In this episode of Making Sense, Sam Harris examines several current geopolitical and domestic issues. The discussion covers Trump's approach to Middle East diplomacy, including his business connections in the Gulf region, and analyzes the prospects for peace in the Middle East. Harris also explores Qatar's role in regional politics and its influence on American institutions.
The conversation extends to concerns about political leadership and social stability in the United States. Harris uses Trump's golf habits as a starting point to discuss broader questions about character and corruption in politics. The discussion also addresses the potential consequences of political violence and growing societal divisions, including their effects on institutional trust and national unity.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Trump's unconventional approach to Middle East diplomacy has produced mixed results. According to Harris, while Trump's "madman theory" of diplomacy combined with Israel's military victories has created unique negotiation opportunities, concerns exist about Trump's business entanglements in the Gulf region, including potential billions in profit from regional deals.
Harris and other speakers express skepticism about lasting peace in the region, pointing to deep-rooted societal mistrust between warring factions. They highlight Qatar's controversial role, with Harris criticizing the nation as a destabilizer through its funding of Islamist groups and influence on US academic institutions.
Harris argues that peace faces significant challenges due to what he calls Islam's "source code," which he believes contributes to persistent divisions and violence. He suggests that addressing extremist ideologies requires a global commitment and an internal ideological battle within Islam itself.
Using Trump's golf habits as an allegory, speakers discuss broader concerns about his character. Harris describes how Trump's pattern of cheating at golf and claiming false championships reflects deeper character flaws. The discussion extends to more serious allegations, including Trump's family accepting $2 billion from the UAE followed by controversial AI chip sales approvals, raising concerns about national security and the exploitation of presidential power.
Harris examines how political violence, exemplified by the hypothetical assassination of Charlie Kirk, could further damage societal trust and cohesion. He warns that such events could trigger broader violence in an already polarized society. The speakers emphasize the urgent need to rebuild institutional trust, reject conspiracy theories, and address economic, social, and cultural divisions to prevent catastrophic consequences for national unity.
1-Page Summary
Trump's approach to Middle East policy has led to mixed perceptions of success and sincerity, with outcomes that challenge the traditional aspects of international relations and diplomacy.
Trump's Middle East dealmaking has been characterized by unpredictability and the use of force, which Harris acknowledges has been beneficial for the Middle East and Israel in some unexpected ways.
Harris and other speakers discuss Trump's "madman theory" of diplomacy in conjunction with Israel's military victories, which have created unique negotiation opportunities not seen in traditional administrations. The speakers reference the ceasefire and the potential for rebuilding Gaza as significant outcomes, suggesting that these developments could reshape interactions in the region.
However, Harris expresses concern regarding Trump's business entanglements in the Gulf, accusing him and his family of potentially profiting billions from deals in the region, including through cryptocurrency. Harris's commentary raises questions about the former president's personal interests and allegiances and casts doubt on the sincerity of peace deals brokered during his term.
While Trump’s methods have seen some results, the ...
Trump's Middle East Policy and Implications
The debate about the prospects for peace and stability in the Middle East paints a complex and challenging picture, according to various speakers who emphasize the deep-rooted issues and the difficult path towards lasting peace in the region.
The conversations around recent peace efforts unravel skepticism regarding their durability and potential for true reconciliation.
Harris and other speakers are doubtful about the promise of a durable peace, including Trump's peace deal or the notion of a two-state solution. There is skepticism about ceasefire deals in the backdrop of a history marked by violence and distrust among the parties involved. Harris suggests that deep-seated societal mistrust between the warring factions presents a significant barrier to achieving peace.
Speakers note that Qatar's involvement complicates regional peace efforts due to allegations of dual activities, including supporting extremist groups alongside fostering diplomatic relations. Harris is critical of Qatar, labeling it a destabilizing influence because of its funding of Islamist groups and stealth theocracy. He suggests that Qatar's actions could be seen as an extension of Muslim Brotherhood theology and describes the nation as a state funder of terrorism. Alliance negotiations with Qatar must be prudent given the country's controversial activities.
Concerns also extend to Qatar's influence in the United States, considering it as the largest state funder of US academic institutions, which Harris believes may be driven by an agenda. He criticizes the media organization Al Jazeera and Harvard and Northwestern universities for accepting money from Qatar, suggesting that it distorts the historical and contemporary understanding of the Middle East.
The discussion posits that peace in the Middle East depends on addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by religious extremism and the promotion of secular values.
Harris articulates the view that the ideological foundations of Islam, which he refers to as Islam's "source code," contribute to persistent divisions and violence in the region. This source code sparks jihadist and Islamist ideologies, he argues, that hamper peace even with an acceptanc ...
Middle East Peace and Stability Prospects
The character of former President Donald Trump, as well as allegations of corruption during his tenure, have been called into question through various actions and patterns of behavior, particularly using his golfing practices as an allegory.
Trump, a known golf enthusiast, reportedly cheats at the sport. He has made claims of winning club championships he never actually played in, which is indicative of a larger pattern of dishonesty and a disregard for truth. Golf is a game that demands personal integrity, and cheating is roundly scorned. Yet, allegations suggest Trump's cheating techniques are brazen -- from having his caddie move balls to favorable positions to inventing tournament victories.
Sam Harris has spoken about Trump’s behavior in the context of golf, describing it as a violation of the sport's norms. He sees the former president’s practices—like claiming championships without competition and adorning walls with commemorations for these unsubstantiated victories—as evidence of a concerning character flaw.
These accusations against Trump's conduct in golf raise larger concerns about his fitness for office and potential for power abuse. The manipulation of outcomes and staff assisting in his deceit could reflect a disregard for the truth and an inclination to bend rules to serve his own interests. Jaron Lowenstein adds that such cheating undermines the very essence of golf, a sport that's fundamentally about personal honesty and performance.
The discussions surrounding Trump’s character take a more serious turn when considering his actions beyond the golf course.
Harris touches on the subject of Trump's dealings, which seem to enrich his family and associates, leading to a b ...
Trump's Character and Alleged Corruption
Sam Harris delves into the serious consequences of political violence and societal fragmentation, considering the assassination of Charlie Kirk as a catalyst for further upheaval.
The assassination of political figures like Charlie Kirk stands as a testament to the heightened dangers present within our deeply polarized society. Harris believes that the distrust in institutions exacerbates these dangers, potentially inciting further violence and deepening existing divides.
An assassination like Kirk's feeds into a profound distrust of institutions, which could lead to broader societal violence. These acts are not isolated tragedies; they reflect and potentially magnify the mistrust and polarization corroding the social fabric.
Harris notes that the fragile state of social cohesion and the specter of political violence underscore the urgency to confront these divisions and work toward re-establishing a shared sense of purpose and direction in society.
In this charged atmosphere, sustained efforts to rebuild trust in institutions are critical. Harris emphasizes that mitigating political violence and restoring unity requires a firm commitment to democratic principles.
To move forward, Harris implies that society must reject the demonization of groups and the lu ...
The Societal Impacts of Political Violence and Divisiveness
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
