Podcasts > Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin > Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

By Money News Network

In this episode of Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin, the podcast explores an economic theory gaining traction — Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). MMT argues that rather than primarily borrowing money or raising taxes, the government can directly create new money for spending without facing the same constraints as household budgets.

The discussion contrasts MMT's approach of "printing money" with conventional economics' emphasis on debt-funded government spending. Both perspectives acknowledge the risks of excessive money creation, such as hyperinflation. However, they differ in proposed solutions, with MMT advocating controlled money creation to drive economic growth and employment.

Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 19, 2024 episode of the Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

1-Page Summary

The US Monetary System

The US government prints physical currency through the Department of Treasury, and the Federal Reserve digitally creates new money by purchasing securities like bonds. Banks also create money indirectly through lending.

The Gold Standard Era

Previously, the US used a gold standard, where the currency's value was linked to gold reserves. This system led to issues with inflation and deflation, eventually prompting its abandonment for the modern fiat currency backed by government creditworthiness.

Conventional Economic Thinking

Conventional economics often views government spending and debt like a household budget, suggesting the government should avoid debt and balance its budget. This perspective favors borrowing money over printing to fund spending.

Modern Monetary Theory

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) argues the government can create money as needed without primarily relying on borrowing or taxes. MMT sees government debt as money spent into the economy, not a debt burden like household debt.

MMT acknowledges excessive money printing risks inflation but believes this can be managed rather than avoided entirely through controlled money creation - contrasting with conventional economics' preference for debt-funded spending.

Inflation Risks

Both conventional economics and MMT agree hyperinflation (over 50% monthly price increases) is a serious problem to avoid. However, as Sanger-Katz notes, they differ on proposed solutions: Conventional economics favors debt-funded spending, while MMT supports controlled money creation for growth and employment.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Banks create money indirectly through lending by using a fractional reserve system. This system requires banks to hold only a fraction of their deposit liabilities as reserves. When a bank receives a deposit, it can lend out a portion of that deposit, effectively creating new money in the form of loans. This process allows banks to expand the money supply beyond the actual physical currency in circulation. By lending out more than they hold in reserves, banks play a crucial role in the creation of money within the economy.
  • Fiat currency backed by government creditworthiness means that the value of the currency is not tied to a physical commodity like gold but is based on the trust and confidence in the government's ability to maintain its value. This system relies on the government's stability, economic policies, and overall creditworthiness to support the value of the currency in circulation. It allows for more flexibility in monetary policy as the government can adjust the money supply based on economic needs without being constrained by a fixed commodity standard. This concept underpins most modern economies where the value of money is derived from the faith in the issuing government rather than a tangible asset.
  • In the context of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), government debt is viewed differently from household debt. MMT sees government debt as money spent into the economy, not a burden like household debt. This perspective stems from the government's unique ability to create money and manage its debt through policies like controlled money creation. Unlike households, governments can influence their debt levels and spending in ways that households cannot.
  • Controlled money creation involves a strategic approach by the government to manage the money supply in a way that supports economic growth without causing excessive inflation. This method focuses on regulating the amount of money entering the economy to maintain stable prices and economic stability. On the other hand, excessive money printing involves indiscriminate and uncontrolled creation of money, which can lead to rapid inflation and economic instability if not managed carefully. The distinction lies in the careful management and purposeful control of money creation to achieve specific economic goals while avoiding the negative consequences of unchecked inflation.
  • In conventional economics, the approach to avoiding hyperinflation typically involves controlling government spending by relying on borrowing to fund expenditures. On the other hand, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) suggests that controlled money creation can be used to manage inflation risks while supporting economic growth and employment. This difference in strategy reflects contrasting views on the role of government debt and money creation in the economy.

Counterarguments

  • The assertion that the US government prints physical currency through the Department of Treasury is slightly misleading; it is the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, a bureau of the Department of the Treasury, that actually prints currency.
  • While the Federal Reserve does create digital money, some argue that this process can lead to asset bubbles and wealth inequality.
  • The idea that banks create money through lending is a simplification; they actually create credit, which can increase the money supply but is contingent on borrowers' willingness to take loans and banks' willingness to lend.
  • Linking the gold standard solely to issues with inflation and deflation may overlook other factors, such as the impact of global gold supply and demand.
  • The abandonment of the gold standard for fiat currency is sometimes criticized for removing a natural check on government spending and monetary expansion.
  • Viewing government spending and debt like a household budget is criticized for not fully accounting for a government's ability to tax and create currency, which households cannot do.
  • The suggestion that the government should avoid debt and balance its budget may not consider the potential benefits of strategic deficit spending, especially during economic downturns.
  • The preference for borrowing over printing money to fund spending does not consider the potential for low-interest rates, which can make borrowing more sustainable.
  • MMT's argument that the government can create money as needed is criticized for potentially underestimating the risk of inflation and the challenge of reversing money creation when necessary.
  • MMT's view of government debt differs from the concern that high levels of debt could lead to higher interest rates and crowd out private investment.
  • The belief that inflation can be managed through controlled money creation is debated, with some economists arguing that it is difficult to control inflation once expectations change.
  • The agreement on avoiding hyperinflation does not address the potential negative effects of even moderate inflation, especially on savers and those on fixed incomes.
  • The favoring of debt-funded spending by conventional economics is sometimes criticized for not considering the potential for fiscal policy to be more effective than monetary policy in certain situations.
  • MMT's support for controlled money creation for growth and employment is challenged by those who believe that such policies could lead to a loss of fiscal discipline and long-term economic instability.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

The history and current state of the US monetary system

The US monetary system has evolved significantly over time, from gold-backed currency to the current fiat money system managed by the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve.

The US government prints its own money through the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve

The Department of Treasury is responsible for printing the actual physical currency, whereas the Federal Reserve participates in the digital creation of money.

The Federal Reserve creates new money by buying securities like bonds and paying for them with newly created dollars

The Federal Reserve generates new money in the economy by purchasing securities such as government bonds. It pays for these purchases with newly created dollars, which are introduced into the financial system.

Banks also create money by lending out the funds they hold in reserve

Additionally, money is indirectly created through the banking system. When banks lend out funds they hold in reserve, this facilitates the creation of new money within the economy.

The US previously used a gold standard to back its currency, but this system had significant drawbacks

Historically, the US dollar was backed by gold. This gold standard meant that the country's currency value was directly linked to the amount of gold held in reserves.

Basing the currency on a limited supply of physical gold led to issues with inflation and deflation

Using gold as a standard could lead to inflation, when too much gold flooded the market, or deflation, if the economy grew while the amount of gol ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The history and current state of the US monetary system

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Fiat money is currency declared legal tender by a government, not backed by a physical commodity like gold. Its value comes from trust in the government's stability and the economy. Unlike commodity money, which has intrinsic value, fiat money's worth is based on societal agreement. This system replaced the gold standard, allowing for more flexibility in managing the money supply.
  • The Federal Reserve creates money digitally by conducting open market operations, where it buys securities like government bonds. This process involves the Federal Reserve increasing the reserves of banks by crediting their accounts with additional funds. By injecting these funds into the banking system, the Federal Reserve aims to influence interest rates and overall economic activity. This digital creation of money is a key tool used by central banks to manage monetary policy and regulate the money supply in the economy.
  • A security, like bonds, is a type of tradable financial asset that represents ownership or debt. Bonds are essentially loans that investors give to entities like governments or corporations in exchange for regular interest payments. When the Federal Reserve buys securities like bonds, it injects new money into the economy. This process is a key tool used by central banks to manage economic conditions.
  • When banks lend out funds they hold in reserve, they are able to create new money through the process of fractional reserve banking. This means that banks are legally allowed to lend out a portion of the deposits they receive, effectively increasing the money supply in the economy. This practice is regulated by central banks to ensure stability in the financial system. By expanding credit through lending, banks play a crucial role in the creation and circulation of money within the economy.
  • The gold standard was a monetary system where the value of a country's currency was directly linked to a specific amount of gold held in reserves. This system was used internationally for periods in history but was eventually abandoned due to its limitations, such as causing economic volatility and re ...

Counterarguments

  • The Federal Reserve's role in creating money is more complex than just buying securities; it also involves setting monetary policy and interest rates which can influence money supply indirectly.
  • The assertion that banks create money by lending out reserves is an oversimplification; the money multiplier effect in modern banking is not a direct one-to-one process due to regulations and the behavior of depositors and borrowers.
  • The gold standard did not inherently cause inflation and deflation; these phenomena can occur under any monetary system and are influenced by a variety of factors including monetary policy, economic growth, and international trade.
  • The transition from the gold standard to fiat currency has not been without criticism; some argue that fiat money lacks intrinsic value and can lead to long-term devaluation of currency due to inflation.
  • The idea that fiat currency is back ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

The conventional economic view on government spending and debt

According to conventional economic wisdom, the approach the government should take towards spending and borrowing is often compared to a household's financial management.

Traditional economic thinking sees the government like a household that should balance its budget and avoid debt

Under this traditional perspective, the national debt—which currently exceeds $35 trillion—is viewed with apprehension, suggesting that a high level of debt is unsustainable and problematic.

Conventional wisdom suggests the government should borrow mon ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The conventional economic view on government spending and debt

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The comparison of government spending to a household's financial management is a simplified analogy often used to explain complex economic concepts to the general public. It suggests that, like a household, the government should manage its finances prudently by balancing its budget and avoiding excessive debt. However, this analogy has limitations as governments have unique abilities, such as issuing currency and influencing interest rates, that households do not possess. Therefore, while the comparison can be helpful in illustrating basic principles, it does not fully capture the complexities of government economic policy.
  • The apprehension towards the national debt exceeding $35 trillion stems from concerns about the sustainability of such a high level of debt and its potential impact on the economy, including issues like interest payments, future tax burdens, and constraints on government spending.
  • Printing money can lead to inflation by increasing the money supply without a corresponding incre ...

Counterarguments

  • The government is not like a household because it can issue its own currency and has the power to tax and regulate the economy.
  • High levels of debt may be sustainable if the economy grows at a rate that outpaces the cost of the debt.
  • Government debt can be seen as an investment in the future, funding infrastructure, education, and other programs that can boost long-term economic growth.
  • Some economists argue that in times of economic downturn, increased government spending is necessary to stimulate demand and prevent recessions.
  • Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) suggests that a government that issues its own currency can never "run out of money" like a household can, and should not be constrained by the same budgetary limitations.
  • Borrowing money can also lead to inflation if it overheats the economy, and in some cases, carefully controlled printing of money may not be infla ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

The modern monetary theory (MMT) perspective on government spending and debt

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) offers an unconventional view on fiscal policy and government spending, providing insights into the nature of government debt and the creation of money.

MMT argues that the government is not like a household and can create money as needed rather than relying on borrowing and taxes

The podcast explains that MMT separates itself from conventional economic thought by denying the comparison between a government's budget and that of a household. Unlike households, which cannot issue their own currency, MMT posits that the US government has the unique ability to print money to fund its expenditures without the necessity to rely solely on borrowing or taxes.

MMT believes government debt is not an issue, as every dollar of debt represents money the government has spent

MMT theorists argue that government debt is not analogous to household debt because it doesn’t carry the same risks or limitations. According to MMT, each dollar of government debt symbolizes a dollar that has been expended into the economy but has not been taxed back. In this sense, government debt is seen as a credit to the public, suggesting that the level of debt is not inherently problematic.

MMT agrees that printing too much money can lead to inflat ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The modern monetary theory (MMT) perspective on government spending and debt

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) challenges traditional views on fiscal policy by emphasizing that governments, unlike households, can create money to fund spending. MMT argues that government debt is not necessarily harmful, as it represents money injected into the economy. MMT acknowledges that excessive money creation can lead to inflation but suggests that proper management can control this risk.
  • In traditional economic thinking, the comparison between a government's budget and a household budget is often used to explain fiscal responsibility. However, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) challenges this analogy by emphasizing that governments, unlike households, can create money to fund their spending without the same constraints as individual households. This distinction is crucial in understanding MMT's perspective on government spending and debt.
  • The US government, unlike households, has the authority to issue its own currency through the Federal Reserve. This power allows the government to create money by authorizing the central bank to increase the money supply. This ability is a fundamental aspect of monetary policy and is used to manage the economy, especially during times of economic stress. The process of money creation involves the government spending money into the economy through various channels, such as government programs, infrastructure projects, and payments to individuals and businesses.
  • In the context of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), government debt is viewed differently from household debt because the government has the power to issue its own currency. Unlike households, governments can create money to fund their spending, which changes the dynamics of debt accumulation and repayment. This distinction means that government debt doesn't carry the same risks or constraints as household debt, as the government can manage its debt in ways that households cannot. This perspective challenges the traditional notion that all forms of debt, whether public or private, should be approached and managed in the same manner.
  • Government debt, according to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), represents money that the government has spent into the eco ...

Counterarguments

  • MMT may underestimate the potential negative impacts of inflation, especially on savings and income inequality.
  • The ability to create money does not eliminate the risk of fiscal irresponsibility, which could undermine trust in the currency.
  • Government debt may not be problematic in the MMT view, but high levels of debt could lead to higher interest rates and crowd out private investment.
  • MMT assumes that the government can always control inflation through taxation and spending cuts, which may not be politically feasible or timely enough to prevent inflation from accelerating.
  • The MMT focus on domestic monetary sovereignty may not fully account for the complexities of international trade and finance, where exchange rates and foreign investor confidence play significant roles.
  • Relying on mo ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Why Doesn't the Government Just Print More Money? Some Economists Are Arguing for More Money

The risks and challenges of inflation and hyperinflation

Inflation and hyperinflation pose significant threats to the stability of an economy, carrying with them the risk of eroding consumer purchasing power and causing economic turmoil.

Hyperinflation, defined as prices skyrocketing over 50% in a single month, has occurred in some countries due to reckless money printing

Hyperinflation occurs when there is an extremely rapid and out-of-control price increase in an economy, with prices rising by more than 50% per month. Examples of economies that have suffered hyperinflation include Germany, Ecuador, and Zimbabwe, where such staggering inflation rates were largely due to reckless fiscal policies and money printing practices.

Both conventional economics and MMT agree that hyperinflation is a serious problem that must be avoided

The need to avoid hyperinflation is a point of consensus across different economic schools of thought. Both conventional economics and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) acknowledge the severe repercussions of hyperinflation. However, they diverge significantly when it comes to their prescribed preventative measures.

The key difference is in the proposed solutions, with conventional economics favoring debt-funded spending and MMT favoring controlled money creation

Conventional econom ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The risks and challenges of inflation and hyperinflation

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hyperinflation is an extreme economic scenario characterized by a rapid and uncontrollable increase in prices. When prices rise by more than 50% in a single month, it is considered a defining threshold for hyperinflation. This level of inflation can lead to severe economic instability and challenges for individuals and businesses. Examples of countries that have experienced hyperinflation include Germany, Ecuador, and Zimbabwe.
  • Hyperinflation is an extreme economic scenario characterized by rapid and uncontrollable price increases, typically over 50% per month. Examples of countries that have experienced hyperinflation include Germany, Ecuador, and Zimbabwe. These instances were often a result of reckless fiscal policies and excessive money printing by the respective governments.
  • Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is an economic theory that suggests governments can create and spend money freely as long as there is no inflation. MMT argues that a government that issues its own currency can never run out of money and can use this power to pursue full employment and economic growth. Controlled money creation in MMT involves the government injecting money into the economy through spending on public projects and services, with the aim of stimulating demand and fostering economic activity. MMT proponents believe that by carefully managing the amount of money in circulation, inflation can be controlled without the need for traditional borrowing or taxation.
  • Controlled money creation as a solution to hyperinflation involves the governm ...

Counterarguments

  • Hyperinflation is not solely caused by money printing; it can also result from a collapse in production, loss of confidence in currency, or external debt.
  • The examples given (Germany, Ecuador, Zimbabwe) are historically and contextually different, and attributing their hyperinflation only to money printing oversimplifies complex economic situations.
  • Some economists argue that a certain level of inflation can be beneficial for economic growth, as it encourages spending and investment over hoarding money.
  • MMT does not advocate for unchecked money creation; it emphasizes the role of fiscal policy in managing inflation, not just monetary policy.
  • The assertion that conventional economics uniformly favors debt-funded spending is an oversimplification; there are various schools within conventional economics with different views on government financing.
  • The effectiveness of debt-funded spending versus money creation depends on the context, such as the state of t ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA