In this episode of Making Sense, Peter Zeihan examines the impact of the Trump administration's trade and foreign policies on American manufacturing and global influence. The discussion explores how protectionist tariffs have affected different sectors of U.S. manufacturing, with simple operations showing some success in domestic relocation while complex industries face significant challenges. Zeihan also analyzes how the combination of deindustrialization and declining globalization could affect inflation and supply chains.
The conversation extends to the Trump administration's approach to international relations, particularly regarding Mexico and Venezuela. Zeihan discusses specific policy decisions, including the handling of drug cartels and maritime law enforcement, as well as questions about presidential military authority under the War Powers Act. The discussion touches on concerns about accountability and rule of law, including the controversial pardon of a former Honduran president.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Peter Zeihan analyzes how Trump's protectionist tariffs have affected U.S. manufacturing, revealing a complex pattern of industrial change. While some simple manufacturing operations, like furniture and paint production, have successfully relocated within the U.S., high-value sectors requiring complex global supply chains have suffered significantly. Zeihan notes that these tariffs, coupled with policy uncertainty, have led to a notable contraction in manufacturing and decreased industrial construction spending.
As the U.S. prepares for what Zeihan describes as the end of globalization, the country faces significant challenges. The combination of deindustrialization and declining globalization could amplify inflation, particularly in critical sectors like GPU production. Zeihan explains that the U.S. now faces a difficult choice: accept high inflation while maintaining productivity, or risk both inflation and goods shortages.
Zeihan critiques the Trump administration's approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding Venezuela and Mexico. He points out that the administration's actions, including alleged extrajudicial targeting of drug smugglers at sea, may violate international laws. Regarding Mexico, despite tough rhetoric on cartels, Zeihan notes that Trump largely continued previous administrations' policies. However, the disruption of the Sinaloa Cartel led to the rise of the more violent Jalisco New Generation Cartel.
The Trump administration, like its predecessors, contested the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which limits presidential military action without congressional approval. Zeihan discusses how the administration sidestepped the act's requirements by not justifying or ending military operations within the required 30-day timeframe. Additionally, the controversial pardon of an ex-Honduran president raised concerns about the administration's commitment to fighting narcotics trafficking and maintaining accountability for corrupt officials.
1-Page Summary
Peter Zeihan provides insights into the effects of President Trump's protectionist tariffs and how they've contributed to the deindustrialization of U.S. manufacturing.
Zeihan explains that the tariffs implemented under Trump’s administration have resulted in a significant shift in U.S. manufacturing.
While low-value manufacturing jobs, like those in furniture and paint, have relocated within the U.S., high-skilled, value-added sectors such as automotive and aerospace have suffered. This is due to tariffs affecting intermediate products that cross borders multiple times in complex global supply chains, leading to costlier final products.
For example, GPUs, essential for technologies like large language models (LLMs), require a globalized production system. The breakdown of globalization poses a threat to the production of these advanced components.
Zeihan notes a contraction in the manufacturing sector and a decrease in industrial construction spending. This indicates businesses are completing projects started pre-tariffs but are now hesitant to initiate new investments due to uncertainty about future policies. The turbulence caused by over 600 tariff changes since January 20 has further contributed to investment hesitancy. Companies are unsure whether new investments will yield returns under these conditions.
The U.S. is bracing for an era beyond globalization, which includes expanding its industrial base—a move that is likely to lead to inflation.
Zeihan discusses that as the U.S. prepares for the end of globalization, it must expand its industrial base. However, deindustria ...
Impact of Trump's Protectionist Policies and Trade War
Peter Zeihan analyzes the Trump administration's foreign policy, specifically towards Venezuela and Mexico, uncovering a lack of clear strategy and continuity with previous administrations, leading to unintended consequences and possible violations of international norms.
Zeihan critiques the Trump administration for having an unplanned policy towards Venezuela, characterized by intimidating gestures without a clear or coherent strategy.
He notes that acts of saber-rattling, including the alleged extrajudicial killing of drug smugglers at sea, may violate international laws and norms. Zeihan also indicates that Trump and Hagseth boasted about actions that could potentially be classified as war crimes, involving attacks on unarmed enemy combatants.
Zeihan reports that Congress has not received adequate briefing regarding the actions against Venezuela and the intelligence used to identify ships purportedly involved with drug smuggling.
Despite threats to deal harshly with cartels, the Trump administration appears to continue the policies of previous administrations toward Mexico without significantly new initiatives.
Trump Administration's Controversial Foreign Policy and Consequences
Recent actions by the Trump administration have spurred debate over its approach to national security and adherence to the rule of law.
The Trump administration, like its predecessors since the War Powers Act’s inception, contends that the law is unconstitutional. However, there has not been a direct judicial challenge to this claim.
Despite requirements by the War Powers Act for presidents to justify military operations within set time frames or end them within 30 days, the Trump administration did not adhere to this 30-day threshold. Furthermore, Congress took no measures to enforce this aspect of the act, leaving questions regarding the check on executive power unresolved.
While detailed information regarding the pardon of the ex-Honduran president is not provided in the transcript chunk, the action raises concerns about the Trump administration’s commitment to the ...
Questions on Trump's National Security and Rule of Law Approach
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
