In this episode of Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin, the podcast explores an economic theory gaining traction — Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). MMT argues that rather than primarily borrowing money or raising taxes, the government can directly create new money for spending without facing the same constraints as household budgets.
The discussion contrasts MMT's approach of "printing money" with conventional economics' emphasis on debt-funded government spending. Both perspectives acknowledge the risks of excessive money creation, such as hyperinflation. However, they differ in proposed solutions, with MMT advocating controlled money creation to drive economic growth and employment.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The US government prints physical currency through the Department of Treasury, and the Federal Reserve digitally creates new money by purchasing securities like bonds. Banks also create money indirectly through lending.
Previously, the US used a gold standard, where the currency's value was linked to gold reserves. This system led to issues with inflation and deflation, eventually prompting its abandonment for the modern fiat currency backed by government creditworthiness.
Conventional economics often views government spending and debt like a household budget, suggesting the government should avoid debt and balance its budget. This perspective favors borrowing money over printing to fund spending.
Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) argues the government can create money as needed without primarily relying on borrowing or taxes. MMT sees government debt as money spent into the economy, not a debt burden like household debt.
MMT acknowledges excessive money printing risks inflation but believes this can be managed rather than avoided entirely through controlled money creation - contrasting with conventional economics' preference for debt-funded spending.
Both conventional economics and MMT agree hyperinflation (over 50% monthly price increases) is a serious problem to avoid. However, as Sanger-Katz notes, they differ on proposed solutions: Conventional economics favors debt-funded spending, while MMT supports controlled money creation for growth and employment.
1-Page Summary
The US monetary system has evolved significantly over time, from gold-backed currency to the current fiat money system managed by the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve.
The Department of Treasury is responsible for printing the actual physical currency, whereas the Federal Reserve participates in the digital creation of money.
The Federal Reserve generates new money in the economy by purchasing securities such as government bonds. It pays for these purchases with newly created dollars, which are introduced into the financial system.
Additionally, money is indirectly created through the banking system. When banks lend out funds they hold in reserve, this facilitates the creation of new money within the economy.
Historically, the US dollar was backed by gold. This gold standard meant that the country's currency value was directly linked to the amount of gold held in reserves.
Using gold as a standard could lead to inflation, when too much gold flooded the market, or deflation, if the economy grew while the amount of gol ...
The history and current state of the US monetary system
According to conventional economic wisdom, the approach the government should take towards spending and borrowing is often compared to a household's financial management.
Under this traditional perspective, the national debt—which currently exceeds $35 trillion—is viewed with apprehension, suggesting that a high level of debt is unsustainable and problematic.
The conventional economic view on government spending and debt
Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) offers an unconventional view on fiscal policy and government spending, providing insights into the nature of government debt and the creation of money.
The podcast explains that MMT separates itself from conventional economic thought by denying the comparison between a government's budget and that of a household. Unlike households, which cannot issue their own currency, MMT posits that the US government has the unique ability to print money to fund its expenditures without the necessity to rely solely on borrowing or taxes.
MMT theorists argue that government debt is not analogous to household debt because it doesn’t carry the same risks or limitations. According to MMT, each dollar of government debt symbolizes a dollar that has been expended into the economy but has not been taxed back. In this sense, government debt is seen as a credit to the public, suggesting that the level of debt is not inherently problematic.
The modern monetary theory (MMT) perspective on government spending and debt
Inflation and hyperinflation pose significant threats to the stability of an economy, carrying with them the risk of eroding consumer purchasing power and causing economic turmoil.
Hyperinflation occurs when there is an extremely rapid and out-of-control price increase in an economy, with prices rising by more than 50% per month. Examples of economies that have suffered hyperinflation include Germany, Ecuador, and Zimbabwe, where such staggering inflation rates were largely due to reckless fiscal policies and money printing practices.
The need to avoid hyperinflation is a point of consensus across different economic schools of thought. Both conventional economics and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) acknowledge the severe repercussions of hyperinflation. However, they diverge significantly when it comes to their prescribed preventative measures.
Conventional econom ...
The risks and challenges of inflation and hyperinflation
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser