#415 — The Cover-Up
In this episode of Making Sense, Sam Harris examines the apparent disconnect between President Biden's public image and internal accounts of his cognitive capabilities. The discussion explores how Biden's team manages public perception of his mental state, including their handling of media access and information control, while highlighting specific instances that suggest a pattern of non-transparency.
The episode delves into the dynamics within Biden's inner circle, particularly the role of loyalty among key advisors and their approach to managing dissenting voices. Jake Tapper discusses his "Jar Jar Binks theory" about power dynamics in leadership, and introduces the potential significance of unreleased "H.E.R. Tapes" that might offer additional insights into the President's cognitive state. The discussion also addresses how media coverage of these issues has been shaped by various political considerations.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 21, 2025 episode of the Making Sense with Sam Harris
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Disconnect Between Biden's Public Image and Private Reality
Discussion centers on the apparent disconnect between public perception of President Biden's cognitive abilities and internal reports from his team. While there are visible signs of cognitive decline in his public appearances, particularly in his communication abilities, his team maintains that his decision-making capabilities remain sharp and effective.
The Biden Team's Cover-Up and Lack of Transparency
Jake Tapper reveals concerning patterns in the Biden team's handling of the President's cognitive state. He discusses a strategic leak from December 2019, where four Biden advisors informed reporter Ryan Lizza about a one-term commitment plan. Tapper suggests this was part of a broader pattern of non-transparency, connecting it to the Biden family's tendency to avoid confronting difficult truths, as evidenced in their handling of other family matters.
Culture of Loyalty and Unwillingness to Challenge Biden
According to Tapper, Biden's inner circle, particularly Steve Ricchetti and Mike Donilon, demonstrates an intense loyalty that may prevent honest feedback. Tapper introduces his "Jar Jar Binks theory," suggesting that powerful leaders often reach a position where they can exclude dissenting voices. This dynamic appears evident in Biden's team, where even discussions about polling for reelection were reportedly shut down by advisor Anita Dunn.
Media's Reporting on Biden's Condition
The media's coverage of Biden's cognitive state has been complicated by several factors. Tapper notes that journalists faced difficulties accessing relevant information due to the Biden team's stonewalling. Additionally, the media's focus on Trump may have led to reluctance in questioning Biden's fitness, fearing such scrutiny might inadvertently benefit the former president.
Revelation of "H.E.R. Tapes" and Significance
The discussion points to potentially unreleased material, referred to as the "H.E.R. Tapes," that might challenge the Biden team's narrative about the President's cognitive capabilities. While specific details about these tapes remain speculative, their existence suggests possible documentation of the President struggling with basic tasks and remembering advisors' names, which would contradict the image of capability presented by his team.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The perception of cognitive decline in public appearances could be attributed to the natural aging process, which does not necessarily impair decision-making abilities.
- The Biden team's assertion that his decision-making remains sharp could be supported by successful policy initiatives and effective crisis management during his tenure.
- The strategic leak about a one-term commitment plan could have been a political strategy rather than a cover-up, aimed at addressing concerns about age during the campaign.
- The Biden family's approach to confronting difficult truths may be a private matter and not indicative of public duties or the President's ability to govern.
- Loyalty within Biden's inner circle could be seen as a strength, fostering a unified team approach to policy and governance.
- The exclusion of dissenting voices, if it occurs, could also be interpreted as a method to maintain a focused and consistent policy direction.
- Shutting down discussions about reelection polling could be a strategic choice to concentrate on governance rather than campaign politics.
- The media's coverage of Biden's cognitive state must balance respect for privacy and the public's right to know, which can lead to cautious reporting.
- Reluctance to question Biden's fitness could stem from a journalistic standard of ensuring claims are substantiated before reporting.
- The existence of the "H.E.R. Tapes" is speculative, and without verification, they do not provide a basis for challenging the Biden team's narrative.
- The "H.E.R. Tapes," if they exist, could be taken out of context, and isolated incidents may not accurately represent the President's overall cognitive capabilities.
Actionables
- You can enhance your critical thinking by comparing different news sources on the same topic to identify biases and gaps in reporting. Start by selecting a current event and read about it from multiple news outlets with varying political leanings. Note the differences in how the event is portrayed, which details are emphasized, and which are omitted. This exercise will help you discern the reliability of information and recognize potential biases.
- Develop your own system for evaluating public figures by creating a checklist of traits you consider important, such as transparency, consistency, and accountability. Whenever a public figure makes a statement or takes action, use your checklist to assess their performance. This personal accountability metric will help you form a more nuanced opinion of leaders and their capabilities.
- Practice open communication in your personal relationships by establishing regular check-ins with friends or family members where you can discuss difficult topics in a supportive environment. Set ground rules for these conversations, such as active listening and non-judgmental responses, to ensure that everyone feels comfortable sharing their thoughts and concerns. This habit can improve your ability to handle challenging discussions and encourage honesty within your inner circle.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Disconnect Between Biden's Public Image and Private Reality
The public perception of President Joe Biden's capability is at odds with the signs of cognitive decline that have been observed during his presidency. Despite potential concerns about his public speaking abilities, reports from within his team suggest he remains sharp and knowledgeable.
Perception of Biden's Capability Despite Cognitive Decline Signs
Testimony: Biden Remained Sharp and Knowledgeable Despite Declining Public Speaking Abilities
An aide close to Biden has identified two primary functions of the presidency: decision-making and communication. According to this aide, President Biden continues to excel at decision-making, even if communication, admittedly not his strongest attribute historically, appears to have declined.
Biden Team: President's Decisions Sound Despite Communication Struggles
Jake Tapper has shed light on the narrative coming from the Biden team. They have been emphasizing that despite any observable difficulties in his communication, President Biden's decision-making capaci ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Disconnect Between Biden's Public Image and Private Reality
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- President Biden's decision-making is assessed based on his ability to analyze complex issues, weigh various perspectives, and make informed choices that align with his administration's goals and values. This evaluation often involves input from advisors, experts, and stakeholders to ensure thorough consideration of all relevant factors before reaching a decision. The effectiveness of his decisions is typically judged by their impact on policy outcomes, public opinion, and the overall functioning of the government. Biden's decision-making process is a critical aspect of his role as president, influencing the direction of the country and shaping his legacy.
- The distinction between Biden's decision-making and communication abilities is highlighted to emphasize that while his public speaking skills may have declined, his capacity to make sound decisions ...
Counterarguments
- Decision-making and communication are both critical for effective leadership; challenges in one area can impact overall performance.
- Public speaking is a significant aspect of a president's role, and difficulties in this area could affect public perception and international relations.
- Cognitive decline, if present, could potentially affect more than just communication, including decision-making, even if it's not immediately apparent.
- The reports from Biden's team may be biased, as they have an interest in maintaining a positive image of the president's capabilities.
- The effectiveness of a president's decision-making is difficult to assess without transparency and may not be full ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Biden Team's Cover-Up and Lack of Transparency
In light of emerging skepticism, Jake Tapper addresses concerns about the Biden team's purported concealment of President Biden's cognitive state during the election and the implications of this perceived non-transparency.
Biden Team's Efforts to Conceal Cognitive Decline
The discussion by Tapper focuses on the strategies implemented by the Biden team that are said to have concealed the President's cognitive health.
Biden Advisors Leaked One-term Plan, Creating Impression of Non-transparent Reality
Tapper delves into the strategic communication decisions during the campaign, mentioning a leak from December 2019 where four different Biden advisors informed reporter Ryan Lizza that Biden would commit to only one term. Tapper suggests that this move was designed to alleviate concerns about Biden's age, but it also served to perpetuate perceptions of a lack of transparency.
Biden Family's Avoidance of "Ugly Truths" Led To Lack of Candor About President's Health
It's mentioned that the Biden family inner circle may have had knowledge of Biden's condition and chose to maintain secrecy around it. This practice of avoiding ugly truths is linked to the family motto of not calling a fat person fat, which appears to have influenced the family's handling of private issues, such as Beau Biden’s cancer diagnosis and Hunter Biden’s struggles with s ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Biden Team's Cover-Up and Lack of Transparency
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The commitment to a single term could be seen as a strategic decision to focus on governance rather than campaigning, rather than an attempt to conceal cognitive health.
- The Biden family's handling of private matters could be interpreted as a desire for privacy and respect for personal boundaries, which is not uncommon in American culture.
- Suppressing challenging polling data and concerns might be a standard political strategy to maintain a positive campaign momentum and not necessarily specific to hiding health issues.
- The lack of public acknowledgment of difficult realities could be due to the complexity of issues and the need for careful messaging in a politically polarized environment.
- Any perceived lac ...
Actionables
- You can foster transparency by starting a personal blog where you commit to sharing your successes and challenges. Use this platform to document your journey, whether it's related to fitness goals, learning a new skill, or personal development. Be honest about setbacks and how you're addressing them, which can encourage others to be open about their struggles and foster a community of accountability.
- Develop a habit of regular self-reflection through journaling to confront your own "ugly truths." Set aside time each week to write down areas where you feel you're not being completely honest with yourself or others. This practice can help you identify patterns of avoidance and develop strategies to address them directly.
- Create a feedback loop with friends or col ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Culture of Loyalty and Unwillingness to Challenge Biden
Jake Tapper sheds light on a culture of loyalty within President Joe Biden's inner circle, highlighting a potential unwillingness to confront difficult truths.
Biden's Inner Circle Dominated by Loyalists Avoiding Bad News or Challenges
Biden's Aides Worshipped Him, Avoided Difficult Questions
According to Tapper, Joe Biden's top aides and advisors, including Steve Ricchetti and Mike Donilon, are described as worshipping him, suggesting a culture of over-loyalty that might discourage challenging Biden or presenting him with hard truths. This culture could potentially lead to the avoidance of difficult questions.
The "Jar Jar Binks Theory" of Leaders Dismissing Dissenters
Tapper employs what he calls the "Jar Jar Binks theory" to describe situations where powerful individuals rise to a level that allows them to exclude dissenting or challenging voices. He suggests this might apply to Biden's situation, where critical opinions or tough feedback are dismissed.
Lack of Succession Plan or Biden Challenger
Tapper also addresses the concern t ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Culture of Loyalty and Unwillingness to Challenge Biden
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Loyalty within a team can be a strength, fostering unity and a consistent approach to policy and messaging.
- Advisors may align closely with Biden's vision and values, which can be seen as a positive reflection of their commitment to his leadership rather than over-loyalty.
- The "Jar Jar Binks theory" is a humorous analogy but may oversimplify complex political dynamics and the reasons behind the exclusion of dissenting voices.
- The absence of a public succession plan does not necessarily mean there isn't one; such discussions and plans might be kept private for strategic reasons.
- The decision not to poll about Biden's reelection could be based on a variety of factors, including the desire to project confidence and stability, rather than an unwillingness to face potential negative f ...
Actionables
- Create a 'challenge circle' with friends or colleagues to practice giving and receiving difficult feedback. Set up regular meetings where each person brings up an issue they're facing, and the group is encouraged to provide honest, constructive criticism. This can help you get used to hearing different perspectives and prevent an echo chamber effect in your personal or professional life.
- Start a 'truth journal' to document instances where you may have avoided difficult truths or where you've seen others do the same. Reflect on these entries weekly to identify patterns and develop strategies to confront challenging issues more directly. For example, if you notice you often avoid giving negative feedback, you might set a goal to have at least one honest conversation per week.
- Volunteer for a local organization that ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Media's Reporting on Biden's Condition
The analysis provided by Tapper raises questions about the media's potential oversight during election coverage, specifically with regard to Biden's cognitive abilities.
Perception Media Ignored Biden's Cognitive Decline Signs Pre-election
The media's coverage—or lack thereof—of President Biden's cognitive state prior to the election has come under scrutiny.
Journalists Admit Poor Coverage of Biden's Decline Due to Biden Team's Stonewalling
Tapper contemplates the media's oversight and suggests that part of the failure to adequately cover Biden's cognitive decline can be attributed to a lack of accessibility to pertinent information, insinuating that the Biden team might have been withholding information from journalists.
Media's Focus on Trump Led to Reluctance to Question Biden's Fitness, Fearing It Aids Former President
The media's preoccupation with President Trump may have contributed to a hesitancy to rigorously evaluate Biden's fitness for office. Journalists may have feared that questioning Biden's cognitive state could inadvertently benefit Trump, ultimately influencing the coverage and c ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Media's Reporting on Biden's Condition
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The media has a responsibility to report objectively and may have covered Biden's cognitive abilities to the extent that evidence was available and verifiable.
- Journalists may have had ethical concerns about reporting on cognitive decline without concrete medical evidence, which could be considered speculative or stigmatizing.
- The media's focus on Trump could be seen as justified given his then-incumbent status and the significant impact of his policies and statements on the election.
- Coverage of a candidate's fitness for office is complex and must balance public interest with respect for privacy and medical confidentiality.
- The distinction between public stumbles and behind-the-scenes concerns could reflect responsible journalism, avoiding the spread of rumors or unverified claims.
- The Biden team's alleged stonewalling may have been a standard political strategy to control messaging and not neces ...
Actionables
- You can develop critical thinking by analyzing different news sources on a controversial topic to see how each presents the information. Start by choosing a current event and then read, watch, or listen to how it's covered by multiple news outlets with varying political leanings. Take notes on the differences in the portrayal of the event, the language used, and what information is emphasized or omitted. This exercise will help you recognize biases and develop a more nuanced understanding of how media coverage can shape public perception.
- Enhance your media literacy by creating a personal checklist of questions to evaluate news stories. When you encounter a new piece of information, especially about a public figure, ask yourself questions like: What is the source of this information? Is there evidence to support the claims made? Are other media outlets reporting the same story differently? What might be the motive behind this coverage? This habit will help you discern the quality of the information you're consuming and ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Revelation of "H.E.R. Tapes" and Significance
The discourse surrounding President Biden has been marked by a dichotomy between public perceptions of his cognitive struggles and the narrative upheld by his team asserting his command and decision-making prowess.
Hunter Biden's Secret Tapes Reveal President's Declining Mental State
In the public discourse, hints of a significant disclosure challenge the image of President Biden's capability presented by his team. It implies there is material, possibly akin to the alluded-to "H.E.R. Tapes," that remains undisclosed and could provide evidence of the President's cognitive decline.
Tapes Reveal Biden Struggling With Tasks and Forgetting Advisors' Names, Challenging Capable Image
While specific tapes referred to as "H.E.R. Tapes" have not been mentioned directly, the ongoing discussion suggests there might be documentation showing President Biden struggling with tasks and forgetting advisors' names. Such material, if it were to exist and be released, would call into question the capable image portrayed by the President's team.
Tapes Challenge Biden Team's Claim of President's Command Despite Public Struggles
The conversation infers a discrepancy between the Biden team's claims of the President’s command over his duties and the public struggles he might be experiencing. The notion of tapes revealing substantial information, yet to be disclosed, adds weight to the challenges against the official narrative of President Biden's cognitive abilities.
Tapes' Release Exposed Biden Team's Cover-Up of President's Cognitive Decline
Base ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Revelation of "H.E.R. Tapes" and Significance
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The existence of the "H.E.R. Tapes" is speculative, and without concrete evidence, it is not appropriate to draw conclusions about their content or the state of President Biden's cognitive health.
- Public perceptions of cognitive struggles can be influenced by a variety of factors, including political bias, media portrayal, and isolated incidents, which may not accurately reflect an individual's overall cognitive abilities.
- Forgetting names or struggling with tasks occasionally can be a normal part of aging and does not necessarily indicate a significant cognitive decline.
- The Biden team's narrative of the President's command and decision-making prowess could be supported by his performance in policy-making, public appearances, and leadership during crises, which are not addressed in the text.
- Claims of a cover-up are serious and would require substantial evidence to be credible; without such evidence, they remain unsubstantiated allegations.
- The President's cognitive health is a private matter, and any public discussion should be approached with sensitivity and respect for his dignity and privacy.
- It is possible that the President's team is manag ...
Actionables
- You can develop critical thinking by comparing different sources of information on a topic to identify discrepancies. Start by selecting a current event and gather reports from multiple news outlets, noting differences in the narratives. This exercise sharpens your ability to discern biases and inconsistencies, much like analyzing contrasting claims about a public figure's capabilities.
- Enhance your media literacy by creating a personal "fact-check file" for public statements made by prominent figures. Whenever you come across a significant statement, do a quick fact-check using reputable sources and document your findings. This habit not only keeps you informed but also trains you to spot potential cover-ups or misinformation.
- Practice transparency by keeping a personal accountability journal where you record inst ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
