Podcasts > Modern Wisdom > #909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

By Chris Williamson

In this episode of the Modern Wisdom podcast, Charles Duhigg and host Chris Williamson explore the key components of effective communication. They discuss how communication skills can be learned and mastered, rather than being innate traits.

Duhigg shares practical techniques used by "super communicators," such as asking meaningful questions, active listening, and strategically sharing vulnerability. He also addresses differences in communication styles between introverts and extroverts, and how both personality types can improve their communication abilities. Additionally, the episode examines the neuroscience behind engaging conversations, bonding through laughter, and how identity perceptions differ between online and in-person interactions.

Ultimately, Duhigg and Williamson offer insights into honing essential communication skills applicable to various interpersonal contexts, from casual conversations to professional interactions. They emphasize that communication is an evolving skill set that can be developed through conscious effort and adaptation.

#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 1, 2025 episode of the Modern Wisdom

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

1-Page Summary

Communication as a Learnable Skill

Charles Duhigg emphasizes that effective communication is a skill anyone can develop through practice, like exercising a muscle. Even great communicators had to overcome hurdles and adapt their skills to new mediums over time.

Chris Williamson explores how focusing on making others feel heard, through techniques like reverse charisma, can create engaging conversations. Duhigg notes his own teenagers communicate nuanced emotions through text, showing communication's continual evolution.

Components of "Super Communicator" Status

Per Duhigg, super communicators ask meaningful questions to discover others' values and emotions. They use "looping for understanding" to actively listen and confirm comprehension. Strategically sharing vulnerability also builds trust and closeness.

Introvert vs. Extrovert Communication Habits

Duhigg explains that introversion/extroversion stems from social habits, not immutable traits. Extroverts naturally practice communication more, while introverts can consciously develop skills.

Both can enhance communication by assessing conversation type and adapting style. Williamson suggests introverts engage more, while extroverts should listen attentively.

Neuroscience Behind Bonding Conversations

Duhigg cites how neural entrainment - brains mirroring patterns like breathing - creates rewarding sensations during good conversation. Maintaining collaborative dynamics prevents toxic "kitchen sinking."

Laughter evolved to bond and signal openness to connection beyond just humor responses, according to Duhigg.

Online vs. In-Person Identity Perceptions

Online personas amplify single identity aspects, skewing full personal complexity according to Duhigg and Williamson. This distortion can increase polarization when contrasted with reality.

However, younger generations develop important digital communication norms as the internet centralizes their experiences.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Looping for understanding in communication is a technique where a listener repeats or paraphrases what they have heard to confirm their understanding. This method helps ensure that both parties are on the same page and can clarify any misunderstandings. It shows active listening and encourages the speaker to elaborate or correct any misinterpretations. Looping for understanding fosters clearer communication and deeper connections in conversations.
  • Neural entrainment is the synchronization of brainwave patterns between individuals during communication. This synchronization can lead to a sense of connection and understanding between people. When brains mirror each other's patterns, it can create a feeling of reward and engagement during conversations. This phenomenon plays a role in fostering positive interactions and bonding between individuals.
  • Online personas often emphasize specific aspects of a person's identity, leading to a distorted representation that may not capture the full complexity of their personality. This selective portrayal can create a skewed perception of an individual, as online platforms often highlight certain traits or behaviors over others. As a result, people may not present their complete selves online, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of their true character. This phenomenon can contribute to increased polarization and challenges in understanding individuals fully within the online realm.
  • Younger generations are developing digital communication norms due to their heavy reliance on the internet for social interactions and information. These norms help shape how they present themselves online and navigate virtual spaces effectively. Understanding and following these norms is crucial for building relationships, expressing themselves, and engaging with others in the digital realm. By establishing and adhering to these norms, younger individuals can effectively communicate, collaborate, and participate in the evolving digital landscape.

Counterarguments

  • While effective communication can be developed through practice, some individuals may have innate predispositions or personality traits that make it more challenging for them to become effective communicators.
  • The idea that introversion/extroversion stems from social habits may be an oversimplification, as there is evidence suggesting biological and genetic factors also play a significant role in these personality dimensions.
  • The concept of "super communicators" might imply that there is a one-size-fits-all approach to communication, which doesn't account for cultural, contextual, and individual differences in communication styles and effectiveness.
  • The emphasis on making others feel heard, while generally positive, might not always be the best strategy in situations where clear, directive communication is necessary, such as in emergencies or when dealing with misinformation.
  • The assertion that online personas amplify single identity aspects could be challenged by the idea that online platforms also offer opportunities for individuals to express multiple facets of their identity that they may not feel comfortable expressing offline.
  • The notion that neural entrainment is a key factor in rewarding conversations could be complemented by acknowledging other psychological and social factors that contribute to the enjoyment and effectiveness of communication.
  • The idea that laughter evolved solely to bond and signal openness to connection might not encompass other functions of laughter, such as expressing nervousness or as a coping mechanism for discomfort.
  • The statement that younger generations are developing important digital communication norms might overlook the potential negative effects of digital communication, such as reduced face-to-face interaction skills and the impact on mental health.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

Communication as a Learnable Skill, Not Just Talent

Experts Charles Duhigg and Chris Williamson explore the idea that effective communication is a learnable skill, highlighting the adaptability of human communication across various mediums and the notion of reverse charisma.

Communication: A Learnable and Practicable Skill

Skillful Communicators Overcame Challenges

Charles Duhigg emphasizes that communication is a skill that anyone can learn and improve through practice, similar to sports or lifting weights. He points out that many adept communicators were not born with these abilities; instead, they had to cultivate them and navigate personal hurdles to become proficient at establishing connections with others.

Duhigg also stresses the importance of adapting communication skills to different mediums. Citing historically how phone conversation skills evolved, Duhigg observes that today’s younger generation is learning effective online communication despite making mistakes along the way—from which they learn and improve.

Communication Ties Character to Identity and Relationships

Chris Williamson delves into how certain individuals can make us feel more engaging through proactive changes in conversational dynamics. He illustrates this with an anecdote about Winston Churchill's mother, emphasizing the concept of reverse charisma—focusing on making others feel interesting as an easier and perhaps more effective approach than trying to be charismatic oneself.

Duhigg further explains that, with practice and a willingness to experiment, people can become "super communicators." He reveals that his teenagers, as an example, can p ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Communication as a Learnable Skill, Not Just Talent

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The notion of reverse charisma involves focusing on making others feel interesting and engaged in conversations, rather than solely trying to be charismatic oneself. It emphasizes the power of enhancing others' experiences through active listening and genuine interest, creating a more impactful and meaningful interaction. This approach shifts the focus from self-promotion to building connections by valuing and highlighting the cont ...

Counterarguments

  • While communication can be improved through practice, some individuals may have innate predispositions that make it easier for them to excel in communication, suggesting a combination of talent and skill.
  • The comparison between communication and sports or weightlifting might oversimplify the complexities of human interaction and the subtleties involved in effective communication.
  • The concept of reverse charisma might not be universally applicable, as some situations or cultures may value direct charisma or other forms of interaction.
  • The effectiveness of emojis in conveying emotional nuances is limited and can sometimes lead to misunderstandings, as they may be interpreted differently by different people.
  • The idea that everyone can become a "super communicator" may not account for individual differences in personality, cognitive abilities, and social anxiety, which can affect communication proficiency.
  • The adaptability of the brain in communication is a general statement and may not consider the specific challenges faced by individuals with communication disorders or neurodivergent conditions.
  • The notion that making mistakes and learning from them is a straightforward path to effective online commun ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

The Key Components Of Being a "Super Communicator"

Charles Duhigg describes what it takes to be a "super communicator," emphasizing the importance of asking deep questions, active listening, and sharing vulnerability in conversations.

Inviting Personal Experiences With Open-Ended Questions

Super communicators stand out by inquiring deeply into another's values, beliefs, and feelings. They ask meaningful "how" and "why" questions rather than just soliciting facts. These types of questions help in reaching an emotional resonance with others. Duhigg notes that these questions could be as personal as asking how it felt to watch one's child graduate or as broad as one's feelings about election day, indicating the importance of emotional relevance.

For instance, Duhigg suggests asking about feelings and values can match the emotional mindset and foster a sense of being seen without judgment. During a debate, for example, inquiring about personal experiences, rather than arguing facts, can help find common ground, considering everyone is an expert in their feelings.

Additionally, Duhigg employs deep personal questions during his speeches to induce meaningful conversations, like when attendees discuss the last time they cried in front of another person.

Active Listening: Using "Looping For Understanding" Techniques

"Looping for understanding" is a critical component of active listening where the listener paraphrases what the speaker has said to show comprehension and engage in shared meaning. Asking for confirmation, such as "Am I getting this right?" and expressing empathy, like "That sounds so hard," are elements of this technique.

Duhigg emphasizes that while most people regard listening as merely waiting your turn to speak, real listening involves actively engaging with the other person's thoughts, allowing them to know they're heard and understood. By conducting the exercise mentioned above, Duhigg illustrates how paraphrasing encourages others to model the same communicative behavior, enhancing group dynamics.

Strategically Sharing Vulnerability to Build Trust and Intimacy.

Duhigg highlights that strategically sharing vulnerability is not about emotional outbursts but ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Key Components Of Being a "Super Communicator"

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While deep, open-ended questions can create emotional resonance, they may also make some individuals uncomfortable or feel like their privacy is being invaded, especially in professional settings or with people they do not know well.
  • Personal experiences and emotions are subjective, and relying on them too heavily can lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations if not carefully managed.
  • Active listening and "looping for understanding" are valuable, but they can be perceived as patronizing or insincere if overused or if the listener's body language and tone do not match their words.
  • The concept of real listening is ideal but may not always be practical in fast-paced or high-pressure environments where quick decision-making is required.
  • Sharing vulnerability strategically can build trust, but it can also be risky if the other party is not receptive or if the environment is not safe for such exchanges.
  • The assumption that authentic vulnerability leads to trustworthiness may not always hol ...

Actionables

  • You can deepen your conversational impact by starting a personal journal where you write down open-ended questions that probe into values, beliefs, and feelings, which you can later use in your conversations. By practicing these questions in a journal, you'll become more adept at initiating meaningful dialogue. For example, after a conversation, reflect on what questions could have led to a deeper understanding and note them for future use.
  • Enhance your active listening skills by practicing with a friend or family member in a role-play scenario where you intentionally focus on paraphrasing their statements and asking for confirmation. This exercise will train you to listen more effectively and show empathy in real conversations. For instance, after your partner shares a story, repeat back the key emotions and facts they mentioned and ask if you've understood correctly.
  • Build trust in your relationships by sharing a small, pers ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

Introverts vs. Extroverts in Communication and Relationship-Building

Chris Williamson and Charles Duhigg examine the differences between introverts and extroverts in terms of communication and the process of building relationships.

Extroverts Naturally Practice Communication; Introverts Can Develop Skills Consciously

Differences Stem From Habits and Comfort in Social Interaction

Williamson suggests that extroverts may have more advantages in communication since they tend to be more outgoing, engage in social activities more frequently, and find these interactions less draining. Although Duhigg does not offer specific insights into the different communication habits and social comfort levels of introverts and extroverts, he does provide an important perspective on the nature of these personality types.

Duhigg mentions that introversion and extroversion are not necessarily inherent traits hardwired into our brains; rather, they are sets of habits that people become comfortable with over time. He explains that extroverts often have more opportunities to practice having conversations because they are more likely to initiate and engage in such interactions routinely.

Through their experiences, extroverts learn from conversational missteps and naturally adjust their approach for future social instances. Duhigg implies that introverts, who may initially be less comfortable in social settings, can similarly develop effective communication skills with conscious practice and intentional effort.

Introverts and Extroverts Can Become "Super Communicators" By Diagnosing Conversation Type and Matching the Other Person's Style

Introverts Should Engage More Socially, While Extroverts Should Listen More

The conversation between Williamson and Duhigg highlight ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Introverts vs. Extroverts in Communication and Relationship-Building

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Extroverts may not always find social interactions less draining; they can also experience social fatigue and need downtime.
  • Introverts may not necessarily need to engage more socially if it goes against their natural preferences and may instead focus on deepening fewer relationships.
  • Extroverts learning from conversational missteps is not exclusive to them; introverts can also learn from social interactions even if they engage in them less frequently.
  • The idea that introverts need to develop communication skills implies they lack them, which may not be true; many introverts possess strong communication skills, particularly in one-on-one or written contexts.
  • The concept of becoming "super communicators" by diagnosing conversation types oversimplifies the complexity of human communication and individual differences.
  • Matching the other person's communication style may not always be effective or authentic, as it c ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance your conversational agility by keeping a journal of social interactions, noting what went well and what could be improved. After each conversation, take a moment to write down key points, reactions from both sides, and any moments where the flow felt off. This reflection will help you identify patterns in your communication style and areas for growth.
  • Develop a habit of active listening by practicing with a friend or family member in a role-play scenario where you summarize their points before responding. This exercise will train you to focus on understanding the speaker's message and can improve your attentiveness in conversations, a skill beneficial for both introverts and extroverts.
  • Try mi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

The Neuroscience and Psychology Behind Successful, Bonding Conversations

Charles Duhigg delves into the intricate relationship between neural processes and the successes of interpersonal communication, specifically pointing out the importance of neural entrainment in conversations that enhance social connections. Further, laughter is depicted not simply as a response to humor but as an evolved mechanism to bond and create shared experiences.

"Conversations Creating Neural Entrainment Foster Rewarding Connection"

Neural entrainment plays a pivotal role in effective and connecting conversations, with Duhigg stating that physiological and neurological mirroring, such as matching breathing rates, heart rates, and even pupil dilation, occur during good conversation. This mirroring results in the release of neurotransmitters that create rewarding sensations, encouraging bonding. In discussion, when individuals talk about personal experiences, their brains activate similar areas, which facilitates better mutual understanding and allows for a flow through different conversational topics.

Collaborative Conversation Dynamics

Duhigg goes on to describe "kitchen sinking" as a detrimental pattern in conversations, particularly in conflicts where arguments about one issue escalate to include everything. This often arises from a desire to control the situation or the other person. He suggests finding mutual elements to control, such as the conversational environment or topics, helps maintain teamwork and avoid lasting damage in relationships.

A study involving groups watching confusing movie scenes illustrates the point further. Duhigg highlights that these groups who could agree on interpretations of the scenes ended up having similar brain activity, showcasing how consensus in dialogue can align thinking.

Laughter Evolved to Forge Bonds and Create Shared Experiences

Laughter in Conversations Shows a Desire to Connect

Laughter, Duhigg notes, has evolved not primarily for the respon ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Neuroscience and Psychology Behind Successful, Bonding Conversations

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Neural entrainment in conversations involves the synchronization of brain activity between individuals, leading to mirroring of physiological responses like breathing and heart rates. This synchronization fosters a sense of connection and understanding, as shared neural patterns create rewarding sensations that enhance bonding during interactions. Essentially, it's like a neural dance where brains align, promoting smoother communication and mutual engagement. This process highlights the intricate link between our brains' responses and the quality of social connections formed during conversations.
  • Physiological and neurological mirroring in conversations involves the subconscious synchronization of bodily responses between individuals, such as matching breathing rates, heart rates, and even pupil dilation. This mirroring occurs during engaging conversations and leads to the release of neurotransmitters that promote bonding and positive feelings. It helps in establishing rapport and mutual understanding by creating a sense of connection and shared experiences. This phenomenon plays a crucial role in enhancing social connections and fostering rewarding interactions.
  • "Kitchen sinking" in conversations is a term used to describe a pattern where arguments about one issue escalate to include unrelated grievances or topics. This can lead to confusion, frustration, and a breakdown in communication. It often stems from a desire to control the conversation or the other person, rather than focusing on resolving the initial issue at hand. Recognizing and addressing this pattern can help maintain constructive dialogue and prevent unnecessary conflict escalation.
  • Consensus in dialogue can align thinking by fostering shared understanding and agreement among individuals. When groups reach a consensus during discussions, it indicates a level of mutual comprehension and agreement on interpretations, leading to similar brain activity among participants. This alignment in thinking showcases how dialogue can influence and synchronize cognitive processes, enhancing mutual understanding and connection.
  • Laughter in conversations serves as a social tool evolved to strengthen bonds and indicate a willingness to connect with others. It is not solely a response to humor but a way to share emotional experiences and mirror energy and affect, fostering rapport and empathy. Research shows that a significant portion of laughter is not directly linked to humor but functions as a signal of the intent to bond and connect with others, showcasing vulnerability and reinforcing social bonds. NASA's assessme ...

Counterarguments

  • While neural entrainment may play a role in enhancing social connections, it is not the only factor; individual personality traits, cultural background, and context also significantly influence the success of interpersonal communication.
  • The physiological and neurological mirroring described might not always lead to positive outcomes; in some cases, it could result in increased stress or discomfort if the conversation is tense or if there is a lack of genuine connection.
  • The idea that talking about personal experiences always facilitates mutual understanding assumes that both parties are equally open and skilled in communication, which might not always be the case.
  • The concept of "kitchen sinking" could be seen as a natural byproduct of emotional overflow rather than just a desire to control, suggesting that emotional regulation skills are also crucial in maintaining healthy conversations.
  • The study involving groups watching confusing movie scenes might not be generalizable to all forms of dialogue or to real-life situations, which are often more complex and less controlled.
  • The role of laughter in conversations might be culturally specific, and what is considered a bonding mechanism in one culture coul ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#909 - Charles Duhigg - The Secret Habits Of Supercommunicators

Online Communication vs. In-person Interaction Impact

Charles Duhigg and Chris Williamson discuss the impact that online communication has on perceptions of identity in contrast to in-person interactions, which reveal the complexity and multifaceted nature of individuals.

Online Discourse Skews Identity, In-person Reveals Complexity

Duhigg highlights how social media amplifies one aspect of a person's identity, creating a misleading representation, as individuals actually possess multifaceted identities. He references Jay Van Bavel's research, which suggests that online conversations exaggerate a single aspect of identity, distorting perceptions.

Williamson discusses how online creators often use "faux vulnerability" or "performative vulnerability" to build relatability and authenticity. He warns of the potential for increased polarization that can arise from these skewed online presentations.

Distorted Perceptions of Reality and Increased Polarization

Duhigg considers how online interactions can devolve into toxic exchanges when there's an attempt to control the other person, pushing users into extreme viewpoints. He describes the dynamic where the online environment, lacking face-to-face human interaction, facilitates perceptions of others that are less than fully human, contributing to increased polarization.

The conversations that rise to the top online are usually the most inflammatory, leading people to overestimate the prevalence of certain events. The internet can therefore skew perceptions of social groups, classes, genders, races, and different positions within society, leading to a heightened state of polarization when confronted with real-world evidence. Williamson points out that surveys demonstrate the overestimation of certain events' prevalence due to their sensational representation online.

Duhigg explains that assuming maximal beliefs based on someone’s political label can distort perceptions and exacerbate polarization. Online platforms like Twitter often reduce people to a single identity or label, m ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Online Communication vs. In-person Interaction Impact

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • "Faux vulnerability" and "performative vulnerability" in online communication refer to the intentional display of vulnerability for strategic purposes rather than genuine emotional expression. Individuals may use these tactics to appear relatable or authentic to their audience, often as a calculated effort to garner sympathy or engagement. This behavior can sometimes be perceived as insincere or manipulative, as it may not reflect the person's true emotions or experiences. In essence, it involves presenting a facade of vulnerability for specific outcomes within the online space.
  • Online presentations that emphasize extreme viewpoints or faux vulnerability can distort perceptions of reality, leading to increased polarization. This distortion occurs when individuals are reduced to simplistic labels or identities online, hindering nuanced discussions and reinforcing polarized views. The amplification of sensational or inflammatory content online can create a skewed perception of societal issues, contributing to a heightened state of polarization among online communities. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the lack of face-to-face interaction in online communication, which can dehumanize others and lead to more extreme and divisive interactions.
  • Online interactions can devolve into toxic exchanges when individuals attempt to control others, leading to extreme viewpoints and dehumanization due to the lack of face-to-face interaction. This dynamic can escalate conflicts and contribute to increased polarization as people engage in inflammatory conversations online. The anonymity and distance provided by online platforms can lead to a breakdown in civility and empathy, fostering an environment where toxic behavior thrives. Misinterpretations, miscommunications, and the echo chamber effect can amplify negativity and hostility in online interactions, fueling toxic exchanges.
  • When individuals interact online without face-to-face contact, they may dehumanize others by perceiving them as less human due to the lack of nonverbal cues and personal connections. This dehumanization can lead to a reduction in empathy and understanding towards others, making it easier to engage in toxic behavior and extreme viewpoints. The absence of in-person interaction can contribute to a sense of detachment and anonymity, allowing individuals to forget or ignore the humanity of those they interact with online. This phenomenon can exacerbate polarization and conflict in online discussions, as people may not fully consider the impact of their words and actions on others.
  • Inflammatory conversations often gain visibility online due to their provocative nature, which can attract more engagement and reactions from users. Algorithms on social media platforms tend to prioritize content that generates high levels of interaction, including likes, comments, and shares. This can lead to inflammatory content being promoted to a wider audience, contributing to its visibility and impact. The competitive nature of online platforms can incentivize users to create sensational or controversial content to stand out and gain attention.
  • The internet can distort perceptions of social groups, genders, races, and societal positions by amplifying extreme or sensationalized viewpoints. This distortion occurs as online platforms often prioritize and highlight inflammatory content, leading to an overestimation of certain events' prevalence. Individuals may reduce others to simplistic labels online, hindering nuanced discussions and reinforcing polarized views. This phenomenon contributes to a heightened state of polarization and can impact how individuals perceive and interact with different social groups and identities.
  • Online platforms like Twitter often simplify individuals by emphasizing a single aspect of their identity or a specific label, such as political affiliation. This reduction can lead to misunderstandings and reinforce polarized ...

Counterarguments

  • While social media can amplify aspects of identity, it also provides a platform for individuals to express multiple facets of their personalities and interests that may not be as visible in-person.
  • Online conversations can also foster understanding and empathy when diverse perspectives are shared in a constructive manner.
  • Not all online vulnerability is "faux" or "performative"; many individuals find genuine support and connection through sharing personal experiences online.
  • Polarization is not solely a product of online communication; it can also stem from broader societal issues and offline discourse.
  • Toxic exchanges are not exclusive to online interactions; in-person conversations can also devolve into harmful or extreme exchanges.
  • The internet can also be a space for humanizing others by sharing personal stories and experiences that may not be encountered in one's immediate physical environment.
  • While sensational content often rises to the top, the internet also provides access to a wide range of viewpoints and information that can counteract overestimation and misinformation.
  • Online platforms can be used to explore and express ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA