In this episode of the Money Rehab podcast, Nicole Lapin and guest Peter Mallouk provide an insightful investing masterclass. They shed light on potential conflicts of interest in the financial industry, emphasizing the importance of working with true fiduciaries.
The episode also covers investing strategies, asset allocation, and the role of alternative investments like cryptocurrencies. Mallouk shares valuable perspectives on the emotional and behavioral aspects of investing, tax planning, and evaluating real estate investments. With straightforward advice from an industry expert, this episode equips listeners with practical knowledge for building a well-diversified portfolio aligned with their long-term financial goals.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Experts point out that most financial advisors operate in sales rather than providing unbiased advice, as per Peter Mallouk. They may lack a fiduciary duty to clients' best interests and earn commissions on product sales, including hidden payments or "kickbacks" for certain investment recommendations.
To ensure advisors are true fiduciaries bound by law to prioritize clients' interests, Mallouk suggests asking if they hold a Series 7 license, indicating they are also brokers.
Peter Mallouk describes cash as "dead money" that doesn't generate returns, while bonds have historically averaged around 4.5% returns, less than half of stocks' 10% average. For long-term investors, Mallouk emphasizes allocating most of a portfolio to stocks due to their higher historical returns despite volatility.
Commodities like copper and zinc are generally poor investments compared to stocks due to higher volatility and lower returns, as per Mallouk. Gold and oil can provide some diversification but should make up a small allocation.
Mallouk notes that 99.9% of cryptocurrencies have gone to zero in value historically. While Bitcoin has been more resilient, its volatility makes it speculative rather than a true store of value, as per Lapin.
Mallouk and Lapin advise keeping any crypto holdings to less than 1% of net worth, as investing in Bitcoin is closer to speculation than a solid strategy.
Mallouk counsels considering investments as "five-year money" and not being swayed by short-term fluctuations. He distinguishes reactions: "bad investors" panic and sell during downturns, "good investors" hold, and "great investors" buy more at lower prices.
While taking profits periodically can manage risk, Mallouk suggests rebalancing by directing new money into other assets to maintain diversification rather than selling winners like Nvidia.
Mallouk cautions that personal residences may generate lower returns than stocks after factoring in ongoing expenses like maintenance and taxes. While investment properties can provide income, they require active management.
Mallouk explains tax-loss harvesting: selling losing positions to capture tax losses that can offset gains elsewhere and boost after-tax returns. He stresses considering taxes when evaluating returns, as actual returns are what investors keep after taxes.
1-Page Summary
The financial services industry is fraught with inherent conflicts of interest that can harm consumers by compromising the quality of advice they receive.
Experts point to the reality that the overwhelming majority of individuals operating within the financial advisory space are essentially in sales rather than providing unbiased advice to clients. These advisors, often also brokers, may not have a legal duty to act in the client's best interest and commonly sell products that earn them commissions. Additionally, many advisors receive hidden payments or "kickbacks" for recommending certain investments, further introducing potential conflicts.
People are frequently unaware of the commissions and fees they pay, which are not transparent. The issue is compounded by revenue sharing practices within the industry, where advisors may recommend products in exchange for financial kickbacks.
A true fiduciary advisor, on the other hand, has a legal obligation to act in the client's best interest at all times. However, some advisors are fiduciaries only part-time and may not always prioritize their clients’ best interests. To ensure advisors are truly acting as fiduciaries, consumers are encouraged to ask if their advisors have a Series 7 license, which indicates they are also brokers and might not always serve in the client's best interest.
Tony Robbins initially recommended that his followers simply ask for a fiduciary advisor. However, after co ...
Identifying and avoiding conflicts of interest in the financial industry
Mallouk and Lapin discuss various investment strategies, emphasizing the importance of asset allocation and the potential pitfalls of certain asset types for younger investors.
Mallouk describes cash as "dead money" that doesn't generate returns and emphasizes that historically, stocks have averaged around a 10% return, while bonds have averaged less than half that, at approximately 4.5%. Cash is often utilized by banks to loan out at higher interest rates, which does not benefit the individual investor in the same way.
Cash is often considered "dead money" since it typically earns very low interest and doesn't keep up with inflation, thereby not generating significant real returns for investors.
Bonds, while providing more stable returns than stocks, have historically had returns that are less than half of those provided by stocks. This makes them a less attractive option for younger investors who are building wealth over the long term.
Mallouk conveys the importance of investing in the stock market despite its volatility because stocks have historically been profitable over the years, even for those investing just before a bear market.
Mallouk emphasizes that stocks are a strong choice for the majority of a long-term portfolio due to their historical average returns of around 10%.
Investors need to accept that stocks can be negative in any given year; however, over longer periods, like five years, their performance tends to be positive a significant percentage of the time.
Lapin refers to Mallouk's viewpoint that commodities, with the exception of some like gold and oil, are generally not great investments when compared to stocks due to their higher volatility and lower returns.
Investing strategies and asset allocation
Nicole Lapin and Peter Mallouk engage in a conversation about the controversial role of cryptocurrencies in investment portfolios, particularly discussing the predominant issues with their stability and true value.
Mallouk notes that historically, 99.9% of cryptocurrencies have gone to zero in value, with the majority of the remainder declining by 90% or more. He observes that someone with a diversified crypto portfolio would have been significantly impacted by the downturns in almost all categories. He further points out that the technology behind Bitcoin, such as blockchain and limited issuance, is not exclusive and that any new cryptocurrency can replicate these features.
Nicole Lapin brings up Bitcoin's resurgence, which is back past $65,000, but questions its role as a hedge against inflation or macroeconomic issues, which it has yet to effectively fulfill. Its performance has been closer to the stock market with both being down at the time of their discussion. Mallouk emphasizes that Bitcoin is kind of the last speculative thing standing after most cryptocurrencies and NFTs blew up, underlining Bitcoin's volatile and speculative nature, rather than a stable investment.
Lapin advises that if so ...
Alternative investments like cryptocurrencies
Investing can be an emotional rollercoaster, and understanding how to manage those emotions can greatly impact an investor's success. Here we explore the importance of staying calm during market downturns and the complexities of managing a dynamic portfolio.
Peter Mallouk advises that investors should consider their investment as "five-year money" and not to be swayed by short-term market fluctuations. He asserts that the risks of being out of the stock market, such as missing out on unexpected market rises, often outweigh the risks of being in it. Mallouk also points out that crashes while invested are merely temporary setbacks, whereas exiting the market can lead to a permanent loss of opportunity if the market doesn't return to the exit levels.
Nicole Lapin and Mallouk acknowledge the anxiety investing can provoke, particularly the emotional pull to sell when the market dips. Mallouk stresses that education is crucial. He outlines how a "bad investor" panics and potentially exits the market during downturns, while a "good investor" holds on, and a "great investor" looks forward to buying more stocks at lower prices.
This aspect is vividly captured as Nicole Lapin talks about receiving messages from panicked investors when their holdings lose value. They feel they've made a mistake and consider selling everything. Mallouk adds that during down markets, investors are often just mourning paper losses and should instead focus on longer timespans, such as ten-year periods, to avoid making hasty, fear-driven decisions.
Peter Mallouk points out the distinction between various levels of investor reactions to market dips. While good investors maintain their positions, excellent investors see downturns as a chance to purchase more assets at a discount, effectively "buying on sale."
Nicole Lapin discusses the challenging decision of when to sell winning stocks, such as Nvidia after a significant increase in its value. She notes that some investors might choose ...
Emotional and behavioral aspects of investing
Nicole Lapin and Mallouk discuss the complexities of considering real estate, including private residences and investment properties, as an investment vehicle. They provide insights into the reality of homeownership costs and the comparative performance of real estate investments.
Mallouk points out even in successful real estate markets such as Austin or Nashville, often homeowners might have made more money by investing in the stock market, like the S&P 500, than depending solely on real estate appreciation. He emphasizes that a home constantly requires cash outflows for maintenance, property taxes, homeowners insurance, and repairs.
Mallouk further explains that while stocks, bonds, and investment properties can generate regular income, a personal home typically does not. Despite a home potentially increasing in value, Mallouk advises homeowners to carefully consider all the expenses related to homeownership, which can significantly reduce the actual returns. He counsels against investing all your financial resources into buying the largest house possible with expectation of it being a noteworthy investment, due to the ongoing costs and uncertain return on investment compared to other investment options.
Real Estate as an Investment
Understanding the nuances of tax planning can lead to significant savings and more efficient investment strategies. One such strategy is tax-loss harvesting, which optimizes the tax implications of investing.
Using the analogy of real estate, Mallouk explains how tax-loss harvesting works. If you sell a property that has decreased in value, you can record a loss on your tax return. This strategy isn’t limited to real estate; it applies to the stock market as well.
Mallouk elucidates the concept further with stock market examples. If you own a stock that has decreased in value, such as Hershey's, you can sell it to realize a loss. Then you immediately reinvest in a similar stock, like Nestle, which is likely to be correlated with the first. This allows you to remain invested in the market and avoid trying to time the market, all while capturing a loss for tax purposes.
By capturing these tax losses, investors can offset taxable gains elsewhere in their portfolio. This means that the losses from selling underperforming assets can help reduce the amount owed on more successful investments, leading to lower overall tax p ...
Tax planning and optimization
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser