altucher suggests potential benefits like leverage in trade negotiations, increased revenue, and moving manufacturing to the US. However, there are risks of recession, though likely not as severe as post-Smoot-Hawley.
Lapin and Altucher state tariffs incentivize companies to relocate manufacturing to the US, boosting American industry and creating jobs. Signs include major investments by Apple, Intel, and others to build US factories and avoid tariffs.
However, increased automation and robotics investment could offset anticipated manufacturing job growth. As Altucher notes, companies may turn to AI and robots over human workers to cut costs, potentially reducing job opportunities from manufacturing relocation.
1-Page Summary
The United States' use of tariffs has a long and significant history, which has had profound impacts on its economy and on international trade.
Tariffs have played a crucial role in the funding of the federal government. In the years following the founding of the country up until 1913, tariffs on imported goods were the primary source of federal revenue, accounting for a staggering 97% of the United States' revenues. This period also coincided with the United States experiencing the industrial revolution and ascending to become one of the world's largest economies.
The reliance on tariffs significantly declined once the federal income tax was instituted as the main funding source. This shift allowed revenue to be raised in a manner less reliant on trade dynamics and facilitated more complex economic policy development.
The most notable and historically significant use of tariffs in the United States is personified by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Passed by Congress in 1929, these tariffs set duty rates for imports at astronomically high levels, some rising to 60%.
Implement ...
Tariff History and Precedents in the US
James Altucher and Nicole Lapin explore how tariffs contribute to various economic factors, from consumer prices and stock market fluctuations to trade negotiations and overall economic health.
Altucher insists that historically tariffs have not led to inflation, presenting evidence from different periods, including before 2018, as well as the early United States, when tariffs were a primary federal revenue source with no inflation. He contends that overall inflation does not happen solely because of tariffs. Rather, prices adjust elsewhere in the economy, offsetting the impact of tariffs on certain goods. He associates overall inflation with the printing of excess money rather than tariffs, citing the hyperinflation in 1920s Germany and the U.S. printing 40% of its money during early pandemic bailouts.
"Inflation stems from money printing and supply chain issues, not tariffs," he states. Altucher points to the inflation rate of 9% in 2022 as a direct result of extensive money printing, whereas tariffs, according to him, have historically not contributed significantly to inflationary pressures.
Nicole Lapin describes a significant downturn in the stock market in response to "Liberation Day tariffs," detailing that the market had its worst day since 2020. Altucher comments on major indices like the S&P 500 experiencing a notable 5% drop, which wiped out many of the gains from the previous four years. This negative sentiment is attributed to the worry about the impact of a potential trade war on company profits and economic growth. Furthermore, economists are weighing in on the possible repercussions of the new reciprocal tariffs.
"The stock market is clearly worried," Altucher observes, explaining that the declines reflect concerns over increased tariffs planned for goods from China, the EU, and Taiwan.
Altucher argues that while there is uncertainty related to "all the tariff stuff," it may not be the inflation trigger that some anticipate and could instead provide the U.S. wit ...
Tariffs' Impact on Inflation, Stocks, and Economy
Tariffs implemented on foreign goods have become a topic of discussion regarding their influence on the US manufacturing landscape and job market.
Nicole Lapin and Altucher highlight that one of the anticipated effects of tariffs is to incentivize companies to relocate manufacturing back to the US. This relocation could potentially benefit the middle class and boost American industry by creating new jobs. Indeed, there are signs that this is happening, as seen by Apple's announcement of a $500 billion investment into US factories and Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor's plans to invest $200 billion in technology facilities within the US to avoid tariffs.
This investment is expected to aid the creation of jobs in the US, as evidenced by the estimated addition of 30,000 new auto worker jobs as a consequence of tariffs on cars from Asia.
However, despite the impetus to move manufacturing to the US, concerns arise over whether there is a sufficiently skilled workforce and whether the pace of technology can support the rebuilding of domestic manufacturing.
The presumed job creation from the migration of manufacturing due to tariffs may be countered by the increasing investment in automation and robotics.
With the threat of deportations and loss of workforces, companies may turn to robotics and AI to cut costs and increase efficiency. Robotics companies are enhancing their inv ...
Impact of Tariffs on US Manufacturing and Jobs
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser