The film and entertainment industries face criticism over shifts in creative control, franchise management, and cultural influence. In this episode of Modern Wisdom, the Critical Drinker voice concerns about Amazon's plans for the James Bond franchise and the compromising of its essence. He also critiques Amazon's "The Rings of Power" and Disney's handling of Star Wars for prioritizing corporate interests.
The episode further examines challenges facing movie genres like comedy and romantic comedy—from risk aversion and "cancel culture" to shifts in viewing habits and celebrity culture. It delves into the Oscars' perceived politicization contributing to declining relevance and studios' pivot away from niche political agendas due to box office performance.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Critics like Critical Drinker fear Amazon's expansion plans for the James Bond franchise, including spin-offs and a larger universe, could undermine the character's core mystique and appeal. The Broccoli family ceded creative control to Amazon to expand profits, but many worry spinning off supporting characters like Moneypenny would compromise Bond's enduring elements.
Amazon's "The Rings of Power" has been criticized by some who believe Amazon Studios ignored Tolkien's vision in favor of corporate interests, as Critical Drinker notes. Similarly, Disney's handling of Star Wars has drawn fire, with suggestions the franchise is over-saturated and struggling to regain its cultural impact after perceived brand mismanagement under Disney's stewardship.
According to Critical Drinker, comedy films like "Tropic Thunder" face difficulties as studios avoid controversial content that could risk offending audiences. Chris Williamson points to stand-up specials filling the void, as streaming offers comedians fewer constraints.
The rom-com genre has seen better days, with McConaughey observing the dismantling of traditional romantic comedies seemingly due to fragmented viewing and the rise of streaming. Celebrity culture shifts may also challenge audience investment in romantic pairings.
According to commentators like Chris Williamson and Critical Drinker, award shows' focus on social and political issues contributes to declining viewership. Recent efforts to tone down politics suggest recognition of diminishing celebrity influence.
Critical Drinker notes industry awareness of audience backlash to overtly progressive messaging. As a result, major studios aim for broad entertainment over niche political agendas due to declining box office performance for the latter.
1-Page Summary
The conversation explores the future of some of the most beloved movie franchises under corporate ownership—with a focus on James Bond, Lord of the Rings, and Star Wars—and how the drive for expansion could dilute their core appeal.
There’s a widespread belief that the character James Bond should remain at the center of his franchise, and concerns are mounting that expanding the universe with spinoffs could undermine his timeless appeal.
Upon feeling frustrated and tapping out, the Broccoli family ceded full creative control of the James Bond franchise to Amazon. The move aimed at expanding the intellectual property and profits but has raised serious concerns among fans and critics alike.
Critical Drinker, along with many others, contends that turning James Bond into a larger franchise with potential spin-offs would be detrimental. The suggestion that a series focusing on supporting characters like Moneypenny or the Q Department would compromise the character's core mystique and enduring elements that have captivated audiences for decades.
The conversation extends beyond James Bond to include the impact of corporate expansion on other storied franchises.
Amazon's show "The Rings of Power" has faced criticism for destroying the core appeal of "Lord of the Rings." Accusations cir ...
Movie Franchises: Impact of Corporate Ownership and Streaming
Recent discussions in the film industry have focused on the noticeable decline of certain movie genres, with comedy and romantic comedy being particularly affected. Experts weigh in on contributing factors such as cultural shifts, industry trends, and technological changes.
Critical Drinker pinpointed the decline of cinema comedies to a culture where offense is easily taken. Comedy films are struggling as studios avoid anything that might be deemed controversial or offensive to avoid alienating audiences. This aversion to risk has had a dampening effect on the production of comedies, as humor often involves treading close to the edges of what society finds acceptable. "Tropic Thunder," cited as the last great comedy to hit cinemas, is over a decade old and wouldn't be allowed in today's climate, illustrating a significant shift in what is considered acceptable content.
Chris Williamson points out that the scarcity of comedy movies has paved the way for stand-up specials on streaming services. These platforms offer comedians more freedom, with fewer constraints from executives and stakeholders who traditionally steer away from potentially edgy material. Streaming services allow this genre to thrive outside the traditional movie theater setting, providing a haven for comedians to explore humor without the boundaries typically enforced by movie studios.
The romantic comedy genre has also seen better days, with a decline in traditional cinematic success stories.
Factors contributing to this downturn have not been directly articulated in the provided content, but it could be inferred that shifts in celebrity culture might challenge the audience's investment in romantic pairings that typically drive the genre.
Decline of Movie Genres and Contributing Factors
The entertainment industry is responding to a shift in public perception and engagement with award shows and political messaging in productions, as commentators like Chris Williamson and Critical Drinker analyze the industry's changing landscape.
Award shows have long been platforms for celebrities to express their views on a host of social and political issues. However, it appears that this trend is contributing to a decline in viewership and the cultural relevance of events like the Oscars.
Chris Williamson relates the current state of award shows to a "tower" of performative empathy that is starting to collapse, a metaphor for the instability caused by the industry's veneer of good intentions that often ring hollow to audiences. Critical Drinker adds to this point by describing the Oscars as "just boring," signaling a lack of engagement from the public. An actress's intention to pay tribute to sex workers during the Oscars exemplifies the disconnection between the ideologies celebrated at these events and mainstream interests.
Critical Drinker points out that recent award seasons seem intentionally toned down and non-controversial, hinting at a memo that may have circulated advising against political commentary. This suggests an active effort by the industry to steer away from politics in response to declining interest from the general public, a sentiment echoed by Williamson, who observes Hollywood is recognizing the dwindling influence of celebrities in political matters.
The entertainment industry is recognizing the backlash to what is sometimes labeled "wokeness" and appears to be adjusting its approach in high-profile productions to align better with audience preferences.
Critical Drinker speaks on the industry's resistance to c ...
Evolving Role and Perception of Award Shows and the Entertainment Industry's Cultural Response
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser