In this Modern Wisdom episode, Scott Galloway examines the challenges facing young men today, from declining college attendance rates to employment difficulties. He analyzes how educational disparities and the absence of positive male role models contribute to broader social issues, while addressing both progressive and conservative perspectives on modern masculinity.
The discussion covers potential solutions to these challenges, including the implementation of national service programs and the importance of mentorship. Galloway also explores how changing social dynamics and online dating have affected young men's relationships, and discusses ways to develop social skills while navigating contemporary dating norms. The conversation provides context for understanding these issues while suggesting practical approaches to address them.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Scott Galloway discusses a growing crisis among young men, highlighting their struggles across multiple life domains. In education, women now make up 60% of college attendance, with men more likely to drop out and less likely to apply. During COVID-19, men were seven times more likely than women to abandon their education. This educational disparity, Galloway explains, leads to employment difficulties and can trigger self-destructive behaviors, including engagement with toxic online content.
Galloway challenges both far-right and far-left narratives about masculinity, arguing against the notion that masculine traits are inherently toxic. He advocates for a balanced vision of masculinity that embraces both traditional attributes like strength and competitiveness alongside compassion and emotional intelligence. This framework, he suggests, could serve as a guiding code for young men's development, helping them aim high while remaining emotionally open.
The absence of positive male role models significantly impacts young men's development, according to Galloway. He notes that boys who lose male role models face higher risks of incarceration and lower college graduation rates. As a solution, Galloway actively engages in mentoring young men and encourages others to do the same, whether through formal programs like Big Brothers or informal mentorship roles.
Galloway proposes several institutional solutions to support young men, including mandatory national service programs similar to Israel's model. He suggests such programs could provide discipline and purpose while serving community needs. Additionally, Galloway advocates for broader policy changes, including progressive tax structures and increased investment in public goods, drawing parallels to post-WWII policies that helped build the American middle class.
In discussing modern dating challenges, Galloway addresses the impact of online dating and changing social norms. He emphasizes the importance of developing social skills and overcoming fear of rejection. Williamson adds that post-Me Too concerns and remote work have reduced opportunities for natural social interaction, while mixed messages about masculinity have left many young men uncertain about how to express romantic interest appropriately.
1-Page Summary
Scott Galloway brings to the forefront a societal issue – the critical struggles that young men are facing in various aspects of life, from education to social engagement.
Galloway acknowledges that young men are increasingly lagging behind in several areas, most notably in education and employment which can lead to mental health issues and adverse social outcomes.
In the realm of education, women are outpacing men significantly. They make up the majority in college attendance with a 60/40 ratio and also tend to score higher academically. College enrollment used to favor men 40 years ago, prompting affirmative action for women. Now, the tables have turned, and men not only drop out at higher rates but also apply to college less often because many feel unwelcome in academic environments. The academic gap between rich and poor has also grown larger than the racial gap, affecting young men considerably.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, men were seven times more likely to drop out of education than women, exacerbating an already concerning trend.
The lack of young male engagement in higher education translates into struggles with employment. Without college degrees, young men are finding it harder to secure stable jobs, which Galloway links to a rise in self-destructive behaviors. Men may turn to the internet where they can be more susceptible to toxic content, including nationalistic and misogynistic views.
The Crisis Facing Young Men and Its Causes
Scott Galloway addresses the complexities of redefining masculinity in today's society, critiquing the far-right's nostalgia and the far-left's sometimes negative portrayal of men.
Galloway dismisses the notion that masculinity is inherently linked to negative traits such as violence, cruelty, or oppression. He argues that conflating masculinity with toxicity is counterproductive.
Scott Galloway asserts that attributes traditionally associated with masculinity, such as strength, risk-taking, and aggression, have significantly benefited society and should not be misunderstood as inherently violent or malicious. He notes that the right has recognized the challenges facing young men, though sometimes the response conflates coarseness with manliness. Galloway further comments on the double standards in the perception of assertiveness and leadership between men and women.
Galloway argues for a balanced approach, where masculine traits are not seen as contradictory to being kind, compassionate, or emotionally intelligent. He suggests that society's expectations for men to show competitiveness can be healthy, but it should also incorporate attributes like protection and providing security. Galloway and Williamson advocate for a nuanced approach that combines ambition with sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of empathy and suppo ...
Redefining and Reframing Masculinity
Scott Galloway emphasizes the critical need for positive male role models and mentorship in the healthy development of young men, recognizing their unique ability to impart a mix of love, motivation, and discipline.
The absence of a male role model is highlighted as a significant issue for boys, with Galloway suggesting that men are better equipped to handle specific situations and lessons as role models. He also acknowledges the importance of having a balance of both feminine and masculine energy in raising children.
Galloway discusses the detrimental effects of losing a male role model through death, disease, or abandonment, with young men becoming more likely to be incarcerated and less likely to graduate from college. Girls in similar circumstances do not exhibit the same negative outcomes.
Galloway conveys his personal involvement in mentoring young men, mentoring or coaching two to three individuals at any given time. He describes an exercise he uses with mentees to improve their social skills and resilience, such as putting themselves in social environments with strangers and ...
The Importance of Male Role Models and Mentorship
Scott Galloway and guests delve into the complexities facing young men as they navigate the modern landscape of dating and relationships, marked by the rise of online dating and shifting societal norms.
Galloway emphasizes the importance of mentorship in guiding young men through challenges posed by online dating, such as the fear of rejection. He underscores the value of practicing asking people out to overcome this fear and learn that encountering rejection is a normal step towards getting a 'yes.' He also advises young men to improve themselves in various aspects, including dressing well, being kind, being fit, and learning how to listen. Galloway suggests that on dates, young men should ask questions and show genuine interest, moving away from boastful behavior.
Galloway and Williamson discuss the diminishing opportunities for young men to demonstrate their attractiveness due to remote working policies and concerns around dating coworkers post-Me Too. This has led to fewer venues for showcasing qualities that might attract a partner. Williamson also discusses women's socioeconomic advancement and how it has made the dating pool more "rarefied," benefiting ultra high-performing men. Galloway adds that in online dating scenarios, where one cannot easily showcase smell, humor, or body language, people often default to signaling resources and physical traits, such as height.
Williamson speaks on the mixed messages young men receive about masculinity and approaching women. He mentions that, post-Me Too, the more naturally hesitant men became even more cautious, fearing that any approach might be unwelcome. Williamson cites David Buss's book indicating most negative actions attributed to men are by a small cohort of repeat offenders, not the majority. Galloway points out the complexity of discerning between harassment and expressing interest in a way that makes the other feel safe. He and Williamson suggest that young men are deterred from taking the initiative in forming relationships due to societal caution against such approaches.
Galloway discusses the consequences of media narratives, which often portray men's relationship mistakes as red flags, suggesting that young men be self-reflective and kind, focusing on building a connection over time. Both he and Williamson highlight the role of kindness and emphasize that acts of kindness should become a natural part of a young man's character. This contrasts with the idea that certain narratives may influence expectations and norms around romantic in ...
Evolving Dating and Relationship Dynamics for Young Men
In response to social changes that have left young men with fewer communal spaces and support structures, Galloway emphasizes the need for a conversation about programs and investments to uplift young men.
Galloway points to the lack of specialized programs for young men and suggests that broader policies might be necessary to improve their outcomes.
Mandatory national service is discussed as a positive force for young people, referencing Israel’s program that provides discipline and purpose. Galloway suggests that such a program—though not necessarily military in nature—could be adapted in America to help young men who may not be prepared for college at age 18. He envisions a national service initiative that could include environmental conservation, elder care, or other community services. This service, he believes, could introduce young men to diverse experiences and responsibilities and would instill them with skills, discipline, and a sense of purpose while fostering an appreciation for being in America.
The differentiation in education approaches, such as that seen in boys' schools that provide twice as much recess, signals a need for a tailored approach to education for boys. While Galloway does not directly state the need for more male teachers and role models within K-12 schools, his discussion about the importance of a unique educational approach for boys implies that such role models could greatly support young men.
Galloway and Williamson discuss broader policy changes ...
Supporting Young Men: Role of Social Institutions and Programs
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
