Podcasts > Making Sense with Sam Harris > #437 — Two Years Since 10/7

#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

By Waking Up with Sam Harris

In this episode of Making Sense, Sam Harris and Dan Senor examine the increase in antisemitic incidents worldwide since October 2023. They discuss how media portrayals of Israel and the spread of anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses have affected Jewish communities globally. The conversation explores European political responses to these developments, with particular focus on France's evolving stance.

Harris and Senor address the broader challenges faced by secular Western societies in addressing religious extremism. Their discussion covers the difficulties of criticizing religious ideologies without facing accusations of bigotry, and examines how the term "Islamophobia" affects public discourse on these topics. The episode analyzes the tension between religious fundamentalism and Western secular values in contemporary society.

Listen to the original

#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 6, 2025 episode of the Making Sense with Sam Harris

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

1-Page Summary

The Rise of Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment Globally

Dan Senor discusses the alarming increase in antisemitic incidents worldwide since October 7th, 2023. The conversation highlights disturbing events, including murders of Jews in Manchester and subsequent celebrations in London streets, demonstrating a concerning surge in open antisemitism.

Pervasiveness of Anti-Israel Narrative

Sam Harris and the hosts explore how the portrayal of Israel as a genocidal, apartheid state in media and on college campuses has fueled attacks against Jews. This narrative, they note, has contributed to a perception that Jews are complicit in alleged genocidal actions, potentially encouraging violence against Jewish communities.

The Inadequate Response From European Political Leaders

The discussion examines European leaders' wavering stance on antisemitism, particularly focusing on French President Emmanuel Macron's shift from solidarity with Israel to a more neutral position, apparently to appease France's Muslim population. This strategy of pandering to anti-Israel sentiment, rather than calming the situation, has reportedly emboldened extremists and led to increased violence against Jewish communities.

Anti-Israel/Jewish Sentiment vs. Open, Secular Societies

Sam Harris analyzes the tension between religious fanaticism and Western secular values, citing various jihadist attacks in Western Europe. He criticizes Western Europe's failure to address the challenges of importing extreme ideologies and discusses the difficulty of critiquing religious ideas without being labeled an "Islamophobe." Harris emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticism of religious ideas and racial bigotry, arguing that the term "Islamophobia" often conflates these distinct concepts and stifles necessary dialogue.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The rise in antisemitic incidents could be part of a broader increase in hate crimes, which also target other minorities, suggesting a wider societal issue rather than a specific antisemitic trend.
  • The actions of individuals celebrating the murders in London do not necessarily represent the views of the wider population or other groups within the city.
  • The characterization of Israel as genocidal or apartheid is a subject of international debate, and there are legitimate criticisms of Israeli government policies that do not stem from antisemitism but from human rights concerns.
  • The perception of Jewish complicity in Israel's actions is a complex issue that can be influenced by a variety of factors, including political views and media bias, not just antisemitism.
  • European leaders may have various reasons for their stance on antisemitism, including domestic and foreign policy considerations, which might not be adequately captured by the term "wavering."
  • President Macron's shift in position could be interpreted as an attempt to maintain diplomatic balance and address the concerns of all constituents, not necessarily as pandering.
  • The increase in violence against Jewish communities may have multiple causes, including socioeconomic factors, and might not be directly linked to the actions of political leaders.
  • The failure to address the import of extreme ideologies might be due to the complexity of the issue, which involves balancing freedom of expression and security concerns.
  • The tension between religious fanaticism and Western secular values is a nuanced debate, and there are voices within religious communities that advocate for coexistence and reform.
  • Jihadist attacks are carried out by a small minority and do not represent the views of the broader Muslim population.
  • The term "Islamophobia" is used by some to highlight discrimination against Muslims, and while it may be misused in some cases, it addresses a real concern for many individuals.
  • Distinguishing between criticism of religious ideas and racial bigotry is important, but it is also necessary to ensure that such criticism does not veer into hate speech or discrimination against individuals based on their religion.

Actionables

  • You can educate yourself on the historical and current context of antisemitism by reading books and articles from diverse perspectives to understand the complexity of the issue beyond media portrayals. By doing so, you'll be better equipped to engage in informed discussions and recognize when antisemitic sentiments are being expressed, even in subtle ways. For example, you might read works by authors from both Jewish and non-Jewish backgrounds that explore the history of Jewish communities in various countries, the evolution of antisemitic tropes, and the impact of geopolitics on perceptions of Jews.
  • Start a dialogue with friends and family about the importance of distinguishing between criticism of political policies and racial or religious bigotry. This can be done during casual conversations or more structured discussions, aiming to clarify misconceptions and promote a culture of critical thinking and empathy. For instance, when topics related to Israel or religious extremism come up, guide the conversation towards understanding the difference between legitimate policy critique and discriminatory generalizations.
  • Encourage your local educational institutions to include curricula on religious literacy and the history of religious conflicts, emphasizing the distinction between critiquing ideas and promoting hate. You can do this by writing to school boards, participating in parent-teacher associations, or supporting educational nonprofits that work towards this goal. This approach fosters a more nuanced understanding among students and can contribute to a more informed and tolerant society. For example, support programs that bring speakers from various religious backgrounds to share their experiences and perspectives, helping to break down stereotypes and build bridges of understanding.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

The Rise of Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment Globally

Dan Senor has been focusing on events in Israel, the Middle East, and the West's reaction to them since October 7th, highlighting the concerning escalation of antisemitic incidents.

Increase In Antisemitic Incidents Worldwide Since October 2023

The podcast discusses the rise in antisemitic sentiment, particularly highlighting the recent violence.

Antisemitism Surges: Murders in Manchester, Celebrations in London

The discussion references the shocking antisemitic violence with the murders of Jews in Manchester on Yom Kippur and the subsequent celebrations in the streets of London. These revelries were described as unabashed celebrations of the murder of Jews, and the hosts express their shock over these incidents and the tacit toleration of such events. Furthermore, a father's Facebook posts celebrating the massacre on October 7th are mentioned, indicating a rise in antisemitic sentiment.

Pervasiveness and Consequences of the "Israel as a Genocidal, Apartheid State" Narrative

Sam Harris and the hosts explore the subsequent consequences of the rise in antisemitism and the portrayal of Israel in media and on social media.

Propaganda Portrays Israelis and Jews as Genocidal, Fuels Attacks

The discussion touches on the dangerous rhetoric present in media, on social media, and on college campus ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Rise of Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment Globally

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can educate yourself on historical and current events related to antisemitism by reading books and articles from multiple perspectives to develop a well-rounded understanding. By doing so, you'll be better equipped to recognize and challenge antisemitic narratives when you encounter them. For example, you might read a history of Jewish communities in various countries, then follow it with a contemporary analysis of social media trends regarding antisemitism.
  • Engage in conversations with friends and family about the dangers of stereotypes and generalizations, using recent events as a starting point for discussion. This helps create a personal ripple effect of awareness and critical thinking. For instance, if a family member shares a biased article on social media, you could initiate a private conversation to discuss the implications of such narratives.
  • Support organization ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

The Inadequate Response From European Political Leaders

Political leadership in Europe has come under scrutiny due to what is perceived as an inadequate response to the increasing levels of antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment across the continent.

European Leaders Fail to Address Rising Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Sentiment

French President Emmanuel Macron originally displayed solidarity with Israel but subsequently altered his behavior, choosing not to attend a solidarity event and seeking 'balance' due to apprehensions regarding the reaction of France's Muslim population. Such a change in posture suggests that Macron, among other European leaders, is not addressing the growing antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment thoroughly.

Macron, Others Backtracked On Israel Support to Appease Muslim Populations

Macron’s attempt to show unbiased support through a more neutral stance reveals an underlying political calculation aimed at appeasing France's Muslim community. The leaders' perceived backtracking on Israeli support raises questions about their commitment to combating antisemitism if it risks stirring discontent among significant demographic groups within their countries.

Pandering To Anti-Israel Sentiment Will Calm the Situation

European leaders have sought to de-escalate tensions by criticizing Israel and acknowledging a Palestinian state with no preconditions on the militant group Hamas. However, the leaders ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Inadequate Response From European Political Leaders

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • European leaders are faced with complex geopolitical and social issues that require nuanced approaches, not just unequivocal support for any one side.
  • Macron's attendance at events is a diplomatic decision that may involve various factors beyond appeasing specific populations.
  • The rise in antisemitism is a multifaceted issue that may not be solely within the control of political leaders and can be influenced by broader societal trends.
  • Criticism of Israeli policies by European leaders does not necessarily equate to antisemitism or a lack of support for Jewish communities.
  • Acknowledging a Palestinian state could be part of a long-term strategy for peace and stability in the region, rather than pandering to anti-Israel sentiment.
  • The ac ...

Actionables

  • You can educate yourself on the complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict to form a well-rounded perspective. Start by reading books from diverse viewpoints, including authors from both Israeli and Palestinian backgrounds. This will help you understand the nuances beyond political rhetoric and media portrayal, enabling you to engage in informed discussions and resist oversimplified narratives.
  • Support organizations that work towards peaceful coexistence and equality in the region. Research and donate to groups that foster dialogue and understanding between Jewish and Muslim communities. By contributing, you're actively participating in creating a more balanced approach to the conflict, countering the one-sidedness that may arise from political pandering.
  • Encourage open, respectful conversations within ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#437 — Two Years Since 10/7

Anti-Israel/Jewish Sentiment vs. Open, Secular Societies

Sam Harris critically analyzes the tension between religious fanaticism coming from the Muslim community and the values of Western secularism, touching upon the rise of jihadist attacks and the controversial use of the term "Islamophobia."

Religious Fanaticism Threatens Western Values

Failure to Confront Radical Islamic Ideas Against Western Secularism Allows Extremism to Fester

Harris discusses religious fanaticism and its increasing influence within the Muslim community, posing a threat to the open, secular societies of the West. Citing jihadist attacks in Western Europe, including the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, the Charlie Hebdo massacre, and the Bataclan massacre, he highlights these events as expressions of such fanaticism. Harris criticizes Western Europe for failing to acknowledge the severity of importing extreme ideologies, referring to it as embracing a "death cult," and allowing such extremism to fester.

Harris points out the visible manifestations of this fanaticism in protests where extremist views and calls for Sharia law are openly expressed. He mentions the UK's struggle to address these challenges and a societal hesitation to confront issues like religious grooming gangs, stemming from fears of being labeled as racist.

Criticizing Islam Without Being Labeled an "Islamophobe"

Distinction Between Critiquing Ideas and Racial Bigotry Lost In Discourse

Harris emphasizes that his critique targets the consequences of deeply held religious ideas, rather than criticizing individuals based on race or ethnicity. He compares the ability to criticize Islam with criticism of communism, asserting that it should be possible to oppose rel ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Anti-Israel/Jewish Sentiment vs. Open, Secular Societies

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The term "Islamophobia" can be used to describe irrational fear or hatred of Muslims, which is a real and harmful form of bigotry that should be distinguished from legitimate criticism of religious practices.
  • The conflation of the actions of extremists with the beliefs of the entire Muslim community can lead to prejudice and discrimination against peaceful adherents of Islam.
  • Open, secular societies benefit from the inclusion of diverse perspectives, including those of Muslims who may also support secularism and oppose extremism.
  • Jihadist attacks, while horrific, do not represent the views or actions of the majority of Muslims, and it is important to address the root causes of extremism, such as political instability and social alienation, rather than attributing them solely to religious beliefs.
  • The use of the term "death cult" to describe the importation of extreme ideologies is inflammatory and may hinder more nuanced understanding and policy development.
  • The struggle to address issues like religious grooming gangs may be due to a variety of complex factors, including legal challenges and resource limitations, rather than simply fear of being labeled racist.
  • Criticizing Islam, like any rel ...

Actionables

  • You can foster critical thinking by starting a book club focused on texts about secularism and religious criticism. Choose a variety of books that explore the history, philosophy, and impact of secularism as well as those that critique religious ideologies, including Islam. This encourages nuanced understanding and discussions that differentiate between criticism of ideas and prejudice against people.
  • Engage in role-playing debates with friends to practice articulating critiques of religious ideas without resorting to personal attacks. Take turns defending and opposing various religious and secular viewpoints. This helps you learn how to express disagreement respectfully and understand the difference between critiquing ideas and discriminating against individuals.
  • Create a personal blog or vlog where ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA